Ce diaporama a bien été signalé.
Nous utilisons votre profil LinkedIn et vos données d’activité pour vous proposer des publicités personnalisées et pertinentes. Vous pouvez changer vos préférences de publicités à tout moment.

The Educational Environment Journey

4 719 vues

Publié le

Presentation given at NVU Conference, Trondheim, Norway, 17 March 2009

Publié dans : Formation, Technologie
  • Login to see the comments

The Educational Environment Journey

  1. Jane Hart Social Media & Learning Consultant Centre for Learning & Performance Technologies www.C4LPT.co.uk The Educational Environment Journey NVU Conference Trondheim, 17 March 2009
  2. 13 March 1989
  3. 13 March 1989 Tim Berners-Lee handed a document to his supervisor Mike Sendall entitled "Information Management : a Proposal". "Vague, but exciting" is how Mike described it, and he gave Tim the nod to take his proposal forward. The following year, the World Wide Web was born.
  4. 1990s : The Early Web <ul><li>Education </li></ul><ul><ul><li>universities publishing information about themselves </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>online learning aka Web Based Learning (text and graphics) </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>primitive course communications </li></ul></ul><ul><li>Businesses </li></ul><ul><ul><li>late 1990s – Web Based Training - to reduce costs </li></ul></ul><ul><ul><li>late 1999 - “e-learning” coined </li></ul></ul>
  5. 2001 : Cisco Systems “ E-Learning is the next killer app: it will make email look like a rounding error “ John Chambers, CEO Cisco Systems, 2001 “ E-Learning is information, instruction, training, education and knowledge sharing” Tom Kelly, Head of ILSG, Cisco Systems, 2001
  6. Early E-Learning: Benefits Learning comes to you – any time, anywhere Self-paced learning – no need for a tutor
  7. E-Learning becomes big business <ul><li>Development of off-the-shelf generic course libraries </li></ul><ul><li>Bespoke multimedia course development companies </li></ul><ul><li>Rise of Course / Learning Management Systems / Virtual Learning Environments </li></ul>
  8. Do students like E-Learning?
  10. Some reasons …. <ul><li>E-Learning = E-Reading = Lonely Learning </li></ul><ul><li>E-Learning = VLE Learning (i.e. not very user-friendly and not like the tools they are used to </li></ul><ul><li>E-Learning = Traditional Learning and doesn’t suit the approach to learning in late 2000s </li></ul>
  11. Much of E-Learning is 1.0 E-Learning 1.0 one-way learning read-only learning online courses produced by experts (teachers) and published on a VLE to be studied by learners Web 1.0 one-way web read-only web content produced by an expert author published on the web to be read by consumers.
  12. Emergence of Web 2.0 Source: Launching the Web 2.0 Framework, Future Exploration Network Blog, 2007 Web 2.0 = read-write web services and apps to co-create content, collaborate and share it with others social media tools encourage socialisation FREE Open Source Hosted tools
  15. Generation Y and Technology <ul><li>97% own a computer </li></ul><ul><li>97% have downloaded music and other media using peer-to-peer file sharing </li></ul><ul><li>94% own a cell phone </li></ul><ul><li>76% use instant messaging and social networking sites </li></ul><ul><li>75% of college students have a Facebook profile and most of them check it daily </li></ul><ul><li>60% own some type of portable music and/or video device such as an iPod </li></ul><ul><li>49% regularly download music and other media using peer-to-peer file sharing </li></ul><ul><li>34% use websites as their primary source of news </li></ul><ul><li>28% author a blog and 44% read blogs </li></ul><ul><li>15% of IM users are logged on 24 hours a day/7 days a week </li></ul>Source: Connecting to the Net.Generation: What Higher Education Professionals Need to Know About Today's Students , Reynold Junco and Jeanna Mastrodicasa, 2007
  16. Attitudes/Approaches to Learning <ul><li>Traditional learner </li></ul><ul><li>classrooms and workshops </li></ul><ul><li>content-driven </li></ul><ul><li>taught </li></ul><ul><li>linear </li></ul><ul><li>tied to tests </li></ul><ul><li>“ just in case” </li></ul><ul><li>singularity </li></ul><ul><li>online web-based courses </li></ul><ul><li>text-based </li></ul><ul><li>independent </li></ul><ul><li>New breed of learner </li></ul><ul><li>hyperlinked info </li></ul><ul><li>multi-task </li></ul><ul><li>visual </li></ul><ul><li>experiential </li></ul><ul><li>short attention spans </li></ul><ul><li>social </li></ul><ul><li>“ just in time” </li></ul><ul><li>needs instant gratification </li></ul><ul><li>construct own learning </li></ul>
  17. Learning 2.0 = Social Learning <ul><li>Learners create content in a variety of formats using tools like blogs and wikis </li></ul><ul><li>share knowledge, experiences, information with others </li></ul><ul><li>work and learn collaboratively </li></ul><ul><li>participatory learning </li></ul>
  18. Learning 2.0 changes model of learning Source: Jeff Cobb, Learning 2.0 for Associations, 2008
  19. How can we support Learning 2.0?
  20. 1. Encourage learners to build a Personal Learning Environment “ collection of tools, brought together under the conceptual notion of openness, interoperability, and learner control.” George Siemens, 2007 “ using whatever tools and devices which the learners choose” “ PLEs are based on the context that learning will take place in different contexts and situations and will not be provided by a single learning provider.” Graham Attwell, 2007
  21. Social networks Communication File sharing sites Social bookmarking Blogs and RSS Collaboration
  22. Social networks Communication File sharing sites Social bookmarking Blogs and RSS Collaboration Personal/Professional Working/Learning Environment or Network PLE or PLN
  23. PLE or PLN <ul><li>Advantages </li></ul><ul><li>self-organising, informal learners </li></ul><ul><li>address own needs </li></ul><ul><li>best-of-breed tools </li></ul><ul><li>social-media aware users </li></ul><ul><li>bottom-up approach </li></ul>Disadvantages appeal to traditional learners? competence/confidence with tools concerns over privacy and data security
  24. 2. VLE 2.0 Source: VLE and future directions in learning environments, Martin Weller, 2006
  25. VLE 1.5?
  26. VLE + Social Media Disadvantages Perpetuates the Learning 1.0 model Doesn’t support informal learning No PLE Advantages Gets all educationalists up and running quickly Uses standard interface Includes/can add-on social media tools
  27. 3. Social Learning Environment “ In SocialLearn, we aim to move beyond web-feed based interoperability and visual clustering of apps on the webtop, with SL-aware apps communicating via the API, so that the learner’s profile can track and intelligently manage the flow of information and events to support their activity.”
  28. “ A social learning network integrates key social media tools like wikis, blogs, RSS, etc as well as social networking and social bookmarking functionality BUT ALSO provides a personal working learning space for individuals.” Jane Hart, Guide to Social Learning, 2009 4. Social Learning Network
  32. Dashboard and Tools
  33. Profile Page
  34. Groups
  36. Social Learning Platform Disadvantages less sophistication of tools can be more complex to install, configure and customise (although hosted solutions available) Advantages integrated suite of tools less complex for the user get everyone up and running very quickly across the enterprise formal and informal learning collaborative environment top-down and bottom-up
  37. Links for presentation <ul><li>www.c4lpt.co.uk/articles/edjourney.htm </li></ul>