This presentation is part of the programme of the International Seminar "Social Protection, Entrepreneurship and Labour Market Activation: Evidence for Better Policies", organized by the International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth (IPC-IG/UNDP) together with Canada’s International Development Research Centre (IDRC) and the Colombian Think Tank Fedesarrollo held on September 10-11 at the Ipea Auditorium in Brasilia.
Dev nathan grovin kelkar women’s identity, social protection and entrepreneurship
1. WoŵeŶ͛s IdeŶtity, SoĐial PƌoteĐtioŶ
and Entrepreneurship
Dev Nathan
Institute for Human Development, India and Duke
University, USA
Govind Kelkar
Landesa, Rural Development Institute, India & Seattle,USA
2. Identity in Development
• Identity – ƌeƋuiƌed foƌ aŶ iŶdiǀidual͛s ƌight to aĐĐess foƌŵal iŶstitutioŶs,
such as government entities, employers, banks
•
• Industrialized countries – official identity established at birth
•
• South Asia had highest proportion of children not registered at birth – 63%
against 55% in Sub-Saharan Africa
•
• India – non-registration of 45% of 26 million births p.a.; Urban-rural
variation
•
• BioŵetƌiĐ ideŶtifiĐatioŶ ĐaŶ eliŵiŶate ͚ideŶtity gap͛
• China, India, Brazil, Iran, Israel, Indonesia – and many others using it
•
• Aadhaar – IŶdia͛s ďioŵetƌiĐ ideŶtifiĐatioŶ systeŵ has ƌeaĐhed ϲϱ0ŵillioŶ
3. Why Identity ?
• To access state and formal services – food, subsidies,
elections, property, credit
• Consequences of Being Marginalized and Invisible –
– Forced to pay bribes, subject to extortions (e.g. homeless
in cities)
•
– Higher transaction costs
•
– Reinforces inequality
4. Benefits of Identity For Poor
• A pavement-dweller, [on how Aadhaar helps]
͚The poliĐe ǁoŶ͛t haƌass us.͛
•
• Foundational identity – does not itself confer
any benefits, but can be used for anything
requiring establishing identity
– Bank account, etc.
5. Women and Identity
• Women, traditionally, have only had a relational
identity (daughter/wife/mother)
•
• For matters related to the state, need a personal
identification, which can be verified by a third party
•
• This is Aadhaaƌ͛s first rupture with tradition
•
• Can allow move from household-based entitlements to
individual-based entitlements
6. Benefit: Enhance WoŵeŶ’s AgeŶcy
• Receive transfers in own name
• AĐt oŶ oŶe͛s oǁŶ ĐhoiĐes
– E.g. widows using their pensions to buy medicines
• Many steps to empowerment- plus
overcoming resistance of men
7. Aadhaar - Direct Benefits Transfer
• [Cash Transfer]
•
• Aadhaar plus micro-ATMs (point-of-sale
instruments)
•
• Woman will get the full household
entitlement
8. Formalization
• Can support formalization – e.g. of rights as
street vendors
•
• Portability of rights – importance in context of
migration
•
• Last-mile for financial inclusion (Only 25%
households have bank accounts)
– Can be linked to private data bases (pay a fee for use)
9. Reducing Cost of Service Delivery
• Problem of ghost and duplicate cards
• E.g. in AP more BPL cards than state
households in Census
• Biometric identification – can eliminate ghost
and duplicate cards
– More than 25% saving
10. Women and Entrepreneurship
• Do not own assets, e.g. land, for collateral
•
• Need support from male members to access bank
loans
• Restricted to home-based, self-employment with
low working capital requirements
•
• Can social protection deal with this problem?
11. Social Protection
• Income / consumption support to poor and
non-poor
• Financial access to health care
• Non-contributory and contributory systems
• But social protection is loaded with patriarchal
Ŷoƌŵs of ͚head of the household͛
12. Social Protection and
Entrepreneurship
• Additional income can e nable investment and
increase productivity
• Assured minimum can increase risk-taking ability
• Manage trade-off between immediate needs and
future livelihoods
• Manage disasters without asset sale
13. Providers of Social Protection
• Usually the State
• Also the Community (in traditional
communities)
• What about Group Social Protection, as in
IŶdia͛s SHGs aŶd soŵe MFI gƌoups?
14. Individual identity of women
• MFI clients are 95% women
• Services delivered to women
• Use within household affected by patriarchal
norms
– But evidence shows – over loan cycles women
assert their decision-making on use of credit
• Plus benefits of being organized
– Able to get better public services
15. Consumption Stipend
• For ultra-poor till they can arrange staple food
on their own
– In 18 months become regular MFI clients
• BRAC (Bangladesh)
• Combines government-subsidised food and asset transfer
with micro-finance
• Later become regular MFI clients
16. Sickness Allowance
– ͚WheŶ a ŵeŵďeƌ falls siĐk, ǁe pay ‘s.ϳϱ as siĐk
allowance per day. If she is not a member, mere
loan will be given͛
– ͚If the member is genuine, she will be supported
by the cluster fund for any such immediate needs
like shelteƌ daŵage oƌ siĐkŶess.͛
• Sickness is major reason for non-poor to
become poor – cost of treatment, income loss
17. Savings or loan for distress
– SaǀiŶgs aŶd haǀiŶg ͚ŵoŶey at haŶd͛ ƌeasoŶ foƌ
feeling secure
– Members are able to use borrowing or savings
rather than sale of assets in distress
18. Savings and insurance
• Then move on to micro credit (BASIX)
• Provide consumption loans, as against
Grameen Bank model where consumption
loans are not allowed
19. Impact
• Enable women, over time, to reduce share of
consumption loans and increase share of income-generating
activities
• Reduce share of income from agricultural labour
to self-employment
• The share of NREGA income that is saved is much
less than the investment from the MFI. Why?
• MFI money has to be returned, unlike NREGA
money; that would induce some investment in
income-generating activities
20. Conclusion
Group-based social protection
Can provide consumption and healthcare
support
And enable women to access working
capital and become entrepreneurs.