SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  13
By Jonathan Mazzella

-Bush v. Gore
-Dredd Scott v. Sanford
-Mcculloch v. Maryland
Plaintiff Arguments
 George

Bush and the Republican
party claimed that they had won
the state of Florida therefor
winning the election.
 Bush complained also that the
recount of the votes undermined
the 14th amendment of the
constitution.
Defendant Arguments
Al Gore and the Democratice party
believed they had won the state of
Florida and the election
 Al Gore demanded a recount of the
votes, because he felt that it was unfair
to bas who had won off of a state
election that was not properly counted.

Verdict
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor
of Bush and the Republican party.
 The recount of the votes had violated
the 14th amendment of the Constitution
which “requires the federal government
to respect, maintain and uphold the legal
rights of American citizens.
Governments in the United States are
not allowed to infringe on the civil rights
and liberties of its people”

Plaintiff Arguments
Dredd Scott believed that he should be
a free man because his owner moved to
a free state but then died.
 He claimed that since he was left in a
free state when his owner died he
should have a right to freedom.
 Dredd Scott had his freedom for a short
period of time and when he was
reclaimed he tried for his freedom again.

Defendant Arguments


John Sanford (who represented
Emerson) said that since Dredd Scott
belonged to Emerson he should be
given to another member of the family
since he was only “property”
Verdict
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that
Congress did not have the right to
declare states as “free states”
 They also ruled that Dredd Scott was
only considered property and that he
belonged to Sanford.

Plaintiff Arguments
McCulloch, the manager of a federal
bank in Maryland did not believe that the
state of Maryland had the right to tax a
federal bank.
 He thought that since it was a branch of
the government that they should not
have to pay state taxes.

Defendant Arguments
The state of Maryland claimed that since
the Bank was on Maryland territory,
using Maryland’s resources, and
Maryland’s money, that they should
have to pay taxes.
 They did not think being a branch of the
government had anything to do with
taxation.

Verdict
The Supreme Court ruled the following:
 Firstly, the Congress of the United States is
granted for certain implied powers by the
Constitution that are implemented in order
to ensure for the proper function of the
Federal Government.
 The other major outcome was that the
States cannot impose on the powers
granted by the Constitution to the Federal
Government by any action, such as levying
a bank tax on a national bank.


Contenu connexe

Tendances

Understanding federal and state courts
Understanding federal and state courtsUnderstanding federal and state courts
Understanding federal and state courts
sevans-idaho
 
Troublewithnormal
TroublewithnormalTroublewithnormal
Troublewithnormal
guestc31971
 
Civics 10th amendment project
Civics 10th amendment projectCivics 10th amendment project
Civics 10th amendment project
jchen18
 

Tendances (19)

Perry Op Ed
Perry Op EdPerry Op Ed
Perry Op Ed
 
Doma faq
Doma faqDoma faq
Doma faq
 
Understanding federal and state courts
Understanding federal and state courtsUnderstanding federal and state courts
Understanding federal and state courts
 
The Courts
The CourtsThe Courts
The Courts
 
Legal Research and Case Briefing
Legal Research and Case BriefingLegal Research and Case Briefing
Legal Research and Case Briefing
 
Constitutional Issues - Chapter 3
Constitutional Issues - Chapter 3Constitutional Issues - Chapter 3
Constitutional Issues - Chapter 3
 
Constitutional Issues - Chapter 2
Constitutional Issues - Chapter 2 Constitutional Issues - Chapter 2
Constitutional Issues - Chapter 2
 
The Courts
The CourtsThe Courts
The Courts
 
Chapter 3 - The U.S. Supreme Court: The Final Word
Chapter 3 - The U.S. Supreme Court: The Final WordChapter 3 - The U.S. Supreme Court: The Final Word
Chapter 3 - The U.S. Supreme Court: The Final Word
 
Constitutional Issues - Chapter 1
Constitutional Issues - Chapter 1Constitutional Issues - Chapter 1
Constitutional Issues - Chapter 1
 
Constitutional Issues - Chapter 13
Constitutional Issues - Chapter 13Constitutional Issues - Chapter 13
Constitutional Issues - Chapter 13
 
Troublewithnormal
TroublewithnormalTroublewithnormal
Troublewithnormal
 
Chapter 2 - An Overview of the U.S. Legal System
Chapter 2 - An Overview of the U.S. Legal SystemChapter 2 - An Overview of the U.S. Legal System
Chapter 2 - An Overview of the U.S. Legal System
 
ap gov chap 6
ap gov chap 6ap gov chap 6
ap gov chap 6
 
News Flash January 20 2015 - Supreme Court Agrees to Address Same Sex Marriage
News Flash January 20 2015 - Supreme Court Agrees to Address Same Sex MarriageNews Flash January 20 2015 - Supreme Court Agrees to Address Same Sex Marriage
News Flash January 20 2015 - Supreme Court Agrees to Address Same Sex Marriage
 
Civics 10th amendment project
Civics 10th amendment projectCivics 10th amendment project
Civics 10th amendment project
 
normal
normalnormal
normal
 
Why The American Legal System Is Unique
Why The American Legal System Is UniqueWhy The American Legal System Is Unique
Why The American Legal System Is Unique
 
Article assignment nullification doj federal lawsuit california
Article assignment nullification doj federal lawsuit californiaArticle assignment nullification doj federal lawsuit california
Article assignment nullification doj federal lawsuit california
 

Similaire à Landmark Case Decisions

The Judicial Branch
The Judicial BranchThe Judicial Branch
The Judicial Branch
dficker
 
The six principles of government
The six principles of governmentThe six principles of government
The six principles of government
Cham216
 
A Case For The Foreclosure Proceeding
A Case For The Foreclosure ProceedingA Case For The Foreclosure Proceeding
A Case For The Foreclosure Proceeding
Karen Gilchrist
 
US Land Mark Cases- Michael Alfano
US Land Mark Cases- Michael AlfanoUS Land Mark Cases- Michael Alfano
US Land Mark Cases- Michael Alfano
mikealfano49
 
Essay 4 ArgumentBackgroundIn 2014, President Barack Obama .docx
Essay 4 ArgumentBackgroundIn 2014, President Barack Obama .docxEssay 4 ArgumentBackgroundIn 2014, President Barack Obama .docx
Essay 4 ArgumentBackgroundIn 2014, President Barack Obama .docx
SALU18
 
The Pros And Cons Of Constitutional Courts
The Pros And Cons Of Constitutional CourtsThe Pros And Cons Of Constitutional Courts
The Pros And Cons Of Constitutional Courts
Melissa Luster
 
Power Point
Power PointPower Point
Power Point
zmiller
 

Similaire à Landmark Case Decisions (17)

Us court cases cbl
Us court cases cbl Us court cases cbl
Us court cases cbl
 
Fourteenth Amendment Brandon-L-Blankenship
Fourteenth Amendment Brandon-L-BlankenshipFourteenth Amendment Brandon-L-Blankenship
Fourteenth Amendment Brandon-L-Blankenship
 
The Judicial Branch
The Judicial BranchThe Judicial Branch
The Judicial Branch
 
Part b
Part bPart b
Part b
 
The six principles of government
The six principles of governmentThe six principles of government
The six principles of government
 
1.4 day 1 ppt
1.4 day 1 ppt1.4 day 1 ppt
1.4 day 1 ppt
 
download56b5_-_Judicial_Review.ppt
download56b5_-_Judicial_Review.pptdownload56b5_-_Judicial_Review.ppt
download56b5_-_Judicial_Review.ppt
 
A Case For The Foreclosure Proceeding
A Case For The Foreclosure ProceedingA Case For The Foreclosure Proceeding
A Case For The Foreclosure Proceeding
 
US Land Mark Cases- Michael Alfano
US Land Mark Cases- Michael AlfanoUS Land Mark Cases- Michael Alfano
US Land Mark Cases- Michael Alfano
 
Co-Owners And Hannon Case Study
Co-Owners And Hannon Case StudyCo-Owners And Hannon Case Study
Co-Owners And Hannon Case Study
 
Marbury vs Madison
Marbury vs MadisonMarbury vs Madison
Marbury vs Madison
 
Sp 108-supreme courtpresentation-3
Sp 108-supreme courtpresentation-3Sp 108-supreme courtpresentation-3
Sp 108-supreme courtpresentation-3
 
Essay 4 ArgumentBackgroundIn 2014, President Barack Obama .docx
Essay 4 ArgumentBackgroundIn 2014, President Barack Obama .docxEssay 4 ArgumentBackgroundIn 2014, President Barack Obama .docx
Essay 4 ArgumentBackgroundIn 2014, President Barack Obama .docx
 
Academic government reading
Academic government readingAcademic government reading
Academic government reading
 
The Pros And Cons Of Constitutional Courts
The Pros And Cons Of Constitutional CourtsThe Pros And Cons Of Constitutional Courts
The Pros And Cons Of Constitutional Courts
 
Power Point
Power PointPower Point
Power Point
 
11th Amendment
11th Amendment11th Amendment
11th Amendment
 

Dernier

Powerful Love Spells in Phoenix, AZ (310) 882-6330 Bring Back Lost Lover
Powerful Love Spells in Phoenix, AZ (310) 882-6330 Bring Back Lost LoverPowerful Love Spells in Phoenix, AZ (310) 882-6330 Bring Back Lost Lover
Powerful Love Spells in Phoenix, AZ (310) 882-6330 Bring Back Lost Lover
PsychicRuben LoveSpells
 

Dernier (20)

2024 04 03 AZ GOP LD4 Gen Meeting Minutes FINAL.docx
2024 04 03 AZ GOP LD4 Gen Meeting Minutes FINAL.docx2024 04 03 AZ GOP LD4 Gen Meeting Minutes FINAL.docx
2024 04 03 AZ GOP LD4 Gen Meeting Minutes FINAL.docx
 
AI as Research Assistant: Upscaling Content Analysis to Identify Patterns of ...
AI as Research Assistant: Upscaling Content Analysis to Identify Patterns of ...AI as Research Assistant: Upscaling Content Analysis to Identify Patterns of ...
AI as Research Assistant: Upscaling Content Analysis to Identify Patterns of ...
 
Nurturing Families, Empowering Lives: TDP's Vision for Family Welfare in Andh...
Nurturing Families, Empowering Lives: TDP's Vision for Family Welfare in Andh...Nurturing Families, Empowering Lives: TDP's Vision for Family Welfare in Andh...
Nurturing Families, Empowering Lives: TDP's Vision for Family Welfare in Andh...
 
BDSM⚡Call Girls in Sector 135 Noida Escorts >༒8448380779 Escort Service
BDSM⚡Call Girls in Sector 135 Noida Escorts >༒8448380779 Escort ServiceBDSM⚡Call Girls in Sector 135 Noida Escorts >༒8448380779 Escort Service
BDSM⚡Call Girls in Sector 135 Noida Escorts >༒8448380779 Escort Service
 
Defensa de JOH insiste que testimonio de analista de la DEA es falso y solici...
Defensa de JOH insiste que testimonio de analista de la DEA es falso y solici...Defensa de JOH insiste que testimonio de analista de la DEA es falso y solici...
Defensa de JOH insiste que testimonio de analista de la DEA es falso y solici...
 
Nara Chandrababu Naidu's Visionary Policies For Andhra Pradesh's Development
Nara Chandrababu Naidu's Visionary Policies For Andhra Pradesh's DevelopmentNara Chandrababu Naidu's Visionary Policies For Andhra Pradesh's Development
Nara Chandrababu Naidu's Visionary Policies For Andhra Pradesh's Development
 
Julius Randle's Injury Status: Surgery Not Off the Table
Julius Randle's Injury Status: Surgery Not Off the TableJulius Randle's Injury Status: Surgery Not Off the Table
Julius Randle's Injury Status: Surgery Not Off the Table
 
Verified Love Spells in Little Rock, AR (310) 882-6330 Get My Ex-Lover Back
Verified Love Spells in Little Rock, AR (310) 882-6330 Get My Ex-Lover BackVerified Love Spells in Little Rock, AR (310) 882-6330 Get My Ex-Lover Back
Verified Love Spells in Little Rock, AR (310) 882-6330 Get My Ex-Lover Back
 
Enjoy Night⚡Call Girls Rajokri Delhi >༒8448380779 Escort Service
Enjoy Night⚡Call Girls Rajokri Delhi >༒8448380779 Escort ServiceEnjoy Night⚡Call Girls Rajokri Delhi >༒8448380779 Escort Service
Enjoy Night⚡Call Girls Rajokri Delhi >༒8448380779 Escort Service
 
TDP As the Party of Hope For AP Youth Under N Chandrababu Naidu’s Leadership
TDP As the Party of Hope For AP Youth Under N Chandrababu Naidu’s LeadershipTDP As the Party of Hope For AP Youth Under N Chandrababu Naidu’s Leadership
TDP As the Party of Hope For AP Youth Under N Chandrababu Naidu’s Leadership
 
29042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
29042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf29042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
29042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
 
WhatsApp 📞 8448380779 ✅Call Girls In Chaura Sector 22 ( Noida)
WhatsApp 📞 8448380779 ✅Call Girls In Chaura Sector 22 ( Noida)WhatsApp 📞 8448380779 ✅Call Girls In Chaura Sector 22 ( Noida)
WhatsApp 📞 8448380779 ✅Call Girls In Chaura Sector 22 ( Noida)
 
BDSM⚡Call Girls in Indirapuram Escorts >༒8448380779 Escort Service
BDSM⚡Call Girls in Indirapuram Escorts >༒8448380779 Escort ServiceBDSM⚡Call Girls in Indirapuram Escorts >༒8448380779 Escort Service
BDSM⚡Call Girls in Indirapuram Escorts >༒8448380779 Escort Service
 
30042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
30042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf30042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
30042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
 
BDSM⚡Call Girls in Greater Noida Escorts >༒8448380779 Escort Service
BDSM⚡Call Girls in Greater Noida Escorts >༒8448380779 Escort ServiceBDSM⚡Call Girls in Greater Noida Escorts >༒8448380779 Escort Service
BDSM⚡Call Girls in Greater Noida Escorts >༒8448380779 Escort Service
 
KAHULUGAN AT KAHALAGAHAN NG GAWAING PANSIBIKO.pptx
KAHULUGAN AT KAHALAGAHAN NG GAWAING PANSIBIKO.pptxKAHULUGAN AT KAHALAGAHAN NG GAWAING PANSIBIKO.pptx
KAHULUGAN AT KAHALAGAHAN NG GAWAING PANSIBIKO.pptx
 
How Europe Underdeveloped Africa_walter.pdf
How Europe Underdeveloped Africa_walter.pdfHow Europe Underdeveloped Africa_walter.pdf
How Europe Underdeveloped Africa_walter.pdf
 
Embed-2 (1).pdfb[k[k[[k[kkkpkdpokkdpkopko
Embed-2 (1).pdfb[k[k[[k[kkkpkdpokkdpkopkoEmbed-2 (1).pdfb[k[k[[k[kkkpkdpokkdpkopko
Embed-2 (1).pdfb[k[k[[k[kkkpkdpokkdpkopko
 
Powerful Love Spells in Phoenix, AZ (310) 882-6330 Bring Back Lost Lover
Powerful Love Spells in Phoenix, AZ (310) 882-6330 Bring Back Lost LoverPowerful Love Spells in Phoenix, AZ (310) 882-6330 Bring Back Lost Lover
Powerful Love Spells in Phoenix, AZ (310) 882-6330 Bring Back Lost Lover
 
2024 02 15 AZ GOP LD4 Gen Meeting Minutes_FINAL_20240228.docx
2024 02 15 AZ GOP LD4 Gen Meeting Minutes_FINAL_20240228.docx2024 02 15 AZ GOP LD4 Gen Meeting Minutes_FINAL_20240228.docx
2024 02 15 AZ GOP LD4 Gen Meeting Minutes_FINAL_20240228.docx
 

Landmark Case Decisions

  • 1. By Jonathan Mazzella -Bush v. Gore -Dredd Scott v. Sanford -Mcculloch v. Maryland
  • 2.
  • 3. Plaintiff Arguments  George Bush and the Republican party claimed that they had won the state of Florida therefor winning the election.  Bush complained also that the recount of the votes undermined the 14th amendment of the constitution.
  • 4. Defendant Arguments Al Gore and the Democratice party believed they had won the state of Florida and the election  Al Gore demanded a recount of the votes, because he felt that it was unfair to bas who had won off of a state election that was not properly counted. 
  • 5. Verdict The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of Bush and the Republican party.  The recount of the votes had violated the 14th amendment of the Constitution which “requires the federal government to respect, maintain and uphold the legal rights of American citizens. Governments in the United States are not allowed to infringe on the civil rights and liberties of its people” 
  • 6.
  • 7. Plaintiff Arguments Dredd Scott believed that he should be a free man because his owner moved to a free state but then died.  He claimed that since he was left in a free state when his owner died he should have a right to freedom.  Dredd Scott had his freedom for a short period of time and when he was reclaimed he tried for his freedom again. 
  • 8. Defendant Arguments  John Sanford (who represented Emerson) said that since Dredd Scott belonged to Emerson he should be given to another member of the family since he was only “property”
  • 9. Verdict The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that Congress did not have the right to declare states as “free states”  They also ruled that Dredd Scott was only considered property and that he belonged to Sanford. 
  • 10.
  • 11. Plaintiff Arguments McCulloch, the manager of a federal bank in Maryland did not believe that the state of Maryland had the right to tax a federal bank.  He thought that since it was a branch of the government that they should not have to pay state taxes. 
  • 12. Defendant Arguments The state of Maryland claimed that since the Bank was on Maryland territory, using Maryland’s resources, and Maryland’s money, that they should have to pay taxes.  They did not think being a branch of the government had anything to do with taxation. 
  • 13. Verdict The Supreme Court ruled the following:  Firstly, the Congress of the United States is granted for certain implied powers by the Constitution that are implemented in order to ensure for the proper function of the Federal Government.  The other major outcome was that the States cannot impose on the powers granted by the Constitution to the Federal Government by any action, such as levying a bank tax on a national bank. 