2. Scenario Indicators
This presentation includes additional indicators
from the four PLANiTulsa scenarios presented
at Cain’s Ballroom on May 12, 2009
These are intended to provide additional detail
for residents interested in delving deeper into
the scenarios.
Please, take some time to review them, and
then complete the survey!
3. People
Scenarios C and D have the most population growth, Scenario A the least.
New Population Growth in the City
600,000
102,333
100,966
72,919
500,000
28,628
400,000
Total Population Added
300,000
2000 Population
200,000
100,000
0
A B C D
4. People
Scenarios C and D also have the greatest new job growth.
New Job Growth in the City
23,859 32,620 41,700 42,183
400,000
350,000
300,000
250,000
Total Jobs Added
200,000
2000 Jobs
150,000
100,000
50,000
0
A B C D
5. People
Scenarios B and D would place the greatest number of new homes on underutilized
parcels
New Infill Housing Units
(and % of total)
56%
25,000
20,000
49%
Infill Housing
15,000
Units
10,000
14%
5,000
4%
0
A B C D
6. People
Each scenario provides a range of new homes on different sized lots.
Variety of Single Family Home Types
14,000
12,000
10,000 Single Family Rural
Single Family Estate
8,000
Single Family 8-15K lot
6,000 Single Family 5-8K lot
Cottage Home
4,000
2,000
0
A B C D
7. People
Scenarios C and D have most new homes in mixed-use areas, with shops nearby.
Proportion of Housing Units In A
Mixed-Use Environment
100%
74%
75%
Percent of
49%
50% Units
27%
25%
8%
0%
A B C D
8. Economy
The types of jobs added were similar across all four scenarios.
Job Profile
100%
14%
15% 15%
90% 21%
80%
70%
60% Retail
61%
60% 60%
58%
50% Office
Industrial
40%
30%
20%
25% 25% 25%
21%
10%
0%
A B C D
9. Economy
Scenario C would result in the greatest total value of new homes and employment space.
Value of Total New Construction
$14,000,000,000
$12,000,000,000
$10,000,000,000
Value Added
$8,000,000,000 from All
Construction
$6,000,000,000
$4,000,000,000
$2,000,000,000
$0
A B C D
10. Economy
The estimated increase in annual sales tax revenue for the city is similar across B, C, and D
Added City Sales Tax Revenue
$50,000,000
$40,000,000
$30,000,000
$20,000,000
$10,000,000
$0
A B C D
11. Transportation
Scenario A would result in more total lane miles than the others.
New Lane-Miles of Road Constructed
2,500
2,000
Added Lane-
604 504 454 434
Miles
1,500
Existing Lane-
1,000
Miles
1,526 1,526 1,526 1,526
500
0
A B C D
12. Transportation
On per-capita basis, Scenario A would require more new roads for fewer new
residents.
Lane Miles of New Road Per 1,000 New Residents
25
21.1
20
Lane Miles
15 Added per
1,000 New
Residents
10
6.9
4.5 4.2
5
0
A B C D
13. Transportation
Scenarios B, C, and D would result in Tulsans driving fewer miles than Scenario A.
Per Capita Vehicle Miles Traveled (City)
40
40
33
31 30
30
VMT per capita
(miles)
20
10
0
A B C D
14. Transportation
The amount of time Tulsans will spend in the car drops dramatically in Scenarios B,
C and D.
Per Capita Vehicle Hours Traveled (City)
60 56
46
50
45
41
40
VHT per capita
30 (Min)
20
10
0
A B C D
15. Transportation
Scenarios B and D would result in the least amount of fuel wasted due to traffic
congestion
Gallons of Fuel Wasted Annually Due to Congestion
10,730,000
9,420,000 10,290,000
10,000,000
8,760,000
7,500,000 Gallons of Fuel
Wasted
Annually
5,000,000
2,500,000
0
A B C D
16. Transportation
Scenarios B and D would result in the least amount of lost time due to traffic
congestion.
Citywide Value of Time Lost Due to Congestion
(Annually, in millions)
$400
$346
$332
$304
$283
$300
Value of Time
$200 Lost (per year)
$100
$0
A B C D
17. Community & Environment
Scenario C would consume the greatest amount of land, overall.
Acres of Land Consumed
(% that is on underutilized parcels)
8%
10,000
8,000
Underutilized
3% land
6,000
26% 35% Vacant Acres
4,000
2,000
0
A B C D
18. Community & Environment
The number of new residents living near parks, the river, and open space is different
for each scenario.
New Housing Units within ½ Mile of Open Space
19. Community & Environment
Scenario C produced the greatest amount of new impervious surface such as parking lots
and rooftops.
Acres of Impervious Surface Added
6,000
4,000
2,000
0
A B C D
