Welcome to Indian Dental Academy
The Indian Dental Academy is the Leader in continuing dental education , training dentists in all aspects of dentistry and offering a wide range of dental certified courses in different formats.
Indian dental academy has a unique training program & curriculum that provides students with exceptional clinical skills and enabling them to return to their office with high level confidence and start treating patients
State of the art comprehensive training-Faculty of world wide repute &Very affordable.
Call Girls Aurangabad Just Call 9907093804 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
Growth&development /certified fixed orthodontic courses by Indian dental academy
1. FACTORS AFFECTING AND
THEORIES
OF
GROWTH AND
DEVELOPMENT
INDIAN DENTAL ACADEMY
Leader in continuing dental education
www.indiandentalacademy.com
www.indiandentalacademy.com
2. Factors affecting growth and
development.
VAN LIMBORGHIntrinsic Genetic-Heredity
Local-Muscle, Function,
Neurotrophism
Epigenetic
GeneralHormones,Neural
www.indiandentalacademy.com
8. GENETIC FACTORS
Body size,shape,fat deposition,growth
pattern
Male – female growth differences
Advancement of girl over boy
Y
chromosome
Actual outcome = Genetic
potential+Environmental influences.
www.indiandentalacademy.com
10. Methodically crossbred dogs
Inheritance of facial characteristics –
major cause malocclusion.
Dog carry gene for achondroplasia.
www.indiandentalacademy.com
13. Lundstrom(1963) conducted
a study on 100 pair of twins,
half of which were
monozygotic and half were
dizygotic.
Both skeletal and dental
overjets were measured.
More variations in the
dizygotic than monozygotic.
Larger genetic variations for
skeletal pattern than dental
overjet.
www.indiandentalacademy.com
14. Lauweryns et al - concluded that 40% of
the dental and skeletal variations can be
attributed to hereditary factors.
www.indiandentalacademy.com
18. Heritability for - craniofacial growth, high.
- dental growth , low.
Dental variation – influenced by
environment.
Inheritance for mandibular prognathism is
strong.
www.indiandentalacademy.com
19. TERATOGENS
Chemicals & other agents capable of
producing embryological defects if given at
critical time.
Low level – Specific defects
High level – Lethal defects
www.indiandentalacademy.com
25. Function –
1.Primary factor – CF
Growth (MOSS)
2.Absence – distortion of
bone morphology
3.EX – NM disorders,
TMJ ankylosis
4.Malfunction – abnormal
growth
5.EX – Tongue thrust
www.indiandentalacademy.com
26. NeurotrophismNervous control of skeletal growth
assumedly by transmission of
substance through axon of nerves
(MOYERS)
Interaction btw nerves & other cells
which initiate or control molecular
modifications in other cells (GUTH)
www.indiandentalacademy.com
30. Neurotrophic control of genetic activity• Interferes – Genomic potential to final
functional differences.
• Protein & specific enzyme synthesis.
•Synthesis of DNA,RNA.
www.indiandentalacademy.com
31. Intra oral & external epithelium growth in
leaps following sensory nerve contact.
Max & Mand hypoplasia – intra oral & intra
nasal sensory deficits.
Nerves – Soft tissue growth &function –
Skeletal growth & morphology.
www.indiandentalacademy.com
32. NEURAL CONTROL
Centre hypothalamus
Keep children on genetically determined
growth curves.
At birth – size to accommodate birth
process.
After birth – destined to become large.
Growth burst – first 2 years.
www.indiandentalacademy.com
33. Children normally grow very rapidly
during the first two years of life.
Between two years of age and the onset
of puberty, children grow slowly. They
begin to grow rapidly again during the
teen years.
- Growth & Weight: -
www.indiandentalacademy.com
48. CLIMATE & SEASONAL CHANGES
HT. Spring then in autumn.
WT. Autumn then in spring.
HT. & teeth eruption more in night.
Fluctuation in hormone release.
www.indiandentalacademy.com
49. SOCIO ECONOMIC STATUS –
1. Nutrition.
2. Variation in ht. & wt. ratio.
www.indiandentalacademy.com
50. EXERCISE –
No direct effect on linear growth.
Muscle mass, fitness, general well being.
www.indiandentalacademy.com
51. FAMILY BIRTH ORDER –
First born child weighs less at birth &
higher I.Q.
www.indiandentalacademy.com
54. PARADIGMS
Normal science – research that members
of specific group of scientist recognize as
central to their field. (KUHN 1970)
Theory – assumption based on certain
evidences but lacking scientific proof.
Hypothesis- assumption not proved by
experiment,conclusion drawn before all
facts are established & tentatively
accepted.
www.indiandentalacademy.com
55. Paradigm –
Conceptual scheme that encompasses
individual theories and is accepted by
scientific community as a model and
foundation for further research.
Define relevant data
Scientist can reject wrong paradigms.
www.indiandentalacademy.com
57. Paradigms in craniofacial biology
Craniofacial biology is a study of
growth,function and adaptation,both
phylogenetically and ontogenetically of the
craniofacial skeleton and related structure.
www.indiandentalacademy.com
61. Moss (1981)“Origin ,Growth and Maintenance of all
skeletal tissue and organs are always
secondary,compensatory and obligatory
responses to temporally and operationally
prior events or processes that occur in
specifically related non skeletal tissues ,
organs or functioning spaces(Functional
Matrices).”
www.indiandentalacademy.com
62. CRANIOFACIAL BIOLOGY
Genomic paradigm
- Genetic
predetermination.
- Popular among
clinical orthodontist.
FUNCTIONAL
PARADIGM
- Functional matrix
hypothesis.
- Popular among
scientist &
orthodontics believing
in functions & physical
interrelationship.
www.indiandentalacademy.com
66. Cullman – stress trajectories.
Meyers 1867 publication – bony trabecular
structures were attributed to specific
trajectories of bone.
www.indiandentalacademy.com
68. Wolff – Internal organization of
femur(1870).
+ interstitial bone growth
_ bone resorption- Wegner & Koelliker
(1872)
Form & Function interaction – Wilhelm
Roux(1881)
Roux argued – Functional stimulus
shaped bone.ex:Fibula & Tibia.
www.indiandentalacademy.com
69. 1892 JULIUS WOLFF
Law of bone transformation
“Every change in form & functions of
bones,or of their function alone, is
followed by certain definite changes in
their internal architecture and equally
definite secondary alteration in their
external conformation in accordance with
mathematical laws.”
www.indiandentalacademy.com
80. FUNCTIONAL MATRIX
HYPOTHESIS
1948 – 1951
Studied- Dept. Anatomy,Columbia
university.
Thesis.
The development of vertebrate skullGaven de Beer.
Growth & Form – Thompson
www.indiandentalacademy.com
81. 1951 – 1960
Calvarial sutures extripation-no size
reduction of neural skull.
Sutures are not primary growth sites.
No genetically predetermined boundaries
to calvarial bones.
Work of Vander Klaauw – experimentally
verified & expanded by Moss.
1960- Paper published-Functional
approach to craniological problems.
www.indiandentalacademy.com
82. 1961 – 1971
Orthodontic field introduced to functional
matrix.
Two types not yet arisen.
Cleared: Conference – 1968
Sutural tissues & Cartilages.
Active transformation & passive translation
www.indiandentalacademy.com
84. FMH
Head – Function occurs
Function – FCC
FCC – Functional matrix (Function)
- Skeletal unit (Protect/Support fm)
Growth changes in size,shape,spatial
position are secondary to primary changes
in their specific functional matrices.
www.indiandentalacademy.com
99. FMH – REFLECTIONS IN A
JAUNDICED EYE:JOHNSTON
Not a unitary mechanism.
Physical forces.
Bl. Condylectomy surgery not completed
till OCT.1961 ; Conclusions made in 1962
– Provisional.
www.indiandentalacademy.com
100. Did not specify – capsular growth is
primary/secondary to expanding space.
Initially macroskeletal unit – two or more
adjacent bones,later – set of microskeletal
units.
Genetic control – soft tissue matrix , later
– nervous system.
www.indiandentalacademy.com
101. “All research has no true completion but,
rather is only the beginning of yet another
cycle of work.”
- MELVIN .L.MOSS
www.indiandentalacademy.com
102. References
T.M. Graber – Orthodontics: Principles &
Practice, III Ed.
Proffit – Contemporary Orthodontics, III
Ed.
Moyers – Handbook of Orthodontics, IV
Ed.
Bishara – Textbook of Orthodontics, I Ed..
Tortora – Principles of Anatomy &
Physiology, VIII Ed.
Guyton & Hall – Textbook of Medical
Physiology, IX Ed.
www.indiandentalacademy.com
103. Moss,Primary role of functional matrix in
facial growth – Am J Orthod, 1969 June
(20-31)
Moss,The capsular matrix – Am J
Orthod,1969 Nov :(56)
Moss,Twenty years of functional cranial
analysis Am J Orthod,1981 Oct:(366-75)
Lysle E Johnston Jr – Factors affecting
the growth of the mid face – The
functional matrix hypothesis:The
Reflections in Jaundiced Eye.
www.indiandentalacademy.com
104. David S Carlson – Craniofacial biology a
normal science.
Bone Biodynamics in Orthodontic &
Orthopedic Treatment – David S Carlson
& Steven A Goldstein.
Control Mechanisms in craniofacial
growth – James Mc Namara Jr.
www.indiandentalacademy.com
111. Petrovic et al –
occlusion (maxilla) play imp role as a
regulating mechanism in growth of
condyles.
Stress on local factors
Lateral pterygoid.
www.indiandentalacademy.com
112. Conclusion
Studies add upto our knowledge
By no means conclusive.
May/May not be similar effects in other
mammals,specifically in man.
www.indiandentalacademy.com
113. Reference
Bernabei,R.L. and L.E.Johnston -A cephalometric
investigation of the growth, in situ, of “isolated”
mandibular condyles in adult rats following the
administration of bovine growth hormone. Am.
J. Orthodont. (In press), 1976.
JAMES A. McNAMARA, Jr. - Factors affecting
the growth of midface, C.F.S, 6: 381-391, 1976.
www.indiandentalacademy.com