There is a need to enhance the effectiveness and reach of complex health promotion initiatives by providing opportunities for diverse health promotion practitioners and others to interact in online settings. This paper reviews the existing literature on how to take health promotion communities and networks into online settings. A scoping review of relevant bodies of literature and empirical evidence was undertaken to provide an interpretive synthesis of existing knowledge on the topic. Sixteen studies were identified between 1986 and 2007. Relatively little research has been conducted on the process of taking existing offl ine communities and networks into online settings. However, more research has focused on offline (i.e. not mediated via computer networks); ‘virtual’ (purely online with no offl ine interpersonal contact); and ‘multiplex’ communities (i.e. those that interact across both online and offl ine settings). Results are summarised under three themes: characteristics of communities in online and offl ine settings; issues in moving offl ine communities online, and designing online communities to match community needs. Existing health promotion initiatives can benefit from online platforms that promote community building and knowledge sharing. Online ehealth promotion settings and communities can successfully integrate with existing offl ine settings and communities to form ‘multiplex’ communities (i.e. communities that operate fl uently across both online and offl ine settings).
Bajaj Allianz Life Insurance Company - Insurer Innovation Award 2024
Systematic Literature Reviews Health Information Management Journal
1. Moving offline
communities online
Dr. Jenine Beekhuyzen
Vice Chancellors’ Research Fellow
University of Southern Queensland
Brisbane, Australia
Based on paper: Sunderland, N., Beekhuyzen, J. Wolski, M. & Kendall, E. (2012) Multiplex communities in place-
based health promotion: A literature review of moving offline communities online, Health Information Management
Journal, 42(2) pp9-16
http://www98.griffith.edu.au/dspace/bitstream/handle/10072/54874/88574_1.pdf?sequence=1
2. Context
• Enable health equity in line with the Ottawa Charter on Health Promotion (WHO)
and the social determinants of health
• Focused on place-based health promotion initiatives in culturally & linguistically
diverse (CALD) low-socio economic communities (Logan/Beaudesert)
• Wilson and Peterson’s (2002) extensive review
• identified a missing link between the historically constituted sociocultural
practices within and outside of mediated communication and the language
practices, social interactions, and ideologies of technology that emerge
from new information and communication technologies
• ——> To situate current practices, we compare with previously existing
media and communication technologies e.g. how social practices were
conducted before the advent of digital technologies
3. SLR
• Systematic Literature Review - scoping review
• RQ “What are the key concepts and conditions for
successfully moving an offline community online?”
• 16 studies in literature between 1986-2013
• Offline - non-mediated via computer networks
• Virtual - purely online / no offline contact
• Multiplex - interact across offline and online
4. Three
main
themes for
designing
multiplex
communities
• Characteristics of
communities in online and
offline settings
• Issues in moving offline
communities online
• Designing online
communities to match
community needs
Aim of review: Identify existing evidence to guide
the development of an online platform to support
complex offline health promotion activities
5. Main Findings (1)
• Characterisation of communities (McMillan & Chavis
1986)
• Strong membership base
• Sustained through loyalty and commitment to
community. Loyalty is linked to influence by peers to
regularly participate and contribute
• Members’ perceived usefulness and sense of
belonging = shared emotional connection
strengthened through ongoing, shared experiences
6. Main Findings (2)
• Multiplex communities can produce significant
benefits
• Strong and sustained community ties and
attachment
• Enhanced engagement in online settings
• Shared governance extending across offline / online
• Enhanced social presence within online
engagements
7. Main Findings (3)
• Two main limitations of multiplex communities
• Those already well educated and connected
offline will be more inclined to connect online in
sustained ways than those less well educated, less
extroverted and who experience social isolation
• Groups of participants who do not connect online
can separate from the main group and re-form as
sub-communities in offline settings which may
weaken the value of the online setting
8. Lessons leant (1)
• Design strategies that appease non-experts and that
encourage multiplex relationships can help improve
the success of online communities
• Existing health promotion initiatives can benefit from
online platforms that promote community building and
knowledge sharing
• Online e-health promotion settings and communities
can successfully integrate with existing offline settings
and communities to form ‘multiplex’ communities
operating fluent across both offline and online settings
9. Lessons leant (2)
• Multiplex communities can result in positive improvements in
health and the social determinants of health include:
• Integrated and holistic approaches
• Interventions that are fully implemented without premature
discontinuation
• Use of community engagement, participation and ownership
• Focus on long term and sustainable benefits
• Must continually to facilitate social interactions among
members, creating loyalty and commitment