Open Scholarship (Open Science, Open Educational Resources) delivers directly to individual researcher`s objectives for impact and tenure evaluation, to the research institutions` objectives on innovative education and excellence research, so can Graduate Schools afford not to train all future graduates in "Open" practices alongside research excellence?

1. Ivo Grigorov, DTU Aqua Research Secretariat

2. FUNDERS: National & EC
Academic Staff
Today`s
Graduate
Student
Scientist of
Tomorrow
Project Managers
INSTITUTIONS
Knowledge
Managers

3. 3 reasons to make
Open Science part of excellence training:
Multiply
Collaborations
Stronger
Research
Profile
Greater
funding
success

4. How do YOU measure the success
of YOUR doctotral school?
Number of
PhD`s?
Publication?
Career
Chances ?

5. @ fosterscience
"Focus on Impact (Factor) distorts
what matters in science”
Dr. Alan Leshner,
CEO AAAS &
Publisher of
”Science” journal
#esof2014 pic.twitter.com/M9D0rVtggI
24/06/2014 16:53

6. "The currency of researchers is really
about making sure their work can be
read
and can be cited”
Robert Kiley,
Wellcome Trust
”Researchers job is to
change the world, not get tenure”
Dr. Mike Taylor
ESOF2014
Should Science Be OPEN?

7. “Open science is the umbrella term of the
movement to make scientific research,
data and dissemination accessible to all
levels of an inquiring society,
amateur or professional.”

8. IDEA &
PROPOSAL
TESTS
DATA
MODEL
CODE
Idealised
Research
Lifecycle
ARTICLES
Peer-review
& DOI
http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0021101
Impact Factor
(IF)
Open
Educational
Resources

9. Problem 1: reproducibility
Source: Peng 2011, Science 334, pp1226
http://www.stodden.net/AMP2011/slides/pengslides.pdf

10. Problem 2: Access to research
(by universities!)
Importance (x axis) and
ease of access for % universities and colleges (x axis)
Source: “Transitions in Scholarly Communications - a Portfolio of Research Projects,
Research Information Network,” 2011.
http://www.rin.ac.uk/our-work/communicating-and-disseminating-research/transitions-scholarly-communications-portfolio-

11. Problem 3: future REF criteria
Quality Research Outputs: articles, books or
other research outputs.
Impact: in the form of case studies which
demonstrate a distinctive
social, economic or cultural impact outside
academia.
Research Environment: the quality
of the environment within which the research conducted.
Source: UK HEFCE, www.hefce.ac.uk/

12. “Weakness in EXCELLENCE:
Involvement of different sectors is limited,
with no non-academic beneficiaries”
“Weakness in IMPACT:
highly focussed on academic activities, and
lacks an advanced communication strategy”
“Weakness in IMPLEMENTATION:
limitied exposure to
non-academic partners & infrastructures”
Source: Horizon2020,
Marie Curie ETN Evaluation Process, 2014

13. Open
Notebook
Science
IDEA &
PROPOSAL
TESTS
Data Publication
DATA
DataCenter
MODEL
CODE
Idealised
Research
Lifecycle
ARTICLES
DOI
Publish Code
http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0021101
DOI
DOI
REF
IMPACT
Open
Educational
Resources

14. Winning Horizon 2020 with Open Science?
Source: Winning Horizon 2020 with Open Science, 10.5281/zenodo.12247

15. Winning Horizon 2020 with Open Science?
2.1 Expected impact to WorkProgram
- expected impacts set out in the work programme
- delivering innovations to the markets
- socially important impacts
- plan for results dissemination and exploitation
- research data management for verification & re-use
- knowledge strategy management & Open Access
… for public and societal engagement!
Source: Winning Horizon 2020 with Open Science, 10.5281/zenodo.12247

16. 25 Nov 2014: Join the Open Science and Research Forum
http://web.csc.fi/csc/kurssit/arkisto/openscienceforum
Jan 2015: Join us in the proposal to the
Nordic eScience Globalization Iniative (NeGI)

17. Ivo Grigorov, DTU Aqua Research Secretariat

18. Ivo Grigorov, DTU Aqua Research Secretariat