SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  40
Assessment II:Moving from Theory to Practice April 14, 2011 Ken Doxsee, Academic Affairs and Jason Schreiner, Teaching Effectiveness Program
Overview Motivation – The value of assessment Curriculum mapping – the concept Samples of curriculum maps Creation of a curriculum map Steps and strategies Establishing outcomes at the Department or Program level
Resources University of Oregon Assessment Workshop Slides http://assessment.uoregon.edu/node/70 University of Hawaii Manoa Curriculum Mapping/Matrix http://manoa.hawaii.edu/assessment/howto/mapping.htm University of West Florida Center for Teaching, Learning and Assessment http://uwf.edu/cutla/curriculum_maps.cfm Boise State University http://ctl.boisestate.edu/programs/CurriculumRevision.asp http://ctl.boisestate.edu/maps/Faculty_Program-Level_Outcomes.pdf
Student Experience at the Research University Survey (SERU) Origins in U of California system – UCUES Extension to AAU institutions Oregon, Texas, Florida, Pitt, Rutgers, Michigan, Minnesota Highlights Annual analysis of student self-reported observations and experience Target population – all undergraduates Data drillable to individual department level 2010 UO SERU – ca. 3,800 student responses
SERU Focus Areas Satisfaction with Educational Experience Current Skills Self-Assessment Gains in Self-Assessment of Skills Development of Scholarship Understanding Other Perspectives Research Experiences Quantitative Skills Use of Time / Academic Disengagement
Self-Reported Gains in Competencies
UO Students Think They Learn A Lot Does that make you wonder if  it’s true? If so, when do these gains occur?
Time spent in class (blue) and out of class on academic pursuit (red), relative to UO average * * * * * * * *  =  n < 10 Time Utilization
Time spent in class (blue) and out of class on academic pursuit (red), relative to UO average * * * *  =  n < 10 Time Utilization
Time spent in class (blue) and out of class on academic pursuit (red), relative to UO average B B B * *  =  n < 10 B  =  Bend campus offering Time Utilization
Curriculum Mapping A method to align instruction in courses with desired program-level outcomes and to support decision making about the curriculum.  ,[object Object]
Is the curriculum aligned with overall objectives?
What is the relationship between what students do in their courses and the program’s  learning objectives?
Identification of gaps (or overemphasis) can lead to curricular change, offering promise for improved student learning and attenuated faculty workloads.,[object Object]
Types of Curriculum Maps “Yes or no” “Intensity scale” E.g., Introduced/Developing/Mastering E.g., Basic/Intermediate/Advanced Scales of maps Alignment of course assignments with course or program goals Alignment of course goals with program goals Curricular alignment with program goals
“Yes or No” Mapping
“Intensity Scale” Mapping
Assignment Alignment with Course(or Program) Objectives
Course Alignment with Program Objectives
Curriculum Alignment with Program Objectives
I=Introduce; R=Reinforce; E=Emphasize http://assessment.uconn.edu/docs/Curriculum_Map_Business.pdf
Developing and Using aCurriculum Map Develop/confirm program-level student learning outcomes. List recommended and required courses, including Core/LFL courses. Create the map in the form of a table. Mark courses that currently address these outcomes indicating the level at which the outcomes are addressed (and how they are assessed, if you wish). Analyze the map, noting gaps, redundancies, and areas where additional information is needed. Gather additional information including evidence related to student achievement of the outcomes. Use the map to make decisions about the program’s curriculum and assess its effectiveness.
Program Core Outcomes Communication: oral (speaking/listening) and written (reading/writing) Interpersonal: collaboration, leadership Problem-solving: application of content/methods to a variety of contexts Critical thinking: application of inquiry/methods to a variety of contexts Information literacy: how to use information (computer, library, media, technical, modeling, etc.)
Program Core Outcomes Multicultural awareness: respecting others and multiple views Intellectual flexibility: open to new ideas and adaptive to changing environments Methods: inquiry process, evidence gathering and assessment, statistics, etc. Ethics: world, personal, research Responsibility: well-rounded character, civic engagement, etc.
Examples Vague: The student will gain knowledge of automated chemistry tests. Specific: The student will state the principle for each automated chemistry test listed.
Examples Vague: The student will be familiar with red blood cell maturation in the bone marrow.  Specific: The student will diagram the maturation of red blood cells.
Examples Vague: The student will become familiar with theories of population growth. Specific: The student will compare and contrast neo-Malthusian, modernization, and distributionist theories of population growth.
Examples Vague: The student will understand the benefits of various exercise modalities for an elderly person. Specific: The student will determine the most appropriate exercise modality for health maintenance in a patience who is elderly.

Contenu connexe

Tendances

Study system in science and math's
Study system in science and math'sStudy system in science and math's
Study system in science and math'sAEAnadia
 
Evaluation in Education
Evaluation in EducationEvaluation in Education
Evaluation in EducationKusum Gaur
 
04 course design development phase
04 course design   development phase04 course design   development phase
04 course design development phaseDr. Chetan Bhatt
 
Aligning Assessments to Course Outcomes
Aligning Assessments to Course OutcomesAligning Assessments to Course Outcomes
Aligning Assessments to Course OutcomesChristine Salmon
 
Gauging Effectiveness of Instructional Grants
Gauging Effectiveness of Instructional GrantsGauging Effectiveness of Instructional Grants
Gauging Effectiveness of Instructional GrantsLynda Milne
 
Final Integrated Summative Assessment
Final Integrated Summative AssessmentFinal Integrated Summative Assessment
Final Integrated Summative AssessmentCIMAP
 
05 course design implementation phase
05 course design   implementation phase05 course design   implementation phase
05 course design implementation phaseDr. Chetan Bhatt
 
Kirkpatrick's evaluation model revised 2017
Kirkpatrick's evaluation model revised 2017Kirkpatrick's evaluation model revised 2017
Kirkpatrick's evaluation model revised 2017tjcarter
 
Recordind and reporting assessment results (1)
Recordind and reporting assessment results (1)Recordind and reporting assessment results (1)
Recordind and reporting assessment results (1)Mad Jutt
 
Conducting Programme Evaluation
Conducting Programme EvaluationConducting Programme Evaluation
Conducting Programme EvaluationPuja Shrivastav
 
Factors in constructing evaluative instruments
Factors in constructing evaluative instrumentsFactors in constructing evaluative instruments
Factors in constructing evaluative instrumentsCatherine Matias
 
Curriculum constrction sem i evaluation models
Curriculum constrction sem i   evaluation modelsCurriculum constrction sem i   evaluation models
Curriculum constrction sem i evaluation modelsRaj Kumar
 
Keeping the Ball Rolling: Developing a System that Supports Real Progress in ...
Keeping the Ball Rolling: Developing a System that Supports Real Progress in ...Keeping the Ball Rolling: Developing a System that Supports Real Progress in ...
Keeping the Ball Rolling: Developing a System that Supports Real Progress in ...WASC Senior
 
Assessment as learning
Assessment as learningAssessment as learning
Assessment as learningAnup Singh
 
Effective assessment practices Project
Effective assessment practices ProjectEffective assessment practices Project
Effective assessment practices Projectwindstar2002
 
Programme Evaluation in Open and Distance Learning
Programme Evaluation in Open and Distance LearningProgramme Evaluation in Open and Distance Learning
Programme Evaluation in Open and Distance LearningSanjaya Mishra
 

Tendances (20)

Assessment at Franklin University
Assessment at Franklin UniversityAssessment at Franklin University
Assessment at Franklin University
 
Study system in science and math's
Study system in science and math'sStudy system in science and math's
Study system in science and math's
 
Evaluation in Education
Evaluation in EducationEvaluation in Education
Evaluation in Education
 
04 course design development phase
04 course design   development phase04 course design   development phase
04 course design development phase
 
Aligning Assessments to Course Outcomes
Aligning Assessments to Course OutcomesAligning Assessments to Course Outcomes
Aligning Assessments to Course Outcomes
 
Gauging Effectiveness of Instructional Grants
Gauging Effectiveness of Instructional GrantsGauging Effectiveness of Instructional Grants
Gauging Effectiveness of Instructional Grants
 
Final Integrated Summative Assessment
Final Integrated Summative AssessmentFinal Integrated Summative Assessment
Final Integrated Summative Assessment
 
05 course design implementation phase
05 course design   implementation phase05 course design   implementation phase
05 course design implementation phase
 
Goal free model
Goal free modelGoal free model
Goal free model
 
Kirkpatrick's evaluation model revised 2017
Kirkpatrick's evaluation model revised 2017Kirkpatrick's evaluation model revised 2017
Kirkpatrick's evaluation model revised 2017
 
Recordind and reporting assessment results (1)
Recordind and reporting assessment results (1)Recordind and reporting assessment results (1)
Recordind and reporting assessment results (1)
 
Curriculum Evaluation
Curriculum EvaluationCurriculum Evaluation
Curriculum Evaluation
 
Conducting Programme Evaluation
Conducting Programme EvaluationConducting Programme Evaluation
Conducting Programme Evaluation
 
Factors in constructing evaluative instruments
Factors in constructing evaluative instrumentsFactors in constructing evaluative instruments
Factors in constructing evaluative instruments
 
Curriculum constrction sem i evaluation models
Curriculum constrction sem i   evaluation modelsCurriculum constrction sem i   evaluation models
Curriculum constrction sem i evaluation models
 
Keeping the Ball Rolling: Developing a System that Supports Real Progress in ...
Keeping the Ball Rolling: Developing a System that Supports Real Progress in ...Keeping the Ball Rolling: Developing a System that Supports Real Progress in ...
Keeping the Ball Rolling: Developing a System that Supports Real Progress in ...
 
Assessment as learning
Assessment as learningAssessment as learning
Assessment as learning
 
Effective assessment practices Project
Effective assessment practices ProjectEffective assessment practices Project
Effective assessment practices Project
 
Programme Evaluation in Open and Distance Learning
Programme Evaluation in Open and Distance LearningProgramme Evaluation in Open and Distance Learning
Programme Evaluation in Open and Distance Learning
 
UCSD 1st year program
UCSD 1st year programUCSD 1st year program
UCSD 1st year program
 

Similaire à Value of Assessment

The Student Success And Faculty Development Grant Programaacn
The Student Success And Faculty Development Grant ProgramaacnThe Student Success And Faculty Development Grant Programaacn
The Student Success And Faculty Development Grant ProgramaacnClayton State University
 
Curriculum mapping intro
Curriculum mapping introCurriculum mapping intro
Curriculum mapping introMike Fisher
 
Assessment Institute August 21 2008
Assessment Institute August 21 2008Assessment Institute August 21 2008
Assessment Institute August 21 2008middlesex
 
Surname3Student’s nameProfessor’s nameCourse titleDue Da.docx
Surname3Student’s nameProfessor’s nameCourse titleDue Da.docxSurname3Student’s nameProfessor’s nameCourse titleDue Da.docx
Surname3Student’s nameProfessor’s nameCourse titleDue Da.docxmabelf3
 
Surname3Student’s nameProfessor’s nameCourse titleDue Da.docx
Surname3Student’s nameProfessor’s nameCourse titleDue Da.docxSurname3Student’s nameProfessor’s nameCourse titleDue Da.docx
Surname3Student’s nameProfessor’s nameCourse titleDue Da.docxdeanmtaylor1545
 
Assessment Futures: The Role for e-Assessment?
Assessment Futures: The Role for e-Assessment?Assessment Futures: The Role for e-Assessment?
Assessment Futures: The Role for e-Assessment?Kenji Lamb
 
Documenting Teaching Effectiveness
Documenting Teaching EffectivenessDocumenting Teaching Effectiveness
Documenting Teaching EffectivenessIlene Dawn Alexander
 
Class 1 overview
Class 1 overviewClass 1 overview
Class 1 overviewtjcarter
 
Class 1 ADLT 670
Class 1 ADLT 670Class 1 ADLT 670
Class 1 ADLT 670tjcarter
 
Blake.Efc Presentation2010.Ms Career Exploration
Blake.Efc Presentation2010.Ms Career ExplorationBlake.Efc Presentation2010.Ms Career Exploration
Blake.Efc Presentation2010.Ms Career ExplorationDanBlake
 
BdEurope2011_BlendedLearningWorkshop.pptx
BdEurope2011_BlendedLearningWorkshop.pptxBdEurope2011_BlendedLearningWorkshop.pptx
BdEurope2011_BlendedLearningWorkshop.pptxAins11
 
Assessing student learning
Assessing student learningAssessing student learning
Assessing student learningsrinivaslalluri
 
continous assessment (LH) for Jinela Teachers.pdf
continous assessment (LH)   for Jinela Teachers.pdfcontinous assessment (LH)   for Jinela Teachers.pdf
continous assessment (LH) for Jinela Teachers.pdfbeyeneyewondwossenDi
 
Developing Course-Level Learning Objectives4.ppt
Developing Course-Level Learning Objectives4.pptDeveloping Course-Level Learning Objectives4.ppt
Developing Course-Level Learning Objectives4.pptDwiS30
 
Tm heart of assessment evaluation
Tm heart of assessment evaluationTm heart of assessment evaluation
Tm heart of assessment evaluationJo-Anne LaForty
 
Examination of relevant syllabi and curriculum guides
Examination of relevant syllabi and curriculum guidesExamination of relevant syllabi and curriculum guides
Examination of relevant syllabi and curriculum guidesleesha roberts
 

Similaire à Value of Assessment (20)

The Student Success And Faculty Development Grant Programaacn
The Student Success And Faculty Development Grant ProgramaacnThe Student Success And Faculty Development Grant Programaacn
The Student Success And Faculty Development Grant Programaacn
 
505 lesson plan j walker
505 lesson plan j walker505 lesson plan j walker
505 lesson plan j walker
 
Curriculum mapping intro
Curriculum mapping introCurriculum mapping intro
Curriculum mapping intro
 
Assessment Institute August 21 2008
Assessment Institute August 21 2008Assessment Institute August 21 2008
Assessment Institute August 21 2008
 
Surname3Student’s nameProfessor’s nameCourse titleDue Da.docx
Surname3Student’s nameProfessor’s nameCourse titleDue Da.docxSurname3Student’s nameProfessor’s nameCourse titleDue Da.docx
Surname3Student’s nameProfessor’s nameCourse titleDue Da.docx
 
Surname3Student’s nameProfessor’s nameCourse titleDue Da.docx
Surname3Student’s nameProfessor’s nameCourse titleDue Da.docxSurname3Student’s nameProfessor’s nameCourse titleDue Da.docx
Surname3Student’s nameProfessor’s nameCourse titleDue Da.docx
 
Assessment Futures: The Role for e-Assessment?
Assessment Futures: The Role for e-Assessment?Assessment Futures: The Role for e-Assessment?
Assessment Futures: The Role for e-Assessment?
 
Documenting Teaching Effectiveness
Documenting Teaching EffectivenessDocumenting Teaching Effectiveness
Documenting Teaching Effectiveness
 
Class 1 overview
Class 1 overviewClass 1 overview
Class 1 overview
 
Class 1 ADLT 670
Class 1 ADLT 670Class 1 ADLT 670
Class 1 ADLT 670
 
Blake.Efc Presentation2010.Ms Career Exploration
Blake.Efc Presentation2010.Ms Career ExplorationBlake.Efc Presentation2010.Ms Career Exploration
Blake.Efc Presentation2010.Ms Career Exploration
 
Course design
Course designCourse design
Course design
 
BdEurope2011_BlendedLearningWorkshop.pptx
BdEurope2011_BlendedLearningWorkshop.pptxBdEurope2011_BlendedLearningWorkshop.pptx
BdEurope2011_BlendedLearningWorkshop.pptx
 
Assessing student learning
Assessing student learningAssessing student learning
Assessing student learning
 
continous assessment (LH) for Jinela Teachers.pdf
continous assessment (LH)   for Jinela Teachers.pdfcontinous assessment (LH)   for Jinela Teachers.pdf
continous assessment (LH) for Jinela Teachers.pdf
 
OFSTED& J ELEY
OFSTED& J ELEYOFSTED& J ELEY
OFSTED& J ELEY
 
Curriculum Mapping
Curriculum MappingCurriculum Mapping
Curriculum Mapping
 
Developing Course-Level Learning Objectives4.ppt
Developing Course-Level Learning Objectives4.pptDeveloping Course-Level Learning Objectives4.ppt
Developing Course-Level Learning Objectives4.ppt
 
Tm heart of assessment evaluation
Tm heart of assessment evaluationTm heart of assessment evaluation
Tm heart of assessment evaluation
 
Examination of relevant syllabi and curriculum guides
Examination of relevant syllabi and curriculum guidesExamination of relevant syllabi and curriculum guides
Examination of relevant syllabi and curriculum guides
 

Value of Assessment

  • 1. Assessment II:Moving from Theory to Practice April 14, 2011 Ken Doxsee, Academic Affairs and Jason Schreiner, Teaching Effectiveness Program
  • 2. Overview Motivation – The value of assessment Curriculum mapping – the concept Samples of curriculum maps Creation of a curriculum map Steps and strategies Establishing outcomes at the Department or Program level
  • 3. Resources University of Oregon Assessment Workshop Slides http://assessment.uoregon.edu/node/70 University of Hawaii Manoa Curriculum Mapping/Matrix http://manoa.hawaii.edu/assessment/howto/mapping.htm University of West Florida Center for Teaching, Learning and Assessment http://uwf.edu/cutla/curriculum_maps.cfm Boise State University http://ctl.boisestate.edu/programs/CurriculumRevision.asp http://ctl.boisestate.edu/maps/Faculty_Program-Level_Outcomes.pdf
  • 4. Student Experience at the Research University Survey (SERU) Origins in U of California system – UCUES Extension to AAU institutions Oregon, Texas, Florida, Pitt, Rutgers, Michigan, Minnesota Highlights Annual analysis of student self-reported observations and experience Target population – all undergraduates Data drillable to individual department level 2010 UO SERU – ca. 3,800 student responses
  • 5. SERU Focus Areas Satisfaction with Educational Experience Current Skills Self-Assessment Gains in Self-Assessment of Skills Development of Scholarship Understanding Other Perspectives Research Experiences Quantitative Skills Use of Time / Academic Disengagement
  • 6.
  • 7.
  • 8.
  • 9.
  • 10.
  • 11.
  • 12.
  • 13.
  • 14.
  • 15.
  • 16. Self-Reported Gains in Competencies
  • 17. UO Students Think They Learn A Lot Does that make you wonder if it’s true? If so, when do these gains occur?
  • 18. Time spent in class (blue) and out of class on academic pursuit (red), relative to UO average * * * * * * * * = n < 10 Time Utilization
  • 19. Time spent in class (blue) and out of class on academic pursuit (red), relative to UO average * * * * = n < 10 Time Utilization
  • 20. Time spent in class (blue) and out of class on academic pursuit (red), relative to UO average B B B * * = n < 10 B = Bend campus offering Time Utilization
  • 21.
  • 22. Is the curriculum aligned with overall objectives?
  • 23. What is the relationship between what students do in their courses and the program’s learning objectives?
  • 24.
  • 25. Types of Curriculum Maps “Yes or no” “Intensity scale” E.g., Introduced/Developing/Mastering E.g., Basic/Intermediate/Advanced Scales of maps Alignment of course assignments with course or program goals Alignment of course goals with program goals Curricular alignment with program goals
  • 26. “Yes or No” Mapping
  • 28. Assignment Alignment with Course(or Program) Objectives
  • 29. Course Alignment with Program Objectives
  • 30. Curriculum Alignment with Program Objectives
  • 31. I=Introduce; R=Reinforce; E=Emphasize http://assessment.uconn.edu/docs/Curriculum_Map_Business.pdf
  • 32.
  • 33. Developing and Using aCurriculum Map Develop/confirm program-level student learning outcomes. List recommended and required courses, including Core/LFL courses. Create the map in the form of a table. Mark courses that currently address these outcomes indicating the level at which the outcomes are addressed (and how they are assessed, if you wish). Analyze the map, noting gaps, redundancies, and areas where additional information is needed. Gather additional information including evidence related to student achievement of the outcomes. Use the map to make decisions about the program’s curriculum and assess its effectiveness.
  • 34. Program Core Outcomes Communication: oral (speaking/listening) and written (reading/writing) Interpersonal: collaboration, leadership Problem-solving: application of content/methods to a variety of contexts Critical thinking: application of inquiry/methods to a variety of contexts Information literacy: how to use information (computer, library, media, technical, modeling, etc.)
  • 35. Program Core Outcomes Multicultural awareness: respecting others and multiple views Intellectual flexibility: open to new ideas and adaptive to changing environments Methods: inquiry process, evidence gathering and assessment, statistics, etc. Ethics: world, personal, research Responsibility: well-rounded character, civic engagement, etc.
  • 36.
  • 37. Examples Vague: The student will gain knowledge of automated chemistry tests. Specific: The student will state the principle for each automated chemistry test listed.
  • 38. Examples Vague: The student will be familiar with red blood cell maturation in the bone marrow. Specific: The student will diagram the maturation of red blood cells.
  • 39. Examples Vague: The student will become familiar with theories of population growth. Specific: The student will compare and contrast neo-Malthusian, modernization, and distributionist theories of population growth.
  • 40. Examples Vague: The student will understand the benefits of various exercise modalities for an elderly person. Specific: The student will determine the most appropriate exercise modality for health maintenance in a patience who is elderly.
  • 41. Drafting Process Draft: Students will be familiar with the major theories of the discipline Revision 1: Students will be familiar with withdrawal, smoothing, forcing, compromising, and problem solving Revision 2: Students will summarize the concepts of withdrawal, smoothing, forcing, compromising, and problem solving Specific: Students will summarize the five major approaches to conflict resolution: withdrawal, smoothing, forcing, compromising, and problem solving Higher order thinking objective: Students will choose and defend a conflict resolution approach appropriate for a given situation
  • 42. Course Example This course is designed to facilitate your learning and practice of essential knowledge and skills for engaging in critical social and environmental inquiry or ‘critical environmental studies.’ If you invest your time and effort fully in meeting course expectations and requirements, you should finish the term being able to: Recognize and describe environmental problems Examine and diagnose social ‘root causes’ of environmental problems Appraise potential solutions for addressing environmental problems Articulate viable courses of action for addressing environmental problems Use your own voice to contribute meaningful ideas to public discourse about environmental issues Summarize and critique major social scientific interpretations of environmental change