Measures of Central Tendency: Mean, Median and Mode
Philosophy and policy in higher education
1. Philosophy and policy
in higher education
November 2011
George Roberts
Oxford Brookes University
2.
3. That’s all very well in practice,
but how does it work in theory?
Do you use theory as a drunk might use
a lamp post:
more for support than illumination?
4. Objectives
By the end of this discussion, you should be able to:
• Elaborate a general “theory of theory”
• Explain some of the uses of theory for
understanding educational development and be
able to point the way to others
• Locate higher education in the context of the
wider institutions of society
• Apply the concept of a “hidden curriculum” to
explaining higher education practices
5. Reflective practice?
... learning can be enhanced through: a consideration of
the context and experience of others, familiarity with
received wisdom, reflection on these, and the use of the
first hand experience of the learner.
[however]
Discussions of reflection in learning often emphasise the
first hand experience of the learner rather than
- the role of formal theory,
- the importance of the broader social context
- and the experience of others
(Dyke 2006)
6. Why do people learn and teach differently?
How can we build on this observation and subsequent explanation to
develop our own learning and teaching practice?
LEARNING THEORY
A THEORY OF THEORY
7. 2 different orientations towards acquiring knowledge
& … 2 functions of theory
Inductive: from observation to theory
Theory building
explanatory
Theory attempts to answer the question: “Why?”
Deductive: from theory to observation
Theory testing
predictive
Theory attempts to answer the question: “What
happens next?”
10. and, which reminds me… theory is:
Nomothetic
oops!
Typical
Or typifying
Or typologising
Or generalising
Here we are typifying “theory”
11. So, we have a typology of theory…
a nomothetic theory of theory
explanatory
predictive
generative
typifying
12. And the last bit?
Falsifiable
Theory vs.. ideology:
Ideology may well be predictive and explanatory,
but instead of generative it is restrictive, instead of
typical it is normalising and instead of falsifiable it is
enforced. (Popper, 1996)
• Theory “proves” nothing
• Things/the world/observation challenges theory
13. So, we have a typology of theory…
a theory of theory
Theory is:
explanatory
predictive
generative
typical
falsifiable
14. Theory
Systematic codification or abstraction of:
• Accumulated observations (or assertions)
• Beliefs
Conceptual framework
• Model
An attempt to answer the question, “Why...?”
An approach or a perspective, e.g.:
• Positivist
• Socio-cultural
See De-localized Production of Scientific Knowledge. (Galison 2007, October 7).
Retrieved from
http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/mediaberkman/2007/09/21/de-localized-
production-of-scientific-knowledge-2/
15. Learning Theory Discussion
• An attempt to answer the question, “Why...?” or
"How?" with a statement: "Because...”
• Why and how do we learn?
• How is it that we come to know things?
• How is it that we come to know things by or in
different ways?
17. Visual triggers
• The images on the next two slides are taken
from a discussion of higher education in South
Africa stimulated by the arts movement
Blackwash in the Journal Arts Review, “Africa's
Premier Arts And Culture Online Magazine” in
2009. (http://www.artsreview.co.za/)
18.
19.
20. Discussion
• In light of those pictures
• What [the heck] use is “A theory of learning”?
– Discuss on the VLE,
• By Friday 2 December, post (at least) one idea, that, for
you, is central to this question.
• Then, respond to at least one other idea posted by a
colleague.
• By Friday 9 December summarise the on-going
discussion in your own words: where did you get to
with this?
24. Institutions of reproduction
That is cultural reproduction
• The family
– kin, clan, folk, nation, etc
• Religion
• Education
• Defense and security
– Military, police, etc
25. • In the last 300 years or so, there has been an
inversion
26. – In the past (when? where?) institutions of
production were subordinated to institutions of
reproduction
• We enter into this endeavour “for the glory of God” or
the “defense of the nation”
27. – Recently (when? where?) institutions of
reproduction have become subordinated to
institutions of production
• The function of higher education is to serve industry
• The family provided the stable base from which
empolyability skills may be acquired
28. OECD Purpose of HE?
• Higher education institutions are expected to provide
education and training relevant to labour market
demands, conduct research activities that will build a
knowledge-based economy, as well as contribute to
social cohesion, regional development and global well-
being. They must also strive constantly to fulfil their
multiple missions, improve the quality of the education
provided, increase their efficiency and demonstrate
their contribution to society.
http://www.oecd.org/document/33/0,3746,en_21571361_47736552_
48511009_1_1_1_1,00.html
29. The real university?
• The real university has no specific location …
[it] is a state of mind. It is that great cultural
heritage of rational thought that has been
brought down to us through the centuries …
which is regenerated throughout the centuries
by a body of people who traditionally carry
the title of [academics] … The real university is
nothing less than the continuing body of
reason itself.
(Pirsig 1974: 143)
31. • Overt curriculum of the early modern age
– “3 Rs”: Reading, ‘Riting and ‘Rithmatic
– Reproduction of these cultural goods, universal
literacy and numeracy, would benefit both the
individual as well as society
32. • Today’s overt curriculum (perhaps)
– Flexibility
– Community/team work
– Individualisation or personalisation
33. Industrial era covert curriculm
• Set against the “3 Rs”
– Reading, ‘Riting and ‘Rithmatic
• Schools taught
– Punctuality
– Tolerance of repetition
– Subordination
34. Post industrial
“knowledge economy” covert curriculum
• Set against
– Flexibility, community and individualisation
• We see
– Piecework, precarity, competition
– Normalisation
– Surveillance
36. Stephen Brookfield’s four “critical reflective lenses”
1. our “autobiography as teachers and learners”, i.e.
through our own eyes
2. through our students eyes
3. through our colleagues’ experience and peer
review
4. through the theoretical literature
Theoretical literature helps us to name our practice
and to find that it is not idiosyncratic
37. Critical theory
Expose hidden assumptions
Structured reduction of complexity
• What is left out of the model?
Indirect object of learning
• Hidden curriculum
Creative appropriation
38. Typical critical theory
• anti-essentialist/critical realist: the basic
givens of existence are fluid and unstable
• heteroglossic/dialogic: all thinking is largely
determined by prior cultural experience
• language is an actor (weak linguistic
determinism)
• meaning is characterised by ambiguity
• context is everything
• grand narratives v petits recipts
39. Positivism:
an orthodoxy?
• Anti-metaphysical/clericalist, accumulist
theory of knowledge based on observation
plus logic.
• Theory is simply the codification of
accumulated knowledge and not of particular
importance.
• Logic plus observation can lead to a grand
unification of all knowledge. (Galison, 2007)
40. Socio-culturalism:
the new orthodoxy?
Social constructivism
• The simplest utterance, far from reflecting a constant,
rigid correspondence between sound and meaning, is
really a process. … the inner relationship we were
looking for was not a prerequisite for, but rather a
product of, the historical development of human
consciousness. (Vygotsky)
• All observation is theory laden (Popper)
• Disciplines are like ships passing in the night (Kuhn)
• Cultures parse the world differently (Galison)
41. In Discussion: Consider this
Most academics - in the humanities and social sciences, particularly -
come at their subject these days from a relativist perspective: knowledge
is "in here"; there is no knowledge without the knower; knowledge is
"constructed" in cultural contexts; knowledge is not "given" or "out
there". There is no "absolute truth".
This position is quite different from the classical approach: knowledge is
"out there"; the "laws of nature" are independent from the mind of the
investigator; there is "truth" to be discovered. This approach depends on
the "independent, objective observer", who can stand aside from the
observed phenomenon and form an unbiased view.
This classical approach is the traditional position of many scientists, as
well the commonsense view of how knowledge is produced, which
(according to Scollon) is held by an international public discourse of
commerce and government.
(Scollon 2003: 71)
42. The classical approach
– Can you illustrate how this classical approach is
held by a “common sense”, “international public
discourse of commerce and government”?
– Or, perhaps, to rephrase the question, what is the
purpose of university?
46. Honey and Mumford
• Activitists (Do)
– Immerse themselves fully in new experiences
– Enjoy here and now
– Open minded, enthusiastic, flexible
– Act first, consider consequences later
– Seek to centre activity around themselves
• Reflectors (Review)
– Stand back and observe
– Cautious, take a back seat
– Collect and analyze data about experience and events, slow to reach conclusions
– Use information from past, present and immediate observations to maintain a big
picture perspective.
• Theorists (Conclude)
– Think through problems in a logical manner, value rationality and objectivity
– Assimilate disparate facts into coherent theories
– Disciplined, aiming to fit things into rational order
– Keen on basic assumptions, principles, theories, models and systems thinking
• Pragmatists (Plan)
– Keen to put ideas, theories and techniques into practice
– Search new ideas and experiment
– Act quickly and confidently on ideas, gets straight to the point
– Are impatient with endless discussion
48. Results
This is the second time I did this. The first time my Dv score was equal to my Nu score. Like all
these sorts of inventories, the results are not fixed nor do they represent any absolute
characterisation of the individual.
49. Wider aims:
a theory of good practice?
These items have been shown to explain and predict
successful learning outcomes
• student-tutor contact
• student-student co-operation
• active learning
• prompt feedback
• time on task
• high expectations
• diverse talents and ways of learning
(Chickering & Gamson, 1987)
independent of the mode of engagement
50. George Roberts
Senior Lecturer, Educational Development
OCSLD
Wheatley Campus
Oxford Brookes University
Oxford, OX33 1HX
groberts@brookes.ac.uk
http://www.google.com/profiles/georgebroberts
THANK YOU
Notes de l'éditeur
We couldn’t ask for a better framing context in which to enter this discussion.
Philosophy, or theory – learning theory in this case – is often regarded with suspicion by teaching practitioners, even if they are well versed in the theoretical traditions of their research discipline. But there is much misuse of theory and some good reason to be suspicious. I hope to be able to address this suspicion.
… and Brookfield also regards theory as one of the four lenses through which the teacher can gain insight into their practice. The other three are: their autobiography, their students and their colleagues.
You might want to go to the discussion forum, now, and consider this question. Or carry on and come back to it. But, do just think for a moment. How is it that we come to know things in different ways?
Unfortunately the pages have been removed from the site.
So, to begin to address the purpose of a theory of learning let’s look at higher education in the context of the institutions of society.
What about banking?
What about security: military and police?
As the relationships between the institutions of society evolvie, there are, as we might expect, differing views of what that institution known as a university might be…
This in a nutshell defines UK HE policy. Ars gratia artis? I don’t think so. But, wasn’t that always a bourgeois luxury? Can we understand “social cohesion, regional development and global well being” through a myriad of local perspectives? Is this only a neoliberal, free-trade, carpetbagging vision? To whom in society must universities “demonstrate their contribution”?
Set this against a different view of higher education: the university or, maybe, the academy.“Education and training relevant to the labour market”, or “nothing less than the continuing body of reason itself”?
Nomothetic: theory of critical theoryBut, isn’t all theory critical?
Positivism was, in origin a radical reaction to the conservative forces of society, particularlythe church. But as Scollon and many others have shown, that utilitarian rationality of the Enlightenment, built on a positivist approach to knowledge,came to protect an exclusive “club” of “civilised men” and excluded the “savages” i.e. colonised people and (most) women.
Socioculturalism takes in a wide range of post-positivist (or new positivist) and critical realist strands of thought including Marxism, Psychoanalysis, Linguistics, Literary criticism, Feminism, and many other bodies of thought. More a broad perspective than a theory as such, socio-culturalism having to some extent supplanted positivism might be seenas a new orthodoxy. And these days, as an orthodoxy is under attack from two directions: a post-foundational emergent systems view of actor networks and a number of new fundamentalisms, both hyper-rational as well as mystical/religious in nature.
So for our next discussion
See also Prosser & Trigwell (various)Simple but well researched 2-dimensional frameworkInformation transfer (teacher focus) scaleConceptual change (student focus) scaleRelational and context specific