2. 2
Residence of respondents (with at least 20
respondents per country)
1. Survey respondent profiles
265
192
168
106
96 93
73
58 57
40 40 36
27 26 23 21 20
86%
14%
EU Member States Other countries
Residence of respondents (EU
vs. Non-EU)
3. 3
10%
1%
1%
1%
1%
2%
2%
2%
2%
2%
3%
5%
12%
13%
15%
20%
22%
Other
Employers Association (European)
Statutory Insurance Organisation
Journalist/media organisation
Trade Union (European)
International public body
Employers Association (national)
EU institution or body
EU-level network, NGO or association
National NGO (non-governmental organisation)
National policy-making organisation
Trade Union (national)
University/research or expert institute
OSH Service Provider, e.g. consultant
National public body (incl. labour inspectorate)
Private company (SME)
Private company (large enterprise)
84%
47%
10%
workplace
intermediaries
policy makers
other
Note: some stakeholder subcategories are considered both workplace intermediaries and policy makers.
Stakeholder subcategories included in the group “policy makers” are: international public bodies, EU Institutions or bodies, national policy-making organisations, national public bodies, EU-level networks/NGOs/associations, European employer associations,
European trade unions, national trade unions and national employer associations.
Stakeholder subcategories included in the group “workplace intermediaries” are: national NGOs, EU-level networks/NGOs/associations, national public bodies, European employers associations, European trade unions, national trade unions, national employers
associations, statutory insurance organisations, OSH Service providers, Journalist/media organisations, large private companies and small or micro companies.
1. Survey respondent profiles
Broad stakeholder groups Stakeholder categories
5. 5
Overall
2. Main attitudes towards EU-Osha
7.5% 13.0% 9.4% 10.2% 13.9% 10.6%
65.4%
75.0%
73.2% 67.4% 63.4% 66.5%
25.4%
11.0% 15.9% 20.4% 20.7% 21.4%
2018 EU-OSHA performs
well as an organization.
2016 EU-OSHA performs
well as an organization.
The work of EU-OSHA
addresses the right
priorities on OSH.
The work of EU-OSHA
adds value to the work
on OSH done by others,
for example by national
organisations.
EU-OSHA guides me to
the knowledge I need on
OSH.
EU-OSHA guides me to
the knowledge I need on
OSH.
strongly disagree disagree agree strongly agree
6. 6
6.6% 7.6% 7.6% 8.7% 10.1% 7.1% 9.2% 10.5% 12.9% 14.3% 15.0%
8.2% 10.8% 11.5% 8.2%
63.7% 66.5% 66.9% 70.1%
73.8% 78.8%
65.7% 67.8% 67.6% 61.5% 63.9%
65.3% 64.2% 67.1% 70.0%
28.1% 24.2% 24.8% 19.9% 14.6% 11.8%
23.3% 19.4% 18.8% 22.5% 19.2% 24.7% 23.6% 20.0% 20.6%
PolicyMakers
Intermediaries
Other
PolicyMakers
Intermediaries
OtherStakeholders
PolicyMakers
Intermediaries
Other
PolicyMakers
Intermediaries
Other
PolicyMakers
Intermediaries
Other
EU-OSHA performs well as an
organization.
The work of EU-OSHA addresses
the right priorities on OSH.
The work of EU-OSHA adds value
to the work on OSH done by
others, for example by national
organisations.
EU-OSHA guides me to the
knowledge I need on OSH.
EU-OSHA provides access to
relevant research based
knowledge on OSH.
strongly disagree disagree agree strongly agree
Main stakeholder groups
2. Main attitudes towards EU-OSHA
7. 7
2. Main attitudes towards EU-OSHA
Contribution of EU-Osha to OSH awareness and solutions
32.4%
28.1%
25.8%
59.5%
61.9%
62.8%
6.2%
9.0%
10.5%
1.9%
1.1%
0.8%
Increase awareness about occupational
safety and health risks
Increase awareness of solutions to
occupational safety and health risks
Improve occupational safety and health
in the workplace
34.7%
31.4%
29.4%
29.2%
27.3%
27.1%
24.2%
25.9%
25.3%
57.7%
60.3%
62.9%
61.9%
62.3%
63.5%
64.7%
62.7%
63.5%
6.3%
6.6%
4.1%
7.9%
9.3%
8.2%
10.5%
10.7%
8.8%
1.2%
1.7%
3.5%
0.9%
1.1%
1.2%
0.5%
0.7%
2.4%
Policy Makers
Intermediaries
Other
Policy Makers
Intermediaries
Other
Policy Makers
Intermediaries
Other
Main stakeholder groupsOverall
4 Strongly agree 3 Agree 2 Disagree 1 Strongly disagree
8. 8
2. Main attitudes towards EU-OSHA
Use and purpose of use of EU-OSHA’s work
57.5%
30.8%
29.2%
26.7%
14.5%
10.8%
4.7%
4.8%
6.6%
Address occupational safety and health issues
at enterprise or workplace level
Talked about it with others
Further research
Awareness raising purposes at European,
national or enterprise level
Guided to information from other sources
than EU-OSHA
Policy-making at national level
Policy-making at European level
Something else
Did not use the work of EU-OSHA
19. 19
87.0%
84.5%
75.9%
91.3%
92.1%
90.1%
85.3%
97.6%
90.5%
94.6%
95.8%
96.8%
Micro and small enterprises
Online interactive Risk Assessment tools
(OiRA)
OSHwiki
Emerging risks/foresight
Very familiar Quite familiar Just a little familiar
3. Familiarity with EU-OSHA’s activities
Correlation between familiarity …
69.7%
62.0%
82.5%
86.3%
84.3%
85.7%
82.4%
87.1%
97.2%
Costs and benefits of OSH
Emerging risks/foresight
OSHwiki
Very familiar Quite familiar Just a little familiar
Relevance Reliability
20. 20
63.0%
52.5%
73.5%
62.2%
55.3%
85.1%
66.7%
67.7%
90.3%
OSHwiki
Emerging risks/foresight
Online interactive Risk Assessment tools
(OiRA)
Very familiar Quite familiar Just a little familiar
3. Familiarity with EU-OSHA’s activities
Correlation between familiarity …
Uniqueness Added value
61.0%
81.8%
80.2%
74.0%
89.5%
88.3%
81.4%
88.9%
90.6%
Healthy Workplaces for All Ages
Campaign
Online interactive Risk Assessment
tools (OiRA)
Micro and small enterprises
Very familiar Quite familiar Just a little familiar