Lessons from Minnesota: A Solar Success (Webinar Presentation)
•
1 j'aime•3,224 vues
A presentation crafted by John Farrell of the Institute for Local Self-Reliance to describe how the state of Minnesota became the 17th state to adopt a solar energy standard in 2013, the components of the bill, and how they differed from the campaign's initial goals. Co-presented with Erin Stojan Ruccolo of Fresh Energy on a webinar hosted by Oregonians for Renewable Energy Progress on July 16, 2013. Audio recording available at http://www.oregonrenewables.com/
Recommandé
Recommandé
Contenu connexe
Tendances
Tendances (20)
En vedette
En vedette (18)
Similaire à Lessons from Minnesota: A Solar Success (Webinar Presentation)
Similaire à Lessons from Minnesota: A Solar Success (Webinar Presentation) (20)
Plus de John Farrell
Plus de John Farrell (20)
Dernier
Dernier (20)
Lessons from Minnesota: A Solar Success (Webinar Presentation)
- 1. TURNING MOMENTUM INTO A SOLARVICTORY: Strategy, policy, and the 2013 Success Presentation by John Farrell, Director of Democratic Energy, Institute for Local Self-Reliance and Erin Stojan Ruccolo, Director, Electricity Markets, Fresh Energy Webinar for Oregonians for Renewable Energy Progress | July 16, 2013 Lessons from Minnesota: A Solar Success
- 2. •Department of Commerce DG process •DFL legislature •Solar rebates to continue? •Ongoing solar campaign LAY OFTHE LAND 2013
- 3. 10% Solar by 2030 CLEAN Program < 2 MW Value of Solar + PBI On-bill incentive feeCommunity solar Net metering 2100 MW Campaign goals
- 4. to “sausage making” From goals
- 5. •10% by 2020 •Mostly DG •All utilities 33% 67% IOUs Munis & Co-ops 2100 MW
- 6. •10% by 2020 •Mostly DG •All utilities •1.5% by 2020 •10% from < 20 kW •IOUs only 33% 67% IOUs Munis & Co-ops 460 MW 2100 MW
- 7. 0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026 2028 2030 10% NV AZ NM CO IL NJ DE MD Minnesota’s Proposed Solar Standard in Comparison NM other state standards MN HF956,SF901 DOE SunShot goal 14% by 2030 NJ NM other state benchmarks NM CO MD AZ John Farrell, Institute for Local Self-Reliance, 4/24/13 Original bill
- 8. 0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026 2028 2030 NV AZ NM CO IL NJ DE MD Minnesota’s Proposed Solar Standard in Comparison NM other state standards MN HF956,SF901 NJ NM other state benchmarks NM CO MD AZ John Farrell, Institute for Local Self-Reliance, 4/24/13 MNSenate Into session
- 9. 0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026 2028 2030 NV AZ NM CO IL NJ DE MD Minnesota’s Proposed Solar Standard in Comparison NM other state standards MN HF956,SF901 NJ NM other state benchmarks NM CO MD AZ John Farrell, Institute for Local Self-Reliance, 4/24/13 MN MNSenate End game
- 10. •Customer choice •Robust formula (> retail rate) •Buy-all, sell-all •20-year, fixed price contract 33% 67% IOUs Munis & Co-ops Value of Solar
- 11. •Customer choice •Robust formula (> retail rate) •Buy-all, sell-all •20-year, fixed price contract •Utility option •3 yr. retail price floor •No payment for excess generation •20-year, fixed price contract •Capped at 1 MW 33% 67% IOUs Munis & Co-ops Value of Solar
- 12. •Sized to solar array •Part of 20-yearVOST contract •Only for 2 MW and smaller •Include bonus payment for Made in MN INCENTIVES
- 13. •Sized to solar array •Part of 20-yearVOST contract •Only for 2 MW and smaller •Include bonus payment for Made in MN INCENTIVES •10-year, separate incentives •Incentive only for < 20 kW, Xcel customers •Made-in Minnesota incentive statewide, < 40 kW
- 14. Value of Solar Energy Gen. capacity Trans. capacity Trans/dist. Environment Other
- 15. •Cap raised to 1 MW •Aggregate metering •Limits on standby 33% 67% IOUs Munis & Co-ops http://www.flickr.com/photos/mncerts/5246823373/ Net Metering
- 16. •Cap raised to 1 MW •Aggregate metering •Limits on standby •120% of load (> 40 kW) •4% “check-in” (IOUs) 33% 67% IOUs Munis & Co-ops http://www.flickr.com/photos/mncerts/5246823373/ Net Metering
- 17. •Distributed projects (< 2 MW) •Low threshold for participation •No program cap •Robust payments 33% 67% IOUs Munis & Co-ops Community Solar
- 18. •Distributed projects (< 2 MW) •Low threshold for participation •No program cap •Robust payments •1 MW and smaller •5 participant min. •No cap •Retail rate placeholder orVOST 33% 67% IOUs Munis & Co-ops Community Solar
- 19. •Also: •40% max. share per person •Contiguous counties •200 W min. / 120% max. 33% 67% IOUs Munis & Co-ops Community Solar
- 20. •Implementation •2013 - State DER -Value of solar rate •2014 - PUC -Value of solar rate •Xcel - community solar •Solar standard in Integrated Resource Plans •100 MW solar bid for RFP NEXT...
- 21. • 3rd party ownership (again) • Decoupling • Rooftop design standards • Tiered interconnection for small projects • Other initiatives (muni/coop customer fairness campaign? INTHEYEAR 2014...
- 22. •1.5% by 2020 •Net Metering to 1 MW •Community Solar •Value of Solar •Small incentives 33% 67% IOUs Munis & Co-ops 460 MWSummary
- 23. TURNING MOMENTUM INTO A SOLARVICTORY: Strategy, policy, and the 2013 Success Presentation by John Farrell, Director of Democratic Energy, Institute for Local Self-Reliance and Erin Stojan Ruccolo, Director, Electricity Markets, Fresh Energy Webinar for Oregonians for Renewable Energy Progress | July 16, 2013 Lessons from Minnesota: A Solar Success John Farrell Director of Democratic Energy Institute for Local Self-Reliance jfarrell@ilsr.org Erin Stojan Ruccolo Director of Electricity Markets Fresh Energy ruccolo@fresh-energy.org