SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  13
Télécharger pour lire hors ligne
Taking D t t th N t L
T ki Data to the Next Level
                          l

 Developing Data to Assess Student Progression

       Maury Pearl, LACCD Institutional Effectiveness
                   September 23, 2011
High Interest in Student Progression
  High Interest in Student Progression
• Understanding the Complete Picture 
   – Short‐term measures
     Short term measures
   – Longer term perspective
• Research Findings
   –LLow rates of student progression
           t    f t d t           i
   – Achievement  gaps
• Desire for Improvement 
               p
   o   Describe student progression
   o   Identify problems or issue along path
   o   Research possible explanations
       Research possible explanations
   o   Design and implement interventions
   o   Assess and evaluate
Student Progress Research Questions
 Student Progress Research Questions
• What has been the progress of first time
                                  first-time
  program pursuing students (students who
  attempted 12 units or more in the first
  year) who were assessed and placed in
  Basic Skills Math?
• Does progress vary by ethnicity?
Basic Skills Math Improvement Over Three Years*

  Progress of first-time program pursuing students (attempted 12 units or
  more in the first year) who were assessed and placed in Basic Skills Math.
     Fall 05: assessed=9,201, placed in BS=6,549
     Fall 06: assessed=9,482, placed in BS=6,563
     Fall 07: assessed=10 040 placed in BS=6 915
              assessed=10,040,           BS=6,915
  * Over the three cohorts, 70% of those assessed in Math have been placed in the basic skills levels.




100%
                         Of Those Placed in Basic Skills Math

75%       69% 70% 69%


50%                           42% 42% 41%
                                                  33% 35% 36%

25%                                                                   18% 20% 20%
                                                                                           8% 10% 9%

 0%
          Enrolled in  Completed 1st                Passed              Passed          Passed College
        Recommended Course in 1st                 Elementary         Intermediate          Algebra/
         Course in 1st    Year                      Algebra           Algebra or        Transfer Level
            Year                                                       Geometry             Math
                       Fall 05 Cohort             Fall 06 Cohort             Fall 07 Cohort
Progress Of Fall 2007 Cohort Students Placed in Basic
                         Skills Math


  80%

  70%

  60%

  50%

  40%

  30%

  20%

  10%

   0%
           Enrolled in        Completed First       Passed              Passed        Passed College
          Recommended          Course in the      Elementary         Intermediate       Algebra /
          Course in the         First Year         Algebra             Algebra        Transfer Level
            First Year                                                                    Math



                                    Asian         Black        Hispanic         White



                                                                                    Amer I d/
                                                                                    A     Ind/
                                                                                    Other Non-    All
                                Asian         Black       Hispanic      White         White    Students
Enrolled in Recommended
                                   67.6%        62.4%        73.7%        62.3%         57.4%      69.8%
Course in the First Year

Completed First Course in
                                   50.6%
                                   50 6%        26.4%
                                                26 4%        43.5%
                                                             43 5%        44.9%
                                                                          44 9%         40.6%
                                                                                        40 6%      41.6%
                                                                                                   41 6%
the First Year

Passed Elementary Algebra          47.2%        18.5%        36.8%        46.8%         43.9%      36.2%


Passed Intermediate Algebra        30.6%         7.3%        19.7%        26.3%         19.4%      19.5%

Passed College Algebra /
                                   17.7%         3.1%          9.1%       12.0%          8.4%          9.2%
Transfer Level Math

                                            Supplemental Slides                                           1
Student Outcomes Database
    Student Outcomes Database
• Student unit record (SUR)
• Currently based Fall 2007 cohort
• Includes student characteristics (age, gender, 
                                   ( g ,g      ,
  ethnicity, student status) 
• Contains outcomes (units attempted units
  Contains outcomes (units attempted, units 
  completed, attempted BS English, attempted 
  BS Math, …, completed degree or certificate)
  BS Math, , completed degree or certificate)
• Database
Outcomes Database

      Variable Name                          Variable Description
ID                    Student ID
CAMPUS                Campus
SEM                   Term of entry
SEX                   Student gender
AGE                   Student age group (at the time of entry)

                                      1.00      Under 20
                                      2.00      20 - 24
                                      3.00      25 - 34
                                      4.00      35 - 54
                                      5.00      55 and over
                                      9.00      Unknown
ETHNIC                Student ethnicity
                                      1.00
                                       .00      Asian
                                                 s a
                                      2.00      Black
                                      3.00      Hispanic
                                      4.00      White
                                      5.00      Amer Ind/Other Non-White
                                      6.00      Unknown/Decline to State
NEW                   Entering status
                      2.0    1st Time Student
                      2.4    Former Concurrent Student This College
                      2.6    Former Concurrent Student Another
                      College
UNATTMPT              Units attempted in Fall 07
UNCOMPLT              Units completed in Fall 07
POINT1                Student attempted units in Fall 07 (1=yes)
POINT2                Student completed units in Fall 07 (1=yes)
ATT20081              Units attempted in Spring 2008
POINT3                Student attempted units in Spring 08 (1=yes)
ATT20083              Units attempted in Fall 08
POINT4                Student attempted units in Fall 08 (1=yes)
COMPENGL              Student completed any basic skills English/ESL (1=yes)
COMPMATH              Student completed any basic skills math (1=yes)
COMPE101              Student completed English 101 (1=yes)
COMPM125              Student completed Math 125 (1=yes)
COMPBOTH              Student completed English 101 and Math 125 (1=yes)
TOTCOMPL              Total units completed
COMP60UN              Student completed 60 units or more (1=yes)
TRANMATH              Student completed transfer-level math (1=yes)
DEGRCERT              Student completed degree or certificate (1=yes)
                             Supplemental Slides                               2
Research Using Outcomes Database
  Research Using Outcomes Database

Analysis of Academic Pipeline and Exit Points
  • City
       y
  • Mission
Next




Supplemental Slides          3
Tables
Degree‐Seeking Academic Pipeline @ Los Angeles Mission College
      Fall 2007 Cohort – Academic Years of Study: 07‐08, 08‐09, 09‐10, 10‐11

Exhibit 1                                 Taking Placement Test Results
Cohort Fall 2007 = 1278        Level of Readiness               Total             % 
Not taking placement test
Not taking placement test                                           327            26%31 Earned Award
                                                                                   26%31 Earned Award
Take placement test                                                 951            74%

                               College ready (M125 & E101 or 
                               E28)                                   53           5.6%
                                     Need English only (M125)         29           3.0%
                                 Need Math only (E101 or E28)        222          23.3%
                                                   Need both         647          68.0%
                                                                     951         100.0%

Exhibit 2 ‐ Momentum Point 1                      Attempted and Completed units in Fall 2007

Level of Readiness             Original cohort                  Attempted %               Completed          %
College ready (M125 & E101 or 
E28)                                                      53                53 100%                     48          91%
Need english only (M125)                                  29                29 100%                     27          93%
Need math only (E101 and/or 
E28)                                                     222            222 100%                       195          88%
Need both                                                647            647 100%                       474          73%

                                                                                              744
Exhibit 3 ‐ Momentum point 2                     Attempted and Success Developmental Courses
                                                            No. 
                                                            Attempte
Level of Readiness             Original Cohort              d         % Attempted No. Success     % Success
Need English only (M125)
N d E li h l (M125)                                      29        23         79%              19           83%
Need Math only (E101 and/or 
E28)                                                     222      182                 82%              130           71%
Need both                                                647      571                 88%              356           62%
             Dev Math courses                                     478                 74%              265           55%
               Dev ESL courses                                    459                 71%              291           63%
                                                                  776                                  505
Exhibit 4 ‐ Momentum Point 3              Completed both E101 and M125                        Completed 60 units or more
                                                                           % 
                                                                           %
                                                                Completed  Completed 60 Units or 
Level of Readiness             Original cohort                  both       both      more                    %
College ready (M125 & E101 or 
E28)                                                      53                37        70%               26          49%
Need english only (M125)                                  29                14        48%               17          59%
Need math only (E101 and/or 
E28)                                                     222                57        26%               58          26%
Need both
Need both                                                647                77        12%              128          20%

                                                                    185                          229
Exhibit 5 ‐ Momentum point 4                      Earned an Award or Still Enrolled in Fall 2011
                                                            Still     % Still 
Level of Readiness             Original cohort              Enrolled Enrolled         Awards         % Awards
College ready (M125 & E101 or 
E28)                                                      53           12             23%               19          36%
Need english only (M125)
         g      y(     )                                  29            6             21%               10          34%
Need math only (E101 and/or 
E28)                                                     222          42              19%               33          15%
Need both                                                647         130              20%               54           8%
                                                                     190                               116
                                             Supplemental Slides                                                           4
Students Entering and Leaving the Pipeline From Fall 2007 to Spring 2011
                                           Fall 2007 Cohort (FTIC) 
1000


 900

                              207
 800


 700


 600
                                                 239                                                           Unsuccess/Incompleted


 500
           951                                                                                                 Success/Completed
 400
                              744                                 276
                                                                                   320
 300
                                                 505
 200
                                                                                                   113
 100                                                              229              185
                                                                                                  116
   0
       Take placement     Completed any        Successful      Completed 60    Completed E101  Earned awards
        test in Fall 07   units in Fall 07   completed dev.    units or more     and M125
                                                courses
Directions for Outcomes Database
Directions for Outcomes Database
• Online access and analytical tools
  Online access and analytical tools
• Additional data elements
• Other Ideas?

Contenu connexe

Similaire à Das presentation 2011

Havelock snapshot
Havelock snapshotHavelock snapshot
Havelock snapshotsmithlori24
 
Havelock snapshot
Havelock snapshotHavelock snapshot
Havelock snapshotsmithlori24
 
Irving Park School Report Card
Irving Park School Report CardIrving Park School Report Card
Irving Park School Report CardTrevor Davenport
 
Kids Active Living
Kids Active LivingKids Active Living
Kids Active LivingErin Farahi
 
PTA Minutes - October 2, 2012
PTA Minutes - October 2, 2012PTA Minutes - October 2, 2012
PTA Minutes - October 2, 2012Matthew Foreman
 
Springboard swp july09-rev3
Springboard swp july09-rev3Springboard swp july09-rev3
Springboard swp july09-rev3base65
 
Naep estimated equivalency 2011 wkce admin ppt
Naep estimated equivalency 2011 wkce admin pptNaep estimated equivalency 2011 wkce admin ppt
Naep estimated equivalency 2011 wkce admin pptroverdust
 
Final Exum English 2010 Edc Web
Final Exum English 2010 Edc WebFinal Exum English 2010 Edc Web
Final Exum English 2010 Edc WebRoy prasetyo
 
Sample data presentation
Sample data presentationSample data presentation
Sample data presentationmarlaphillips3
 
BISG's MIP for Higher Ed Publishing 2013 -- Rebecca Griffiths
BISG's MIP for Higher Ed Publishing 2013 -- Rebecca GriffithsBISG's MIP for Higher Ed Publishing 2013 -- Rebecca Griffiths
BISG's MIP for Higher Ed Publishing 2013 -- Rebecca Griffithsbisg
 
PTISD District Report Oct. 2012
PTISD District Report Oct. 2012PTISD District Report Oct. 2012
PTISD District Report Oct. 2012Pine Tree ISD
 

Similaire à Das presentation 2011 (20)

Havelock snapshot
Havelock snapshotHavelock snapshot
Havelock snapshot
 
Havelock snapshot
Havelock snapshotHavelock snapshot
Havelock snapshot
 
Irving Park School Report Card
Irving Park School Report CardIrving Park School Report Card
Irving Park School Report Card
 
Kids Active Living
Kids Active LivingKids Active Living
Kids Active Living
 
AYP 2012 Georgetown ISD Presentation
AYP 2012 Georgetown ISD PresentationAYP 2012 Georgetown ISD Presentation
AYP 2012 Georgetown ISD Presentation
 
PTA Minutes - October 2, 2012
PTA Minutes - October 2, 2012PTA Minutes - October 2, 2012
PTA Minutes - October 2, 2012
 
Springboard swp july09-rev3
Springboard swp july09-rev3Springboard swp july09-rev3
Springboard swp july09-rev3
 
Naep estimated equivalency 2011 wkce admin ppt
Naep estimated equivalency 2011 wkce admin pptNaep estimated equivalency 2011 wkce admin ppt
Naep estimated equivalency 2011 wkce admin ppt
 
The Condition of College and Career Readiness of Hispanic Students
The Condition of College and Career Readiness of Hispanic StudentsThe Condition of College and Career Readiness of Hispanic Students
The Condition of College and Career Readiness of Hispanic Students
 
State of school 11 12 1
State of school 11 12 1State of school 11 12 1
State of school 11 12 1
 
AYP 2010-2011 Presentation
AYP 2010-2011 PresentationAYP 2010-2011 Presentation
AYP 2010-2011 Presentation
 
Final Exum English 2010 Edc Web
Final Exum English 2010 Edc WebFinal Exum English 2010 Edc Web
Final Exum English 2010 Edc Web
 
Sample data presentation
Sample data presentationSample data presentation
Sample data presentation
 
Senior project power point
Senior project power pointSenior project power point
Senior project power point
 
AEIS 2012 Georgetown ISD Presentation
AEIS 2012 Georgetown ISD PresentationAEIS 2012 Georgetown ISD Presentation
AEIS 2012 Georgetown ISD Presentation
 
MAPC_EAC_SchoolChoice_presentation_2_20_13
MAPC_EAC_SchoolChoice_presentation_2_20_13MAPC_EAC_SchoolChoice_presentation_2_20_13
MAPC_EAC_SchoolChoice_presentation_2_20_13
 
BISG's MIP for Higher Ed Publishing 2013 -- Rebecca Griffiths
BISG's MIP for Higher Ed Publishing 2013 -- Rebecca GriffithsBISG's MIP for Higher Ed Publishing 2013 -- Rebecca Griffiths
BISG's MIP for Higher Ed Publishing 2013 -- Rebecca Griffiths
 
IHE Success
IHE SuccessIHE Success
IHE Success
 
PTISD District Report Oct. 2012
PTISD District Report Oct. 2012PTISD District Report Oct. 2012
PTISD District Report Oct. 2012
 
Utrecht sa- jacqueline e. king
Utrecht  sa- jacqueline e. kingUtrecht  sa- jacqueline e. king
Utrecht sa- jacqueline e. king
 

Plus de harrindl

At d & data presentation
At d & data presentationAt d & data presentation
At d & data presentationharrindl
 
Bsi leadership for student success what matters_most_2010
Bsi leadership for student success what matters_most_2010Bsi leadership for student success what matters_most_2010
Bsi leadership for student success what matters_most_2010harrindl
 
June 20 2010 bsi christie
June 20 2010 bsi christieJune 20 2010 bsi christie
June 20 2010 bsi christieharrindl
 
Lessons learnedfor bsi
Lessons learnedfor bsiLessons learnedfor bsi
Lessons learnedfor bsiharrindl
 
Pipeline math
Pipeline mathPipeline math
Pipeline mathharrindl
 
Motivation and self regulation--Myron Dembo
Motivation and self regulation--Myron DemboMotivation and self regulation--Myron Dembo
Motivation and self regulation--Myron Demboharrindl
 
Classroom Research
Classroom ResearchClassroom Research
Classroom Researchharrindl
 
Laccd Program Assessment
Laccd Program AssessmentLaccd Program Assessment
Laccd Program Assessmentharrindl
 
Institution As Learner
Institution As LearnerInstitution As Learner
Institution As Learnerharrindl
 
Action Plan Presentation.6.16.09
Action Plan Presentation.6.16.09Action Plan Presentation.6.16.09
Action Plan Presentation.6.16.09harrindl
 
Apg Presentation
Apg PresentationApg Presentation
Apg Presentationharrindl
 

Plus de harrindl (11)

At d & data presentation
At d & data presentationAt d & data presentation
At d & data presentation
 
Bsi leadership for student success what matters_most_2010
Bsi leadership for student success what matters_most_2010Bsi leadership for student success what matters_most_2010
Bsi leadership for student success what matters_most_2010
 
June 20 2010 bsi christie
June 20 2010 bsi christieJune 20 2010 bsi christie
June 20 2010 bsi christie
 
Lessons learnedfor bsi
Lessons learnedfor bsiLessons learnedfor bsi
Lessons learnedfor bsi
 
Pipeline math
Pipeline mathPipeline math
Pipeline math
 
Motivation and self regulation--Myron Dembo
Motivation and self regulation--Myron DemboMotivation and self regulation--Myron Dembo
Motivation and self regulation--Myron Dembo
 
Classroom Research
Classroom ResearchClassroom Research
Classroom Research
 
Laccd Program Assessment
Laccd Program AssessmentLaccd Program Assessment
Laccd Program Assessment
 
Institution As Learner
Institution As LearnerInstitution As Learner
Institution As Learner
 
Action Plan Presentation.6.16.09
Action Plan Presentation.6.16.09Action Plan Presentation.6.16.09
Action Plan Presentation.6.16.09
 
Apg Presentation
Apg PresentationApg Presentation
Apg Presentation
 

Dernier

The Ultimate Guide to Choosing WordPress Pros and Cons
The Ultimate Guide to Choosing WordPress Pros and ConsThe Ultimate Guide to Choosing WordPress Pros and Cons
The Ultimate Guide to Choosing WordPress Pros and ConsPixlogix Infotech
 
"Debugging python applications inside k8s environment", Andrii Soldatenko
"Debugging python applications inside k8s environment", Andrii Soldatenko"Debugging python applications inside k8s environment", Andrii Soldatenko
"Debugging python applications inside k8s environment", Andrii SoldatenkoFwdays
 
WordPress Websites for Engineers: Elevate Your Brand
WordPress Websites for Engineers: Elevate Your BrandWordPress Websites for Engineers: Elevate Your Brand
WordPress Websites for Engineers: Elevate Your Brandgvaughan
 
H2O.ai CEO/Founder: Sri Ambati Keynote at Wells Fargo Day
H2O.ai CEO/Founder: Sri Ambati Keynote at Wells Fargo DayH2O.ai CEO/Founder: Sri Ambati Keynote at Wells Fargo Day
H2O.ai CEO/Founder: Sri Ambati Keynote at Wells Fargo DaySri Ambati
 
Developer Data Modeling Mistakes: From Postgres to NoSQL
Developer Data Modeling Mistakes: From Postgres to NoSQLDeveloper Data Modeling Mistakes: From Postgres to NoSQL
Developer Data Modeling Mistakes: From Postgres to NoSQLScyllaDB
 
Story boards and shot lists for my a level piece
Story boards and shot lists for my a level pieceStory boards and shot lists for my a level piece
Story boards and shot lists for my a level piececharlottematthew16
 
DevEX - reference for building teams, processes, and platforms
DevEX - reference for building teams, processes, and platformsDevEX - reference for building teams, processes, and platforms
DevEX - reference for building teams, processes, and platformsSergiu Bodiu
 
TeamStation AI System Report LATAM IT Salaries 2024
TeamStation AI System Report LATAM IT Salaries 2024TeamStation AI System Report LATAM IT Salaries 2024
TeamStation AI System Report LATAM IT Salaries 2024Lonnie McRorey
 
Powerpoint exploring the locations used in television show Time Clash
Powerpoint exploring the locations used in television show Time ClashPowerpoint exploring the locations used in television show Time Clash
Powerpoint exploring the locations used in television show Time Clashcharlottematthew16
 
Merck Moving Beyond Passwords: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Merck Moving Beyond Passwords: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxMerck Moving Beyond Passwords: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Merck Moving Beyond Passwords: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxLoriGlavin3
 
Hyperautomation and AI/ML: A Strategy for Digital Transformation Success.pdf
Hyperautomation and AI/ML: A Strategy for Digital Transformation Success.pdfHyperautomation and AI/ML: A Strategy for Digital Transformation Success.pdf
Hyperautomation and AI/ML: A Strategy for Digital Transformation Success.pdfPrecisely
 
CloudStudio User manual (basic edition):
CloudStudio User manual (basic edition):CloudStudio User manual (basic edition):
CloudStudio User manual (basic edition):comworks
 
Artificial intelligence in cctv survelliance.pptx
Artificial intelligence in cctv survelliance.pptxArtificial intelligence in cctv survelliance.pptx
Artificial intelligence in cctv survelliance.pptxhariprasad279825
 
Human Factors of XR: Using Human Factors to Design XR Systems
Human Factors of XR: Using Human Factors to Design XR SystemsHuman Factors of XR: Using Human Factors to Design XR Systems
Human Factors of XR: Using Human Factors to Design XR SystemsMark Billinghurst
 
Unraveling Multimodality with Large Language Models.pdf
Unraveling Multimodality with Large Language Models.pdfUnraveling Multimodality with Large Language Models.pdf
Unraveling Multimodality with Large Language Models.pdfAlex Barbosa Coqueiro
 
Tampa BSides - Chef's Tour of Microsoft Security Adoption Framework (SAF)
Tampa BSides - Chef's Tour of Microsoft Security Adoption Framework (SAF)Tampa BSides - Chef's Tour of Microsoft Security Adoption Framework (SAF)
Tampa BSides - Chef's Tour of Microsoft Security Adoption Framework (SAF)Mark Simos
 
Ensuring Technical Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365
Ensuring Technical Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365Ensuring Technical Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365
Ensuring Technical Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 3652toLead Limited
 
TrustArc Webinar - How to Build Consumer Trust Through Data Privacy
TrustArc Webinar - How to Build Consumer Trust Through Data PrivacyTrustArc Webinar - How to Build Consumer Trust Through Data Privacy
TrustArc Webinar - How to Build Consumer Trust Through Data PrivacyTrustArc
 
Search Engine Optimization SEO PDF for 2024.pdf
Search Engine Optimization SEO PDF for 2024.pdfSearch Engine Optimization SEO PDF for 2024.pdf
Search Engine Optimization SEO PDF for 2024.pdfRankYa
 

Dernier (20)

The Ultimate Guide to Choosing WordPress Pros and Cons
The Ultimate Guide to Choosing WordPress Pros and ConsThe Ultimate Guide to Choosing WordPress Pros and Cons
The Ultimate Guide to Choosing WordPress Pros and Cons
 
"Debugging python applications inside k8s environment", Andrii Soldatenko
"Debugging python applications inside k8s environment", Andrii Soldatenko"Debugging python applications inside k8s environment", Andrii Soldatenko
"Debugging python applications inside k8s environment", Andrii Soldatenko
 
WordPress Websites for Engineers: Elevate Your Brand
WordPress Websites for Engineers: Elevate Your BrandWordPress Websites for Engineers: Elevate Your Brand
WordPress Websites for Engineers: Elevate Your Brand
 
H2O.ai CEO/Founder: Sri Ambati Keynote at Wells Fargo Day
H2O.ai CEO/Founder: Sri Ambati Keynote at Wells Fargo DayH2O.ai CEO/Founder: Sri Ambati Keynote at Wells Fargo Day
H2O.ai CEO/Founder: Sri Ambati Keynote at Wells Fargo Day
 
Developer Data Modeling Mistakes: From Postgres to NoSQL
Developer Data Modeling Mistakes: From Postgres to NoSQLDeveloper Data Modeling Mistakes: From Postgres to NoSQL
Developer Data Modeling Mistakes: From Postgres to NoSQL
 
Story boards and shot lists for my a level piece
Story boards and shot lists for my a level pieceStory boards and shot lists for my a level piece
Story boards and shot lists for my a level piece
 
DevEX - reference for building teams, processes, and platforms
DevEX - reference for building teams, processes, and platformsDevEX - reference for building teams, processes, and platforms
DevEX - reference for building teams, processes, and platforms
 
TeamStation AI System Report LATAM IT Salaries 2024
TeamStation AI System Report LATAM IT Salaries 2024TeamStation AI System Report LATAM IT Salaries 2024
TeamStation AI System Report LATAM IT Salaries 2024
 
Powerpoint exploring the locations used in television show Time Clash
Powerpoint exploring the locations used in television show Time ClashPowerpoint exploring the locations used in television show Time Clash
Powerpoint exploring the locations used in television show Time Clash
 
Merck Moving Beyond Passwords: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Merck Moving Beyond Passwords: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptxMerck Moving Beyond Passwords: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
Merck Moving Beyond Passwords: FIDO Paris Seminar.pptx
 
Hyperautomation and AI/ML: A Strategy for Digital Transformation Success.pdf
Hyperautomation and AI/ML: A Strategy for Digital Transformation Success.pdfHyperautomation and AI/ML: A Strategy for Digital Transformation Success.pdf
Hyperautomation and AI/ML: A Strategy for Digital Transformation Success.pdf
 
CloudStudio User manual (basic edition):
CloudStudio User manual (basic edition):CloudStudio User manual (basic edition):
CloudStudio User manual (basic edition):
 
Artificial intelligence in cctv survelliance.pptx
Artificial intelligence in cctv survelliance.pptxArtificial intelligence in cctv survelliance.pptx
Artificial intelligence in cctv survelliance.pptx
 
DMCC Future of Trade Web3 - Special Edition
DMCC Future of Trade Web3 - Special EditionDMCC Future of Trade Web3 - Special Edition
DMCC Future of Trade Web3 - Special Edition
 
Human Factors of XR: Using Human Factors to Design XR Systems
Human Factors of XR: Using Human Factors to Design XR SystemsHuman Factors of XR: Using Human Factors to Design XR Systems
Human Factors of XR: Using Human Factors to Design XR Systems
 
Unraveling Multimodality with Large Language Models.pdf
Unraveling Multimodality with Large Language Models.pdfUnraveling Multimodality with Large Language Models.pdf
Unraveling Multimodality with Large Language Models.pdf
 
Tampa BSides - Chef's Tour of Microsoft Security Adoption Framework (SAF)
Tampa BSides - Chef's Tour of Microsoft Security Adoption Framework (SAF)Tampa BSides - Chef's Tour of Microsoft Security Adoption Framework (SAF)
Tampa BSides - Chef's Tour of Microsoft Security Adoption Framework (SAF)
 
Ensuring Technical Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365
Ensuring Technical Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365Ensuring Technical Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365
Ensuring Technical Readiness For Copilot in Microsoft 365
 
TrustArc Webinar - How to Build Consumer Trust Through Data Privacy
TrustArc Webinar - How to Build Consumer Trust Through Data PrivacyTrustArc Webinar - How to Build Consumer Trust Through Data Privacy
TrustArc Webinar - How to Build Consumer Trust Through Data Privacy
 
Search Engine Optimization SEO PDF for 2024.pdf
Search Engine Optimization SEO PDF for 2024.pdfSearch Engine Optimization SEO PDF for 2024.pdf
Search Engine Optimization SEO PDF for 2024.pdf
 

Das presentation 2011

  • 1. Taking D t t th N t L T ki Data to the Next Level l Developing Data to Assess Student Progression Maury Pearl, LACCD Institutional Effectiveness September 23, 2011
  • 2. High Interest in Student Progression High Interest in Student Progression • Understanding the Complete Picture  – Short‐term measures Short term measures – Longer term perspective • Research Findings –LLow rates of student progression t f t d t i – Achievement  gaps • Desire for Improvement  p o Describe student progression o Identify problems or issue along path o Research possible explanations Research possible explanations o Design and implement interventions o Assess and evaluate
  • 3. Student Progress Research Questions Student Progress Research Questions • What has been the progress of first time first-time program pursuing students (students who attempted 12 units or more in the first year) who were assessed and placed in Basic Skills Math? • Does progress vary by ethnicity?
  • 4. Basic Skills Math Improvement Over Three Years* Progress of first-time program pursuing students (attempted 12 units or more in the first year) who were assessed and placed in Basic Skills Math. Fall 05: assessed=9,201, placed in BS=6,549 Fall 06: assessed=9,482, placed in BS=6,563 Fall 07: assessed=10 040 placed in BS=6 915 assessed=10,040, BS=6,915 * Over the three cohorts, 70% of those assessed in Math have been placed in the basic skills levels. 100% Of Those Placed in Basic Skills Math 75% 69% 70% 69% 50% 42% 42% 41% 33% 35% 36% 25% 18% 20% 20% 8% 10% 9% 0% Enrolled in Completed 1st Passed Passed Passed College Recommended Course in 1st Elementary Intermediate Algebra/ Course in 1st Year Algebra Algebra or Transfer Level Year Geometry Math Fall 05 Cohort Fall 06 Cohort Fall 07 Cohort
  • 5. Progress Of Fall 2007 Cohort Students Placed in Basic Skills Math 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Enrolled in Completed First Passed Passed Passed College Recommended Course in the Elementary Intermediate Algebra / Course in the First Year Algebra Algebra Transfer Level First Year Math Asian Black Hispanic White Amer I d/ A Ind/ Other Non- All Asian Black Hispanic White White Students Enrolled in Recommended 67.6% 62.4% 73.7% 62.3% 57.4% 69.8% Course in the First Year Completed First Course in 50.6% 50 6% 26.4% 26 4% 43.5% 43 5% 44.9% 44 9% 40.6% 40 6% 41.6% 41 6% the First Year Passed Elementary Algebra 47.2% 18.5% 36.8% 46.8% 43.9% 36.2% Passed Intermediate Algebra 30.6% 7.3% 19.7% 26.3% 19.4% 19.5% Passed College Algebra / 17.7% 3.1% 9.1% 12.0% 8.4% 9.2% Transfer Level Math Supplemental Slides 1
  • 6. Student Outcomes Database Student Outcomes Database • Student unit record (SUR) • Currently based Fall 2007 cohort • Includes student characteristics (age, gender,  ( g ,g , ethnicity, student status)  • Contains outcomes (units attempted units Contains outcomes (units attempted, units  completed, attempted BS English, attempted  BS Math, …, completed degree or certificate) BS Math, , completed degree or certificate) • Database
  • 7. Outcomes Database Variable Name Variable Description ID Student ID CAMPUS Campus SEM Term of entry SEX Student gender AGE Student age group (at the time of entry) 1.00 Under 20 2.00 20 - 24 3.00 25 - 34 4.00 35 - 54 5.00 55 and over 9.00 Unknown ETHNIC Student ethnicity 1.00 .00 Asian s a 2.00 Black 3.00 Hispanic 4.00 White 5.00 Amer Ind/Other Non-White 6.00 Unknown/Decline to State NEW Entering status 2.0 1st Time Student 2.4 Former Concurrent Student This College 2.6 Former Concurrent Student Another College UNATTMPT Units attempted in Fall 07 UNCOMPLT Units completed in Fall 07 POINT1 Student attempted units in Fall 07 (1=yes) POINT2 Student completed units in Fall 07 (1=yes) ATT20081 Units attempted in Spring 2008 POINT3 Student attempted units in Spring 08 (1=yes) ATT20083 Units attempted in Fall 08 POINT4 Student attempted units in Fall 08 (1=yes) COMPENGL Student completed any basic skills English/ESL (1=yes) COMPMATH Student completed any basic skills math (1=yes) COMPE101 Student completed English 101 (1=yes) COMPM125 Student completed Math 125 (1=yes) COMPBOTH Student completed English 101 and Math 125 (1=yes) TOTCOMPL Total units completed COMP60UN Student completed 60 units or more (1=yes) TRANMATH Student completed transfer-level math (1=yes) DEGRCERT Student completed degree or certificate (1=yes) Supplemental Slides 2
  • 8. Research Using Outcomes Database Research Using Outcomes Database Analysis of Academic Pipeline and Exit Points • City y • Mission
  • 11. Degree‐Seeking Academic Pipeline @ Los Angeles Mission College Fall 2007 Cohort – Academic Years of Study: 07‐08, 08‐09, 09‐10, 10‐11 Exhibit 1 Taking Placement Test Results Cohort Fall 2007 = 1278 Level of Readiness Total %  Not taking placement test Not taking placement test 327 26%31 Earned Award 26%31 Earned Award Take placement test 951 74% College ready (M125 & E101 or  E28) 53 5.6% Need English only (M125) 29 3.0% Need Math only (E101 or E28) 222 23.3% Need both 647 68.0% 951 100.0% Exhibit 2 ‐ Momentum Point 1 Attempted and Completed units in Fall 2007 Level of Readiness Original cohort Attempted % Completed % College ready (M125 & E101 or  E28) 53 53 100% 48 91% Need english only (M125) 29 29 100% 27 93% Need math only (E101 and/or  E28) 222 222 100% 195 88% Need both 647 647 100% 474 73% 744 Exhibit 3 ‐ Momentum point 2 Attempted and Success Developmental Courses No.  Attempte Level of Readiness Original Cohort d % Attempted No. Success % Success Need English only (M125) N d E li h l (M125) 29 23 79% 19 83% Need Math only (E101 and/or  E28) 222 182 82% 130 71% Need both 647 571 88% 356 62% Dev Math courses 478 74% 265 55% Dev ESL courses 459 71% 291 63% 776 505 Exhibit 4 ‐ Momentum Point 3 Completed both E101 and M125 Completed 60 units or more %  % Completed  Completed 60 Units or  Level of Readiness Original cohort both both more % College ready (M125 & E101 or  E28) 53 37 70% 26 49% Need english only (M125) 29 14 48% 17 59% Need math only (E101 and/or  E28) 222 57 26% 58 26% Need both Need both 647 77 12% 128 20% 185 229 Exhibit 5 ‐ Momentum point 4 Earned an Award or Still Enrolled in Fall 2011 Still  % Still  Level of Readiness Original cohort Enrolled Enrolled Awards % Awards College ready (M125 & E101 or  E28) 53 12 23% 19 36% Need english only (M125) g y( ) 29 6 21% 10 34% Need math only (E101 and/or  E28) 222 42 19% 33 15% Need both 647 130 20% 54 8% 190 116 Supplemental Slides 4
  • 12. Students Entering and Leaving the Pipeline From Fall 2007 to Spring 2011 Fall 2007 Cohort (FTIC)  1000 900 207 800 700 600 239 Unsuccess/Incompleted 500 951 Success/Completed 400 744 276 320 300 505 200 113 100 229 185 116 0 Take placement  Completed any  Successful  Completed 60  Completed E101  Earned awards test in Fall 07 units in Fall 07 completed dev.  units or more and M125 courses
  • 13. Directions for Outcomes Database Directions for Outcomes Database • Online access and analytical tools Online access and analytical tools • Additional data elements • Other Ideas?