SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  52
GES 679 SDIs and Standards
Topics ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Voluntary Consensus Standards
Voluntary Consensus Standards ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
OMB Circular A-119 ,[object Object],[object Object]
Why develop FGDC standards? ,[object Object]
Functional relationships IETF / W3C IT Infrastructure FGDC Thematic data standards OGC Interface and Encoding De Facto De Jure Domain Infrastructure ISO/TC 211 Conceptual modeling Data spec methodologies
U.S. National Standards Strategy ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
U.S. National Standards Strategy ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
OMB Circular A-119 ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
WTO Technical Barriers to Trade ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Standards development
Standards development processes ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
FGDC Standards Process From FGDC Standards process,  http:// www.fgdc.gov /standards/process   FGDC Steering Committee 12 – Endorsement  FINAL CG 11 - Approve Standard for Endorsement  SWG 10 - Evaluate Responsiveness to Public Comments  Standards Development Group 9 - Respond to Public Comments  FGDC Secretariat 8 - Coordinate Public Review  FGDC Coordination Group (CG) 7 - Approve Standard for Public Review  SWG 6 - Review and Evaluate Committee Draft  REVIEW SC/WG 5 - Review Working Draft  Standards Development Group 4 - Produce Working Draft  DRAFT FGDC Subcommittee or Working Group (SC/WG) 3 - Set Up Project  PROJECT SWG 2 - Review Proposal  FGDC Standards Working Group (SWG) 1- Develop Proposal PROPOSAL CUSTODIAN STEP STAGE
FGDC Standards Process From FGDC Standards Reference Model, http://www.fgdc.gov/standards/refmod97.pdf Recommendation Final draft standard Recommendation final draft standard Comment document Draft standard Public comments  Draft standard  Active proposal  Step 4  –  Produce working draft Step 1  –  Develop proposal Step 2  –  Review proposal Proposal Step 3  –  Set-up project Project  Step 5  –  Review working draft Working draft  Step 6  –  Review and evaluate committee draft Committee draft  Step 7  –  Review and evaluate committee draft Step 8  –  Coordinate public review Committee draft  Step 9  –  Respond to public comments Step 10  –  Evaluate responsiveness to public comments Step 11  –  Approve standard for endorsement Step 12  –  Endorsement Proposal Draft Standard
Standards development processes ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Review ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Standards reference models
Standards reference models ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
ISO/IEC 10746, RM-ODP By Marcel Douwe Dekker, from   http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:RM-ODP_viewpoints.jpg
FEA Geospatial Profile
Enterprise Architecture ,[object Object],[object Object]
Goals of EA ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Federal Enterprise Architecture
FEA Reference Models ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
FEA Reference Models ,[object Object],[object Object]
FEA Reference Models Business Ref Model What do you do? What are the Requirements?   How often? Who are the users? Data Ref Model What information does the process need? How is it structured? What is its quality? Where is it located? Service Component Ref Model How can access to the data+processes be exposed for re-use across the enterprise? Performance Ref Model How can success be measured? What are the outcomes and products? What are the costs? Technology  Ref Model What standards can be leveraged to maximize re-use and minimize development/acquisition costs?
FEA Geospatial Profile ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Data Reference Model ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Data context ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Data description ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Data sharing ,[object Object],[object Object]
Technical Reference Model ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
ISO 19101:2002 Geographic information – Reference Model
ISO 19101:2002 ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
ISO 19101
ISO 19101
Domain reference model
Architectural Reference Model
Architectural Reference Model
ISO 19101:2002 ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Geospatial Interoperability Reference Model (GIRM)
GIRM ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Viewpoints and levels of abstraction  Content Behavior Abstract models ("what")  Encoding Interface Implementation specifications ("how") Information Transfer Service Invocation Information Viewpoint Computation Viewpoint
Metadata and catalog access Information Viewpoint Computation Viewpoint Content: FGDC Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata ISO 19115:2003, Metadata Behavior: OGC Topic 13, [Data] Catalog Services Abstract models  Encoding:    ISO 19139, XML implementation of ISO 19115 Interface: OGC Catalog Interface  ISO 23950 (a.k.a. ANSI Z39.50) Implementation specifications  Information Transfer Service Invocation
Review ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
References ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
References ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
References ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
2009-10-17 Class 3 ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
(Ms.) Julie Binder Maitra Federal Geographic Data Committee (FGDC) Chair, FGDC Standards Working Group International Representative, INCITS Technical Committee L1, Geographic Information Systems Email:  [email_address] Phone: (703) 648 4627 GMT -5 h Web: FGDC Standards:  www.fgdc.gov /standards/ INCITS L1:  l1.incits.org LinkedIn:  www.linkedin.com/juliebindermaitra "We live in two worlds: the world that we can measure with line and rule, and the world that we feel with our hearts and imagination." - Leigh Hunt Thank you!

Contenu connexe

En vedette

Robin Jarossi Visual CV
Robin Jarossi Visual CVRobin Jarossi Visual CV
Robin Jarossi Visual CVTavener
 
Referentiecase A.S. Watson | ICreative
Referentiecase A.S. Watson | ICreativeReferentiecase A.S. Watson | ICreative
Referentiecase A.S. Watson | ICreativeICreative
 
3.4.1 Week 4 Discussion
3.4.1 Week 4 Discussion3.4.1 Week 4 Discussion
3.4.1 Week 4 DiscussionPriyank Patel
 
Referentiecase ODH | ICreative
Referentiecase ODH | ICreativeReferentiecase ODH | ICreative
Referentiecase ODH | ICreativeICreative
 

En vedette (8)

Robin Jarossi Visual CV
Robin Jarossi Visual CVRobin Jarossi Visual CV
Robin Jarossi Visual CV
 
Data formats
Data formatsData formats
Data formats
 
Referentiecase A.S. Watson | ICreative
Referentiecase A.S. Watson | ICreativeReferentiecase A.S. Watson | ICreative
Referentiecase A.S. Watson | ICreative
 
3.4.1 Week 4 Discussion
3.4.1 Week 4 Discussion3.4.1 Week 4 Discussion
3.4.1 Week 4 Discussion
 
FGDC Standards Update
FGDC Standards UpdateFGDC Standards Update
FGDC Standards Update
 
Referentiecase ODH | ICreative
Referentiecase ODH | ICreativeReferentiecase ODH | ICreative
Referentiecase ODH | ICreative
 
FGDC Standards WG update
FGDC Standards WG updateFGDC Standards WG update
FGDC Standards WG update
 
2009 09 19 Learning Unit Sdi
2009 09 19 Learning Unit Sdi2009 09 19 Learning Unit Sdi
2009 09 19 Learning Unit Sdi
 

Similaire à 2009 10 03 Learning Unit Sdi

Understanding and Applying The Open Group Architecture Framework (TOGAF)
Understanding and Applying The Open Group Architecture Framework (TOGAF)Understanding and Applying The Open Group Architecture Framework (TOGAF)
Understanding and Applying The Open Group Architecture Framework (TOGAF)Nathaniel Palmer
 
Understanding and Applying The Open Group Architecture Framework (TOGAF)
Understanding and Applying The Open Group Architecture Framework (TOGAF)Understanding and Applying The Open Group Architecture Framework (TOGAF)
Understanding and Applying The Open Group Architecture Framework (TOGAF)Nathaniel Palmer
 
Achieving IT Strategic Directives When Evaluating a New Promotional Content E...
Achieving IT Strategic Directives When Evaluating a New Promotional Content E...Achieving IT Strategic Directives When Evaluating a New Promotional Content E...
Achieving IT Strategic Directives When Evaluating a New Promotional Content E...Cognizant
 
Target Open Architecture for TOGAF and DM
Target Open Architecture for TOGAF and DMTarget Open Architecture for TOGAF and DM
Target Open Architecture for TOGAF and DMGopiMaren
 
Apqcbusinessimprovement 100602214353-phpapp02
Apqcbusinessimprovement 100602214353-phpapp02Apqcbusinessimprovement 100602214353-phpapp02
Apqcbusinessimprovement 100602214353-phpapp02NATHAN Consulting
 
The Challenges Of, And Advantages In, Establishing A Consistent Architectural...
The Challenges Of, And Advantages In, Establishing A Consistent Architectural...The Challenges Of, And Advantages In, Establishing A Consistent Architectural...
The Challenges Of, And Advantages In, Establishing A Consistent Architectural...Tim Eyres
 
ICT Industry standards overview
ICT Industry standardsoverviewICT Industry standardsoverview
ICT Industry standards overviewanandbajaj
 
Redd IOA Meridian
Redd IOA MeridianRedd IOA Meridian
Redd IOA MeridiantheREDDdesk
 
TMF-Reference-Model-Presentation.pptx
TMF-Reference-Model-Presentation.pptxTMF-Reference-Model-Presentation.pptx
TMF-Reference-Model-Presentation.pptxJaimeHinojosa18
 
The Research Data Alliance ICT Technical Specifications
The Research Data AllianceICT Technical SpecificationsThe Research Data AllianceICT Technical Specifications
The Research Data Alliance ICT Technical SpecificationsResearch Data Alliance
 
Ea As A Strategy M Veeraragaloo Approach
Ea As A Strategy   M Veeraragaloo ApproachEa As A Strategy   M Veeraragaloo Approach
Ea As A Strategy M Veeraragaloo ApproachMaganathin Veeraragaloo
 
The essential role of technology standards
The essential role of technology standardsThe essential role of technology standards
The essential role of technology standardsQualcomm Research
 
2012 08-15 standards-summary_draft
2012 08-15 standards-summary_draft2012 08-15 standards-summary_draft
2012 08-15 standards-summary_draftRich Elmore
 

Similaire à 2009 10 03 Learning Unit Sdi (20)

Understanding and Applying The Open Group Architecture Framework (TOGAF)
Understanding and Applying The Open Group Architecture Framework (TOGAF)Understanding and Applying The Open Group Architecture Framework (TOGAF)
Understanding and Applying The Open Group Architecture Framework (TOGAF)
 
Understanding and Applying The Open Group Architecture Framework (TOGAF)
Understanding and Applying The Open Group Architecture Framework (TOGAF)Understanding and Applying The Open Group Architecture Framework (TOGAF)
Understanding and Applying The Open Group Architecture Framework (TOGAF)
 
Achieving IT Strategic Directives When Evaluating a New Promotional Content E...
Achieving IT Strategic Directives When Evaluating a New Promotional Content E...Achieving IT Strategic Directives When Evaluating a New Promotional Content E...
Achieving IT Strategic Directives When Evaluating a New Promotional Content E...
 
Target Open Architecture for TOGAF and DM
Target Open Architecture for TOGAF and DMTarget Open Architecture for TOGAF and DM
Target Open Architecture for TOGAF and DM
 
TOGAF
TOGAFTOGAF
TOGAF
 
Apqcbusinessimprovement 100602214353-phpapp02
Apqcbusinessimprovement 100602214353-phpapp02Apqcbusinessimprovement 100602214353-phpapp02
Apqcbusinessimprovement 100602214353-phpapp02
 
Pcf 5x
Pcf 5xPcf 5x
Pcf 5x
 
The Challenges Of, And Advantages In, Establishing A Consistent Architectural...
The Challenges Of, And Advantages In, Establishing A Consistent Architectural...The Challenges Of, And Advantages In, Establishing A Consistent Architectural...
The Challenges Of, And Advantages In, Establishing A Consistent Architectural...
 
SDLC_Intro.ppt
SDLC_Intro.pptSDLC_Intro.ppt
SDLC_Intro.ppt
 
ICT Industry standards overview
ICT Industry standardsoverviewICT Industry standardsoverview
ICT Industry standards overview
 
Redd IOA Meridian
Redd IOA MeridianRedd IOA Meridian
Redd IOA Meridian
 
1. 5sc methodology colombia
1. 5sc methodology colombia1. 5sc methodology colombia
1. 5sc methodology colombia
 
1. 5sc methodology colombia
1. 5sc methodology colombia1. 5sc methodology colombia
1. 5sc methodology colombia
 
TMF-Reference-Model-Presentation.pptx
TMF-Reference-Model-Presentation.pptxTMF-Reference-Model-Presentation.pptx
TMF-Reference-Model-Presentation.pptx
 
Chap02
Chap02Chap02
Chap02
 
The Research Data Alliance ICT Technical Specifications
The Research Data AllianceICT Technical SpecificationsThe Research Data AllianceICT Technical Specifications
The Research Data Alliance ICT Technical Specifications
 
Ea As A Strategy M Veeraragaloo Approach
Ea As A Strategy   M Veeraragaloo ApproachEa As A Strategy   M Veeraragaloo Approach
Ea As A Strategy M Veeraragaloo Approach
 
The essential role of technology standards
The essential role of technology standardsThe essential role of technology standards
The essential role of technology standards
 
2012 08-15 standards-summary_draft
2012 08-15 standards-summary_draft2012 08-15 standards-summary_draft
2012 08-15 standards-summary_draft
 
TMF PDF.pdf
TMF PDF.pdfTMF PDF.pdf
TMF PDF.pdf
 

2009 10 03 Learning Unit Sdi

  • 1. GES 679 SDIs and Standards
  • 2.
  • 4.
  • 5.
  • 6.
  • 7. Functional relationships IETF / W3C IT Infrastructure FGDC Thematic data standards OGC Interface and Encoding De Facto De Jure Domain Infrastructure ISO/TC 211 Conceptual modeling Data spec methodologies
  • 8.
  • 9.
  • 10.
  • 11.
  • 12.
  • 14.
  • 15. FGDC Standards Process From FGDC Standards process, http:// www.fgdc.gov /standards/process FGDC Steering Committee 12 – Endorsement FINAL CG 11 - Approve Standard for Endorsement SWG 10 - Evaluate Responsiveness to Public Comments Standards Development Group 9 - Respond to Public Comments FGDC Secretariat 8 - Coordinate Public Review FGDC Coordination Group (CG) 7 - Approve Standard for Public Review SWG 6 - Review and Evaluate Committee Draft REVIEW SC/WG 5 - Review Working Draft Standards Development Group 4 - Produce Working Draft DRAFT FGDC Subcommittee or Working Group (SC/WG) 3 - Set Up Project PROJECT SWG 2 - Review Proposal FGDC Standards Working Group (SWG) 1- Develop Proposal PROPOSAL CUSTODIAN STEP STAGE
  • 16. FGDC Standards Process From FGDC Standards Reference Model, http://www.fgdc.gov/standards/refmod97.pdf Recommendation Final draft standard Recommendation final draft standard Comment document Draft standard Public comments Draft standard Active proposal Step 4 – Produce working draft Step 1 – Develop proposal Step 2 – Review proposal Proposal Step 3 – Set-up project Project Step 5 – Review working draft Working draft Step 6 – Review and evaluate committee draft Committee draft Step 7 – Review and evaluate committee draft Step 8 – Coordinate public review Committee draft Step 9 – Respond to public comments Step 10 – Evaluate responsiveness to public comments Step 11 – Approve standard for endorsement Step 12 – Endorsement Proposal Draft Standard
  • 17.
  • 18.
  • 20.
  • 21. ISO/IEC 10746, RM-ODP By Marcel Douwe Dekker, from http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:RM-ODP_viewpoints.jpg
  • 23.
  • 24.
  • 26.
  • 27.
  • 28. FEA Reference Models Business Ref Model What do you do? What are the Requirements? How often? Who are the users? Data Ref Model What information does the process need? How is it structured? What is its quality? Where is it located? Service Component Ref Model How can access to the data+processes be exposed for re-use across the enterprise? Performance Ref Model How can success be measured? What are the outcomes and products? What are the costs? Technology Ref Model What standards can be leveraged to maximize re-use and minimize development/acquisition costs?
  • 29.
  • 30.
  • 31.
  • 32.
  • 33.
  • 34.
  • 35. ISO 19101:2002 Geographic information – Reference Model
  • 36.
  • 42.
  • 44.
  • 45. Viewpoints and levels of abstraction Content Behavior Abstract models ("what") Encoding Interface Implementation specifications ("how") Information Transfer Service Invocation Information Viewpoint Computation Viewpoint
  • 46. Metadata and catalog access Information Viewpoint Computation Viewpoint Content: FGDC Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata ISO 19115:2003, Metadata Behavior: OGC Topic 13, [Data] Catalog Services Abstract models Encoding: ISO 19139, XML implementation of ISO 19115 Interface: OGC Catalog Interface ISO 23950 (a.k.a. ANSI Z39.50) Implementation specifications Information Transfer Service Invocation
  • 47.
  • 48.
  • 49.
  • 50.
  • 51.
  • 52. (Ms.) Julie Binder Maitra Federal Geographic Data Committee (FGDC) Chair, FGDC Standards Working Group International Representative, INCITS Technical Committee L1, Geographic Information Systems Email: [email_address] Phone: (703) 648 4627 GMT -5 h Web: FGDC Standards: www.fgdc.gov /standards/ INCITS L1: l1.incits.org LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/juliebindermaitra "We live in two worlds: the world that we can measure with line and rule, and the world that we feel with our hearts and imagination." - Leigh Hunt Thank you!

Notes de l'éditeur

  1. FGDC standards process is structured similarly to processes used by ISO and ANSI Standards development group interfaces with SWG at steps 2, 6, and 10
  2. Search ISO 10646 and standards reference models
  3. The enterprise viewpoint - describes the relationship of the information system to its environment in the organization, the role of the information system in the organization, and the policies for using the information system: might correspond to FEA Business Reference Model The engineering viewpoint implementations within distributed, networked computing systems that support the specifications defined from the perspective of the information and computational viewpoints. The technology viewpoint provision of an underlying infrastructure within which services operate. A technology specification defines how a system is structured in terms of hardware and software components.
  4. The information viewpoint : Model of the information in a GIS and defines the processing that is performed by such a system. Provides a consistent common view on information that can be referenced in a GIS. The computational viewpoint interaction between services that are part of a larger system. A specification of a service is a model of the service as seen by a client or by a set of other services with which this service interacts.
  5. Conceptual modeling . Necessary for both the information and computational viewpoints. Rigorously describe geographic information – one way to view this to capture map data in text. Also used to define services for transformation and exchange of geographic information. We will discuss conceptual modeling in in Class 3. Domain reference model . encompasses both the information and computational viewpoints, focusing most closely on those standards in the ISO 19100 series of standards that standardize  the structure of geographic information in data models and definition of operations, and  the administration of geographic information. This includes metadata. Cataloguing refers to feature cataloguing, not data cataloguing The General feature model defines a metamodel for features and their properties. Architectural reference model . Describes the general types of services that will be provided by computer systems to manipulate geographic information and enumerates the service interfaces across which those services must interoperate. This model also provides a method of identifying specific requirements for standardization of geographic information that is processed by these services. The Architectural reference model focuses primarily on the computational viewpoint (see Annex A). To be complete, the reference model must provide an understanding of how it relates to other ISO reference model standards that describe key aspects of information technology upon which the ISO 19100 series is based. Clause 9 describes the relationship between the ISO 19100 series and the Open Systems Environment Reference Model.
  6.  Model/Information Management Services management of the development, manipulation, and storage of metadata, conceptual schemas, and datasets.  Geographic Information Model/Information Management Services . Specific services within this class are identified in ISO 19119. These services are based on the content of those standards in the ISO 19100 series that standardize the structure of geographic information and the procedures for its administration. Examples of such services are a query and update service for access and manipulation of geographic information and a catalogue service for management of feature catalogues.  Human Interaction Services management of user interfaces, graphics, multimedia, and presentation of compound documents. Geographic Information Human Interaction Services forcus on managing the interface between humans and Geographic Information Systems, for example, portrayal  Workflow/Task Services support specific tasks or work-related activities that may be conducted by different persons Geographic Information Workflow/Task Management Services focuses on workflow for tasks associated with geographic information – involving processing of orders for buying and selling of geographic information and services: what about  Processing Services perform large-scale computations involving substantial amounts of data. Geographic Information Processing Services . Services for coordinate transformation, metric translation, and format conversion.  Communication Services are services for encoding and transfer of data across communications networks. Geographic Information Communication Services . Transfer of geographic information (data sharing, ESRI shapefiles, GML/XML)  System Management Services management of system components, applications, and networks. These services also include management of user accounts and user access privileges. Geographic Information System Management focus on user management and performance management. These services are described in more detail in ISO 19119.