Contenu connexe
Similaire à Linearity enhancement of operational transconductance amplifier using source (20)
Plus de IAEME Publication (20)
Linearity enhancement of operational transconductance amplifier using source
- 1. International Journal of Advanced Research in Engineering and Technology (IJARET), ISSN
0976 – 6480(Print), ISSN 0976 – 6499(Online) Volume 4, Issue 3, April (2013), © IAEME
257
LINEARITY ENHANCEMENT OF OPERATIONAL
TRANSCONDUCTANCE AMPLIFIER USING SOURCE
DEGENERATION
Mohammed Arifuddin Sohel 1
, Dr. K. Chennakeshava Reddy 2
Dr. Syed Abdul Sattar3
1
(Associate Professor, Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Muffakham Jah
College of Engineering and Technology, Hyderabad, A.P., India)
2
(Principal, TKR College of Engineering and Technology, Meerpet, Ranga Reddy Dist,A.P., INDIA)
3
(Professor, Royal institute of Technology and Science, Chevella, Ranga Reddy Dist,A.P., INDIA)
ABSTRACT
The signal to noise ratio and resolution of an analog to digital converter is governed by the
linearity constraints of the basic building block, which is the Operational Transconductance Amplifier
(OTA). The OTA design is based on MOS transistors that are inherently non linear and lead to
performance deterioration. To overcome the non-linearities imposed by the OTA a resistive source
degeneration technique is proposed. The use of linearization techniques leads to a tradeoff between
transconductance and gain of the amplifier. The proposed Source Degenerated OTA (SDOTA)
achieves Third order Intermodulation (IM3) of -62dB at a high frequency range of 70 MHz with an
effective Transconductance of 655.8 µA/V. The SDOTA offers a gain of 14dB at a Unity Gain
Frequency of 4.7 GHz and is implemented in 180nm CMOS technology.
Keywords: Analog and Mixed Signal IC Design, Operational Transconductance Amplifier (OTA),
Linearization, Source Degeneration
1. INTRODUCTION
The modern day Analog and Mixed Signal IC designs like filters, oscillators and Data
Converters (ADC, DAC) are implemented using the operational amplifiers (OPAMPs) as basic
building block. The design, analysis, and implementation of these applications is simplified by using
OPAMPs. The OPAMPs work well for low-frequency applications, such as audio and video systems
but at Radio Frequency range, OPAMP designs become difficult due to their frequency limitation [1].
The OTA is an amplifier that produces an output current which is proportional to the
differential input voltage. They are very simple to design and require small area when compared to
most of the operational amplifiers. Due to the simple circuitry there are no high impedance internal
nodes, where parasitic capacitors can results in long time constants that limit bandwidth [2].
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED RESEARCH IN
ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY (IJARET)
ISSN 0976 - 6480 (Print)
ISSN 0976 - 6499 (Online)
Volume 4, Issue 3, April 2013, pp. 257-263
© IAEME: www.iaeme.com/ijaret.asp
Journal Impact Factor (2013): 5.8376 (Calculated by GISI)
www.jifactor.com
IJARET
© I A E M E
- 2. International Journal of Advanced Research in Engineering and Technology (IJARET), ISSN
0976 – 6480(Print), ISSN 0976 – 6499(Online) Volume 4, Issue 3, April (2013), © IAEME
258
Therefore, OTAs are more suitable for high frequency applications that operate in the Radio
frequency range [3].
The major disadvantage of OTAs is the input stage non–linearity at higher differential input
voltages due to the non–linear characteristics of the input transistors. This problem leads to
occurrence of intermodulation components at the output and degrades Dynamic Range(DR) and
Signal to Noise Ratio (SNR) of the analog application. Consequently, a good number of techniques
have been reported to improve the linearity of OTAs [4] [5]. Owing to continuous reduction in
transistor size, supply voltages, and increase in the frequency of operation there has been a steady
decrease in linearity of OTA. Hence, it is important to revisit these techniques, and also to come up
with new methods for linearization. The main focus of this paper is the design and implementation of
a 70 MHz, low distortion OTA with IM3 (Third Intermodulation product) below -65 dB using source
degeneration technique in 0.18µm CMOS technology. The above specifications are derived so that the
OTA can be used for the implementation of a continuous time filter for the Band Pass Sigma Delta
ADC, operating at Intermediate Frequency of 70 MHz and a bandwidth of 5 MHz.
The Paper is organized as follows: section 2 introduces the design aspects of basic and balanced OTA.
Section 3 discusses the issue of non linearity and proposed technique of source degeneration to
improve this non linearity. Section 4 describes the circuit level implementation of proposed OTA and
the improvement achieved in performance metrics. A comparison of results and conclusions are
given in section 5.
2. OTA DESIGN
The CMOS implementation of OTA consists of a source-coupled differential-pair input stage
as shown in figure 1, which provides high input impedance, high gain, and high common-mode
rejection [6]. In Figure 1(a) a differential input single ended output basic OTA is depicted. Here, the
current mirror CMp transfers the left output current of the input differential pair, id+
, to the right to
combine with its right output current id-
, from which the transconductor output current is doubled,
the transconductance is given in equation1 .
(1)
where and are the differential input voltages, and gmM1 is the transconductance of each
transistor in the differential pair.
The balanced implementation of an OTA is shown in Figure 1(b), it consists of two PMOS
current mirrors in order to improve the balance between its two differential input paths. Furthermore,
these two PMOS current mirrors can be set in such way that they have a size ratio of B between their
reference transistor and controlled transistor. This boosts their output currents by B times [7].
Figure 1: Differential-input single ended output CMOS OTAs (a) Simple OTA (b) Current boosted OTA [7]
- 3. International Journal of Advanced Research in Engineering and Technology (IJARET), ISSN
0976 – 6480(Print), ISSN 0976 – 6499(Online) Volume 4, Issue 3, April (2013), © IAEME
259
The boosted currents are combined at the output using a NMOS current mirror at the bottom, resulting
in a transconductance as large as B times of the basic OTA as shown in equation 2.
(2)
The transconductance in equation 1 and 2 can be tuned by changing the DC tail currents Itail in
Figure 1(a) and 1(b). The CMOS OTAs in Figure 2 illustrate two OTA implementations of fully-
differential topology [8]. The structure is similar to that of figure 1 and the aforementioned size ratio
of B can also be applied in the current mirrors to increase their transconductance and therefore their
current efficiency. Fully differential architectures are preferred over single ended ones as they support
noise cancellation at the input and output side.
Figure 2: Fully Differential CMOS OTA (a) Simple OTA and (b) Balanced OTA.
Compared to the OTA in Figure 2(a), the balanced OTA in Figure 2(b) has an additional
common-mode feed forward (CMFF) circuit comprising MC1, MC2 and MC3 to further enhance its
common-mode rejection [8]. The sizes of MC1, MC2, and MC3 are selected to achieve a common-
mode transconductance gain of BgmM1, in order to optimize its common-mode cancellation with the
B-size PMOS transistors at the outputs.
3. LINEARIZATION TECHNIQUES FOR OTA
The OTA structure consists of Active devices in the form of MOS transistors which are non-
linear in operation. When a large signal is applied, the device slips into non linear region of operation
and will generate spurious signals that are highly undesirable. This results in increase of third order
intermodulation (IM3) which is a measure of circuit non linearity. There are two techniques used
commonly for linearization - (a) nonlinear term cancellation and (b) signal attenuation through Source
degeneration. In the first method, the linear range is very restricted and a good cancellation is hard to
achieve especially under process, voltage, Temperature (PVT) variations [9]. Hence, the Source
Degeneration Technique is adopted in this paper and appropriate transistor sizing is performed to
optimize the IM3.
- 4. International Journal of Advanced Research in Engineering and Technology (IJARET), ISSN
0976 – 6480(Print), ISSN 0976 – 6499(Online) Volume 4, Issue 3, April (2013), © IAEME
260
Figure 3: (a) Resistive Source Degeneration at
low frequency
(b) Effect of Parasitic Capacitance (Cp) at high frequency on resistive degeneration
Figure 3(a) depicts Resistive Source Degeneration Technique at low and high frequency. This
technique involves the use of a linear resistor, which reduces the signal swing between the gate and
source of the transistor, thereby making input/output characteristics more linear. The effective
transconductance Gmeff is given in equation 3 and it depends on resistor as well as transconductance of
the transistor. In this equation If gm1. R >>1, then the effective transconductance (Gmeff) is equivalent
to 1/R and thereby less sensitive to nonlinear device parameters.
(3)
The source degeneration factor is N = 1 + gm1.R. Therefore, in order to achieve higher
linearity, it is desirable to increase gm (and to increase the degeneration factor, N), so that Gmeff is
only dependent on linear resistor R, and gm non–linear contribution is small. One method to increase
gm is to increase W/L ratio of input transistor and increase bias current Ib[10], but it increases power
and area. Further, at high frequencies, as shown in figure 3(b), the parasitic capacitor at the source
terminal of the input transistor (M1) decreases the effective impedance at that node, and
thereby decreases the source degeneration factor (N). The effect of parasitic capacitor is modeled in
equation 4
(4)
The parasitic capacitance at source terminal of input transistor (Cp) is mainly due to the
source capacitance of the input transistor, M1 and the drain capacitance of M2. Therefore, if width of
M1 is increased to increase gm (proportional to sqrt(W/L)), then Cp also increases proportional to W
and overall degeneration factor does not improve. Furthermore, the parasitic capacitor effect becomes
dominant at higher frequencies decreasing degeneration factor with frequency[11]. In order to solve
this problem an appropriate balancing of W/L ratios with the resistor value is required and this paper
proposes a balanced design that is able to overcome the effects of parasitic capacitor at high
frequency, thus achieving high linearity at higher frequencies of 70MHz.
4. IMPLEMENTATION OF CONVENTIONAL AND PROPOSED OTA
The transistor schematic of conventional OTA is shown in figure 4. This OTA when
implemented on Cadence virtuoso simulation platform provides a transconductance of 788.4µA/V and
gain of about 26dB at a UGB of 7.25 GHz as depicted in figure 5(a).
- 5. International Journal of Advanced Research in Engineering and Technology (IJARET), ISSN
0976 – 6480(Print), ISSN 0976 – 6499(Online) Volume 4, Issue 3, April (2013), © IAEME
261
Figure 4: Transistor schematic of conventional OTA
Figure 5: Simulation Results of Non Linear conventional OTA (a) Response of AC analysis showing
gain and UGB (b) Response of PSS analysis for a two tone test
But there were more harmonic distortions introduced due to the non-linearity of the OTA.
This non linearity is measured by conducting a two tone test[12]. Two sine wave input with 0.1 V
(amplitude) at 70 MHz and 71 MHz are applied, and the IM3 distortion is obtained by performing
PSS analysis on Cadence. It is measured to give an IM3 value of -26dB and the overall noise floor is
also very high, as seen in figure 5(b).
The proposed SDOTA is much similar in design to the one in Figure 4 except that it makes
use of source degeneration resistors as shown in Figure 6. The proposed OTA provides a reduced gain
of 14 dB at a UGB of 4.76GHz as shown in figure 7(a). The transconductance also reduces to
655.8µA/V, which is a direct consequence of using resistor degeneration. But on the other hand, the
proposed OTA has reduced the harmonic distortions to greater amount and improved the linearity of
the OTA to -62 dB and the noise floor has reduced significantly as depicted in figure 7(b).
- 6. International Journal of Advanced Research in Engineering and Technology (IJARET), ISSN
0976 – 6480(Print), ISSN 0976 – 6499(Online) Volume 4, Issue 3, April (2013), © IAEME
262
Figure 6: Transistor schematic of Proposed Source Degenerated OTA(SDOTA)
Figure 7: Simulation Results of Proposed SDOTA (a) Response of AC analysis showing gain and
UGB (b) Response of PSS analysis for a two tone test
5. CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE SCOPE
The Performance Comparison of conventional and Proposed OTA is shown in table 1. It can
be seen that though the gain and UGB of proposed OTA have reduced, it also reduces the IM3
distortion to -62dB and is hence preferred in design of Analog and mixed signal applications.
Table 1 Performance Comparison of Conventional OTA and Proposed SDOTA
OTA Parameters Conventional OTA Proposed SDOTA
DC Gain 26dB 14dB
Unity Gain Bandwidth (UGB) 7.25Ghz 4.76Ghz
Effective Transconductance Gmeff 788.4µA/V 655.8µA/V
Third Order Intermodulation(IM3) -26dB -62dB
- 7. International Journal of Advanced Research in Engineering and Technology (IJARET), ISSN
0976 – 6480(Print), ISSN 0976 – 6499(Online) Volume 4, Issue 3, April (2013), © IAEME
263
REFERENCES
1. L. H. C. Ferreira, T. C. Pimenta, and R. L. Moreno, “An ultra-low-voltage ultralow power CMOS
Miller OTA with rail-to-rail input/output swing,” IEEE Trans. Circuits and Systems II: Express
Briefs, vol. 54, no. 10, pp. 843-847, Oct. 2007
2. R. L. Geiger and E. Sanchez-Sinencio, “Active filter design using operational transconductance
amplifiers: A tutorial,” IEEE Circuit and Device Magazine, vol. 1, pp. 20-32, Mar. 1985
3. X. Zhang and E. I. El-Masry, “A novel CMOS OTA based on body-driven MOSFETs and its
applications in OTA-C filters,” IEEE Trans. Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers, vol. 54, no.
6, pp. 1204-1212, Jun. 2007
4. T. Lin, C. Wu, and M. Tsai, “A 0.8-V 0.25-mW current-mirror OTA with 160- MHz GBW in
0.18-um CMOS,” IEEE Trans. Circuits and Systems II: Express Briefs, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 131-
135, Feb.
5. D. Grasso, G. Palumbo, and S. Pennisi, “Three-stage CMOS OTA for large capacitive loads with
efficient frequency compensation scheme,” IEEE Trans. Circuits and Systems II: Express Briefs,
vol. 53, no.10, pp. 1044-1048, Oct. 2006.
6. F. A. P. Baruqui and A. Petraglia, “Linear tunable CMOS OTA with constant dynamic range
using source-degenerated current mirrors,” IEEE Trans. Circuits and Systems II: Express Briefs,
vol. 53, no. 9, pp. 797-801, Sep. 2006.
7. B. K. Thandri and J. Silva–Martinez, “A 63 dB 75 mW bandpass sigma–delta RF ADC at 950
MHz using 3.8 GHz clock in 0.25 mm SiGe BiCMOS technology,” IEEE Journal of Solid–State
Circuits, vol. 42, pp. 269-279, Feb. 2007
8. E. Sanchez-Sinencio and J. Silva-Martinez, “CMOS transconductance amplifiers, architectures
and active filters: a tutorial,” IEE Proceedings - Circuits, Devices and Systems, vol. 147, no. 1,
pp. 3-12, Feb. 2000.
9. W. Huang and E. Sanchez-Sinencio, “Robust highly linear high-frequency CMOS OTA with IM3
below -70 dB at 26 MHz,” IEEE Trans. Circuits and Systems I: Fundamental Theory and
Applications, vol. 53, no. 7, pp. 1433-1447, Jul. 2006.
10. A. J. Lopez-Martin, S. Baswa, J. Ramirez-Angulo, and R. G. Carvajal, “Low voltage super class-
AB CMOS OTA cells with very high slew rate and power efficiency,” IEEE Journal of Solid-
State Circuits, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 1068-1077, May 2005.
11. J. Chen, E. Sanchez–Sinencio, and J. Silva–Martinez, “Frequency–dependent harmonic distortion
analysis of a linearized cross–coupled CMOS OTA and its application to OTA–C filters,” IEEE
Transactions on Circuits and Systems, vol. 53, no. 3, Mar. 2006.
12. A. Lewinski and J. Silva-Martinez, “OTA linearity enhancement technique for high frequency
applications with IM3 below -65 dB,” IEEE Trans. Circuits and Systems II: Analog and Digital
Signal Processing, vol. 51, no. 10, pp. 542-548, Oct. 2004.
13. Aswathy G Nair and Gopakumar M G, “CS-CMOS: A Low-Noise Logic Family for Mixed
Signal Socs”, International journal of Electronics and Communication Engineering & Technology
(IJECET), Volume 4, Issue 2, 2013, pp. 180 - 190, ISSN Print: 0976- 6464, ISSN Online:
0976 –6472.
14. P.Sreenivasulu, Krishnna veni, Dr. K.Srinivasa Rao and Dr.A.VinayaBabu, “Low Power
Design Techniques of CMOS Digital Circuits”, International Journal of Electronics and
Communication Engineering & Technology (IJECET), Volume 3, Issue 2, 2012, pp. 199 - 208,
ISSN Print: 0976- 6464, ISSN Online: 0976 –6472.