Online reading lists: encouraging staff engagement to improve student information literacy - Taylor
1. Resource Lists
What helps students make the
most of their reading?
Allie Taylor, Academic Liaison Librarian,
Institute of Humanities and Creative Arts,
University of Worcester
alison.taylor@worc.ac.uk
2. Things to discuss:
• What makes a good reading list?
• What helps students make the most of
reading lists?
• How do you encourage academics to engage
with reading lists?
3. What are resource lists for?
a. A starting point for the
subject
b. A comprehensive list of
everything on the subject
c. Week by week set reading
d. A record of the module
leader’s own reading
experience
A
startingpoint
A
com
prehensive
list
W
eekbyw
eek
Leader’sreadingexperience
4.
5. I prefer to arrange my resource list
items:
a. Alphabetically
b. By theme
c. By week
d. In no particular
order
Alphabetically
Bythem
e
Byw
eek
In
no
particularorder
6.
7.
8. How long are your resource lists on
average?
a. 0 items
b. 1-25 items
c. 26-75 items
d. 75 items +
0
item
s
1-25
item
s
26-75
item
s
75
item
s+
9.
10. How long is too long?
a. >0
b. >20
c. >50
d. >100
>0
>20
>50
>100
11.
12.
13. Feedback from my students about
online resource lists has been:
a. Non existent
b. Mixed
c. Largely positive
d. Largely negative
Non
existent
M
ixed
Largelypositive
Largelynegative
14. I feel much more confident
about starting to do my
own research
so much easier to access
the key readings now
The new reading lists are
brilliant. So much easier
than before
I can spend the time I have for
studying actually doing just that -
reading the articles and the books -
not spending ages trying to find them
from the printed reading list before I
can even make a start
Third years love it
The Online Resource
button is really useful as it
saves so much time
15. The best thing about the new resource
list system is:
a. One definitive
version of the list
b. Easier/ simpler
access to resources
c. Digitised articles
and chapters
d. Other
One
definitive
version
Easier/sim
pler
Digitisation
Other
16. The worst thing about the new
resource list system is:
a. Clunky/ laborious
b. Spoon feeds the
students
c. Not in Harvard
d. Nothing
Clunky/laborious
Spoon
feedsthe
students
Notin
Harvard
Nothing
17.
18. I tell my students how to access the
resource list for my module
a. True
b. False
True
False
0%0%
19. I discuss my resource lists with my
students
a. True
b. False
True
False
0%0%
46. Can all modules have lists
like this please?
I can’t shut the students up
about their reading!
The students are very good at
working at a peer group and
supporting each other’s reading
This module is really well
organised
47. You have to be willing to be reflective and
change your practice. You have to enhance
the want to read and make it purposeful and
current.
48. The time you invest on the reading list makes
your life so much easier during the semester.
It used to be the last thing I thought about
when planning a module. Now it is the first.
49.
50. References
Bevan, N. (2012) Preliminary to reading. Times Higher Education Supplement (THES). Available from:
https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/preliminary-to-reading/419086.article (Accessed 6 March 2017).
Brewerton, G. (2014) Implications of Student and Lecturer Qualitative Views on Reading Lists: A Case Study at Loughborough
University, UK. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 20 (1), pp. 78–90.
Franklin, G. (2012) Staff survey on academic reading. Available from:
http://www.lboro.ac.uk/media/wwwlboroacuk/content/library/downloads/projects/StaffReadingSurvey_Report_March2012.pdf
(Accessed 6 March 2017).
Martin, L. (2006) Reading lists under the spotlight: Cinderella or superstar? SCONUL Focus. (37), pp. 33–36.
Miller, B. (1999) An Integrated Taxonomy of Student Reading and Learning Development. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 23
(3), pp. 309–316.
Piscioneri, M. & Hlavac, J. (2012) The minimalist reading model: Rethinking reading lists in arts and education subjects. Arts and
Humanities in Higher Education, 12 (4), pp. 424–445.
Siddall, G. & Rose, H. (2014) Reading lists – time for a reality check? An investigation into the use of reading lists as a pedagogical tool to
support the development of information skills amongst Foundation Degree students. Library and Information Research, 38 (118), pp.
52–73.
Stokes, P. & Martin, L. (2008) Reading lists: a study of tutor and student perceptions, expectations and realities. Studies in Higher
Education, 33 (2), pp. 113–125.
Sultany, A. & Halford, S. (2013) Using a techno-scepticism framework to evaluate the perception and acceptance of a new online
reading list. In: IADIS International Conference on Information Systems. Available from: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B-
hlVJRmdzVsQ2pIbDhrV3BHWjA/edit (Accessed: 6 March 2017).
Swain, H. (2006) Makeovers for the guides to essential reading. Times Higher Education Supplement (THES). Available from:
https://www.timeshighereducation.com/features/makeovers-for-the-guides-to-essential-reading/200896.article (Accessed: 6 March
2017).
Thompson, L., Mahon, C. & Thomas, L. (2004) Reading lists - how do you eat yours? Available from: http://wlv.openrepository.
com/wlv/handle/2436/3693 (Accessed: 6 March 2017).
Notes de l'éditeur
Whatever the purpose of your list, it needs to be communicated to your students, either in class or by annotating the list
Example of a week-by-week resource list
We are trying to avoid an endless list with no subject/ theme/ time groupings.
If does, of course, depend on subject. But, have a guess at the longest UW resource list.
Click on the image to see the sections, themes, annotations, etc
Student feedback
Upgrades are coming.
Design you list so that it doesn’t spoon-feed (and think about your own undergraduate reading behaviour)
Can generate a bibliography in Harvard.
Please do
Students want their reading to be relevant. Module leaders need to demonstrate this by discussing why students should look at different reading and by annotating lists.
No list is fine. But don’t just leave you students in the wilderness and expect them to find good resources. Students can benefit from library classes and workshops and more guidance on using resources. Just ask!
AQU guidelines require that there is a link to http://resourcelists.worc.ac.uk in the module guide. Print lists are discouraged
One list to rule them all! The UW Academic Quality Unit request that the only list made available to students is the Aspire list. There should be no other copies on module guides, Blackboard, blogs etc. Links to the original list only.
Worst example: 12 item reading list, 11 items out of print and not in library/ online (for a subject that involves quite a lot of tech).
Your reading list should not look like this!
Annotation give students reasons to read the items on the lists. It makes sure they are relevant to what’s being studied in class and means they are much more likely to be read. Use your own voice.
Everything on your list should be relevant and add value for your students
Good pedagogy to do this. Colleagues have participated in a project doing this. Very positive reaction from the students and a very up to date and interesting list was produced.
Students used to be looking for a single plant in a desert. Now they are looking for a single plant in a jungle. A decent resource list can guide them to the right plant.
At induction new Early Childhood students were asked which book they would take with them to a desert island. Answers were largely YA fiction or books which had recently been made into films. Very few students said the liked reading or read for pleasure.
Academics were continually entreating students to read more widely but to no great effect. Realised students are much more used to just finding information at the touch of a button, often don’t like reading very much and don’t understand the language of reading lists.
Michelle and team set about rewriting their modules, starting with the resource list. They altered the whole first year study skills and the whole first year practice based modules starting with the list. Teaching content, assessments and even teaching location were all focused around encouraging the students to engage with the literature.
Lists were wee-by-week and included notes and explanations. Made sure the list was the starting point for teaching rather than the add on at the end. Made it clear the list could change depending on current policy, things the students were interested in etc.
Gave different levels of reading to engage different students. Were very specific about why something should be read. Pointed out the exact chapter that was important.
Gave reading for less academic elements including placements.
Encouraged student to revisit reading and reflect on it in the light of new things they had learnt. Purposeful reading- the reading is directly related to teaching.
Gave weeks off for students to catch up or revisit reading. Supported the students to increasingly find their own materials. 7 sessions from Liaison Librarians, frequent class trips to the Hive.
7 sessions from Liaison Librarians, frequent class trips to the Hive.
Resource list usage went up (cohort of 30). But more importantly the students’ whole attitude to reading has changed.
Student and staff feedback showed some interesting effects. As well as increasing reading the appreciation of the need to read, students found the module better organised. Staff were equally please about the effects of all the pre-reading in class. Reading improved class discussions and formative assessments. Staff are eagerly awaiting the students summative submissions, due in any day now.