SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  119
Télécharger pour lire hors ligne
Plato
Justice & Power--session ii
Topics in This Session


i.introduction
ii.Classical Greece
iii.Plato
iv.Politea (Republic)
v.Criticism
Introduction
Introduction
In the late 1960s it became fashionable to criticize the teaching
of Western Civilization as a source of white racism or cultural
chauvinism. By emphasizing the deeds and thoughts of the
ancestors of European Americans, the impression might grow
that Asians, Africans and Amerindians were people without
history, without culture… clearly inferior. “Why begin every
[expletive deleted] course with the Greeks?” Yippie leader
Jerry Rubin [Walnut Hills High School, Class of 1956] asked a
crowd of young Cincinnatians at a rally at Eden Park just prior
to the Chicago Conspiracy trial [in 1969]. A valid question,
however rudely put. Why should our inquiry begin with a small,
sparsely settled region of the ancient Mediterranean world?
                                  James B. Powers, Justice & Power, p. 1
The Heartland
         of
 Classical Greece




 Socrates would use
    the image of
  “frogs around a
pond” to describe the
  Greek city-states
 around the Aegean
        Sea
Fourth century B.C. Greece might justly be considered
poor, perhaps barbaric, or even insignificant by a citizen
of one of the river states---Egypt or Persia nearby, or
the Indus or Yellow River empires of ancient Asia. The
Golden Age of Classical Greece passed quickly, but in a
sense the achievements of Hellas have never since been
surpassed.
                                                     Ibid.
As Bertrand Russell, the
great twentieth century
philosopher, has said of
Greek civilization:
  Based on an underlying
  principle of harmony, it was torn
  by internal strife, and this may
  have enhanced its greatness.
  For though it never could evolve
  a viable panhellenic state, it
  c o n q u e re d a l l t h o s e w h o
  conquered the land of Hellas,
  and to this day remains the
  framework of the West.
                 Wisdom of the West, p. 35
Plato and his student Aristotle are universally held to epitomize
Greek academic thought. “It may be true that all succeeding
political philosophy is a footnote to and a commentary on Plato,
Professor Michael Curtis has written [quoting Alfred North
Whitehead] (The Great Political Theories, 1961, p. 23). With Plato’s
Republic, quite simply, we are beginning at the beginning. This is
humankind’s first attempt to systematically and intelligently record
a search for the ideal way to live.
                                                                Ibid.
This perfect condition was ascribed by other earlier or
contemporary cultures, such as the aforementioned river
kingdoms or the post-exilic Jewish state, to divine activity or
revelation. With characteristic Greek self-confidence Plato
presents his program as the product of an evening’s conversation.
The atmosphere of the dialogue is one of curiosity, intellectual
rivalry, humor, and moral earnestness---with here and there
evidence of the wine which inevitably fueled a Greek symposium.
                                                             Ibid.
This perfect condition was ascribed by other earlier or
contemporary cultures, such as the aforementioned river
kingdoms or the post-exilic Jewish state, to divine activity or
revelation. With characteristic Greek self-confidence Plato
presents his program as the product of an evening’s conversation.
The atmosphere of the dialogue is one of curiosity, intellectual
rivalry, humor, and moral earnestness---with here and there
evidence of the wine which inevitably fueled a Greek symposium.
                                                                            Ibid.




           Attic red figure Krater, ca. 390 BC at the J. Paul Getty Museum
Plato, the man who invented higher education with his Academy,
invites you to be one of the silent listeners. Socrates is the
narrator; Plato’s two brothers, Glaucon and Adeimantus, speak,
as does the host, a rich and aged merchant Cephalus, and his son
Polemarchus. Socrates’ chief adversary is the sophist
Thrasymachus, a cynical professional wise man or tutor.
                                                            Ibid.
Plato, the man who invented higher education with his Academy,
invites you to be one of the silent listeners. Socrates is the
narrator; Plato’s two brothers, Glaucon and Adeimantus, speak,
as does the host, a rich and aged merchant Cephalus, and his son
Polemarchus. Socrates’ chief adversary is the sophist
Thrasymachus, a cynical professional wise man or tutor.
                                                            Ibid.
Once you have listened to the plan proposed “just last night,”
you may become a disciple like Plato’s brothers. Or, like
Thrasymachus and after him Aristotle, you may remain a skeptical
critic. But like every political theorist since Plato’s day, you cannot
be ignorant of the ideas discussed that night and expect an
educated audience to give weight to your ideas.
                                                                  Ibid.
Classical Greece
Classical Greece
Hellas-the common
    heritage
Hellas-the common
    heritage
I. Classical Greece
  A. Hellas - the common heritage
    1. Homer
    2. Pre-Socratics
       a. Milesians - sceptics
       b. Pythagoreans - ascetics
       c. Heraclitus
       d Eleatics - Parmenides & Zeno
       e. the Sophists - Protagoras

   B. Polis - irreconcilable differences
     1. Citizens and “others”
     2. Sparta, Athens et al.
        a. experience and theory
        b. metropolis and colonies
     3. Persian Wars, 490-70 B.C.
     4. Periclean Athens
     5. Peloponnesian War, 431-04 B.C.



                                           Justice & Power, p. 3
Apotheosis of Homer
   J.A.D. Ingres, 1827
He was not the Greek Bible; he was the representative and spokesman of the

Greeks. He was quintessentially Greek. The stamp of the Greek genius is

everywhere on his two epics, in the banishment of the ugly and the frightful

and the senseless; in the conviction that gods were like men and men able to be

godlike; in the courage and undaunted spirit with which the heroes faced any

opponent, human or divine, even Fate herself; in the prevailing atmosphere of

reason and good sense…. Homer was the great molding force of Greece

because he was so Greek himself.


                                               Edith Hamilton, The Greek Way, p. 212
Pre-Socratic Philosophy


Milesians-sceptics
Pythagoreans-ascetics
Heraclitus
Eleatics
   Parmenides

   Zeno

the Sophists-Protagoras
Milesians
philosophers from the Greek colony of Miletus
Thales, Anaximander, Anaximenes

                                                       Θαλῆς,
                                                c. 624 BC – c. 546 BC




                                                   Ἀναξίμανδρος
                                                 c. 610 – c. 546 BC




                                                    Άναξιμένης
                                                  585 BC-528 BCE
Milesians
 one of the Seven Sages, father of philosophy (and
 science), he began to doubt his senses and inquire
                                                                        Θαλῆς,
    attempted to explain natural phenomena without reference     c. 624 BC – c. 546 BC
    to mythology

    his first principle--the world started from water


 he was followed by Anaximander who also doubted
 (σκεπσις-skepsis, skepticism)                                      Ἀναξίμανδρος
                                                                  c. 610 – c. 546 BC

    an indefinite (apeiron) principle gives rise to all natural
    phenomena


 finally, Anaximenes joined the argument

    his first principle--air
                                                                    Άναξιμένης
                                                                   585 BC-528 BC
Milesians
 one of the Seven Sages, father of philosophy (and
 science), he began to doubt his senses and inquire
                                                                        Θαλῆς,
    attempted to explain natural phenomena without reference     c. 624 BC – c. 546 BC
    to mythology

    his first principle--the world started from water


 he was followed by Anaximander who also doubted
 (σκεπσις-skepsis, skepticism)                                      Ἀναξίμανδρος
                                                                  c. 610 – c. 546 BC

    an indefinite (apeiron) principle gives rise to all natural
    phenomena


 finally, Anaximenes joined the argument

    his first principle--air
                                                                    Άναξιμένης
                                                                   585 BC-528 BC
Pythagoras and his followers salute the sunrise-Fyodor Bronnikov, 1869
little reliable information about him
is known. He may have travelled to
Egypt in his youth

530-he moved to Croton, a Greek
colony in Southern Italy where he
established a communal sect

his disciples followed ascetic
practices such as vegetarianism.
They were called the mathematikoi
Μαθηματικοι   (learners)

their first principle of the cosmos          Πυθαγόρας
                                        c. 570 – c. 495 BC
was number
a proof of Pythagoras' theorem, showing
how by rearranging triangles the areas a2
+ b2 and c2 can be shown to be the same.
The area of the outer square never
changes, and the total area of the four
right triangles is the same at both the
                                                          tetraktys
beginning and the end, therefore the         a mystical symbol, “source of the roots
black area at the beginning, a2 + b2, must           of ever-flowing nature”
equal the black area at the end, c2.
he was considered obscure, even by
                       contemporaries


                       famous for asserting change as the
                       basis of the cosmos-panta rhei kai
                       ouden menei (everything burns,
                       nothing remains)


                       but he is also known for hodos ano
                       kato-(the upward-downward path)


                       another first principle of the cosmos
Ἡράκλειτος ὁ Ἐφέσιος   was the Logos. Its meaning is arguable
  —Hērákleitos ho
       Ephésios
  c. 535 – c. 475 BC
he describes two views of reality. In
"the way of truth", he explains how
reality (coined as "what-is") is one,
change is impossible, and existence is
timeless, uniform, necessary, and
unchanging--his first principle


In "the way of opinion," he explains the
world of appearances, in which one's
sensory faculties lead to conceptions
which are false and deceitful


These ideas strongly influenced the
w h o l e o f We s t e r n p h i l o s o p h y ,      Παρμενίδης ὁ
perhaps most notably through its                        Ἐλεάτης
                                                   fl. early 5th century BC
effect on Plato
not to be confused with Zeno of Citium
     founder of the Stoic school                                   member of the Eleatic School founded by
                                                                   Parmenides, his erotes. Aristotle called him
                                                                   the inventor of the dialectic


                                                                   449-Plato describes a visit to Athens by
                                                                   Zeno and Parmenides, at a time when
                                                                   Parmenides is "about 65," Zeno is "nearly
                                                                   40" and Socrates is "a very young man"


                                                                   best known for his paradoxes, which
                                                                   Bertrand Russell has described as
                                                                   "immeasurably subtle and profound"


                                                                            Achilles & the tortoise: In a race, the
                                                                            quickest runner can never overtake the
                                                                            slowest, since the pursuer must first reach
           Ζήνων ὁ Ἐλεάτης                                                  the point whence the pursued started, so that
            c. 490 – c. 430 BC                                              the slower must always hold a lead



         Zeno shows the Doors to Truth and Falsity (Veritas et Falsitas). Fresco in the Library of El Escorial, Madrid.
Polis-irreconcilable
    differences
B. Polis - irreconcilable differences
  1. Citizens and “others”
  2. Sparta, Athens et al.
     a. experience and theory
     b. metropolis and colonies
  3. Persian Wars, 490-79 B.C.
  4. Periclean Athens
  5. Peloponnesian War, 431-04 B.C.




                                        Justice & Power, p. 3
“Citizens” and others
each of the more than 1,000 poleis had its own definition
of who was a citizen
none enfranchised slaves, females or minors
resident aliens (metoikoi) were usually excluded as well
in Athens, the largest polis, birthplace of democracy,
estimates place the number of polites (citizens) at
40-50,000 out of a total population of several hundred
thousand
political participation was only one of the irreconcilable
differences
barbaroi--the ultimate other



our word “barbarian” comes from the Greek
it’s how they mocked the “incomprehensible speech” of
the savage non-Hellenes. cf. our “blah, blah, blah”
even enlightened philosophers had no doubts of Greek
racial and cultural superiority to other ethnicities
the two most famous of the many different
                                                   and fractious Greek poleis




    Sparta-the way of war

their struggle for hegemony will ultimately
        destroy Classical Greece


a tragedy of “irreconcilable differences”



                                                 Athens-the light of reason
a journey of only a day or two might take a Greek through several different
states whose laws and customs were different from those of his native polis


these different experiences explain why he might think about and theorize
(θεωρειν-theōrein) about which might be the better state


could this be why political philosophy began in Greece rather than Egypt,
Mesopotamia -- older, more “advanced” societies?


Greeks began to send out settlers in the 8th century. These colonies had to
develop their own constitutions


they would take some elements from their “mother country” (metropolis). New
experiences required them to theorize about how best to frame government to
meet local condtions
war-unifier or divider?


war against a common enemy can bring tremendous unity
within an alliance system and within each state
a prolonged war, however, often produces conflict over
strategies, even internal dispute over whether to continue
the fight or seek “peace at any price.”
Persian wars-490-479 BC
                 Persia,then the greatest empire in the
                 world, decided to conquer the divided
                 Greek states

                 490-amazingly, the Athenians
                 defeated the first attack at Marathon

                 480-479--Xerxes returned with a huge
                 force to punish them

                 the Athenian navy at Salamis, then the
                 Spartan-led land forces at Plataea
                 once again drove the Persians off

                 this David-Goliath moment created the
                 pride and self-confidence which
                 produced the Golden Age of Classical
                 Greece
Age of Pericles




                  the Parthenon with its famous
                  statue of Athena was financed by
                  the wealth of the Athenian empire
Age of Pericles
Athens and Sparta shared the victory over
the Persian Empire

but Athens soon began to reap greater
rewards

Pericles, the leader of Athenian democracy,
led the building program which attracted
the wonder of all Hellas

the arts flourished under state patronage

but the rivalry with Sparta was fed by the
growth of Athens’ power. The Delian
League against Persia became the Athenian
Empire                                        the Parthenon with its famous
                                              statue of Athena was financed by
431-Sparta and her allies declared war
                                              the wealth of the Athenian empire
Age of Pericles
Athens and Sparta shared the victory over
the Persian Empire

but Athens soon began to reap greater
rewards

Pericles, the leader of Athenian democracy,
led the building program which attracted
the wonder of all Hellas

the arts flourished under state patronage

but the rivalry with Sparta was fed by the
growth of Athens’ power. The Delian
League against Persia became the Athenian
Empire                                        the Parthenon with its famous
                                              statue of Athena was financed by
431-Sparta and her allies declared war
                                              the wealth of the Athenian empire
Peloponnesian War-431-404 BC
                                   the war began with each system of allies using
                                   their asymmetrical strengths, Sparta on land,
                                   Athens at sea

                                   421-415--after an uneasy truce, Athens
                                   launched the disastrous Sicilian expedition

                                   413-405--despite its crippling failure, Athens
                                   survived and fought on until Lysander
                                   destroyed her fleet at Aegospotami

                                   this long “war like no other” in its ruthless
                                   brutality left the Greek states exhausted,
                                   disillusioned, divided internally, ripe for
                                   political extremism, and prey to external
“...to the music of flutes Sparta   powers like Persia and Macedonia
made Athenian captives tear down
their walls”--Xenophon
Socrates, an Athenian citizen of humble means, fought in the early
land battles as a foot soldier. Plato, who would become his disciple,
an Athenian aristocrat, was born a few years after the war began. He
fought as a cavalryman in its last battles. Both tasted the bitter
defeat, the disillusionment of this war which ended the Golden Age.
Both experienced the political upheavals which replaced democracy
with a pro-Spartan oligarchy, the Thirty Tyrants led by Plato’s uncle.
It was soon overthrown by a vengeful democracy which would put
Socrates to death in 399 BC.
Plato
Plato     Πλάτων, Plátōn
        428/27 BC – 348/347 BC
II. Plato
  A. Discipleship
    1. early life
    2.Socrates
       a. Socratic method
       b. “know thyself”- anamnesis
       c. Apology, Crito, Phaedo
   B. Travels
   C. Academy, 387 BC - 529 AD (!)
      1. dialogues vs. treatises
His early years were filled with the education of his social
station--private tutors, ‘music and gymnastic’. There is a
tradition of his success as an athlete, experimentation with
poetry. His name may refer “to the breadth of his
shoulders, his brow, his style. He is said to have become a
disciple of Socrates at the age of twenty, some eight or nine
years before Socrates’ death.”
                                      Paul Shorey, What Plato Said, p. 1
Athens was by modern standards a small and gossipy city. Plato
would have had abundant opportunity to observe the piquant
contrast between the strange uncouth figure, the barefoot begging
chatterbox, the butt of Attic comedy, and the magic of the man’s
words, his power to deal with his interlocutors as he pleased, and to
compel everyone who approached him to render an account of his
soul and view his opinions in the light of reason...the irony that
enabled him to mingle with the world yet not be of it, the feigned
defective memory that introduced the demand for dialectic in place
of long speeches of rhetoric, the professed ignorance that served
to provoke joint inquiry.
                                                         Shorey, pp. 10-11
Athens was by modern standards a small and gossipy city. Plato
would have had abundant opportunity to observe the piquant
contrast between the strange uncouth figure, the barefoot begging
chatterbox, the butt of Attic comedy, and the magic of the man’s
words, his power to deal with his interlocutors as he pleased, and to
compel everyone who approached him to render an account of his
soul and view his opinions in the light of reason...the irony that
enabled him to mingle with the world yet not be of it, the feigned
defective memory that introduced the demand for dialectic in place
of long speeches of rhetoric, the professed ignorance that served
to provoke joint inquiry.
                                                              Shorey, pp. 10-11



               The School of Athens (detail), Raphael, 1511
“He did not profess to know or teach anything. ‘I am like
             the midwife whose function I exercise on the minds of
             others.’...His function, he said, was like that of the
             physician who purged men’s minds of their false
             conceits; it was like that of the midwife who assisted in
             the delivery of their true and more considered
             thought….He himself had no body of doctrine to
             impart….In respect of method...Plato confirms
             Aristotle’s statement that there are two things that may
             be rightly attributed to Socrates, inductive argument
             and the quest for definitions. His philosophical dogmas:

“no man willingly does wrong


“virtue is knowledge, all wrongdoing and error is ignorance


“it is better to suffer injustice than to do it”
                                                              Shorey, pp. 12-13
“know thyself”- anamnesis

Socrates’ theory of education was based on his belief that every
person has innate knowledge. The teacher’s role is not to “pour”
facts into empty vessels. Rather it is to draw out that knowledge
through skillful questions which aid the learner to remember
(ανάµνησις -- anamnesis) that which she already knows[Plato is the
first recorded master to allow a woman to enter his Academy].
Thus Socrates practiced that Delphic motto--”know thyself” (γνόθι
σεαθτόν--gnothi seauton). He also said the unexamined life is not
worth living (ὁ δὲ ἀνεξέταστος βίος οὐ βιωτὸς ἀνθρώπῳ -- ho de
an•ex• EH•tas•tos BI•os ou bi•ōh•TOS an•THRŌ•pō--Apology, 38a)
Apology, Crito, Phaedo

These three “biographical” dialogues narrate the famous “sin
against philosophy” committed by the vengeful Athenian democracy
in 399 BC. The Apology takes the form of Socrates’ speeches to his
accusers who charged him with blasphemy and corrupting the youth.
In Crito Socrates gently refuses this disciple’s offer of an escape. He
must remain true to his principles and obey the laws of his polis. The
Phaedo is a moving “last class” with his disciples. The night of his
execution is spent in a dialogue on the nature of death. “Be of good
cheer, no harm can come to a good man in life or death.”
Apology, Crito, Phaedo

These three “biographical” dialogues narrate the famous “sin
against philosophy” committed by the vengeful Athenian democracy
in 399 BC. The Apology takes the form of Socrates’ speeches to his
accusers who charged him with blasphemy and corrupting the youth.
In Crito Socrates gently refuses this disciple’s offer of an escape. He
must remain true to his principles and obey the laws of his polis. The
Phaedo is a moving “last class” with his disciples. The night of his
execution is spent in a dialogue on the nature of death. “Be of good
cheer, no harm can come to a good man in life or death.”




            The Death of Socrates, Jacques-Louis David, 1787
Shocked, disillusioned and grieving the death of his master, Plato
left Athens for nearby Megara. From there he may have travelled to
Egypt, the source of wisdom and mystery for the Greeks. He
definitely travelled to the Greek colony of Syracuse.

      “T this period belongs his first Sicilian visit at the court of the
        o
      elder Dionysius, and the story that he was sold into slavery
      on the island of Aegina by the Spartan ambassador Pollis, at
      the instigation of Dionysius, and ransomed by one Anniceris
      of Cyrene. He may or may not have taught at Athens during
      these twelve years.”
                                                              Shorey, p.1
Academy

This school, which he located on his estate north of Athens, near
the grove of the hero Academus, gives its name to every later such
institution of higher learning. It would endure for some nine hundred
and sixteen years (387 BC-529 AD) a record unequalled by any such
later school!
    “The forty years of residence, teaching, and writing at Athens that
    followed were interrupted by his two visits to the court of Dionysius
    the Younger in Syracuse. Otherwise little is known of these forty
    years of his life, except conjectures about the dates of his writings
    and a few anecdotes of his relations with contemporaries.”
                                                                 Shorey, p.2
Republic
Republic
Republic
III. Politeia (Republic), 365 (?) [recent scholarship-350s] BC; bks., x, pp. 397
  A. Bk I -- Introduction: defective definitions of justice
    1. conventional morality
       a. Cephalus
       b. Polemarchus
    2. cynical “realism”
       a. Thrasymachus’ argument
       b. Socrates’ refutation




                                                               Justice & Power, p. 3
In Book i Socrates describes how
the gathering turned after dinner to
examine the thesis question of The
Republic: What is justice?
 Cephalus remarks how his wealth
frees him to “make offering due the
gods [and pay] debts which he owes
to men.”
 “Well said, Cephalus, I replied; but
as concerning justice, what is it (η
δικαιοσυνη, το τι; hē dikaiosyne, to ti,
literally: the justice. it what?)---to
speak the truth and to pay your
debts---no more than this” asks
Socrates.
                          Powers, J & P, p. 1
Polemarchus’ Definition
             ...Πολλ’ δ’ ἄλγεα δυσµενὲεσσι,
             χαρµατα δ’ εὐµενέτῃσι
               ...POL’ D’AL•gĕ•a   dus•men•E•e•si,
               CHAR•ma•ta d’eu•men•ET•ē•si


              ...many pains to enemies,
              joys to well-wishers
                        Homer, Odyssey, bk vi, 184-185


In other words, the traditional Greek definition of justice:
doing good to those who do good to you, getting even
with your enemies-- as old as the Homeric tradition.
Then, after Polemarchus offers his definition, “Socrates
expresses his dissatisfaction with both these conventional
approaches and through a series of questions, points out their
shortcomings.
    Unable to contain himself, Thrasymachus scornfully breaks in
to develop his famous definition of justice as that which is to the
advantage of those in power:
 ‘Justice is the interest of the stronger.’ “
                                                        op. cit., pp. 1-2
“What’s the matter with you two, Socrates? Why do you go on in this

imbecile way, politely deferring to each other’s nonsense? If you really

want to know what justice means, stop asking questions and scoring

off the answers you get. You know very well it is easier to ask questions

than to answer them. Answer yourself, and tell us what you think

justice means.”


Plato, The Republic, F.M. Cornford, trans. Oxford University Press, 1945 quoted in J & P: Reader p. 1
Socrates craftily maneuvers Thrasymachus into giving his
definition--
     “Listen then, Thrasymachus began. What I say is that ‘just’
   or ‘right’ means nothing but what is to the interest of the
   stronger party….Don’t you know, then, that a state may be
   ruled by a despot, or a democracy, or an aristocracy?

   “Of course.

   “And that the ruling element is always the strongest?

   “Yes.”

                                                           op. cit., p. 2
“Well then, in every case the laws are made by the ruling party in its
   own interest: a democracy makes democratic laws [in the interest of
   the Many who control a democracy], a despot autocratic ones, and
   so on….That is what I mean: in all states alike ‘right’ has the same
   meaning, namely what is for the interest of the party established in
   power, and that is the strongest.

     “Now I see what you mean, said I; whether it is true or not, I must
   try to make out.”

                                                                op. cit., p. 2



Socrates then attacks the definition with a series of dialectical
propositions: Well, if X, then Y?-OK-And if P, then Q? Well, I
guess so-Then it must follow that R is S, &c., &c.
Socrates gets him to agree that no ruler will study what is in his own
interest, rather what is good and proper for his subjects:
     “At this point, when everyone could see that Thrasymachus’ definition of
  justice had been turned inside out, instead of making any reply, he said:

    “Socrates, have you a nurse?

    “Why do you ask such a question as that?

     “Because she lets you go around sniffling like a child whose nose wants
  wiping. She hasn’t even taught you to know a shepherd when you see one, or
  his sheep either.

      “What makes you say that?

        “Why you imagine that a herdsman studies the interests of his flocks of
  cattle, tending and fattening them up with some other end in view than his
  master’s profit or his own; and so don’t you see that, in politics, the genuine
  ruler regards his subjects like sheep, and thinks of nothing...but the good he
  can get out of them for himself… “[and much more in this cynical vein]
“Having deluged our ears with this torrent of words, as a man at

       the baths might empty a bucket over one’s head, Thrasymachus

       meant to take himself off; but the company obliged him to stay and

       defend his position. I was specially urgent in my entreaties.”


                                                                        op. cit., p. 6


Socrates, once again, gets the better of the sophist Thrasymachus,
much to the delight of Plato’s brothers, Glaucon and Adeimantus and
the host Cephalus’ son, Polemarchus. Thrasymachus departs and
Socrates proposes to continue the search for the definition of this
most precious quality justice.
Which brings us to Book ii
III. Politeia (Republic), 365 (?) [recent scholarship-350s] BC; bks., x, pp. 397
  A. Bk I -- Introduction: defective definitions of justice
    1. conventional morality
        a. Cephalus
        b. Polemarchus
    2. cynical “realism”
        a. Thrasymachus’ argument
        b. Socrates’ refutation
  B. Bks II-IV -- two cities
     1. growth of the typical or “natural” polis
         a. division of labor
         b. luxury --- cause of war
     2. the ideal (just) state
         a. government --- “machinery” or people?
         b. guardians CAUTION! two usages
             1. attributes
             2. education, censorship, & propaganda
               a. stages: 20, 30, 35, 50 years
              3. “careers open to talent”
              4. myth of the metals
      3. justice discovered --- the four virtues in
          a. state
          b. soul
          c. individual                                       Justice & Power, pp. 3-4
III B -- two cities (poleis)



Socrates suggests that it will be easier to see what justice is by
looking at it writ large, justice in a just state, not justice in an
individual or in his dealings with other individuals. Just as with
an eye chart, we start with the big letters at the top, then work
down. So let’s imagine a state coming into being and see if we
can find justice in it.
growth of the “natural” polis

 Socrates gives a remarkably modern description of
 how cities grow out of people’s need to come
 together in order to enjoy economic benefits
     each makes or does that which he is best suited for

     then they exchange goods and services

     all do better than as if each tried to meet all his needs isolated
     “in the state of nature”

 so the polis prospers. With this comes luxury
     Socrates deplores that there will need to be more people to
     cater to the “unhealthy desires” of this swollen state
“The country which was large enough to support the original inhabitants, will
now be too small. If we are to have enough pasture and plow land, we shall have
to cut off a slice of our neighbors’ territory; and if they too are not content with
necessities, but give themselves up to getting unlimited wealth, they will want a
slice of ours.

    “That is inevitable, Socrates.

     “So the next thing will be, Glaucon, that we shall be at war.

     “No doubt.

    “We need not say yet whether war does good or harm, but only that we have
discovered its origin in desires which are the most fruitful source of evils both to
individuals and to states.”

                                                                         op. cit., p. 11
“That will mean a considerable addition to our community--a whole army, to go
out to battle with any invader, in defense of all this property and of the
citizens….

  “Why so? Can’t they defend themselves?

    “Not if the principle was right, which we all accepted in framing our society.
You remember we agreed that no one man can practice many trades or arts
satisfactorily.

  “True.

           “Well, is not the conduct of war an art, quite as important as
shoemaking? ...We gave each man one trade, for which he was naturally fitted; he
would do good work, if he confined himself to that all his life….”

                                                                              Ibid.
III B 2-the ideal (just) state

Socrates pretends to have stumbled upon the principle of
justice in the state with this need to have those who are ideally
(by nature) intended to be warriors. He calls them Guardians.
But before we follow his imaginary creation of the just state it is
well to review our own notions about government. The modern
tendency is to equate government with its “machinery,” its
constitution; what kind of legislature, executive, judiciary,
bureaucracy….Plato is now going to focus on the people who
fill those “slots.”
Guardians (φυλακοι,phylakoi)
The rulers, Plato’s words harken back to his image of the good
king as shepherd of his people (Homer’s anax andron
Agamemnon), must be ideally (by nature) suited to the job.
They will be the best citizens, possessed of all the virtues--
wisdom, courage, temperance, and JUSTICE.
  But, be aware, he begins by talking about the rulers’ function
of guarding the people--warriors. Later he will discuss what we
call the civil authorities. Like our American constitution, Plato
will place these civil guardians in authority over the military
ones.    The civil he will call Guardians in the strict sense, the
military, he will call Auxiliaries.
“I suspect then, we may find what we are looking for in this way. I take it that
our state, having been founded and built up on the right lines, is good in the
complete sense of the word.

  “It must be.

  “Obviously, then, it is wise, brave, temperate, and just.

  “Obviously.

   “Then if we find some of these qualities in it, the remainder will be the one we
have not found.”

                                                                              Ibid.
B.2.b.1-attributes-the four (pagan) virtues
wisdom
    “...a passion for knowledge and understanding….the same thing as
    philosophy--the love of wisdom” (φιλειν + σοφια = φιλοσοφια)

courage
    “...the same temperament as a well-bred watch dog...quick sense to
    detect an enemy, swiftness in pursuing him, and strength, if they have to
    fight when they have caught him.

    “...the right conviction about the things which ought, or ought not, to be
    feared…”cf. Pericles

temperance
    moderation in all things--(µη δεν αγαν, may den agan)

justice
    the definition we seek...more will be revealed….
Education-Sparta & Athens

Physical and mental education combining the best of both
societies: the rigor of Sparta and the cultivation of reason
which characterized Athenian schooling. Boys and girls will train
together, ala Sparta. As in Sparta, strict censorship will exclude
ideas which might conflict with the mindset which this education
is to produce. A series of tests will weed out the weak and
cowardly. Only the strongest, bravest and best will make the
“first cut” at age twenty. They become Auxiliaries, the warrior
Guardians.
Education-Sparta & Athens

Physical and mental education combining the best of both
societies: the rigor of Sparta and the cultivation of reason
which characterized Athenian schooling. Boys and girls will train
together, ala Sparta. As in Sparta, strict censorship will exclude
ideas which might conflict with the mindset which this education
is to produce. A series of tests will weed out the weak and
cowardly. Only the strongest, bravest and best will make the
“first cut” at age twenty. They become Auxiliaries, the warrior
Guardians.
further refinement
   From age thirty to thirty-five the Auxiliaries are instructed in
philosophy to discover the wisest among them (“philosophy is
wasted on the young”). Those who don’t make the second cut
remain warriors. The best (hoi aristoi) of the best are further
groomed to become, like the Spartan Gerousia, the ruling
oligarchy. At age fifty these Guardians in the strict sense
become the ultimate authority in this ideal state, Plato’s
Republic. (Res publica is a Latin word. The Greek term is
Politeia.)
      This selection through education will produce what the
French revolutionaries called “careers open to talent.” Other
nineteenth century states also adopted civil service exams to
replace corrupt job-filling with the principle of merit.
the myth of the metals
  Glaucon objects. Wont those who don’t get the top positions
be envious? Socrates responds: our goal is to do what’s best
for all, not just make a few happy. But he offers a “harmless”
fable, propaganda delivered in the education process. After
several generations it will become accepted as fact:

     we are all born from the Earth (autochthonous)
     within each of us our souls are either golden,
     silver, or some baser element
     if we accept this fate, all will be well
     if we do not, terrible calamities will ensue
justice discovered!
  In the state wisdom is to be found in the Guardians, courage
in the Auxiliaries, temperance in the acceptance of every citizen
of his place and responsibilities--“the better part ruling the
worse.”(p. 19) So justice must be what’s left. This was our first
principle--division of labor--according to each person’s innate
vocation. “...this minding of one’s own business, when it takes a
certain form, is actually the same thing as justice….”
    “Justice admittedly means that a man should possess and
concern himself with what properly [according to nature]
belongs to him.”
                                                         op. cit, p. 21
in the polis
wisdom - found in the Guardians
courage - the Auxiliaries
temperance - these two controlling the
Many (hoi polloi)
justice - each “having” and “doing”
according to his nature
in the soul (ψυχη, psychē)

wisdom - σοφια, sophia
courage - θαρσεω, tharseō
temperance - σοφροσυνη, sophrosynē
justice - δικαιοσυνη, dikaiosynē
in the individual
wisdom - found in the mind, brain
courage - the heart
temperance - when the brain rules the
passions and the appetites
Passion
           Reason
                         Silver
         in the individual
            Gold
                              Appetite
                             baser metal


wisdom - found in the mind, brain
courage - the heart
temperance - when the brain rules the
passions and the appetites
in the individual
wisdom - found in the mind, brain
courage - the heart
temperance - when the brain rules the
passions and the appetites
justice - each organ “having” and
“doing” according to its nature
III. Politeia (Republic)
  C. Bks V-VII -- “...philosophers become kings…”
    1. life among the Guardians and Auxiliaries
        a. communism - goods and wives
        b. near equality of women
        c. eugenics - abortion & festivals
    2. the cave - Plato’s theory of ideas

  D. Bks VII-IX -- degenerate types of city & man
     1. causes of decline
         a. timocracy
         b. oligarchy
         c. democracy
         d. tyranny
     2. the argument concluded --- three proofs
  E. Bk X -- supplement




                                                    Justice & Power, p. 4
τα τον φιλον κοινη (the things of friends [ought to be] common)
Guardians and Auxiliaries will live simply--no gold and silver things, no luxury

they will take their meals in common messes, like the Spartan syssitia

the women will also be held in common, as with their children
     coming together for procreation is done at periodical festivals, pairing is apparently
     by lot

     actually the rulers rig the lottery,mating the best with the best to promote eugenics

each child is taught to regard every Guardian as father or mother; they
are raised in common nurseries (day care centers?) so that the Guardian
women can attend to “higher” matters

as in Sparta, children with birth defects are exposed to die
these bizarre practices apply only to the rulers. The Many live as in other
poleis
III.C.1.b -- near equality of women
Plato’s view was quite “countercultural” for a Greek of that
time
“Socrates after some demure and deprecation of ridicule
expounds:
“women have the same capacities as men though usually in
lesser degree
thus women of the Guardian class should share in the
education of the males
they should even share their occupations! soldiering or ruling
based on merit
                                         quotes from Shorey, p. 177
“What do we mean by philosophers...
  and what is the higher education that will develop their native
powers and fit them to be guardians of the state? By true
wisdom [that which philosophers love] Plato meant thought,
abstract ideas, general conceptions---a systematic and
coherent philosophy of life such as can be achieved onlt
through the severest discipline of the higher mental faculties.
All this is expressed in the terminology of the Platonic doctrine
of ideas. Universals, ideas, notions, are treated as
things….They belong to the world of true being and
unchanging reality. The particulars of sense which the world
thinks so real are imperfect copies of the idea and hold a place
midway between true being and absolute non-being or nothing.
                                                     Shorey, p.178
The relationship of appearance to reality in Plato’s worldview can perhaps
be best grasped in the context of mathematics. A ring...or the perimeter of
a hoplite shield might seem to the casual observer to be a circle, but these
round objects are not circles in the same sense that the locus of all points
in a given plane equidistant from a given point is a circle. They only look
like circles; if you were to put them under a magnifying glass you would
see that they were not circles at all, merely objects vaguely circular in
appearance that bring to mind the Form of the circle. Only the circle
depicted in the mathematical definition is a circle. Some people might say
that these concrete objects are real circles whereas the geometrical concept
is imaginary, but Plato is not one of these people. For Plato, only the
concept is real. The tangible objects are debased copies, feeble imitations
of the ideal Form.

                                            Pomeroy et al. Ancient Greece, pp. 389-390
Plato’s brothers, Glaucon and Adeimantus, become so excited
by the discussion that they implore Socrates to help them
begin to build this ideal just polis.
He brings them down to earth with what is the most famous
excerpt from the dialogue:

 “And I said: Cities will have no respite from evil, my dear Glaucon, nor
 will the human race, I think, unless philosophers rule as kings in the
 cities, or those whom we now call kings and rulers genuinely and
 adequately study philosophy, until, that is, political power and
 philosophy coalesce, and the various natures of those who now
 pursue the one to the exclusion of the other are forcibly debarred
 from doing so. Otherwise the city we have been describing will never
 grow into a possibility or see the light of day.
                                     Republic, trans. G.M.A. Grube, bk v, sect 473d
Philosopher kings are the rulers, or Guardians, of
Plato's Utopian Kallipolis (beautiful city). If his ideal
city-state is to ever come into being, "philosophers
[must] become kings…or those now called kings
[must]…genuinely and adequately
philosophize" (The Republic, v. 473d).
                                                Wikipedia
III. Politeia (Republic)
  C. Bks V-VII -- “...philosophers become kings…”
    1. life among the Guardians and Auxiliaries
        a. communism - goods and wives
        b. near equality of women
        c. eugenics - abortion & festivals
    2. the cave - Plato’s theory of ideas

  D. Bks VIII-IX -- degenerate types of city & man
     1. causes of decline
         a. timocracy
         b. oligarchy
         c. democracy
         d. tyranny
     2. the argument concluded --- three proofs
  E. Bk X -- supplement


                                                     Justice & Power, p. 4
States-the cyclical theory


best




worst
States-the cyclical theory
                                                Hesiod’s
                                                Five Ages

best              aristocracy
                                                GOLDEN


                                  timocracy
                                                 SILVER



                                    oligarchy
                                                BRONZE



                                                HEROIC
                                democracy

worst              tyranny
                                                 IRON
Book viii-defective poleis
 The first step down the path of corruption is timarchy on the
Spartan model. Reason no longer rules but the spirited part is
in control and the army dominates. War and victory are
therefore the things that are prized. The guardians still protect
the state against outside enemies, but they now rule harshly
and demand some private property [for themselves]. The arts
are neglected and education degenerated. Men love money, but
secretly. The next stage is oligarchy (plutocracy) where this
love of money openly dominates, a wealth qualification for
offices is instituted, and there are great disparities.
                                                         G.M.A. Grube, p. 193
Book viii-defective poleis (cont.)
   So in the corresponding individual character love of money is
supreme, and both reason and spirit are enslaved to it. This still
requires control of appetites, but of the wrong kind. In democracy, the
next stage, there is no control at all and all desires are equal. There is
a rich vein of broad irony in the description of democracy and the
democratic man, and Plato is obviously enjoying himself.
  As excessive love of money destroys oligarchy, so excessive love of
liberty destroys democracy and leads to dictatorship where there is
no freedom at all.
  Dictatorship comes about through the people choosing a champion
who grasps all power for himself with the help of the unsuspecting
populace who vote him a bodyguard. In this last stage of degeneration
the very worst passions are in command of the state.
                                                      G.M.A. Grube, pp. 193-194
Democratic Man Comes to Power
“Often a poor man, spare and suntanned, stands in battle next to a
rich man who is pale for lack of sun with much superfluous flesh, and
sees him panting and at a loss. Do you not think that he would
consider that it is through the cowardice of the poor that people like
that are rich, and one poor man would say to the other as they met
privately:”These men are at our mercy; they are no good.” --”I know
very well that they do this.”
  “...so a city [which is sick with the love of money] needs but a small
excuse and, as one side [of the class war] brings in allied from an
oligarchic city or the other from a democracy, the city is ill and fights
itself, and sometimes a revolution occurs even without outside help.”
--”Most certainly.”
                                       Plato, Republic, G.M.A. Grube, trans., p. 206
After describing the ills of tyranny in bk. ix, Plato explains that
these abuses lead “the best” (hoi aristoi) citizens to overthrow
the tyrant. They now reestablish aristocracy and the cycle
( Gk. kyklos, circle) begins again.
Book ix-why philosophers should rule


   There are three lives, the philosophic, the ambitious, and the
appetitive, and each man believes his own life to be the most pleasant.
The philosopher, however, is the best judge because he has some
experience of the others’ pleasures, whereas they have no experience
of his. Moreover the means of judgement --- intelligence and
reasoned discourse --- are peculiarly his.

                                                        G.M.A. Grube, p. 219
Book x is often described as an addendum. It gives a more
detailed argument for the ban on “imitative poetry”, it offers
what Grube calls an unconvincing argument for immortality,
and concludes with the myth of Er:
     “an elaborate and vivid picture of the soul’s thousand-year
     journey from incarnation to incarnation to incarnation, is atale
     of rewards and punishments after death, which completes the
     case for justice and makes a fitting ending to the whole
     Republic.”

                                                                Grube, p. 239
Criticism
"The safest general
characterization of the
European philosophical
tradition is that it consists of
a series of footnotes to
Plato." (Alfred Nor th
Whitehead, Process and
Reality, 1929).
IV. Criticism
     1. Aristotle to Popper
     2. Utopia - static vs. dynamic concepts
     3. realism
     4. model or blueprint?
     5. historical parallels
     6. Plato in Sicily
     7. Voltaire at Potsdam




                                               Justice & Power, p. 4
Beginning with Plato’s most famous student, Aristotle, hardly any

writer on the topic of politics has failed to make reference to The

Republic. Perhaps the most frequent criticism is the difficulty bordering

on impossibility of coming close to this goal of staffing the government

with philosopher kings. Twentieth century Austro-British philosopher

Karl Popper goes even further. He sees in Plato’s utopia the roots of

modern fascism. He dislikes the Spartan elements and the “banishment

of the poets” as antithetical to his preferred “open society.”
Utopia

Although the term dates from the sixteenth century the
Republic is a utopian vision. If the utopian philosopher sees
his “New Jerusalem” as a static perfect concept, he runs up
against historical reality. As Heraclitus said, “Everything
‘burns’ [changes] nothing remains [stays constant].”
But Plato seems to deal with this reality in his cyclical theory.
As Jefferson puts it later about what he called the tree of
liberty, it needs periodic ‘watering’ with the blood of patriots
and tyrants.
Realism



Another recurring criticism of the Republic is that it can’t
work. Perhaps it would be more philosophical to say, as
Gandhi did about Christianity, it’s a really attractive
suggestion but it’s never been tried. T say something isn’t
                                       o
realistic begs the question.
Model or Blueprint?



At several points Plato has Socrates dash the hopes of
Glaucon and Adeimantus. He is offering a model for
understanding justice, not a constitution to be applied to a
new colony.
Historical Parallels



Will Durant draws an interesting parallel between the three
orders of the Republic and the three estates of medieval
Christendom: clergy, nobility, and third estate. Not exactly a
perfect constitution but it did endure for a millennium. Doesn’t
that speak to the realistic question!
Historical Parallels



Will Durant draws an interesting parallel between the three
orders of the Republic and the three estates of medieval
Christendom: clergy, nobility, and third estate. Not exactly a
perfect constitution but it did endure for a millennium. Doesn’t
that speak to the realistic question!
Philosophers as Political Consultants

The cynical school of critics point to Plato’s disastrous
attempts to help the tyrants of Syracuse “attain the element
of philosophy.” Likewise Voltaire was invited by the
enlightened despot Frederick the Great to his court at
Potsdam. At first, all went well. Then the two became
estranged and Voltaire had to beat a hasty retreat. Countless
other examples from history could be found where
philosophical idealism and the rough and tumble demands of
ruling are hard to combine.
Last Word


Perhaps the quest for justice has something in common with
the quest for the Holy Grail. Twain mocked such knight
errantry as “grailing.” But the last hundred years have offered
some pretty dreadful examples of what a more “realistic”
amoral approach to government produces.
Let’s keep refining our search for justice and give Plato praise
for beginning the quest.
clipping from the Indian Hill High School paper, Chieftain, in the late ‘70s (?)

Contenu connexe

Tendances

ARISTOTLE PHILOSOPHY
ARISTOTLE PHILOSOPHYARISTOTLE PHILOSOPHY
ARISTOTLE PHILOSOPHY
farouq umar
 

Tendances (20)

Socrates
SocratesSocrates
Socrates
 
History of philosophy
History of philosophyHistory of philosophy
History of philosophy
 
Plato
PlatoPlato
Plato
 
ANCIENT PHILOSOPHY: PRE-SOCRATICS
ANCIENT PHILOSOPHY: PRE-SOCRATICSANCIENT PHILOSOPHY: PRE-SOCRATICS
ANCIENT PHILOSOPHY: PRE-SOCRATICS
 
Greek Philosophy
Greek PhilosophyGreek Philosophy
Greek Philosophy
 
History of Philosophy
History of PhilosophyHistory of Philosophy
History of Philosophy
 
Ancient philosophy
Ancient philosophyAncient philosophy
Ancient philosophy
 
Sophists, Socrates, & Plato
Sophists, Socrates, & PlatoSophists, Socrates, & Plato
Sophists, Socrates, & Plato
 
Comparative Study on Aristotle and Plato
Comparative Study on Aristotle and PlatoComparative Study on Aristotle and Plato
Comparative Study on Aristotle and Plato
 
History of philosophy
History of philosophyHistory of philosophy
History of philosophy
 
Aristotle
AristotleAristotle
Aristotle
 
Socrates
SocratesSocrates
Socrates
 
Philosophy history
Philosophy historyPhilosophy history
Philosophy history
 
ARISTOTLE PHILOSOPHY
ARISTOTLE PHILOSOPHYARISTOTLE PHILOSOPHY
ARISTOTLE PHILOSOPHY
 
Socrates Philosophy
Socrates PhilosophySocrates Philosophy
Socrates Philosophy
 
The Sophists
The SophistsThe Sophists
The Sophists
 
Confucius: An Overview
Confucius: An OverviewConfucius: An Overview
Confucius: An Overview
 
The greek philosophers - AN OVERVIEW
The greek philosophers - AN OVERVIEWThe greek philosophers - AN OVERVIEW
The greek philosophers - AN OVERVIEW
 
Middle Ages: Theocentric philosophy
Middle Ages: Theocentric philosophyMiddle Ages: Theocentric philosophy
Middle Ages: Theocentric philosophy
 
History of philosophy_and_philosophers
History of philosophy_and_philosophersHistory of philosophy_and_philosophers
History of philosophy_and_philosophers
 

En vedette

Front-end Justice Reform
Front-end Justice ReformFront-end Justice Reform
Front-end Justice Reform
NACoPresents
 
Aristotle poetics[1]
Aristotle poetics[1]Aristotle poetics[1]
Aristotle poetics[1]
hitesh
 
My first ppt presentation
My first ppt presentationMy first ppt presentation
My first ppt presentation
maulikbhatt
 
Paper 3 jyotsna presentatio literary theory and criticism
Paper 3 jyotsna presentatio literary theory and criticismPaper 3 jyotsna presentatio literary theory and criticism
Paper 3 jyotsna presentatio literary theory and criticism
valajyotsna
 
Chapter 7 power, authority, and governance
Chapter 7 power, authority, and governanceChapter 7 power, authority, and governance
Chapter 7 power, authority, and governance
shaonansalome
 
Literary Criticism
Literary CriticismLiterary Criticism
Literary Criticism
kateboardman
 
Shapes And Bond Angles Of Simple Organic Compounds
Shapes And Bond Angles  Of Simple Organic CompoundsShapes And Bond Angles  Of Simple Organic Compounds
Shapes And Bond Angles Of Simple Organic Compounds
Keri Johnson
 

En vedette (20)

Filosofia grega. Plató
Filosofia grega. PlatóFilosofia grega. Plató
Filosofia grega. Plató
 
Plato & The Matrix
Plato & The MatrixPlato & The Matrix
Plato & The Matrix
 
Front-end Justice Reform
Front-end Justice ReformFront-end Justice Reform
Front-end Justice Reform
 
Literory criticism
Literory criticismLiterory criticism
Literory criticism
 
Six parts of tragedy
Six parts of tragedySix parts of tragedy
Six parts of tragedy
 
Performativity and Language
Performativity and LanguagePerformativity and Language
Performativity and Language
 
Khushali paper no 3
Khushali  paper no  3Khushali  paper no  3
Khushali paper no 3
 
Aristotle poetics[1]
Aristotle poetics[1]Aristotle poetics[1]
Aristotle poetics[1]
 
My first ppt presentation
My first ppt presentationMy first ppt presentation
My first ppt presentation
 
Paper 3 jyotsna presentatio literary theory and criticism
Paper 3 jyotsna presentatio literary theory and criticismPaper 3 jyotsna presentatio literary theory and criticism
Paper 3 jyotsna presentatio literary theory and criticism
 
Chapter 7 power, authority, and governance
Chapter 7 power, authority, and governanceChapter 7 power, authority, and governance
Chapter 7 power, authority, and governance
 
Aristotle' s realism presentation
Aristotle' s realism presentationAristotle' s realism presentation
Aristotle' s realism presentation
 
Krishna ppt-3- Literary Theory And Criticism
Krishna ppt-3- Literary Theory And CriticismKrishna ppt-3- Literary Theory And Criticism
Krishna ppt-3- Literary Theory And Criticism
 
Paper 3 Literary Theory & Criticism
Paper 3 Literary Theory & CriticismPaper 3 Literary Theory & Criticism
Paper 3 Literary Theory & Criticism
 
Literary Criticism
Literary CriticismLiterary Criticism
Literary Criticism
 
Paper - 3 Literary Criticism and Theory
Paper - 3 Literary Criticism and TheoryPaper - 3 Literary Criticism and Theory
Paper - 3 Literary Criticism and Theory
 
Shapes And Bond Angles Of Simple Organic Compounds
Shapes And Bond Angles  Of Simple Organic CompoundsShapes And Bond Angles  Of Simple Organic Compounds
Shapes And Bond Angles Of Simple Organic Compounds
 
William wordsworth as a critic
William wordsworth as a criticWilliam wordsworth as a critic
William wordsworth as a critic
 
Aristotle poetics
Aristotle   poeticsAristotle   poetics
Aristotle poetics
 
Aristotle MetaPhysics
Aristotle MetaPhysicsAristotle MetaPhysics
Aristotle MetaPhysics
 

Similaire à Justice & Power, session ii, Plato

Hum2220 for love of wisdom ancient greek philosophy
Hum2220 for love of wisdom   ancient greek philosophyHum2220 for love of wisdom   ancient greek philosophy
Hum2220 for love of wisdom ancient greek philosophy
ProfWillAdams
 
Hum1020 for love of wisdom ancient greek philosophy
Hum1020 for love of wisdom   ancient greek philosophyHum1020 for love of wisdom   ancient greek philosophy
Hum1020 for love of wisdom ancient greek philosophy
ProfWillAdams
 
hist1002_new_Ancient_Greek_Philosophy
hist1002_new_Ancient_Greek_Philosophyhist1002_new_Ancient_Greek_Philosophy
hist1002_new_Ancient_Greek_Philosophy
Dr Arshad Javed Rizvi
 
10 greek classicism and hellenism v2018
10 greek classicism and hellenism v201810 greek classicism and hellenism v2018
10 greek classicism and hellenism v2018
PetrutaLipan
 
Great philosophers
Great philosophersGreat philosophers
Great philosophers
tatuta
 

Similaire à Justice & Power, session ii, Plato (20)

Hum2220 for love of wisdom ancient greek philosophy
Hum2220 for love of wisdom   ancient greek philosophyHum2220 for love of wisdom   ancient greek philosophy
Hum2220 for love of wisdom ancient greek philosophy
 
Hum1020 for love of wisdom ancient greek philosophy
Hum1020 for love of wisdom   ancient greek philosophyHum1020 for love of wisdom   ancient greek philosophy
Hum1020 for love of wisdom ancient greek philosophy
 
Greek Presentation (Gurrobat)
Greek Presentation (Gurrobat)Greek Presentation (Gurrobat)
Greek Presentation (Gurrobat)
 
The athenian
The athenianThe athenian
The athenian
 
Classical Athens
Classical AthensClassical Athens
Classical Athens
 
Hist1002 new ancient_greek_philosophy
Hist1002 new ancient_greek_philosophyHist1002 new ancient_greek_philosophy
Hist1002 new ancient_greek_philosophy
 
hist1002_new_Ancient_Greek_Philosophy
hist1002_new_Ancient_Greek_Philosophyhist1002_new_Ancient_Greek_Philosophy
hist1002_new_Ancient_Greek_Philosophy
 
Pre socratic
Pre socraticPre socratic
Pre socratic
 
10 greek classicism and hellenism v2018
10 greek classicism and hellenism v201810 greek classicism and hellenism v2018
10 greek classicism and hellenism v2018
 
Ancient Greek Philosophy Author Pearson - The world's learning company - Cana...
Ancient Greek Philosophy Author Pearson - The world's learning company - Cana...Ancient Greek Philosophy Author Pearson - The world's learning company - Cana...
Ancient Greek Philosophy Author Pearson - The world's learning company - Cana...
 
Ancient Greece NOTES de Beaufort
Ancient Greece NOTES de BeaufortAncient Greece NOTES de Beaufort
Ancient Greece NOTES de Beaufort
 
The Carpenter.1
The Carpenter.1The Carpenter.1
The Carpenter.1
 
Pre socratics
Pre socraticsPre socratics
Pre socratics
 
Greek philosophy and culture
Greek philosophy and cultureGreek philosophy and culture
Greek philosophy and culture
 
The Hellenistic Age
The Hellenistic AgeThe Hellenistic Age
The Hellenistic Age
 
Great philosophers
Great philosophersGreat philosophers
Great philosophers
 
Scientific Method Essay
Scientific Method EssayScientific Method Essay
Scientific Method Essay
 
Greek ideas and beliefs
Greek ideas and beliefsGreek ideas and beliefs
Greek ideas and beliefs
 
Introduction to Greek Architecture
Introduction to Greek ArchitectureIntroduction to Greek Architecture
Introduction to Greek Architecture
 
Quest for a moral compass
Quest for a moral compassQuest for a moral compass
Quest for a moral compass
 

Plus de Jim Powers

Plus de Jim Powers (20)

19 c Europe, Part 1, 1815-1848; General Observations
19 c Europe, Part 1, 1815-1848; General Observations19 c Europe, Part 1, 1815-1848; General Observations
19 c Europe, Part 1, 1815-1848; General Observations
 
19 c Europe, session 1; The Great Powers and the Balance of Power, 1815 1848
19 c Europe, session 1; The Great Powers and the Balance of Power, 1815 184819 c Europe, session 1; The Great Powers and the Balance of Power, 1815 1848
19 c Europe, session 1; The Great Powers and the Balance of Power, 1815 1848
 
19 c Europe, Part 1, session 2; The Eastern Powers: Absolutism and its Limita...
19 c Europe, Part 1, session 2; The Eastern Powers: Absolutism and its Limita...19 c Europe, Part 1, session 2; The Eastern Powers: Absolutism and its Limita...
19 c Europe, Part 1, session 2; The Eastern Powers: Absolutism and its Limita...
 
19 c Europe, part 1, session 3; France: The Restoration and the July Monarchy
19 c Europe, part 1, session 3; France: The Restoration and the July Monarchy19 c Europe, part 1, session 3; France: The Restoration and the July Monarchy
19 c Europe, part 1, session 3; France: The Restoration and the July Monarchy
 
19 c Europe, session 4; great britain: social unrest and social compromise
19 c Europe, session 4; great britain: social unrest and social compromise19 c Europe, session 4; great britain: social unrest and social compromise
19 c Europe, session 4; great britain: social unrest and social compromise
 
19 c Europe 1, session 5; Revolutions of 1848
19 c Europe 1, session 5; Revolutions of 184819 c Europe 1, session 5; Revolutions of 1848
19 c Europe 1, session 5; Revolutions of 1848
 
19 c Europe, Part 2, 1850-1871; General Observations
19 c Europe, Part 2, 1850-1871;  General Observations19 c Europe, Part 2, 1850-1871;  General Observations
19 c Europe, Part 2, 1850-1871; General Observations
 
19 c Europe, session 2.6; The breakdown of the concert and the crimean war
19 c Europe, session 2.6; The breakdown of the concert  and the crimean war19 c Europe, session 2.6; The breakdown of the concert  and the crimean war
19 c Europe, session 2.6; The breakdown of the concert and the crimean war
 
19 c Europe, session 2.7; France: The Second Empire
19 c Europe, session 2.7; France: The Second Empire19 c Europe, session 2.7; France: The Second Empire
19 c Europe, session 2.7; France: The Second Empire
 
19 c Europe, session 2.8; The Unification of Italy
19 c Europe, session 2.8; The Unification of Italy19 c Europe, session 2.8; The Unification of Italy
19 c Europe, session 2.8; The Unification of Italy
 
19 c Europe, session 2.9; The German Question, 1850-66
19 c Europe, session 2.9; The German Question, 1850-6619 c Europe, session 2.9; The German Question, 1850-66
19 c Europe, session 2.9; The German Question, 1850-66
 
19 c Europe, session 2.10; The Reorganization of Europe, 1866-1871
19 c Europe, session 2.10; The Reorganization of Europe, 1866-187119 c Europe, session 2.10; The Reorganization of Europe, 1866-1871
19 c Europe, session 2.10; The Reorganization of Europe, 1866-1871
 
19 c Europe, Part 3; General Observations
19 c Europe, Part 3;  General Observations19 c Europe, Part 3;  General Observations
19 c Europe, Part 3; General Observations
 
19 c Europe, session 3.11; Great Powers and the Balance of Power; 1871-1890
19 c Europe, session 3.11; Great Powers and the Balance of Power; 1871-189019 c Europe, session 3.11; Great Powers and the Balance of Power; 1871-1890
19 c Europe, session 3.11; Great Powers and the Balance of Power; 1871-1890
 
19 c Europe, session 3.12; capitalism and socialism
19 c Europe, session 3.12; capitalism and socialism 19 c Europe, session 3.12; capitalism and socialism
19 c Europe, session 3.12; capitalism and socialism
 
19 c Europe, session 3.13; from liberalism to democracy: political progress ...
19 c Europe, session 3.13; from  liberalism to democracy: political progress ...19 c Europe, session 3.13; from  liberalism to democracy: political progress ...
19 c Europe, session 3.13; from liberalism to democracy: political progress ...
 
19 c europe, session.3.14; third french republic
19 c europe, session.3.14; third french republic 19 c europe, session.3.14; third french republic
19 c europe, session.3.14; third french republic
 
19 c Europe, session 3.15; The Second Reich
19 c Europe, session 3.15; The Second Reich19 c Europe, session 3.15; The Second Reich
19 c Europe, session 3.15; The Second Reich
 
19 c Europe, session 3.16; Austria-Hungary, the Balkans and Turkey
19 c Europe, session 3.16; Austria-Hungary, the Balkans and Turkey19 c Europe, session 3.16; Austria-Hungary, the Balkans and Turkey
19 c Europe, session 3.16; Austria-Hungary, the Balkans and Turkey
 
19 c Europe, session 3.17 Russia
19 c Europe, session 3.17 Russia19 c Europe, session 3.17 Russia
19 c Europe, session 3.17 Russia
 

Dernier

Ecosystem Interactions Class Discussion Presentation in Blue Green Lined Styl...
Ecosystem Interactions Class Discussion Presentation in Blue Green Lined Styl...Ecosystem Interactions Class Discussion Presentation in Blue Green Lined Styl...
Ecosystem Interactions Class Discussion Presentation in Blue Green Lined Styl...
fonyou31
 
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdfActivity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
ciinovamais
 

Dernier (20)

Sanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdf
Sanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdfSanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdf
Sanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdf
 
Arihant handbook biology for class 11 .pdf
Arihant handbook biology for class 11 .pdfArihant handbook biology for class 11 .pdf
Arihant handbook biology for class 11 .pdf
 
Student login on Anyboli platform.helpin
Student login on Anyboli platform.helpinStudent login on Anyboli platform.helpin
Student login on Anyboli platform.helpin
 
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impact
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impactAccessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impact
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impact
 
Class 11th Physics NEET formula sheet pdf
Class 11th Physics NEET formula sheet pdfClass 11th Physics NEET formula sheet pdf
Class 11th Physics NEET formula sheet pdf
 
The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13
The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13
The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13
 
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdfKey note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
 
Disha NEET Physics Guide for classes 11 and 12.pdf
Disha NEET Physics Guide for classes 11 and 12.pdfDisha NEET Physics Guide for classes 11 and 12.pdf
Disha NEET Physics Guide for classes 11 and 12.pdf
 
9548086042 for call girls in Indira Nagar with room service
9548086042  for call girls in Indira Nagar  with room service9548086042  for call girls in Indira Nagar  with room service
9548086042 for call girls in Indira Nagar with room service
 
microwave assisted reaction. General introduction
microwave assisted reaction. General introductionmicrowave assisted reaction. General introduction
microwave assisted reaction. General introduction
 
IGNOU MSCCFT and PGDCFT Exam Question Pattern: MCFT003 Counselling and Family...
IGNOU MSCCFT and PGDCFT Exam Question Pattern: MCFT003 Counselling and Family...IGNOU MSCCFT and PGDCFT Exam Question Pattern: MCFT003 Counselling and Family...
IGNOU MSCCFT and PGDCFT Exam Question Pattern: MCFT003 Counselling and Family...
 
A Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy Reform
A Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy ReformA Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy Reform
A Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy Reform
 
Ecosystem Interactions Class Discussion Presentation in Blue Green Lined Styl...
Ecosystem Interactions Class Discussion Presentation in Blue Green Lined Styl...Ecosystem Interactions Class Discussion Presentation in Blue Green Lined Styl...
Ecosystem Interactions Class Discussion Presentation in Blue Green Lined Styl...
 
Interactive Powerpoint_How to Master effective communication
Interactive Powerpoint_How to Master effective communicationInteractive Powerpoint_How to Master effective communication
Interactive Powerpoint_How to Master effective communication
 
APM Welcome, APM North West Network Conference, Synergies Across Sectors
APM Welcome, APM North West Network Conference, Synergies Across SectorsAPM Welcome, APM North West Network Conference, Synergies Across Sectors
APM Welcome, APM North West Network Conference, Synergies Across Sectors
 
Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...
Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...
Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...
 
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdfActivity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
 
Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: The Basics of Prompt Design"
Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: The Basics of Prompt Design"Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: The Basics of Prompt Design"
Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: The Basics of Prompt Design"
 
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot GraphZ Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
 
Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...
Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...
Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...
 

Justice & Power, session ii, Plato

  • 2. Topics in This Session i.introduction ii.Classical Greece iii.Plato iv.Politea (Republic) v.Criticism
  • 5. In the late 1960s it became fashionable to criticize the teaching of Western Civilization as a source of white racism or cultural chauvinism. By emphasizing the deeds and thoughts of the ancestors of European Americans, the impression might grow that Asians, Africans and Amerindians were people without history, without culture… clearly inferior. “Why begin every [expletive deleted] course with the Greeks?” Yippie leader Jerry Rubin [Walnut Hills High School, Class of 1956] asked a crowd of young Cincinnatians at a rally at Eden Park just prior to the Chicago Conspiracy trial [in 1969]. A valid question, however rudely put. Why should our inquiry begin with a small, sparsely settled region of the ancient Mediterranean world? James B. Powers, Justice & Power, p. 1
  • 6. The Heartland of Classical Greece Socrates would use the image of “frogs around a pond” to describe the Greek city-states around the Aegean Sea
  • 7. Fourth century B.C. Greece might justly be considered poor, perhaps barbaric, or even insignificant by a citizen of one of the river states---Egypt or Persia nearby, or the Indus or Yellow River empires of ancient Asia. The Golden Age of Classical Greece passed quickly, but in a sense the achievements of Hellas have never since been surpassed. Ibid.
  • 8. As Bertrand Russell, the great twentieth century philosopher, has said of Greek civilization: Based on an underlying principle of harmony, it was torn by internal strife, and this may have enhanced its greatness. For though it never could evolve a viable panhellenic state, it c o n q u e re d a l l t h o s e w h o conquered the land of Hellas, and to this day remains the framework of the West. Wisdom of the West, p. 35
  • 9. Plato and his student Aristotle are universally held to epitomize Greek academic thought. “It may be true that all succeeding political philosophy is a footnote to and a commentary on Plato, Professor Michael Curtis has written [quoting Alfred North Whitehead] (The Great Political Theories, 1961, p. 23). With Plato’s Republic, quite simply, we are beginning at the beginning. This is humankind’s first attempt to systematically and intelligently record a search for the ideal way to live. Ibid.
  • 10. This perfect condition was ascribed by other earlier or contemporary cultures, such as the aforementioned river kingdoms or the post-exilic Jewish state, to divine activity or revelation. With characteristic Greek self-confidence Plato presents his program as the product of an evening’s conversation. The atmosphere of the dialogue is one of curiosity, intellectual rivalry, humor, and moral earnestness---with here and there evidence of the wine which inevitably fueled a Greek symposium. Ibid.
  • 11. This perfect condition was ascribed by other earlier or contemporary cultures, such as the aforementioned river kingdoms or the post-exilic Jewish state, to divine activity or revelation. With characteristic Greek self-confidence Plato presents his program as the product of an evening’s conversation. The atmosphere of the dialogue is one of curiosity, intellectual rivalry, humor, and moral earnestness---with here and there evidence of the wine which inevitably fueled a Greek symposium. Ibid. Attic red figure Krater, ca. 390 BC at the J. Paul Getty Museum
  • 12. Plato, the man who invented higher education with his Academy, invites you to be one of the silent listeners. Socrates is the narrator; Plato’s two brothers, Glaucon and Adeimantus, speak, as does the host, a rich and aged merchant Cephalus, and his son Polemarchus. Socrates’ chief adversary is the sophist Thrasymachus, a cynical professional wise man or tutor. Ibid.
  • 13. Plato, the man who invented higher education with his Academy, invites you to be one of the silent listeners. Socrates is the narrator; Plato’s two brothers, Glaucon and Adeimantus, speak, as does the host, a rich and aged merchant Cephalus, and his son Polemarchus. Socrates’ chief adversary is the sophist Thrasymachus, a cynical professional wise man or tutor. Ibid.
  • 14. Once you have listened to the plan proposed “just last night,” you may become a disciple like Plato’s brothers. Or, like Thrasymachus and after him Aristotle, you may remain a skeptical critic. But like every political theorist since Plato’s day, you cannot be ignorant of the ideas discussed that night and expect an educated audience to give weight to your ideas. Ibid.
  • 17. Hellas-the common heritage
  • 18. Hellas-the common heritage
  • 19. I. Classical Greece A. Hellas - the common heritage 1. Homer 2. Pre-Socratics a. Milesians - sceptics b. Pythagoreans - ascetics c. Heraclitus d Eleatics - Parmenides & Zeno e. the Sophists - Protagoras B. Polis - irreconcilable differences 1. Citizens and “others” 2. Sparta, Athens et al. a. experience and theory b. metropolis and colonies 3. Persian Wars, 490-70 B.C. 4. Periclean Athens 5. Peloponnesian War, 431-04 B.C. Justice & Power, p. 3
  • 20. Apotheosis of Homer J.A.D. Ingres, 1827
  • 21. He was not the Greek Bible; he was the representative and spokesman of the Greeks. He was quintessentially Greek. The stamp of the Greek genius is everywhere on his two epics, in the banishment of the ugly and the frightful and the senseless; in the conviction that gods were like men and men able to be godlike; in the courage and undaunted spirit with which the heroes faced any opponent, human or divine, even Fate herself; in the prevailing atmosphere of reason and good sense…. Homer was the great molding force of Greece because he was so Greek himself. Edith Hamilton, The Greek Way, p. 212
  • 23. Milesians philosophers from the Greek colony of Miletus Thales, Anaximander, Anaximenes Θαλῆς, c. 624 BC – c. 546 BC Ἀναξίμανδρος c. 610 – c. 546 BC Άναξιμένης 585 BC-528 BCE
  • 24. Milesians one of the Seven Sages, father of philosophy (and science), he began to doubt his senses and inquire Θαλῆς, attempted to explain natural phenomena without reference c. 624 BC – c. 546 BC to mythology his first principle--the world started from water he was followed by Anaximander who also doubted (σκεπσις-skepsis, skepticism) Ἀναξίμανδρος c. 610 – c. 546 BC an indefinite (apeiron) principle gives rise to all natural phenomena finally, Anaximenes joined the argument his first principle--air Άναξιμένης 585 BC-528 BC
  • 25. Milesians one of the Seven Sages, father of philosophy (and science), he began to doubt his senses and inquire Θαλῆς, attempted to explain natural phenomena without reference c. 624 BC – c. 546 BC to mythology his first principle--the world started from water he was followed by Anaximander who also doubted (σκεπσις-skepsis, skepticism) Ἀναξίμανδρος c. 610 – c. 546 BC an indefinite (apeiron) principle gives rise to all natural phenomena finally, Anaximenes joined the argument his first principle--air Άναξιμένης 585 BC-528 BC
  • 26. Pythagoras and his followers salute the sunrise-Fyodor Bronnikov, 1869
  • 27. little reliable information about him is known. He may have travelled to Egypt in his youth 530-he moved to Croton, a Greek colony in Southern Italy where he established a communal sect his disciples followed ascetic practices such as vegetarianism. They were called the mathematikoi Μαθηματικοι (learners) their first principle of the cosmos Πυθαγόρας c. 570 – c. 495 BC was number
  • 28. a proof of Pythagoras' theorem, showing how by rearranging triangles the areas a2 + b2 and c2 can be shown to be the same. The area of the outer square never changes, and the total area of the four right triangles is the same at both the tetraktys beginning and the end, therefore the a mystical symbol, “source of the roots black area at the beginning, a2 + b2, must of ever-flowing nature” equal the black area at the end, c2.
  • 29. he was considered obscure, even by contemporaries famous for asserting change as the basis of the cosmos-panta rhei kai ouden menei (everything burns, nothing remains) but he is also known for hodos ano kato-(the upward-downward path) another first principle of the cosmos Ἡράκλειτος ὁ Ἐφέσιος was the Logos. Its meaning is arguable —Hērákleitos ho Ephésios c. 535 – c. 475 BC
  • 30. he describes two views of reality. In "the way of truth", he explains how reality (coined as "what-is") is one, change is impossible, and existence is timeless, uniform, necessary, and unchanging--his first principle In "the way of opinion," he explains the world of appearances, in which one's sensory faculties lead to conceptions which are false and deceitful These ideas strongly influenced the w h o l e o f We s t e r n p h i l o s o p h y , Παρμενίδης ὁ perhaps most notably through its Ἐλεάτης fl. early 5th century BC effect on Plato
  • 31. not to be confused with Zeno of Citium founder of the Stoic school member of the Eleatic School founded by Parmenides, his erotes. Aristotle called him the inventor of the dialectic 449-Plato describes a visit to Athens by Zeno and Parmenides, at a time when Parmenides is "about 65," Zeno is "nearly 40" and Socrates is "a very young man" best known for his paradoxes, which Bertrand Russell has described as "immeasurably subtle and profound" Achilles & the tortoise: In a race, the quickest runner can never overtake the slowest, since the pursuer must first reach Ζήνων ὁ Ἐλεάτης the point whence the pursued started, so that c. 490 – c. 430 BC the slower must always hold a lead Zeno shows the Doors to Truth and Falsity (Veritas et Falsitas). Fresco in the Library of El Escorial, Madrid.
  • 32. Polis-irreconcilable differences
  • 33. B. Polis - irreconcilable differences 1. Citizens and “others” 2. Sparta, Athens et al. a. experience and theory b. metropolis and colonies 3. Persian Wars, 490-79 B.C. 4. Periclean Athens 5. Peloponnesian War, 431-04 B.C. Justice & Power, p. 3
  • 34. “Citizens” and others each of the more than 1,000 poleis had its own definition of who was a citizen none enfranchised slaves, females or minors resident aliens (metoikoi) were usually excluded as well in Athens, the largest polis, birthplace of democracy, estimates place the number of polites (citizens) at 40-50,000 out of a total population of several hundred thousand political participation was only one of the irreconcilable differences
  • 35. barbaroi--the ultimate other our word “barbarian” comes from the Greek it’s how they mocked the “incomprehensible speech” of the savage non-Hellenes. cf. our “blah, blah, blah” even enlightened philosophers had no doubts of Greek racial and cultural superiority to other ethnicities
  • 36. the two most famous of the many different and fractious Greek poleis Sparta-the way of war their struggle for hegemony will ultimately destroy Classical Greece a tragedy of “irreconcilable differences” Athens-the light of reason
  • 37. a journey of only a day or two might take a Greek through several different states whose laws and customs were different from those of his native polis these different experiences explain why he might think about and theorize (θεωρειν-theōrein) about which might be the better state could this be why political philosophy began in Greece rather than Egypt, Mesopotamia -- older, more “advanced” societies? Greeks began to send out settlers in the 8th century. These colonies had to develop their own constitutions they would take some elements from their “mother country” (metropolis). New experiences required them to theorize about how best to frame government to meet local condtions
  • 38. war-unifier or divider? war against a common enemy can bring tremendous unity within an alliance system and within each state a prolonged war, however, often produces conflict over strategies, even internal dispute over whether to continue the fight or seek “peace at any price.”
  • 39. Persian wars-490-479 BC Persia,then the greatest empire in the world, decided to conquer the divided Greek states 490-amazingly, the Athenians defeated the first attack at Marathon 480-479--Xerxes returned with a huge force to punish them the Athenian navy at Salamis, then the Spartan-led land forces at Plataea once again drove the Persians off this David-Goliath moment created the pride and self-confidence which produced the Golden Age of Classical Greece
  • 40. Age of Pericles the Parthenon with its famous statue of Athena was financed by the wealth of the Athenian empire
  • 41. Age of Pericles Athens and Sparta shared the victory over the Persian Empire but Athens soon began to reap greater rewards Pericles, the leader of Athenian democracy, led the building program which attracted the wonder of all Hellas the arts flourished under state patronage but the rivalry with Sparta was fed by the growth of Athens’ power. The Delian League against Persia became the Athenian Empire the Parthenon with its famous statue of Athena was financed by 431-Sparta and her allies declared war the wealth of the Athenian empire
  • 42. Age of Pericles Athens and Sparta shared the victory over the Persian Empire but Athens soon began to reap greater rewards Pericles, the leader of Athenian democracy, led the building program which attracted the wonder of all Hellas the arts flourished under state patronage but the rivalry with Sparta was fed by the growth of Athens’ power. The Delian League against Persia became the Athenian Empire the Parthenon with its famous statue of Athena was financed by 431-Sparta and her allies declared war the wealth of the Athenian empire
  • 43. Peloponnesian War-431-404 BC the war began with each system of allies using their asymmetrical strengths, Sparta on land, Athens at sea 421-415--after an uneasy truce, Athens launched the disastrous Sicilian expedition 413-405--despite its crippling failure, Athens survived and fought on until Lysander destroyed her fleet at Aegospotami this long “war like no other” in its ruthless brutality left the Greek states exhausted, disillusioned, divided internally, ripe for political extremism, and prey to external “...to the music of flutes Sparta powers like Persia and Macedonia made Athenian captives tear down their walls”--Xenophon
  • 44. Socrates, an Athenian citizen of humble means, fought in the early land battles as a foot soldier. Plato, who would become his disciple, an Athenian aristocrat, was born a few years after the war began. He fought as a cavalryman in its last battles. Both tasted the bitter defeat, the disillusionment of this war which ended the Golden Age. Both experienced the political upheavals which replaced democracy with a pro-Spartan oligarchy, the Thirty Tyrants led by Plato’s uncle. It was soon overthrown by a vengeful democracy which would put Socrates to death in 399 BC.
  • 45. Plato
  • 46. Plato Πλάτων, Plátōn 428/27 BC – 348/347 BC
  • 47. II. Plato A. Discipleship 1. early life 2.Socrates a. Socratic method b. “know thyself”- anamnesis c. Apology, Crito, Phaedo B. Travels C. Academy, 387 BC - 529 AD (!) 1. dialogues vs. treatises
  • 48. His early years were filled with the education of his social station--private tutors, ‘music and gymnastic’. There is a tradition of his success as an athlete, experimentation with poetry. His name may refer “to the breadth of his shoulders, his brow, his style. He is said to have become a disciple of Socrates at the age of twenty, some eight or nine years before Socrates’ death.” Paul Shorey, What Plato Said, p. 1
  • 49. Athens was by modern standards a small and gossipy city. Plato would have had abundant opportunity to observe the piquant contrast between the strange uncouth figure, the barefoot begging chatterbox, the butt of Attic comedy, and the magic of the man’s words, his power to deal with his interlocutors as he pleased, and to compel everyone who approached him to render an account of his soul and view his opinions in the light of reason...the irony that enabled him to mingle with the world yet not be of it, the feigned defective memory that introduced the demand for dialectic in place of long speeches of rhetoric, the professed ignorance that served to provoke joint inquiry. Shorey, pp. 10-11
  • 50. Athens was by modern standards a small and gossipy city. Plato would have had abundant opportunity to observe the piquant contrast between the strange uncouth figure, the barefoot begging chatterbox, the butt of Attic comedy, and the magic of the man’s words, his power to deal with his interlocutors as he pleased, and to compel everyone who approached him to render an account of his soul and view his opinions in the light of reason...the irony that enabled him to mingle with the world yet not be of it, the feigned defective memory that introduced the demand for dialectic in place of long speeches of rhetoric, the professed ignorance that served to provoke joint inquiry. Shorey, pp. 10-11 The School of Athens (detail), Raphael, 1511
  • 51. “He did not profess to know or teach anything. ‘I am like the midwife whose function I exercise on the minds of others.’...His function, he said, was like that of the physician who purged men’s minds of their false conceits; it was like that of the midwife who assisted in the delivery of their true and more considered thought….He himself had no body of doctrine to impart….In respect of method...Plato confirms Aristotle’s statement that there are two things that may be rightly attributed to Socrates, inductive argument and the quest for definitions. His philosophical dogmas: “no man willingly does wrong “virtue is knowledge, all wrongdoing and error is ignorance “it is better to suffer injustice than to do it” Shorey, pp. 12-13
  • 52. “know thyself”- anamnesis Socrates’ theory of education was based on his belief that every person has innate knowledge. The teacher’s role is not to “pour” facts into empty vessels. Rather it is to draw out that knowledge through skillful questions which aid the learner to remember (ανάµνησις -- anamnesis) that which she already knows[Plato is the first recorded master to allow a woman to enter his Academy]. Thus Socrates practiced that Delphic motto--”know thyself” (γνόθι σεαθτόν--gnothi seauton). He also said the unexamined life is not worth living (ὁ δὲ ἀνεξέταστος βίος οὐ βιωτὸς ἀνθρώπῳ -- ho de an•ex• EH•tas•tos BI•os ou bi•ōh•TOS an•THRŌ•pō--Apology, 38a)
  • 53. Apology, Crito, Phaedo These three “biographical” dialogues narrate the famous “sin against philosophy” committed by the vengeful Athenian democracy in 399 BC. The Apology takes the form of Socrates’ speeches to his accusers who charged him with blasphemy and corrupting the youth. In Crito Socrates gently refuses this disciple’s offer of an escape. He must remain true to his principles and obey the laws of his polis. The Phaedo is a moving “last class” with his disciples. The night of his execution is spent in a dialogue on the nature of death. “Be of good cheer, no harm can come to a good man in life or death.”
  • 54. Apology, Crito, Phaedo These three “biographical” dialogues narrate the famous “sin against philosophy” committed by the vengeful Athenian democracy in 399 BC. The Apology takes the form of Socrates’ speeches to his accusers who charged him with blasphemy and corrupting the youth. In Crito Socrates gently refuses this disciple’s offer of an escape. He must remain true to his principles and obey the laws of his polis. The Phaedo is a moving “last class” with his disciples. The night of his execution is spent in a dialogue on the nature of death. “Be of good cheer, no harm can come to a good man in life or death.” The Death of Socrates, Jacques-Louis David, 1787
  • 55. Shocked, disillusioned and grieving the death of his master, Plato left Athens for nearby Megara. From there he may have travelled to Egypt, the source of wisdom and mystery for the Greeks. He definitely travelled to the Greek colony of Syracuse. “T this period belongs his first Sicilian visit at the court of the o elder Dionysius, and the story that he was sold into slavery on the island of Aegina by the Spartan ambassador Pollis, at the instigation of Dionysius, and ransomed by one Anniceris of Cyrene. He may or may not have taught at Athens during these twelve years.” Shorey, p.1
  • 56. Academy This school, which he located on his estate north of Athens, near the grove of the hero Academus, gives its name to every later such institution of higher learning. It would endure for some nine hundred and sixteen years (387 BC-529 AD) a record unequalled by any such later school! “The forty years of residence, teaching, and writing at Athens that followed were interrupted by his two visits to the court of Dionysius the Younger in Syracuse. Otherwise little is known of these forty years of his life, except conjectures about the dates of his writings and a few anecdotes of his relations with contemporaries.” Shorey, p.2
  • 60. III. Politeia (Republic), 365 (?) [recent scholarship-350s] BC; bks., x, pp. 397 A. Bk I -- Introduction: defective definitions of justice 1. conventional morality a. Cephalus b. Polemarchus 2. cynical “realism” a. Thrasymachus’ argument b. Socrates’ refutation Justice & Power, p. 3
  • 61. In Book i Socrates describes how the gathering turned after dinner to examine the thesis question of The Republic: What is justice? Cephalus remarks how his wealth frees him to “make offering due the gods [and pay] debts which he owes to men.” “Well said, Cephalus, I replied; but as concerning justice, what is it (η δικαιοσυνη, το τι; hē dikaiosyne, to ti, literally: the justice. it what?)---to speak the truth and to pay your debts---no more than this” asks Socrates. Powers, J & P, p. 1
  • 62. Polemarchus’ Definition ...Πολλ’ δ’ ἄλγεα δυσµενὲεσσι, χαρµατα δ’ εὐµενέτῃσι ...POL’ D’AL•gĕ•a dus•men•E•e•si, CHAR•ma•ta d’eu•men•ET•ē•si ...many pains to enemies, joys to well-wishers Homer, Odyssey, bk vi, 184-185 In other words, the traditional Greek definition of justice: doing good to those who do good to you, getting even with your enemies-- as old as the Homeric tradition.
  • 63. Then, after Polemarchus offers his definition, “Socrates expresses his dissatisfaction with both these conventional approaches and through a series of questions, points out their shortcomings. Unable to contain himself, Thrasymachus scornfully breaks in to develop his famous definition of justice as that which is to the advantage of those in power: ‘Justice is the interest of the stronger.’ “ op. cit., pp. 1-2
  • 64. “What’s the matter with you two, Socrates? Why do you go on in this imbecile way, politely deferring to each other’s nonsense? If you really want to know what justice means, stop asking questions and scoring off the answers you get. You know very well it is easier to ask questions than to answer them. Answer yourself, and tell us what you think justice means.” Plato, The Republic, F.M. Cornford, trans. Oxford University Press, 1945 quoted in J & P: Reader p. 1
  • 65. Socrates craftily maneuvers Thrasymachus into giving his definition-- “Listen then, Thrasymachus began. What I say is that ‘just’ or ‘right’ means nothing but what is to the interest of the stronger party….Don’t you know, then, that a state may be ruled by a despot, or a democracy, or an aristocracy? “Of course. “And that the ruling element is always the strongest? “Yes.” op. cit., p. 2
  • 66. “Well then, in every case the laws are made by the ruling party in its own interest: a democracy makes democratic laws [in the interest of the Many who control a democracy], a despot autocratic ones, and so on….That is what I mean: in all states alike ‘right’ has the same meaning, namely what is for the interest of the party established in power, and that is the strongest. “Now I see what you mean, said I; whether it is true or not, I must try to make out.” op. cit., p. 2 Socrates then attacks the definition with a series of dialectical propositions: Well, if X, then Y?-OK-And if P, then Q? Well, I guess so-Then it must follow that R is S, &c., &c.
  • 67. Socrates gets him to agree that no ruler will study what is in his own interest, rather what is good and proper for his subjects: “At this point, when everyone could see that Thrasymachus’ definition of justice had been turned inside out, instead of making any reply, he said: “Socrates, have you a nurse? “Why do you ask such a question as that? “Because she lets you go around sniffling like a child whose nose wants wiping. She hasn’t even taught you to know a shepherd when you see one, or his sheep either. “What makes you say that? “Why you imagine that a herdsman studies the interests of his flocks of cattle, tending and fattening them up with some other end in view than his master’s profit or his own; and so don’t you see that, in politics, the genuine ruler regards his subjects like sheep, and thinks of nothing...but the good he can get out of them for himself… “[and much more in this cynical vein]
  • 68. “Having deluged our ears with this torrent of words, as a man at the baths might empty a bucket over one’s head, Thrasymachus meant to take himself off; but the company obliged him to stay and defend his position. I was specially urgent in my entreaties.” op. cit., p. 6 Socrates, once again, gets the better of the sophist Thrasymachus, much to the delight of Plato’s brothers, Glaucon and Adeimantus and the host Cephalus’ son, Polemarchus. Thrasymachus departs and Socrates proposes to continue the search for the definition of this most precious quality justice. Which brings us to Book ii
  • 69. III. Politeia (Republic), 365 (?) [recent scholarship-350s] BC; bks., x, pp. 397 A. Bk I -- Introduction: defective definitions of justice 1. conventional morality a. Cephalus b. Polemarchus 2. cynical “realism” a. Thrasymachus’ argument b. Socrates’ refutation B. Bks II-IV -- two cities 1. growth of the typical or “natural” polis a. division of labor b. luxury --- cause of war 2. the ideal (just) state a. government --- “machinery” or people? b. guardians CAUTION! two usages 1. attributes 2. education, censorship, & propaganda a. stages: 20, 30, 35, 50 years 3. “careers open to talent” 4. myth of the metals 3. justice discovered --- the four virtues in a. state b. soul c. individual Justice & Power, pp. 3-4
  • 70. III B -- two cities (poleis) Socrates suggests that it will be easier to see what justice is by looking at it writ large, justice in a just state, not justice in an individual or in his dealings with other individuals. Just as with an eye chart, we start with the big letters at the top, then work down. So let’s imagine a state coming into being and see if we can find justice in it.
  • 71. growth of the “natural” polis Socrates gives a remarkably modern description of how cities grow out of people’s need to come together in order to enjoy economic benefits each makes or does that which he is best suited for then they exchange goods and services all do better than as if each tried to meet all his needs isolated “in the state of nature” so the polis prospers. With this comes luxury Socrates deplores that there will need to be more people to cater to the “unhealthy desires” of this swollen state
  • 72. “The country which was large enough to support the original inhabitants, will now be too small. If we are to have enough pasture and plow land, we shall have to cut off a slice of our neighbors’ territory; and if they too are not content with necessities, but give themselves up to getting unlimited wealth, they will want a slice of ours. “That is inevitable, Socrates. “So the next thing will be, Glaucon, that we shall be at war. “No doubt. “We need not say yet whether war does good or harm, but only that we have discovered its origin in desires which are the most fruitful source of evils both to individuals and to states.” op. cit., p. 11
  • 73. “That will mean a considerable addition to our community--a whole army, to go out to battle with any invader, in defense of all this property and of the citizens…. “Why so? Can’t they defend themselves? “Not if the principle was right, which we all accepted in framing our society. You remember we agreed that no one man can practice many trades or arts satisfactorily. “True. “Well, is not the conduct of war an art, quite as important as shoemaking? ...We gave each man one trade, for which he was naturally fitted; he would do good work, if he confined himself to that all his life….” Ibid.
  • 74. III B 2-the ideal (just) state Socrates pretends to have stumbled upon the principle of justice in the state with this need to have those who are ideally (by nature) intended to be warriors. He calls them Guardians. But before we follow his imaginary creation of the just state it is well to review our own notions about government. The modern tendency is to equate government with its “machinery,” its constitution; what kind of legislature, executive, judiciary, bureaucracy….Plato is now going to focus on the people who fill those “slots.”
  • 75. Guardians (φυλακοι,phylakoi) The rulers, Plato’s words harken back to his image of the good king as shepherd of his people (Homer’s anax andron Agamemnon), must be ideally (by nature) suited to the job. They will be the best citizens, possessed of all the virtues-- wisdom, courage, temperance, and JUSTICE. But, be aware, he begins by talking about the rulers’ function of guarding the people--warriors. Later he will discuss what we call the civil authorities. Like our American constitution, Plato will place these civil guardians in authority over the military ones. The civil he will call Guardians in the strict sense, the military, he will call Auxiliaries.
  • 76. “I suspect then, we may find what we are looking for in this way. I take it that our state, having been founded and built up on the right lines, is good in the complete sense of the word. “It must be. “Obviously, then, it is wise, brave, temperate, and just. “Obviously. “Then if we find some of these qualities in it, the remainder will be the one we have not found.” Ibid.
  • 77. B.2.b.1-attributes-the four (pagan) virtues wisdom “...a passion for knowledge and understanding….the same thing as philosophy--the love of wisdom” (φιλειν + σοφια = φιλοσοφια) courage “...the same temperament as a well-bred watch dog...quick sense to detect an enemy, swiftness in pursuing him, and strength, if they have to fight when they have caught him. “...the right conviction about the things which ought, or ought not, to be feared…”cf. Pericles temperance moderation in all things--(µη δεν αγαν, may den agan) justice the definition we seek...more will be revealed….
  • 78. Education-Sparta & Athens Physical and mental education combining the best of both societies: the rigor of Sparta and the cultivation of reason which characterized Athenian schooling. Boys and girls will train together, ala Sparta. As in Sparta, strict censorship will exclude ideas which might conflict with the mindset which this education is to produce. A series of tests will weed out the weak and cowardly. Only the strongest, bravest and best will make the “first cut” at age twenty. They become Auxiliaries, the warrior Guardians.
  • 79. Education-Sparta & Athens Physical and mental education combining the best of both societies: the rigor of Sparta and the cultivation of reason which characterized Athenian schooling. Boys and girls will train together, ala Sparta. As in Sparta, strict censorship will exclude ideas which might conflict with the mindset which this education is to produce. A series of tests will weed out the weak and cowardly. Only the strongest, bravest and best will make the “first cut” at age twenty. They become Auxiliaries, the warrior Guardians.
  • 80. further refinement From age thirty to thirty-five the Auxiliaries are instructed in philosophy to discover the wisest among them (“philosophy is wasted on the young”). Those who don’t make the second cut remain warriors. The best (hoi aristoi) of the best are further groomed to become, like the Spartan Gerousia, the ruling oligarchy. At age fifty these Guardians in the strict sense become the ultimate authority in this ideal state, Plato’s Republic. (Res publica is a Latin word. The Greek term is Politeia.) This selection through education will produce what the French revolutionaries called “careers open to talent.” Other nineteenth century states also adopted civil service exams to replace corrupt job-filling with the principle of merit.
  • 81. the myth of the metals Glaucon objects. Wont those who don’t get the top positions be envious? Socrates responds: our goal is to do what’s best for all, not just make a few happy. But he offers a “harmless” fable, propaganda delivered in the education process. After several generations it will become accepted as fact: we are all born from the Earth (autochthonous) within each of us our souls are either golden, silver, or some baser element if we accept this fate, all will be well if we do not, terrible calamities will ensue
  • 82. justice discovered! In the state wisdom is to be found in the Guardians, courage in the Auxiliaries, temperance in the acceptance of every citizen of his place and responsibilities--“the better part ruling the worse.”(p. 19) So justice must be what’s left. This was our first principle--division of labor--according to each person’s innate vocation. “...this minding of one’s own business, when it takes a certain form, is actually the same thing as justice….” “Justice admittedly means that a man should possess and concern himself with what properly [according to nature] belongs to him.” op. cit, p. 21
  • 83. in the polis wisdom - found in the Guardians courage - the Auxiliaries temperance - these two controlling the Many (hoi polloi) justice - each “having” and “doing” according to his nature
  • 84. in the soul (ψυχη, psychē) wisdom - σοφια, sophia courage - θαρσεω, tharseō temperance - σοφροσυνη, sophrosynē justice - δικαιοσυνη, dikaiosynē
  • 85. in the individual wisdom - found in the mind, brain courage - the heart temperance - when the brain rules the passions and the appetites
  • 86. Passion Reason Silver in the individual Gold Appetite baser metal wisdom - found in the mind, brain courage - the heart temperance - when the brain rules the passions and the appetites
  • 87. in the individual wisdom - found in the mind, brain courage - the heart temperance - when the brain rules the passions and the appetites justice - each organ “having” and “doing” according to its nature
  • 88. III. Politeia (Republic) C. Bks V-VII -- “...philosophers become kings…” 1. life among the Guardians and Auxiliaries a. communism - goods and wives b. near equality of women c. eugenics - abortion & festivals 2. the cave - Plato’s theory of ideas D. Bks VII-IX -- degenerate types of city & man 1. causes of decline a. timocracy b. oligarchy c. democracy d. tyranny 2. the argument concluded --- three proofs E. Bk X -- supplement Justice & Power, p. 4
  • 89. τα τον φιλον κοινη (the things of friends [ought to be] common) Guardians and Auxiliaries will live simply--no gold and silver things, no luxury they will take their meals in common messes, like the Spartan syssitia the women will also be held in common, as with their children coming together for procreation is done at periodical festivals, pairing is apparently by lot actually the rulers rig the lottery,mating the best with the best to promote eugenics each child is taught to regard every Guardian as father or mother; they are raised in common nurseries (day care centers?) so that the Guardian women can attend to “higher” matters as in Sparta, children with birth defects are exposed to die these bizarre practices apply only to the rulers. The Many live as in other poleis
  • 90. III.C.1.b -- near equality of women Plato’s view was quite “countercultural” for a Greek of that time “Socrates after some demure and deprecation of ridicule expounds: “women have the same capacities as men though usually in lesser degree thus women of the Guardian class should share in the education of the males they should even share their occupations! soldiering or ruling based on merit quotes from Shorey, p. 177
  • 91. “What do we mean by philosophers... and what is the higher education that will develop their native powers and fit them to be guardians of the state? By true wisdom [that which philosophers love] Plato meant thought, abstract ideas, general conceptions---a systematic and coherent philosophy of life such as can be achieved onlt through the severest discipline of the higher mental faculties. All this is expressed in the terminology of the Platonic doctrine of ideas. Universals, ideas, notions, are treated as things….They belong to the world of true being and unchanging reality. The particulars of sense which the world thinks so real are imperfect copies of the idea and hold a place midway between true being and absolute non-being or nothing. Shorey, p.178
  • 92.
  • 93.
  • 94.
  • 95.
  • 96. The relationship of appearance to reality in Plato’s worldview can perhaps be best grasped in the context of mathematics. A ring...or the perimeter of a hoplite shield might seem to the casual observer to be a circle, but these round objects are not circles in the same sense that the locus of all points in a given plane equidistant from a given point is a circle. They only look like circles; if you were to put them under a magnifying glass you would see that they were not circles at all, merely objects vaguely circular in appearance that bring to mind the Form of the circle. Only the circle depicted in the mathematical definition is a circle. Some people might say that these concrete objects are real circles whereas the geometrical concept is imaginary, but Plato is not one of these people. For Plato, only the concept is real. The tangible objects are debased copies, feeble imitations of the ideal Form. Pomeroy et al. Ancient Greece, pp. 389-390
  • 97. Plato’s brothers, Glaucon and Adeimantus, become so excited by the discussion that they implore Socrates to help them begin to build this ideal just polis. He brings them down to earth with what is the most famous excerpt from the dialogue: “And I said: Cities will have no respite from evil, my dear Glaucon, nor will the human race, I think, unless philosophers rule as kings in the cities, or those whom we now call kings and rulers genuinely and adequately study philosophy, until, that is, political power and philosophy coalesce, and the various natures of those who now pursue the one to the exclusion of the other are forcibly debarred from doing so. Otherwise the city we have been describing will never grow into a possibility or see the light of day. Republic, trans. G.M.A. Grube, bk v, sect 473d
  • 98. Philosopher kings are the rulers, or Guardians, of Plato's Utopian Kallipolis (beautiful city). If his ideal city-state is to ever come into being, "philosophers [must] become kings…or those now called kings [must]…genuinely and adequately philosophize" (The Republic, v. 473d). Wikipedia
  • 99. III. Politeia (Republic) C. Bks V-VII -- “...philosophers become kings…” 1. life among the Guardians and Auxiliaries a. communism - goods and wives b. near equality of women c. eugenics - abortion & festivals 2. the cave - Plato’s theory of ideas D. Bks VIII-IX -- degenerate types of city & man 1. causes of decline a. timocracy b. oligarchy c. democracy d. tyranny 2. the argument concluded --- three proofs E. Bk X -- supplement Justice & Power, p. 4
  • 101. States-the cyclical theory Hesiod’s Five Ages best aristocracy GOLDEN timocracy SILVER oligarchy BRONZE HEROIC democracy worst tyranny IRON
  • 102. Book viii-defective poleis The first step down the path of corruption is timarchy on the Spartan model. Reason no longer rules but the spirited part is in control and the army dominates. War and victory are therefore the things that are prized. The guardians still protect the state against outside enemies, but they now rule harshly and demand some private property [for themselves]. The arts are neglected and education degenerated. Men love money, but secretly. The next stage is oligarchy (plutocracy) where this love of money openly dominates, a wealth qualification for offices is instituted, and there are great disparities. G.M.A. Grube, p. 193
  • 103. Book viii-defective poleis (cont.) So in the corresponding individual character love of money is supreme, and both reason and spirit are enslaved to it. This still requires control of appetites, but of the wrong kind. In democracy, the next stage, there is no control at all and all desires are equal. There is a rich vein of broad irony in the description of democracy and the democratic man, and Plato is obviously enjoying himself. As excessive love of money destroys oligarchy, so excessive love of liberty destroys democracy and leads to dictatorship where there is no freedom at all. Dictatorship comes about through the people choosing a champion who grasps all power for himself with the help of the unsuspecting populace who vote him a bodyguard. In this last stage of degeneration the very worst passions are in command of the state. G.M.A. Grube, pp. 193-194
  • 104. Democratic Man Comes to Power “Often a poor man, spare and suntanned, stands in battle next to a rich man who is pale for lack of sun with much superfluous flesh, and sees him panting and at a loss. Do you not think that he would consider that it is through the cowardice of the poor that people like that are rich, and one poor man would say to the other as they met privately:”These men are at our mercy; they are no good.” --”I know very well that they do this.” “...so a city [which is sick with the love of money] needs but a small excuse and, as one side [of the class war] brings in allied from an oligarchic city or the other from a democracy, the city is ill and fights itself, and sometimes a revolution occurs even without outside help.” --”Most certainly.” Plato, Republic, G.M.A. Grube, trans., p. 206
  • 105. After describing the ills of tyranny in bk. ix, Plato explains that these abuses lead “the best” (hoi aristoi) citizens to overthrow the tyrant. They now reestablish aristocracy and the cycle ( Gk. kyklos, circle) begins again.
  • 106. Book ix-why philosophers should rule There are three lives, the philosophic, the ambitious, and the appetitive, and each man believes his own life to be the most pleasant. The philosopher, however, is the best judge because he has some experience of the others’ pleasures, whereas they have no experience of his. Moreover the means of judgement --- intelligence and reasoned discourse --- are peculiarly his. G.M.A. Grube, p. 219
  • 107. Book x is often described as an addendum. It gives a more detailed argument for the ban on “imitative poetry”, it offers what Grube calls an unconvincing argument for immortality, and concludes with the myth of Er: “an elaborate and vivid picture of the soul’s thousand-year journey from incarnation to incarnation to incarnation, is atale of rewards and punishments after death, which completes the case for justice and makes a fitting ending to the whole Republic.” Grube, p. 239
  • 109. "The safest general characterization of the European philosophical tradition is that it consists of a series of footnotes to Plato." (Alfred Nor th Whitehead, Process and Reality, 1929).
  • 110. IV. Criticism 1. Aristotle to Popper 2. Utopia - static vs. dynamic concepts 3. realism 4. model or blueprint? 5. historical parallels 6. Plato in Sicily 7. Voltaire at Potsdam Justice & Power, p. 4
  • 111. Beginning with Plato’s most famous student, Aristotle, hardly any writer on the topic of politics has failed to make reference to The Republic. Perhaps the most frequent criticism is the difficulty bordering on impossibility of coming close to this goal of staffing the government with philosopher kings. Twentieth century Austro-British philosopher Karl Popper goes even further. He sees in Plato’s utopia the roots of modern fascism. He dislikes the Spartan elements and the “banishment of the poets” as antithetical to his preferred “open society.”
  • 112. Utopia Although the term dates from the sixteenth century the Republic is a utopian vision. If the utopian philosopher sees his “New Jerusalem” as a static perfect concept, he runs up against historical reality. As Heraclitus said, “Everything ‘burns’ [changes] nothing remains [stays constant].” But Plato seems to deal with this reality in his cyclical theory. As Jefferson puts it later about what he called the tree of liberty, it needs periodic ‘watering’ with the blood of patriots and tyrants.
  • 113. Realism Another recurring criticism of the Republic is that it can’t work. Perhaps it would be more philosophical to say, as Gandhi did about Christianity, it’s a really attractive suggestion but it’s never been tried. T say something isn’t o realistic begs the question.
  • 114. Model or Blueprint? At several points Plato has Socrates dash the hopes of Glaucon and Adeimantus. He is offering a model for understanding justice, not a constitution to be applied to a new colony.
  • 115. Historical Parallels Will Durant draws an interesting parallel between the three orders of the Republic and the three estates of medieval Christendom: clergy, nobility, and third estate. Not exactly a perfect constitution but it did endure for a millennium. Doesn’t that speak to the realistic question!
  • 116. Historical Parallels Will Durant draws an interesting parallel between the three orders of the Republic and the three estates of medieval Christendom: clergy, nobility, and third estate. Not exactly a perfect constitution but it did endure for a millennium. Doesn’t that speak to the realistic question!
  • 117. Philosophers as Political Consultants The cynical school of critics point to Plato’s disastrous attempts to help the tyrants of Syracuse “attain the element of philosophy.” Likewise Voltaire was invited by the enlightened despot Frederick the Great to his court at Potsdam. At first, all went well. Then the two became estranged and Voltaire had to beat a hasty retreat. Countless other examples from history could be found where philosophical idealism and the rough and tumble demands of ruling are hard to combine.
  • 118. Last Word Perhaps the quest for justice has something in common with the quest for the Holy Grail. Twain mocked such knight errantry as “grailing.” But the last hundred years have offered some pretty dreadful examples of what a more “realistic” amoral approach to government produces. Let’s keep refining our search for justice and give Plato praise for beginning the quest.
  • 119. clipping from the Indian Hill High School paper, Chieftain, in the late ‘70s (?)