Contenu connexe Similaire à Engineering Simulation: Where are we going? (20) Engineering Simulation: Where are we going?1. • * “Engineering Simulations, Part 1: “Where We Are and How We
Got Here” was webcast on Wednesday, February 12th.
•
Slides and recorded versions of both webcasts are/will be available
at www.TheUberCloud.com
2. Who Am I?
(my 1 minute of shameless self-promotion or your bathroom
break )
Copyright © 2014 by Dennis A. Nagy
February 27, 14
2
3. MCAE Future Trend Topics/
Comments
What is MCAE today? Beyond the Software
Overview of Key Trends
Key Near-Future Trend Themes
The Famous “V” Diagram
Dramatic Potential Expansion of Simulation Use
Copyright © 2014 by Dennis A. Nagy
February 27, 14
3
4. People
• Full-time CAE/
Simulation
Specialists
• Product
Development
Engineers
(© D. Nagy, 2011)
Training
Help
SPM
Engineering
Simulation
Processes
Simulation
Software (Tools)
• Working Environments
(pre/post)
• Computational Engines
(solvers)
• Capture
• Store
• Repeat/re-use
(templates)
SDM
KBE
Simulation Data
• Work in progress
& archiving
• Data explosion
(vs. PDM, CDM)
Copyright © 2014 by Dennis A. Nagy
February 27, 14
4
5. Overview of Key Trends in Engineering
Simulation (1)
Development continues in the most mature branch—
environments and solvers (“But how much is used?”)
Nonlinear, non-”standard” materials, materials design, multi-physics, multifidelity, multi-scale,…
More attention to the “connectors” (the keys to synergy):
Training and help: In-line and on-line
Simulation Process Management (SPM): capturing,
standardizing, and re-using best practices, linking multiple
software tools; “Intelligent Templates”
Knowledge-based Engineering (KBE): leveraging past work
on similar new projects, accessing past expertise and relevant
data; “Intelligent Templates”
Simulation Data Management (SDM):
storing, retrieving, and re-using results of simulation runs
Recognizing the differences between PDM and SDM:
temporary storage of significant (size of files) results vs.
archiving end results
Copyright © 2014 by Dennis A. Nagy
February 27, 14
5
6. Overview of Key Trends in Engineering
Simulation
(2)
Significant growth of materials research, data, use (Multiscale)
Composites, micro- and nano-materials, simulated materials testing,…
Multi-physics: different physical phenomena interacting/
affecting each other, e.g.,
Structural-thermal
Fluid-structure interaction (FSI)
CFD with chemical reactions, combustion
Structural, CFD, electromagnetics
Multi-fidelity/System Level (model/network-based):
Structural: 1-D (bars, beams), 2-D (plates, shells), 3-D (solids)
Flow: 1-D (piping networks, 3-D CFD (single-phase), 3-D CFD (multiphase)
Block-diagrammatic system modeling (MatLab, SABER, SysML, Modelica,
LabVIEW,…), connecting to 3D
Simulation Governance (SimGov):
administering enterprise-wide use of simulation as a corporate asset
“Command and Control”
Copyright © 2014 by Dennis A. Nagy
February 27, 14
6
7. Key Near-Future CAE Trend
Themes
Simulation-driven design (SDD)
Democratization (supply meets demand)
“The Cloud” (ubiquitous computing access)
Multi: Scale/Level, Fidelity, Physics
Mechatronics Convergence (MCAE meets ECAE/EDA
CAE) and beyond to requirements capture, systems
modeling and simulation (MBSE)
Continual Evolving ISV Ecosystems (acquisition,
creation)
Simulation Governance
All of these are a mixture of business and technology
trends
Copyright © 2014 by Dennis A. Nagy
February 27, 14
7
8. Simulation before Traditional
CAD
Using simulation (CAE) to drive product development and
more detailed product design features, rather than
following that step as a “verification” step.
“De-featuring” tools are proof that the CAD process has
gotten ahead of where it should be (?)
SpaceClaim, as an example, has targeted this pre-CAD
segment/need
Berlin-based FRIENDSHIP SYSTEMS (a DNV-GL
company) also sees the advantage:
“Traditional CAD tools (e.g. CATIA, NX, Pro/E, SolidWorks),
although powerful, are detail-oriented and encompass
features which may not be relevant for simulation.”
--FRIENDSHIP Framework web page
Copyright © 2014 by Dennis A. Nagy
February 27, 14
8
9. The Famous “V” Diagram
(Should it be a “W”?)
Copyright © 2014 by Dennis A. Nagy
February 27, 14
9
10. Dramatic Potential Expansion of Simulation
Use
Population of product
development engineers
who could make use of
simulation
Copyright © 2014 by Dennis A. Nagy
Population of simulation
engineers capable of using
today’s generation of CAE tools
February 27, 14
10
11. Widening the Availability of
Simulation to “Design” Engineers
(“Democratization”?)
“Old” Paradigm: A CAD company purchases an FEA/CFD tool/company
and offers a CAD-embedded version of the traditional analysis process.
Examples: PTC Rasna, Solidworks SRAC (Cosmos), Autodesk Algor,
PlassoTech, Siemens PLM Femap
Vince Adams wrote recently (in DE article): “Autodesk wasn’t prepared to
accept the status quo. Per Scott Reese, the company’s senior director of
Simulation Solutions, after exhaustive research with customers and across the
market, Autodesk chose a different approach that it expects to be a game
changer…”
“Newer” Paradigms:
Creating simulation tools/wizards/e-handbooks to give non-simulation-experts
reliable answers to specific classes of difficult (simulation-dependent)
problems using simulation “under the covers.”
“Intelligent” templates for capturing, driving use of “right” simulation at the
right stage of product development (= at the right positions on the “V” diagram)
Copyright © 2014 by Dennis A. Nagy
February 27, 14
11
13. A Few Examples
of Wizards &
Templates
Copyright © 2014 by Dennis A. Nagy
February 27, 14
13
15. “The Cloud”
A lot of talk (hype?), increasing availability of remote
computing access, called “Cloud” by individual vendors
This is the subject of a whole different presentation
But still to early to predict which business model(s) will
emerge and dominate
Client-server, web/browser portals
Cloud-based simulation has some additional layers of
difficulty:
the need to more automatically locate enough powerful
computing (clusters/nodes/cores) to get the job done as fast
as possible
Software pricing/licensing models for “pay as you go”
Remote visualization of results vs. downloading very large
files for local visualization
…
Copyright © 2014 by Dennis A. Nagy
February 27, 14
15
17. TheUberCloud HPC
Experiment:
An open voluntary collaborative community
Objective:
Making HPC as a Service available, for everybody, on
demand
How?
For SMEs and their engineering applications
to explore the end-to-end process
of using remote computing resources,
as a service, on demand, at your finger tips,
and learning how to resolve the roadblocks.
Copyright © 2014 by Dennis A. Nagy
February 27, 14
17
19. Where Are We with the
Experiment?
Started August 2012: today (February 2014) 900+
participating organizations and individuals
Participants are from 48 countries
Round 5 started February 1, 2014: ~25-30 new
teams
140+ teams have been formed in Rounds 1-5
Registration at:
www.hpcexperiment.com
www.cfdexperiment.com
www.compbioexperiment.com
www.bigdataexperiment.com
Copyright © 2014 by Dennis A. Nagy
February 27, 14
19
20. Team 8: Multiphase flows
within the cement and mineral
industry
Drying moist particles with hot gas
Copyright © 2014 by Dennis A. Nagy
February 27, 14
20
21. More Details on the
25 Best Teams So Far (Rounds 1 & 2)
UberCloud HPC Experiment Compendium
25 selected use-cases from 60 teams in Rounds 1 & 2
Sponsored by Intel’s HPC Organization
Copyright © 2014 by Dennis A. Nagy
February 27, 14
21
22. Trends in Broader MCAE
Environments
The ongoing debate of “integrated, from a single supplier”
vs. “best of breed” from multiple vendors continues to this
day because, in reality, end users and end-user
companies really need a common environment where
seamless integration of best of breed is available.
Vendors of solver tools and environments focused/
oriented mainly around their own tools are opening up to
the heterogeneous tools needs that will remain for the
foreseeable future.
From captive environments to open foundations/
frameworks
Copyright © 2014 by Dennis A. Nagy
February 27, 14
22
23. “Best of Breed” Vendors in Main MCAE Application
Areas
Flexible mechanics (structural) solvers (FEA):
ANSYS, MSC.NASTRAN, SIMULIA/Abaqus
Multibody Dynamics (MBD) solvers:
MSC.ADAMS (LMS/CADSI, RecurDyn distant seconds)
Fluid/Thermal solvers (CFD):
Best-of-Breed
ANSYS/Fluent+CFX, CD-adapco STAR-CCM+, Exa
Electromagnetics solvers:
and “Integrated”
(at the macro level)
ANSYS/Ansoft
CAE GUI Environments and generic meshers/viewers
Altair Hyperworks, ANSYS/Workbench, ANSA, NX CAE, Ensight,…
Simulation Lifecycle Management
Siemens PLM Teamcenter, SIMULIA and ENOVIA, MSC SimManager
Copyright © 2014 by Dennis A. Nagy
February 27, 14
23
27. Key Associations Reacting to
Mechatronics Convergence
: the only global vendor-neutral, notfor-profit association for Mechanical Engineering
Simulation (MCAE)
Grew out of FEA use in the UK Nuclear Industry in the early
1980s
.
Started in the US but is now global (slightly larger than NAFEMS)
NAFEMS and INCOSE formed formal partnership
and first joint System Modeling and Simulation
Working Group (SMSWG) in mid-2012
Copyright © 2014 by Dennis A. Nagy
February 27, 14
27
29. PDF copies of these slides (with active hyperlinks)
available from TheUberCloud:
www.TheUberCloud.com
Dennis.Nagy@BeyondCAE.
or from me at:
com
Copyright © 2014 by Dennis A. Nagy
February 27, 14
29