Contenu connexe
Similaire à What is strategy by Michael Porter (20)
What is strategy by Michael Porter
- 1. What is Strategy?
Professor Michael E. Porter
Harvard Business School
Business Strategy Executive Education
June 3, 2008
This presentation draws on ideas from Professor Porter’s books and articles, in particular, Competitive Strategy (The Free Press, 1980); Competitive
p
,
p
,
p
gy (
,
);
p
Advantage (The Free Press, 1985); “What is Strategy?” (Harvard Business Review, Nov/Dec 1996); “Strategy and the Internet” (Harvard Business
Review, March 2001); and a forthcoming book. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or
by any means—electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise—without the permission of Michael E. Porter. Additional information may
be found at the website of the Institute for Strategy and Competitiveness, www.isc.hbs.edu. Version: May 20, 2pm
20080603 – SBSCA (strategy Exec Ed).ppt
1
Copyright 2007 © Professor Michael E. Porter
- 2. How Managers Think About Competition
COMPETING TO BE THE
BEST
COMPETING TO BE UNIQUE
• The worst error in strategy is to compete with rivals on the same
dimensions
20080603 – SBSCA (strategy Exec Ed).ppt
2
Copyright 2007 © Professor Michael E. Porter
- 3. Flawed Concepts of Strategy
• Strategy as action
–
–
–
–
–
“Our strategy is to merge…”
“… internationalize…”
“… consolidate the industry…”
y
“… outsource…”
“…double our R&D budget…”
• Strategy as aspiration
–
–
–
–
“Our strategy is to be #1 or #2…”
“Our strategy is to grow…”
“Our strategy is to be the world leader…”
“Our strategy is to provide superior returns to our shareholders…”
• St t
Strategy as vision
i i
– “Our strategy is to best understand and satisfy our customers’
needs…”
– “… provide superior products and services ”
services…
– “…to advance technology for mankind…”
20080603 – SBSCA (strategy Exec Ed).ppt
3
Copyright 2007 © Professor Michael E. Porter
- 4. Setting the Right Goals
• The fundamental goal of a company is superior long-term return on
investment
• Growth is good only if superiority in ROIC is achieved and sustained
– ROIC threshold
• Profitability must be measured realistically, capturing the actual profits
on the full investment
• Profitability metrics besides ROIC (e.g., return on sales; ebitda
margin; pro-forma earnings; and cash flow margin) are risky
for strategy
• Prevalent accounting adjustments to reported profitability
(e.g., writeoffs, restructuring charges) can obscure true
economic performance and lead to bad competitive choices
• Goodwill must be treated as part of investment
• Setting unrealistic profitability or growth targets can undermine
strategy
20080603 – SBSCA (strategy Exec Ed).ppt
4
Copyright 2007 © Professor Michael E. Porter
- 5. Economic Performance versus Shareholder Value
Economic
Performance
Shareholder Value
• Sustained ROIC
• Stock Price
• S t i bl R
Sustainable Revenue
Growth
• EPS
• EPS Growth
• Shareholder value is the result of creating real economic value
• Pleasing today’s shareholders is not the goal
20080603 – SBSCA (strategy Exec Ed).ppt
5
Copyright 2007 © Professor Michael E. Porter
- 6. Levels of Strategy
Competitive or
Business Strategy
• How to compete in each distinct business or
industry
Group or Corporate Strategy
• The company’s mix of businesses and the way
that business unit strategies are integrated
20080603 – SBSCA (strategy Exec Ed).ppt
6
Copyright 2008 © Professor Michael E. Porter
- 7. Economic Foundations of Competition
• The fundamental unit of strategic analysis is the business or industry
− Defining the relevant industry is important to strategy
• Company economic performance results from two distinct causes
Industry
Structure
Relative Position
Within the
Industry
- Overall Rules of Competition
- Sources of Competitive Advantage
• Strategic thinking must encompass both
20080603 – SBSCA (strategy Exec Ed).ppt
7
Copyright 2007 © Professor Michael E. Porter
- 8. Disaggregating Economic Performance:
Industry vs. Position
35%
31.4%
30.8%
30%
Return on
Invested
Capital
1992-2006
25%
25.4%
20%
15%
10%
9.6%
5%
0%
Reebok International
Paccar
Industry Average
Note: ‘Invested capital less excess cash’ is the average of the beginning period and the ending period values. Excess cash is calculated by subtracting cash in
excess of 10% of annual revenue.
Source: Compustat (2007), author’s analysis
20080603 – SBSCA (strategy Exec Ed).ppt
8
Copyright 2007 © Professor Michael E. Porter
- 9. Determinants of Industry Profitability
Threat of Substitute
Products
P d t or Services
S i
Bargaining Power
of Suppliers
Rivalry Among
Existing
Competitors
Bargaining Power
of Buyers
y
Threat of New
Entrants
20080603 – SBSCA (strategy Exec Ed).ppt
9
Copyright 2007 © Professor Michael E. Porter
- 10. Strategic Implications of Industry Structure
Positioning to Mute the Five Forces
Heavy Truck Industry
Threat of Substitute
Products or
Services
• Railroads
• Water transportation
Bargaining Power
of Suppliers
• Large independent
suppliers of engines
and drive train
components
Rivalry Among
Existing
g
Competitors
• Heavy price
competition on
standardized models
Bargaining Power
of Buyers
y
• Large fleets
• Leasing companies
• Small fleets and owner
operators
Threat of New
Entrants
• Many truck producers
are assemblers
20080603 – SBSCA (strategy Exec Ed).ppt
10
Copyright 2007 © Professor Michael E. Porter
- 11. Paccar Competitive Positioning
• Focus on owner-operators
• D i t k with special f t
Design trucks ith
i l features and amenities
d
iti
• Customization and build-to-order
• Achieve low truck operating costs
• Offer extensive roadside assistance to truckers
20080603 – SBSCA (strategy Exec Ed).ppt
11
Copyright 2007 © Professor Michael E. Porter
- 12. Determinants of Relative Performance
Differentiation
(Higher Price)
Competitive
Advantage
Lower Cost
20080603 – SBSCA (strategy Exec Ed).ppt
12
Copyright 2007 © Professor Michael E. Porter
- 13. Foundations of Economic Performance
The Value Chain
Firm Infrastructure
(e.g. Financing, Planning, Investor Relations)
Human Resource Management
Support
Activities
(e.g. Recruiting, Training, Compensation System)
(
R
iti
T i i
C
ti S t )
Technology Development
(e.g. Product Design, Testing, Process Design, Material Research, Market Research)
M
(e.g. Components, Machinery, Advertising,
(e g Components Machinery Advertising Services)
Inbound
Logistics
Operations
(e.g.
(e g Incoming
Material
Storage, Data
Collection,
Service,
Customer
Access)
)
(e.g. Assembly,
(e g Assembly
Component
Fabrication,
Branch
Operations)
Value
a
Procurement
r
g
Outbound
Logistics
Marketing
& Sales
After-Sales
Service
(e.g.
(e g Order
Processing,
Warehousing,
Report
Preparation)
(e.g.
(e g Sales
Force,
Promotion,
Advertising,
Proposal
Writing, Web
site)
)
What
buyers are
willing to
pay
(e.g. Installation,
(e g Installation
Customer
Support,
Complaint
Resolution,
Repair)
i
n
Primary Activities
• Competing in a business involves performing a set of discrete
activities, in which competitive advantage resides
20080603 – SBSCA (strategy Exec Ed).ppt
13
Copyright 2007 © Professor Michael E. Porter
- 14. Defining the Value Chain
Homebuilding
Firm Infrastructure
(e.g. Financing, Planning
(e g Financing Planning, Investor Relations)
Human Resource Management
Support
Activities
(e.g. Recruiting, Training, Compensation System)
Technology Development
(e.g. Product Design, Testing, Process Design, Materials Research, Market Research)
M
(e.g. Materials, Subcontracted Labor, Advertising, Services)
Land Acquisition
q
& Development
(Identify attractive
markets, Secure
land, Procure
entitlements and
permits, Prepare
site)
Construction
Value
a
Procurement
Marketing
g
& Sales
(Design,
(Lead generation,
Engineering,
Model home
Schedule and
display, Sales
manage
force, Customer
construction
selection of
process)
personalized
options)
Closing
(e.g. Customer
Financing,
Contract, Title,
Closing)
r
g
After-Sales
Service
i
n
What
buyers are
willing to
pay
(e.g. Warranties,
Customer
Complaints)
Primary Activities
• There can be different ways of configuring the value chain in the same industry
20080603 – SBSCA (strategy Exec Ed).ppt
14
Copyright 2007 © Professor Michael E. Porter
- 15. Achieving Superior Performance
Operational Effectiveness is Not Strategy
Operational
Effectiveness
Strategic
Positioning
• Assimilating, attaining, and
extending best practices
•
Run the same race faster
20080603 – SBSCA (strategy Exec Ed).ppt
Creating a unique and
sustainable competitive
position
Choose to run a different race
15
Copyright 2007 © Professor Michael E. Porter
- 16. Five Tests of a Good Strategy
• A unique value proposition
compared to other organizations
• A different, tailored value chain
• Clear tradeoffs, and choosing what
not to do
• Activities that fit together and
reinforce each other
• Strategic continuity with continual
improvement in realizing the
strategy
20080603 – SBSCA (strategy Exec Ed).ppt
16
Copyright 2007 © Professor Michael E. Porter
- 17. Strategic Positioning
Enterprise Rent-A-Car
Distinctive
Activities
Value Proposition
• Numerous, small, inexpensive offices in each
• Home-city replacement cars for drivers
whose cars are being repaired or who need
an extra vehicle, at low rates (30% below
airport rates)
p
)
metropolitan area, including on-premises offices at
major accounts
• Open during daylight hours
• Deliver cars to customers’ homes or rental sites, or
deliver customers to cars
• Acquire new and older cars, favoring soon-to-be
discontinued older models
• Keep cars six months longer than other major
rental companies
• In-house reservations
• Grassroots marketing with limited television
• Cultivate strong relationships with auto
dealerships, body shops, and insurance adjusters
• Hire extroverted college graduates to encourage
community interaction and customer service
• Employ a highly sophisticated computer network to
track the fleet
20080603 – SBSCA (strategy Exec Ed).ppt
17
Copyright 2007 © Professor Michael E. Porter
- 18. Defining the Value Proposition
What
Customers?
C
?
•
•
Which
Needs?
N d ?
•
•
•
What end users?
What h
Wh t channels?
l ?
Which products?
Which features?
Whi h f t
?
Which services?
What Relative
Price?
• A novel value proposition can grow the pie/expand the industry
20080603 – SBSCA (strategy Exec Ed).ppt
18
Copyright 2007 © Professor Michael E. Porter
- 19. Strategic Positioning
IKEA, Sweden
Distinctive
Di ti ti
Activities
Value Proposition
•
• Young first time or price-sensitive buyers who
Young,
time, price sensitive
want stylish, space efficient and scalable
furniture and accessories at very low price
points.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
20080603 – SBSCA (strategy Exec Ed).ppt
19
Modular, ready to assemble
Modular ready-to-assemble, easy to package
designs
In-house design of all products
Wide range of styles displayed in huge
warehouse stores with large on-site inventories
on site
Self-selection
Extensive customer information in the form of
catalogs, explanatory ticketing, do-it-yourself
videos, and assembly instructions
y
Ikea designer names attached to products to
inform coordinated purchases
Long hours of operation
Suburban locations with large parking lots
On-site, low-cost, restaurants
Child care provided in the store
Self-delivery by most customers
Copyright 2007 © Professor Michael E. Porter
- 20. Strategic Positioning
Whole Foods Markets
Distinctive
Activities
Value Proposition
•
• Natural fresh, organic and prepared foods and
Natural, fresh organic,
health items with excellent service at premium
prices
•
•
• Educated, middle class, and affluent customers
passionate about food as a part of a healthy
lifestyle
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
20080603 – SBSCA (strategy Exec Ed).ppt
20
Well-lit,
Well lit inviting supermarket store formats with
appealing displays and extensive prepared
foods sections
Produce section as “theater”
Café-style seating areas with wireless internet
y
g
for meetings and meals
Each store carries local produce and has the
authority to contract with the local farmers
Information and education provided to
shoppers along with products
High touch in-store customer service via
knowledgeable, non-unionized, highly
motivated personnel
Egalitarian compensation structure
Own seafood procurement and processing
facilities to control quality (and price) from the
boat to the counter
Donates 5% of profits to non profits
non-profits
Each store has “green projects,” directed by
employees, to improve environmental
performance
Copyright 2007 © Professor Michael E. Porter
- 21. Strategic Positioning
BMW
Value Proposition
• S
Superior-engineered, hi h performance,
i
i
d high
f
sporty, customized automobiles at a
premium price
Distinctive
Activities
• “A ti driving” design philosophy
“Active d i i ” d i
hil
h
• Highly unique product and engine
performance
• Centralized engineering
• Design department with high degree of
autonomy to encourage creativity
• Factories configured for customization
• High craft labor input in production with
selective automation
• High vertical integration to achieve
proprietary components
• One global brand
• Limited dealer system
Non traditional, brand focused
• Non-traditional, brand-focused marketing
• BMW-sponsored race team
Source: Draws on research conducted by Harvard Business School students M. Collardin, F. Cueto, J. Encinar, A. Gonzalez, A. Kulyk, and D. Smith, April 1997
21
Copyright 2007 © Professor Michael E. Porter
20080603 – SBSCA (strategy Exec Ed).ppt
- 22. Making Strategic Tradeoffs
• Tradeoffs occur when strategic positions are incompatible
– The need for a choice
Sources of Tradeoffs
– Incompatible product / service features or attributes
– Differences in the best configuration of activities in the value chain to deliver
the chosen value proposition
– Inconsistencies in image or reputation across positions
– Limits on internal coordination, measurement, motivation, and control
• Tradeoffs make a strategy sustainable against imitation by established
rivals
i l
• A essential part of strategy is choosing what not t do
An
ti l
t f t t
i h
i
h t t to d
20080603 – SBSCA (strategy Exec Ed).ppt
22
Copyright 2007 © Professor Michael E. Porter
- 23. Strategic Tradeoffs
Neutrogena Soap (1990)
•
Forgo cleaning, skin softening, and deodorizing
features
•
Choose higher costs through the configuration of:
– packaging
– manufacturing
– detailing
– medical advertising
– skin research
•
Give up the ability to reach customers via:
– promotions
– television
– some distribution channels
20080603 – SBSCA (strategy Exec Ed).ppt
23
Copyright 2007 © Professor Michael E. Porter
- 24. Strategic Tradeoffs
IKEA, Sweden
Typical Furniture Retailer
IKEA
Product
• Low-priced, modular, ready-to-assemble
p
,
,
y
designs
• No custom options
Product
• Higher p
g
priced, fully assembled p
,
y
products
• Customization of fabrics, colors, finishes,
and sizes
• Design driven by image, materials, varieties
• Furniture design driven by cost,
manufacturing simplicity, and style
Value Chain
• Centralized, in-house design of all products
Value Chain
• Source some or all lines from outside
suppliers
• Medium sized showrooms with limited
portion of available models on display
• Limited inventories / order with lead time
• Extensive sales assistance
• All styles on display in huge warehouse stores
• Large on-site inventories
• Limited sales help, but extensive customer
help
information
• Long hours of operation
20080603 – SBSCA (strategy Exec Ed).ppt
• Traditional retail hours
24
Copyright 2007 © Professor Michael E. Porter
- 25. Typical Thinking on the Sources of Competitive Advantage
• “Key” Success Factors
• “Core” Competencies
• “Critical” Resources
• Competitive advantage is seen as concentrated in a few parts of the
g
value chain
20080603 – SBSCA (strategy Exec Ed).ppt
25
Copyright 2007 © Professor Michael E. Porter
- 26. Mutually Reinforcing Activities
Zara Apparel
Word-ofWord-ofmouth
th
marketing
and repeat
buying
CuttingCuttingedge fashion
at moderate
price and
quality
Customers
C t
chic but
costcostconscious
Wide
Wid
range of
styles
Global
team of
trendspotters
Majority
of
productio
n in
Europe
Very
frequent
product
changes
Little media
advertising
Advanced
Ad
d
productio
n
machiner
y
Extensive
use of
store
sales
data
Prime store
locations in
high traffic
areas
JIT delivery
Tight
coordination
with 20
wholly-owned
factories
Very
flexible
productio
n system
• Fit is leveraging what is different to be more different
Source: Draws on research by Jorge Lopez Ramon (IESE) at the Institute for Strategy and Competitiveness, HBS
26
20080603 – SBSCA (strategy Exec Ed).ppt
Copyright 2007 © Professor Michael E. Porter
- 27. IKEA Activity System
Suburban
locations with
ample parking
Instructions
and support for
customer
assembly
Ease of
transport and
assembly
Self delivery
and assembly
by most
customers
Increased
likelihood of
follow-on
purchase
Modular,
Modular
scalable
furniture
designs
‘Knock-down’
kit packaging
20080603 – SBSCA (strategy Exec Ed).ppt
High traffic
g
store layout
Limited Sales
Staffing
Explanatory
catalogs,
informative
displays and
labels
Selfselection by
customer
More
impulse
buying
Ample
inventory on
site
Complete line of
furniture and
accessories to
furnish home
In-house
design focused
on cost of
manufacturing
High variety,
but ease of
manufacturing
27
Designer
identification of
compatible
lines
Year-round
stocking to
even out
production
Low
manufacturing
cost
100 percent
t
sourcing from
long-term
suppliers
Copyright 2007 © Professor Michael E. Porter
- 28. Strategic Continuity
• Continuity of strategy is fundamental to sustainable competitive advantage
–
–
–
–
e.g., allowing the organization to understand the strategy
building truly unique skills and assets related to the strategy
g
y
gy
establishing a clear identity with customers, channels, and other outside entities
strengthening fit across the value chain
• R i
Reinvention and f
ti
d frequent shifts in direction are costly and confuse the
t hift i di
ti
tl
d
f
th
customer, the industry, and the organization
• Maintain continuity in the value proposition
• Continuously improve ways to realize the value proposition
– Strategic continuity and continuous change should occur simultaneously. They are not
inconsistent
• Continuity of strategy allows learning and change to be faster and more effective
20080603 – SBSCA (strategy Exec Ed).ppt
28
Copyright 2007 © Professor Michael E. Porter
- 29. Barriers to Strategy
Flawed Management Concepts
• Misunderstanding of strategy itself
• Poor industry definition
Industry Convergence Pressures
y
g
• Industry conventional wisdom leads all companies to follow
common practices
• Labor agreements limit ways of configuring activities
• Regulation constrains price, product, service or process alternatives
• Customers ask for incompatible features or request new products or
services that do not fit the strategy
20080603 – SBSCA (strategy Exec Ed).ppt
29
Copyright 2007 © Professor Michael E. Porter
- 30. Barriers to Strategy
Internal Practices
• Inappropriate goals and performance metrics bias strategy choices
– Size over profitability
– Short time horizon
• Rapid turnover of leadership undermines strategic direction to
achieve short-term performance benefits
• A desire for consensus blurs strategic tradeoffs
• Inappropriate cost allocation leads to too many products, services,
or customers
• Outsourcing makes activities homogenous and less distinctive
20080603 – SBSCA (strategy Exec Ed).ppt
30
Copyright 2007 © Professor Michael E. Porter
- 31. Barriers to Strategy
Capital Market Biases
• Strong pressure for short-term “surprises” in earnings or revenue
• Strong pressure to grow faster than the industry
y
y
g
• Industry-wide analyst metrics are misaligned with true value and
drive strategic convergence
• Strong pressures to emulate currently “successful” peers
• A strong bias for “doing deals” (M&A)
• Over-weighting of equity-based management compensation
Over weighting equity based
amplifies such unhealthy pressures
20080603 – SBSCA (strategy Exec Ed).ppt
31
Copyright 2007 © Professor Michael E. Porter
- 32. Defining the Relevant Industry
Foodservice Distribution
Broadline Distribution
Systems Distribution
• Customers are independent restaurants
and institutions
• Customers are national chains
• The product line consists of well over
10,000 SKUs
• The product line consists of several
hundred SKUs
• Sales and service activities are carried
out by local sales reps
• Customer relationships and services
are specified by national contracts
• Value-added services, credit terms, and
distributors’ private-label products are
valued and allow support product/service
differentiation
• Price is the key basis for selection;
customers do not purchase valueadded services or private-label
p
products
• Logistical activities are heavily local in
nature (local warehouses and trucks)
• A national distribution and
warehousing network is required
• Tools for industry definition: the 5 Forces and the Value Chain
20080603 – SBSCA (strategy Exec Ed).ppt
32
Copyright 2007 © Professor Michael E. Porter
- 33. Finding a Unique Strategic Position
Segmenting the Industry
(not just the Market)
• Creatively segmenting product
varieties, customer groups, a d
a e es, cus o e g oups, and
purchase occasions
Exploiting Tradeoffs
• Identifying tradeoffs in the value
proposition or in the value chain
Leveraging Unique Activities
g g
q
Capitalizing on Industry Dynamics
p
g
y y
• Building off activities with true
• Identifying strategic positions opened
uniqueness
up by industry structural changes
• Looking for new activity configurations
and combinations
• Migrate toward the chosen strategic position
• Focus incremental investments on reinforcing the chosen strategy
20080603 – SBSCA (strategy Exec Ed).ppt
33
Copyright 2007 © Professor Michael E. Porter
- 34. Segmentation and Strategic Positioning
Automobile Insurance
Progressive
Geico
Customer Group
• High-risk drivers shunned by standard
automobile insurers
Customer Group
• “Preferred”, lowest risk drivers
Set of Activities
• Distribution primarily through independent
agents
• Sales force that educates independent agents in
complex information gathering techniques
• 30-year database on high-risk drivers
• Complex rating scheme
• 14,000 different prices
• 50-300% premium pricing over standard
segment
• Adjusters work from offices on wheels to provide
immediate response. Adj t
i
di t
Adjusters t i d and
trained d
empowered to write out check at scene of
accident
• Steep incentives to make a 4% underwriting
profit
• Conservative, liquid investment portfolio
Set of Activities
• Direct customer interaction through direct mail,
telephone, and the Internet
• Sophisticated direct mail targeting low risk
households
• 35+ year database and modeling utilities on
preferred drivers
• Complex rating and pricing system
• Heavy advertising to drive requests for rate
quotes (“I’ve got good news.”)
• Quote rates to only 50% of customers who
inquire about coverage
• 15-20% lower prices than competition
• Network of insurance adjusters with cell phones
working out of own vehicles for immediate
response
• 24-hour customer service to handle sales, policy
inquires, and claims
• Conservative, liquid investment portfolio
20080603 – SBSCA (strategy Exec Ed).ppt
34
Copyright 2007 © Professor Michael E. Porter
- 35. Growing Strategically
1. Make the strategy even more distinctive
− Introduce new technologies features products or services that are tailored to
technologies, features,
the strategy and which leverage other distinctive activities within the value
chain
2. Deepen the strategic position (rather than broaden it)
– Raise the penetration of chosen customers / needs
3. Expand geographically to tap new regions or countries using the same
positioning
– Aggressively reposition foreign acquisitions around the company’s strategy
4. Expand the market for what the company can uniquely deliver
– Find other customers and segments that value the strategy
•
•
•
•
It is an illusion that growth (and especially profitability) are
easier to achieve in untapped or growth segments
It is difficult, and often dangerous, to try to grow faster than the
underlying market for an extended period.
Industry leaders should concentrate as much, or more, on
growing the category as on growing share
In many cases, shareholders are best served by earning a high
return and returning capital, especially via dividends
20080603 – SBSCA (strategy Exec Ed).ppt
35
Copyright 2007 © Professor Michael E. Porter
- 36. Strategy
What is Not a Strategy?
What Is a Strategy?
• A unique value proposition
compared to other organizations
p
g
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
• A different, tailored value chain
• Clear tradeoffs, and choosing what
not to do
• Activities that fit together and
reinforce each other
• Strategic continuity with
continual improvement in realizing
the strategy
20080603 – SBSCA (strategy Exec Ed).ppt
36
Best practice improvement
Execution
Aspirations
A vision
Learning
Agility
Flexibility
Innovation
The Internet (or any technology)
Downsizing
Restructuring
Mergers / Consolidation
Alliances / Partnering
Outsourcing
Internationalizing
Copyright 2007 © Professor Michael E. Porter
- 37. The Role of Leaders in Strategy
• Drive operational improvement but clearly distinguish it from strategy
• Lead the process of choosing the company’s unique position
– The CEO is the chief strategist
– Th choice of strategy cannot b entirely d
The h i
f
be
i l democratic
i
•
Communicate the strategy relentlessly to all constituencies
– Harness the moral purpose of strategy
• Maintain discipline around the strategy, in the face of many distractions.
• Decide which industry changes, technologies, and customer needs to
respond to and how the response can be tailored to the company s strategy
to,
company’s
• Measure progress against the strategy using tailored metrics that capture
the implications of the strategy for serving customers and performing
particular activities
• Sell the company’s strategy and how to evaluate progress against the
strategy to the financial markets
• Commitment to strategy is tested every day
20080603 – SBSCA (strategy Exec Ed).ppt
37
Copyright 2007 © Professor Michael E. Porter