Dead Run Stream Restoration Project Segments 2/3 – Final Concept Plan
1. A Fairfax County, VA, publication
Department of Public Works and Environmental Services
Working for You!
Dead Run Stream Restoration Project
Segments 2/3 – Final Concept Plan
Community Meeting
Dolley Madison Library
May 4, 2016
2. Dead Run Segment 2/3 Stream Restoration Project
Stormwater Planning Division
Meeting Outline
2
• Project Scope
• Project Timeline
• Background
• Existing Conditions
• Task Force and Community Involvement
• Revised Final Concept Changes – Summary
• Proposed Condition Renderings
• Revised Final Concept Design Approach
• Buffer and Riparian Corridor Restoration Plan
• Next Steps
• Q&A
3. Dead Run Stream Restoration
Project Limits – Two Projects
3
Segment 2:
McLean Central Park
• 750 linear feet of main
channel and 560 feet of
tributary channels
Segment 3:
Dead Run Stream Valley
Park
• 1,460 linear feet of main
channel and 350 feet of
tributary channels
Segment 1:
Dominican Retreat
• 1,500 linear feet of main
channel and 380 feet of
tributary channels
4. Dead Run Stream Restoration
4
Segment 2 – McLean Central Park
• 750 linear feet main
channel and 560 feet of
tributary channels
• Completely in Park
• Starts below previously
restored section near
library
5. Dead Run Stream Restoration
5
Segment 3 – Dead Run Stream Valley Park
• 1,460 linear feet of main channel
and 350 feet of tributary
channels
• Extends to Churchill Road
• Residential lots along Elizabeth
Drive and Carol Raye Street
6. Stormwater Planning Divison
Dead Run Segment 2/3 Stream Restoration Project
Project timeline
6
• Fall, 2013: Project initiated
• Winter, 2013: Surveys and assessment completed
• April, 2014: Pre-concepts submitted
• April 23, 2014: First public meeting
• August 15, 2014: Field walk with FCPA, MTF, Urban Forestry
• February, 2015: Pre-concept revisions to minimize tree loss completed
• February 18, 2015: Second public meeting
• May 12, 2015: Revised concept plan with alternative access options for
Segment 3 completed
• May 19, 2015: Third public meeting and first field walk with community
• June 9, 2015: Fourth public meeting and second field walk with
community
7. Stormwater Planning Divison
Dead Run Segment 2/3 Stream Restoration Project
Project timeline
7
• Community Stream Team – Task Force
• Held 4 meetings between August and December 2015
• Visited completed stream restoration sites
• Met with residents adjacent to project in March, 2016
• Revised final concept design completed in April, 2016.
Next Steps:
• Site visit with Community (May 19, 2016)
• Final design phase
• Coordination with task force and community
• Final construction documents and bidding
• Pardon our dust community meeting and construction
• Post-construction monitoring and maintenance
8. Stormwater Planning Division
Watershed Planning and Project Implementation
• Watershed Characterization
– Water Quality Monitoring
– Physical Stream Assessment
– Land Use Change
– Pollutant Loading
• Structural Project
– 25 year plan
• Non-Structural Practices
– Policy and Regulations
8
http://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/dpwes/watersheds/
9. Stormwater Planning Division
Watershed Planning and Project Implementation
• Dead Run has a drainage area
just over 3 mi2
• 24 priority projects identified
in the watershed
management plan
• Pond retrofits
• LID Stormwater Enhancements
• Stream Restoration
• Neighborhood Stormwater
Improvements
9
http://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/dpwes/stormwater/
projects/project_list.htm
10. Stormwater Planning Division
Stormwater Program Regulatory Drivers
• National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
• Virginia Stormwater Management Program (VSMP)
– Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Permit (MS4)
– Discharge from approximately 7,000 storm drain outfalls
– Includes watershed planning and project implementation
• Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs)
– Chesapeake Bay
– Local Streams
– Establishes pollutant loading budget for a given impaired water
body to meet water quality standards
10
13. Stormwater Planning Division
Dead Run– Stream Conditions
13
Fairfax County Annual Water Quality Report
• http://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/hd/streams/strannualrpt.htm
Virginia Department of Environmental Quality
• Water Quality Report (305b report)
• http://www.deq.virginia.gov/Programs/Water.aspx
U.S. Geological Survey
• Dead Run stream gage at Whann Avenue
• Fairfax County Water Resources Monitoring
• http://va.water.usgs.gov/fairfax/
19. Stormwater Planning Division
Dead Run Segment 2/3 Stream Restoration Project
Segment 2 Existing Conditions
19
Stream Bank Erosion and at Risk Trees
20. Stormwater Planning Division
Dead Run Segment 2/3 Stream Restoration Project
Segment 3 Existing Conditions
20
February 2012
July 2015
Trees along stream bank
continue to fall and/or die
27. Stormwater Planning Division
Dead Run Segment 2/3 Stream Restoration Project
Segment 3 Existing Conditions
27
Bridge at Churchill Road
28. Stormwater Planning Division
Dead Run Segment 2/3 Stream Restoration Project
On-line: Story Map of Existing Conditions
28
Existing conditions: http://arcg.is/1Y55MNj
29. Dead Run Segment 2/3 Stream Restoration Project
Stormwater Planning Division
Summary of Task Force Comments and Concerns
29
• Project Benefits
• Design Approach
• Tree Loss
• Frequent Yard Flooding
• Flooding at Churchill Road
• Construction Equipment and Footprint
• Trail Closures
• Invasive Plant Management
• Others
– Site restoration and maintenance
– Stream conditions and erosion below Churchill Road
30. Dead Run Segment 2/3 Stream Restoration Project
Stormwater Planning Division
Project Benefits
• Estimated annual erosion rates for Segment 2/3 based
on field data is between 783 to 1,500 tons/year
30
Stream Bank Erosion Field Data• Chesapeake Bay Expert Panel
protocols used for estimating
stream restoration nutrient
and sediment credits.
• Estimated reduction in Total
Phosphorus loading is
between 190 and 788
lbs/year
31. Dead Run Segment 2/3 Stream Restoration Project
Stormwater Planning Division
Churchill Road Flooding
• VDOT staff attended last Stream
Team meeting (December, 2015)
• VDOT inspection reports
indicate no deficiencies with the
bridge
• No current or future project
planned for the bridge at this
time
31
• Proposed stream restoration project includes removing
sediment and debris upstream of the bridge and aligning
channel with bridge abutments.
33. Stormwater Planning Division
Dead Run Segment 2/3 Stream Restoration Project
Summary of Plan Revisions – Tree Loss
33
Tree Loss Summary
Date 6” to 12” 12” and Larger Total Trees at Risk
February 2014
Not Surveyed
137 137
February 2015 110 110
May 2015
Alt 1 133 88 221
Alt 2 153 98 251
December 2015
Alt 1 76 72 148 48
Alt 2 81 72 153 45
Alt 1 and Alt 2 refer to access alternatives 1 and 2:
Alt 1: Access road is closer to the stream for Segment 3
Alt 2: Access road follows trail and utilizes cut-throughs for access to stream for Segment 3.
34. Stormwater Planning Division
Dead Run Segment 2/3 Stream Restoration Project
Summary of Plan Revisions – Tree Loss
34
• Total number of trees to be removed for project (148-153)
• Total number of trees within the LOD that were either dead or at risk (45-48) –
approximately 1/3rd
• Reduction in tree loss impact as a result of design modification between May
2015 and December 2015:
• Alt 1 – 73 trees saved (33% reduction)
• Alt 2 – 98 trees saved (39% reduction)
• Existing trees have very little diversity with only 2 species making up the majority
of trees: red maples and tulip poplars.
35. Stormwater Planning Division
Dead Run Segment 2/3 Stream Restoration Project
Proposed Planting
35
• Proposed Planting Based on
Alternative 1
• Approx. 250 trees 1 inch to
1.5 inch caliper size
• Approx. 500 trees that are 6
to 8 feet tall
• Approx. 2,600 shrubs
• All vegetation is native
species and specifically
selected for the stream
corridor
36. Dead Run Segment 2/3 Stream Restoration Project
Stormwater Planning Division
Dead Run Stream Restoration Project
Existing Park Conditions
• Park Area = 33.25 acres
• Tree Canopy = 27.45 acres
36
37. Stormwater Planning Division
Dead Run Segment 2/3 Stream Restoration Project
Summary of Plan Revisions – Area disturbed
37
Total Acres* Woodland /
Open**
May 2015
Alt 1 ~5.05 Acres 3.65
Alt 2 ~5.15 Acres 3.75
December 2015
Alt 1 ~4.58 Acres 3.18
Alt 2 ~4.72 Acres 3.32
*Excludes trail area, ** Excludes stream channel area and trail area
Conclusion Alt 2 access has slightly more disturbance and would close the trails for a
longer period of time compared to Alt 1, and would likely necessitate the use of
woodchip trails which would have additional impacts.
The overall area of disturbance has been reduced by 10% from May 2015. If the
stream channel area (1.4 ac) is excluded (i.e only impacts to woodland/open areas
considered), the actual AOD has been reduced by 11-13%
38. Stormwater Planning Division
Dead Run Segment 2/3 Stream Restoration Project
Summary of Plan Revisions – Channel Size
38
Segment 2 Upper Segment 3 Lower Segment 3
Existing channel size(SF) 59-82 57-113 62-70
Proposed channel size (SF) 55-80 60-129 62-72
Proposed channel size is now comparable in size to the existing channel.
This channel was sized using natural channel design principles and represents a
balance to minimize impacts but still provide long-term channel stability and
water quality benefits.
39. Dead Run Segment 2/3 Stream Restoration Project
Stormwater Planning Division
Summary of Plan Revisions – Floodplain and Drainage
39
• No change in 100-year or
FEMA floodplain
• No rise certification
• Improve drainage from
existing storm drains
Fairfax County 100-Year Floodplain
FEMA Special Flood Hazard Area
40. Stormwater Planning Division
Dead Run Segment 2/3 Stream Restoration Project
Proposed Conditions Renderings – Segment 2
40
Existing Conditions
41. Stormwater Planning Division
Dead Run Segment 2/3 Stream Restoration Project
Proposed Conditions Renderings – Segment 2
41
Rendering of Proposed Conditions
42. Stormwater Planning Division
Dead Run Segment 2/3 Stream Restoration Project
Proposed Conditions Renderings – Segment 3
42
Existing Conditions
43. Stormwater Planning Division
Dead Run Segment 2/3 Stream Restoration Project
Proposed Conditions Renderings – Segment 3
43
Rendering of Proposed Conditions
44. Stormwater Planning Division
Dead Run Segment 2/3 Stream Restoration Project
Proposed Conditions Renderings – Segment 3
44
Existing Conditions
45. Stormwater Planning Division
Dead Run Segment 2/3 Stream Restoration Project
Proposed Conditions Renderings – Segment 3
45
Rendering of Proposed Conditions
46. Stormwater Planning Division
Dead Run Segment 2/3 Stream Restoration Project
Proposed Conditions On-line Map Tour
46
http://arcg.is/1N4KSgq
47. Dead Run Segment 2/3 Stream Restoration Project
Stormwater Planning Division
Riparian Corridor Restoration Plan
47
48. Dead Run Segment 2/3 Stream Restoration Project
Stormwater Planning Division
Existing vegetation baseline characterization
48
Existing Vegetation classified into 5 major areas:
MCPP1: Gazebo area, Area near Martha Jane
Street
MCPP2: Areas adjacent to Segment 2 and
upstream of Segment 2.
MCPP3: Adjacent to Segment 3
MCPP4: Area to the right of trail along middle and
lower Segment 3 (looking towards Churchill Road
MCPP5: Area to the right when entering park from
Oak Ridge Avenue (near tennis courts)
Story Map: http://arcg.is/1TKK67P
49. Dead Run Segment 2/3 Stream Restoration Project
Stormwater Planning Division
Existing vegetation baseline characterization
49
50. Dead Run Segment 2/3 Stream Restoration Project
Stormwater Planning Division
Dolley Madison Library Outfall before Restoration
50
51. Dead Run Segment 2/3 Stream Restoration Project
Stormwater Planning Division
Existing vegetation baseline characterization
51
52. Dead Run Segment 2/3 Stream Restoration Project
Stormwater Planning Division
Existing vegetation baseline characterization
52
53. Dead Run Segment 2/3 Stream Restoration Project
Stormwater Planning Divison
Existing vegetation baseline characterization
53
54. Dead Run Segment 2/3 Stream Restoration Project
Stormwater Planning Division
Existing vegetation baseline characterization
54
55. Dead Run Segment 2/3 Stream Restoration Project
Stormwater Planning Division
Elements of Riparian Corridor Restoration Plan
• Invasive Plant Management
• Planting plan
– Inside and outside project limits
within park
• Residential lots adjacent to
stream
• Warranty requirements (2-years)
• Long-term monitoring and
maintenance
55
56. Dead Run Segment 2/3 Stream Restoration Project
Stormwater Planning Division
Chesapeake Bay Preservation Ordinance
Resource Protection Area (RPA)
56
http://www.fairfaxcounty.gov/dpwes/environmental/cbay/
57. Stormwater Planning Division
Dead Run Segment 2/3 Stream Restoration Project
Proposed Planting
57
• Proposed Planting Based on
Alternative 1
• Approx. 250 trees 1 inch to
1.5 inch caliper size
• Approx. 500 trees that are 6
to 8 feet tall
• Approx. 2,600 shrubs
• All vegetation is native
species and specifically
selected for the stream
corridor
58. Stormwater Planning Division
Dead Run Segment 2/3 Stream Restoration Project
Next Steps
58
• Continue to work with residents to develop buffer enhancements on
private lots adjoining Segment 3.
• Site visit (May 19, 2016) – trees to be flagged
• Final design phase and prepare construction documents
• Coordination with Task Force and community
• Bidding and contract award
• Pardon Our Dust Meeting
• Construction
• Post-construction monitoring and maintenance
59. Dead Run Segment 2/3 Stream Restoration Project
Stormwater Planning Division
Next Steps: Site Visit
Site Visit
• Date: Thursday, May 19, 2016
• Time: 6:30 – 8:00 pm
• Meeting Location: McLean
Central Park - Pedestrian bridge
crossing Dead Run near tennis
courts
59
Meeting Location
60. Additional Information
For additional information, please contact
www.fairfaxcounty.gov/dpwes
Dead Run Segment 2/3 Stream Restoration Project
Stormwater Planning Division 60
Dipmani Kumar
Project Manager
703-324-5500
dkumar@fairfaxcounty.gov
Notes de l'éditeur
Dead Run Segment 1: Restored Length = 1690 LF, Removing 58 trees >12” DBH
Bull Neck Run : Restored Length = 1620 LF, Removing 48 trees >12” DBH
The estimated erosion rate translates to 75 – 144 truck loads of sediment.
Alt 1 – Limits of Disturbance is 5.14 AC with 0.51 AC of Tree Preservation = 4.63 AC area of disturbance. The area of existing trail disturbed area is 0.05 AC, so total “new” disturbed area would be about 4.58 AC for access alt 1 that follows the stream channel in most places.
Alt 2 – Limits of Disturbance is 5.61 AC with 0.74 AC of Tree Preservation = 4.87 AC area of disturbance. The area of existing trail disturbed area is 0.15 AC, so the total “new” disturbed area would be about 4.72 AC for access alt 2 that follows the trail in most places. It should be noted that with Alt 2, it will in all likelihood, be necessary to install a temporary woodchip trail that will result in impacts to existing ground vegetation in wooded areas.
Conclusion Alt 2 access has slightly more disturbance and would close the trails for a longer period of time compared to Alt 1, and would likely necessitate the use of woodchip trails which would have additional impacts.
The overall area of disturbance has been reduced by 10% from May 2015. If the stream channel area (1.4 ac) is excluded (i.e only impacts to woodland/open areas considered), the actual AOD has been reduced by 11-13%