SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  10
Hunter Powell
Ms. Washington’s class
       Government

     February 11, 2013
Powell vs. Alabama
“The Scottsboro Boys”
Who are the players in this court
case? Who too the matter to court?
   Plaintiff:
       Charlie Weems, Ozie Powell, Clarence Norris,
        Olen Montgomery, Willie Roberson,
        Haywood Patterson, Andrew (Andy) Wright,
        Leroy (Roy) Wright and Eugene Williams –
        also known as the Scottsboro Boys
       Represented by ACLU Attorney Walter
        Pollack

   Defendant
       State of Alabama
What?
   Nine, young, African American
    men were accused of raping
    two white women while
    traveling on a freight train
       The young men stood trial in
        Scottsboro, AL and were
        convicted of the rape and all
        but one were sentenced to
        death for the crime
       ACLU Attorney Walter Pollack
        appealed their case to the US
        Supreme Court based on the
        Defendants were denied
        adequate legal counsel.
When?
   1931
        March 25, 1931: Defendants were accused of raping two white women on a freight train
        March 30, 1931: Grand jury indicts all 9 “Scottsboro boys”
        April 6-7, 1931: Before Judge A. E. Hawkins, Clarence Norris and Charlie Weems are tried,
         convicted, and sentenced to death.
        April 7-8, 1931: Haywood Patterson is tried, convicted, and sentenced to death.
        April 8-9, 1931: Olen Montgomery, Ozie Powell, Willie Roberson, Eugene Williams, and
         Andy Wright are tried, convicted, and sentenced to death.
        April 9, 1931: The case against Roy Wright, aged 13, ends in a hung jury when 11 jurors
         seek a death sentence, and one votes for life imprisonment.
        June 22, 1931: The executions of the defendants are stayed pending appeal to the
         Alabama Supreme Court.

   1932
        March 24, 1932: The Alabama Supreme Court, voting 6-1, upholds the convictions of
         seven of the defendants, granting Eugene Williams a new trial because he was a juvenile
         at the time of his conviction.
        May 27, 1932: The United States Supreme Court agrees to hear the case.
        November 7, 1932: In Powell v. Alabama, the U.S. Supreme Court rules that the
         defendants were denied the right to counsel, which violated their right to due process under
         the Fourteenth Amendment. The cases are remanded to the lower court.
        *The following link contains a full timeline of the events of the “Scottsboro boys”
          http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/scottsboro/timeline/timeline2.html
Where?
   The alleged rape took place on a Southern Railroad freight train.
    The train was stopped in Paint Rock, Alabama by an angry posse.
    Nine young African American young men were arrested for assault.
    Rape charges were later added.

   The case was first heard and convictions handed down to all nine
    young men in Scottsboro, Alabama. Upon waiting for their trials,
    eight of the nine defendants stayed in Kilby Prison.

   The case was appealed to the Alabama Supreme Court. The
    Alabama Supreme Court affirmed seven of the eight convictions,
    and granted thirteen-year-old Eugene Williams a new trial because
    he was a juvenile. The case was returned to the lower court and the
    judge allowed a change of venue, moving the retrials to
    Decatur, Alabama.
Why?
   In the height of the depression and tense racial times in the south, a group of young
    black men were involved in an altercation between some white men while traveling on
    a freight train. All but one of the white men were thrown from the train. Two white
    women remained on the train and accused the black men of rape. One of which later
    recanted her accusations.

   The black men were arrested and were denied consultation with legal representation
    until immediately before the trial. The jury’s in all of the trials consisted of only white
    jurors.

   Throughout the proceedings, none of the “Scottsboro” boys was allowed to contact
    their relatives, who lived out of State. On the day of the trial, an out-of-town attorney
    appeared for the defendants but announced that he could not formally represent
    them. The trial judge called on all the local lawyers present to assume responsibility
    for defending the nine young men, but only one agreed. The two lawyers had no
    opportunity to investigate the case or consult with their “clients.” All nine youths were
    found guilty by four separate juries, despite testimony from doctors who said they
    found no evidence of rape upon examining the women. Eight of the nine men
    received the death penalty. The convictions were appealed through the State courts
    of Alabama, and failing there, went to the Supreme Court.
How?
   The case was first heard in Scottsboro, Alabama in three rushed trials,
    where the defendants received poor legal representation. All but the
    thirteen-year-old Roy Wright were convicted of rape and sentenced to
    death, the common sentence in Alabama at the time for black men
    convicted of raping white women. But with help from the
    American Communist Party, the case was appealed. The
    Alabama Supreme Court affirmed seven of the eight convictions, and
    granted thirteen-year-old Eugene Williams a new trial because he was a
    juvenile. Chief Justice John C. Anderson dissented however, ruling that the
    defendants had been denied an impartial jury, fair trial, fair sentencing, and
    effective counsel.
   The case was returned to the lower court and the judge allowed a change of
    venue, moving the retrials to Decatur, Alabama. Judge Horton was
    appointed. During the retrials, one of the alleged victims admitted fabricating
    the rape story and asserted that none of the Scottsboro Boys touched either
    of the white women. The jury found the defendants guilty, but the judge set
    aside the verdict and granted a new trial. After a new series of trials, the
    verdict was the same: guilty. The cases were ultimately tried three times.
    For the third time a jury—now with one black member—returned a third
    guilty verdict. Charges were finally dropped for four of the nine defendants.
    Sentences for the rest ranged from 75 years to death.
Outcome and Opinions

It is my opinion that these young men were
    wrongly accused and wrongly convicted for a
    crime they did not commit. They were poor,
    illiterate, and a minority. They did not receive fair
    trails nor adequate legal representation. Even
    when one of the witness recanted her
    accusations of rape, the courts still convicted
    them of a crime they did not commit.
Bibliography
   The following links were used in research
    for this project:
       http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scottsboro_Boys
       http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/scottsboro/tim
        eline/index.html
       http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/sc
        ottsboro/scottsb.htm
       http://www.infoplease.com/us/supreme-
        court/cases/ar30.html

Contenu connexe

En vedette

The Scottsboro Trial
The Scottsboro TrialThe Scottsboro Trial
The Scottsboro Trialbiancaj5
 
Plessy vs ferguson
Plessy vs fergusonPlessy vs ferguson
Plessy vs fergusona152580
 
Plessy v ferguson presentation
Plessy v ferguson presentationPlessy v ferguson presentation
Plessy v ferguson presentationPreshaylaJames
 
United states v. nixon
United states  v. nixonUnited states  v. nixon
United states v. nixonxsportz28
 
Plessy v. Ferguson
Plessy v. FergusonPlessy v. Ferguson
Plessy v. Fergusonmradrian777
 
Plessy vs ferguson
Plessy vs fergusonPlessy vs ferguson
Plessy vs fergusonKeri Hays
 

En vedette (7)

Scottsboro boys
Scottsboro boysScottsboro boys
Scottsboro boys
 
The Scottsboro Trial
The Scottsboro TrialThe Scottsboro Trial
The Scottsboro Trial
 
Plessy vs ferguson
Plessy vs fergusonPlessy vs ferguson
Plessy vs ferguson
 
Plessy v ferguson presentation
Plessy v ferguson presentationPlessy v ferguson presentation
Plessy v ferguson presentation
 
United states v. nixon
United states  v. nixonUnited states  v. nixon
United states v. nixon
 
Plessy v. Ferguson
Plessy v. FergusonPlessy v. Ferguson
Plessy v. Ferguson
 
Plessy vs ferguson
Plessy vs fergusonPlessy vs ferguson
Plessy vs ferguson
 

Similaire à Powell vs. alabama power point

The Scottsboro Trials
The Scottsboro Trials The Scottsboro Trials
The Scottsboro Trials rollie14
 
Second. ppt2
Second. ppt2Second. ppt2
Second. ppt2mck2
 
TKM Presentation
TKM PresentationTKM Presentation
TKM Presentationa a
 
Scottsboro And Mockingbird
Scottsboro And MockingbirdScottsboro And Mockingbird
Scottsboro And Mockingbirdtranceking
 
The Evolution of An Absolute Right: Assignment of Counsel in Criminal Cases
The Evolution of An Absolute Right: Assignment of Counsel in Criminal CasesThe Evolution of An Absolute Right: Assignment of Counsel in Criminal Cases
The Evolution of An Absolute Right: Assignment of Counsel in Criminal Casesjmuhlnic
 
Scottsboro boys trial pbs
Scottsboro boys trial pbsScottsboro boys trial pbs
Scottsboro boys trial pbssarahvroom
 
English Powerpoint
English PowerpointEnglish Powerpoint
English Powerpointmce43
 
Kill Mock Trial Comp9 K Palmiter
Kill Mock Trial Comp9 K PalmiterKill Mock Trial Comp9 K Palmiter
Kill Mock Trial Comp9 K Palmiterbiancaj5
 
The scottsboro trials
The scottsboro trialsThe scottsboro trials
The scottsboro trialszouk246
 
Race-Based Jury Nullification
Race-Based Jury NullificationRace-Based Jury Nullification
Race-Based Jury NullificationVisualBee.com
 
Important Supreme Court Cases
Important Supreme Court CasesImportant Supreme Court Cases
Important Supreme Court CasesCory Plough
 
The scottsboro trial
The scottsboro trialThe scottsboro trial
The scottsboro trialMeghan Payne
 

Similaire à Powell vs. alabama power point (13)

The Scottsboro Trials
The Scottsboro Trials The Scottsboro Trials
The Scottsboro Trials
 
Second. ppt2
Second. ppt2Second. ppt2
Second. ppt2
 
TKM Presentation
TKM PresentationTKM Presentation
TKM Presentation
 
Scottsboro And Mockingbird
Scottsboro And MockingbirdScottsboro And Mockingbird
Scottsboro And Mockingbird
 
The Evolution of An Absolute Right: Assignment of Counsel in Criminal Cases
The Evolution of An Absolute Right: Assignment of Counsel in Criminal CasesThe Evolution of An Absolute Right: Assignment of Counsel in Criminal Cases
The Evolution of An Absolute Right: Assignment of Counsel in Criminal Cases
 
Scottsboro boys trial pbs
Scottsboro boys trial pbsScottsboro boys trial pbs
Scottsboro boys trial pbs
 
English Powerpoint
English PowerpointEnglish Powerpoint
English Powerpoint
 
Kill Mock Trial Comp9 K Palmiter
Kill Mock Trial Comp9 K PalmiterKill Mock Trial Comp9 K Palmiter
Kill Mock Trial Comp9 K Palmiter
 
The scottsboro trials
The scottsboro trialsThe scottsboro trials
The scottsboro trials
 
Race-Based Jury Nullification
Race-Based Jury NullificationRace-Based Jury Nullification
Race-Based Jury Nullification
 
Important Supreme Court Cases
Important Supreme Court CasesImportant Supreme Court Cases
Important Supreme Court Cases
 
The scottsboro trial
The scottsboro trialThe scottsboro trial
The scottsboro trial
 
Ferguson Vs Plessy
Ferguson Vs PlessyFerguson Vs Plessy
Ferguson Vs Plessy
 

Powell vs. alabama power point

  • 1. Hunter Powell Ms. Washington’s class Government February 11, 2013
  • 2. Powell vs. Alabama “The Scottsboro Boys”
  • 3. Who are the players in this court case? Who too the matter to court?  Plaintiff:  Charlie Weems, Ozie Powell, Clarence Norris, Olen Montgomery, Willie Roberson, Haywood Patterson, Andrew (Andy) Wright, Leroy (Roy) Wright and Eugene Williams – also known as the Scottsboro Boys  Represented by ACLU Attorney Walter Pollack  Defendant  State of Alabama
  • 4. What?  Nine, young, African American men were accused of raping two white women while traveling on a freight train  The young men stood trial in Scottsboro, AL and were convicted of the rape and all but one were sentenced to death for the crime  ACLU Attorney Walter Pollack appealed their case to the US Supreme Court based on the Defendants were denied adequate legal counsel.
  • 5. When?  1931  March 25, 1931: Defendants were accused of raping two white women on a freight train  March 30, 1931: Grand jury indicts all 9 “Scottsboro boys”  April 6-7, 1931: Before Judge A. E. Hawkins, Clarence Norris and Charlie Weems are tried, convicted, and sentenced to death.  April 7-8, 1931: Haywood Patterson is tried, convicted, and sentenced to death.  April 8-9, 1931: Olen Montgomery, Ozie Powell, Willie Roberson, Eugene Williams, and Andy Wright are tried, convicted, and sentenced to death.  April 9, 1931: The case against Roy Wright, aged 13, ends in a hung jury when 11 jurors seek a death sentence, and one votes for life imprisonment.  June 22, 1931: The executions of the defendants are stayed pending appeal to the Alabama Supreme Court.  1932  March 24, 1932: The Alabama Supreme Court, voting 6-1, upholds the convictions of seven of the defendants, granting Eugene Williams a new trial because he was a juvenile at the time of his conviction.  May 27, 1932: The United States Supreme Court agrees to hear the case.  November 7, 1932: In Powell v. Alabama, the U.S. Supreme Court rules that the defendants were denied the right to counsel, which violated their right to due process under the Fourteenth Amendment. The cases are remanded to the lower court.  *The following link contains a full timeline of the events of the “Scottsboro boys” http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/scottsboro/timeline/timeline2.html
  • 6. Where?  The alleged rape took place on a Southern Railroad freight train. The train was stopped in Paint Rock, Alabama by an angry posse. Nine young African American young men were arrested for assault. Rape charges were later added.  The case was first heard and convictions handed down to all nine young men in Scottsboro, Alabama. Upon waiting for their trials, eight of the nine defendants stayed in Kilby Prison.  The case was appealed to the Alabama Supreme Court. The Alabama Supreme Court affirmed seven of the eight convictions, and granted thirteen-year-old Eugene Williams a new trial because he was a juvenile. The case was returned to the lower court and the judge allowed a change of venue, moving the retrials to Decatur, Alabama.
  • 7. Why?  In the height of the depression and tense racial times in the south, a group of young black men were involved in an altercation between some white men while traveling on a freight train. All but one of the white men were thrown from the train. Two white women remained on the train and accused the black men of rape. One of which later recanted her accusations.  The black men were arrested and were denied consultation with legal representation until immediately before the trial. The jury’s in all of the trials consisted of only white jurors.  Throughout the proceedings, none of the “Scottsboro” boys was allowed to contact their relatives, who lived out of State. On the day of the trial, an out-of-town attorney appeared for the defendants but announced that he could not formally represent them. The trial judge called on all the local lawyers present to assume responsibility for defending the nine young men, but only one agreed. The two lawyers had no opportunity to investigate the case or consult with their “clients.” All nine youths were found guilty by four separate juries, despite testimony from doctors who said they found no evidence of rape upon examining the women. Eight of the nine men received the death penalty. The convictions were appealed through the State courts of Alabama, and failing there, went to the Supreme Court.
  • 8. How?  The case was first heard in Scottsboro, Alabama in three rushed trials, where the defendants received poor legal representation. All but the thirteen-year-old Roy Wright were convicted of rape and sentenced to death, the common sentence in Alabama at the time for black men convicted of raping white women. But with help from the American Communist Party, the case was appealed. The Alabama Supreme Court affirmed seven of the eight convictions, and granted thirteen-year-old Eugene Williams a new trial because he was a juvenile. Chief Justice John C. Anderson dissented however, ruling that the defendants had been denied an impartial jury, fair trial, fair sentencing, and effective counsel.  The case was returned to the lower court and the judge allowed a change of venue, moving the retrials to Decatur, Alabama. Judge Horton was appointed. During the retrials, one of the alleged victims admitted fabricating the rape story and asserted that none of the Scottsboro Boys touched either of the white women. The jury found the defendants guilty, but the judge set aside the verdict and granted a new trial. After a new series of trials, the verdict was the same: guilty. The cases were ultimately tried three times. For the third time a jury—now with one black member—returned a third guilty verdict. Charges were finally dropped for four of the nine defendants. Sentences for the rest ranged from 75 years to death.
  • 9. Outcome and Opinions It is my opinion that these young men were wrongly accused and wrongly convicted for a crime they did not commit. They were poor, illiterate, and a minority. They did not receive fair trails nor adequate legal representation. Even when one of the witness recanted her accusations of rape, the courts still convicted them of a crime they did not commit.
  • 10. Bibliography  The following links were used in research for this project:  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scottsboro_Boys  http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/scottsboro/tim eline/index.html  http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/sc ottsboro/scottsb.htm  http://www.infoplease.com/us/supreme- court/cases/ar30.html