This document discusses identifying, quantifying, and communicating the benefits of transboundary water cooperation. It presents a draft typology of four categories of benefits: 1) benefits for the transboundary waters, 2) benefits from the transboundary waters, 3) benefits thanks to the transboundary waters, and 4) benefits beyond the transboundary waters. The document outlines UNECE's methodology for developing guidance on assessing these benefits through expert workshops and a guidance note. It also discusses challenges in quantifying both economic and non-economic benefits and integrating benefit assessments into policy processes.
2. Transboundary cooperation
under the Water Convention
• Protection of transboundary waters
by preventing, controlling and
reducing transboundary impacts
• Reasonable and equitable use of
transboundary waters
• Obligation to cooperate through
agreements and joint institutions
=> Objective: sustainable water
management, looking at economic,
social & environmental dimensions
of water
3. Identifying, quantifying &
communicating the benefits of
transboundary cooperation
• Background
Limited scope of cooperation
Willigness to cooperate depends on perception of potential
benefits
Need for more qualitative & quantitative data on benefits
• Objectives
Support countries to understand and estimate the full
range of potential benefits of transboundary water
cooperation
Encourage the broadening of cooperation
4. Identifying, quantifying &
communicating the benefits of
transboundary cooperation
• Methodology
Development of a Policy Guidance Note on Identifying,
Quantifying and Communicating the benefits of cooperation
• Activities
– Expert framing workshop (June 2013)
– Workshop to gather & share experiences (22-23 May
2014)
– Expert Workshop to finalize the policy guidance note
and discuss next steps (Nov. 2014, tbc)
Contribute to the development of the Policy Guidance Note
Share experience during the Workshop in May 2014
5. Structure of the Guidance Note
•
•
•
•
•
Executive Summary
Ch1 – Setting the Context
Ch2 – Identifying benefits
Ch3 – Quantifying benefits
Ch4 – Maximizing the policy impact of benefit
assessment
• Technical annexes
6. DRAFT TYPOLOGY OF BENEFITS
I. Benefits for the
transboundary
waters
Environmental benefits (avoided habitat
degradation and biodiversity loss)
II. Benefits from
the transboundary
waters
Improved human satisfaction (recreation, cultural
values), improved health (reduced water-borne
diseases), and direct economic benefits
(increased economic production in sectors, reduced
costs of carrying out productive activities, avoided
losses from floods & droughts, increased value of
properties) as a consequence of managing water
better
• Reduced costs (managing water, complying with
treaties, defense spending) and improved benefits
(in other policy areas) as a consequence of
building trust between countries
III. Benefits
thanks to the
transboundary
waters
IV. Benefits
beyond the
transboundary
waters
• Economic growth and poverty reduction
generated by more cross-border investment and
open markets for goods, services and labor (as a
second order consequence of direct economic
benefits and increased trust)
7. Challenges of the work on benefits
of cooperation
• Need to build on existing knowledge and to bridge
science and policy
• Need to develop a policy-makers oriented guidance
note, based on concrete experience (GEF projects)
• Not all benefits can be valued: qualitative and
quantitative information
• Many tools and methodologies available for economic
valuation, to be communicated in an easy way to
influence the policy process
• High request to develop guidance on valuation of
benefits related to trust building
8. Which benefits of transboundary water
cooperation have you identified in your
project?
DRAFT TYPOLOGY OF BENEFITS
I. Benefits for the
transboundary waters
Environmental benefits
II. Benefits from the
transboundary waters
Consequences of managing water
better, direct economic benefits
III. Benefits thanks to the
transboundary waters
Consequences of building trust
between countries
IV. Benefits beyond the
transboundary waters
Economic growth and poverty
reduction generated
Have some benefits of transboundary water
cooperation already been quantified?
(in a qualitative or quantitative way)
9. In your projects, have benefits of
transboundary water cooperation
been communicated to influence
the policy process? How?
How could we better communicate
the benefits? How can the
assessment of benefits be
integrated into the policy process?
Signed on 17 March 1992
Entered into force on 6 October 1996
Counts 39 Parties
Amendments to allow accession to the Convention by all UN Member States entered into force in 2013. This turns the Water Convention into a global legal framework for transboundary water cooperation. Early 2014 (after the amendments become operational) countries from outside the ECE region shoud be able to join the Convention, with the same rights and responsibilities as existing Parties.
The Convention has been into force for more than 15 years and has supported the development of transboundary agreements, the establishment of joint bodies and the strengthening of water cooperation at both technical and political levels.
The Convention is based on three complementary and mutually sustaining obligations,
THREE PILLARS:
The obligation to take all appropriate measure to prevent control and reduce transboundary impacts.
The obligation to ensure that transboundary waters are used in a reasonable and equitable way, so that all riparian should benefit from the water in an equitable manner, offering benefits and placing similar demands on both upstream and downstream countries.
The obligation for riparian to cooperate through the establishment of agreements that foresee joint bodies responsible for joint management
The translation in practice of the first 2 pillars can only be achieved through cooperation and agreement by riparian countries. The Convention fosters the establishment of legal and institutional mechanism and the implementation of agreements, but also to develop to adapt to possibly changing conditions.
Consult and exchange of information
Joint monitoring and assessment
Elaborate joint objectives and concerted action programme for their shared waters
The Convention takes a holistic approach based on the understanding that water resources play an integral part in ecosystems as well as in human societies and economies.
Programme of work of the Water Convention adopted at the sixth session of the Meeting of the Parties (Nov. 2012)
Programme of work of the Water Convention adopted at the sixth session of the Meeting of the Parties (Nov. 2012)
Stakeholders to involve: : water and environmental economists, practitioners, policy makers, water diplomats