Court Essay

Essay On Court
"Hey Mom? Can I go to the courts to play ball?" My mom does not answer. I look at the small clock
on the kitchen counter. Four o' nine post meridiem. "Creak." The wooden floor boards receive
my weight as I walk slowly. More erupt: "Creak, creak." I walk up the stairs feeling the smooth
painted walls of my home. "Mother?" "Yes dear? Do you need a ride to the court again? You can
climb into the car. Also, do not forget you are only thirteen. If you can not make sometennis shots,
you have your whole life ahead of you. Do not worry." She comes up to me and puts her hand
through my thick brown hair. "Okay. I'll grab my racket and coat." I walk on to the old clay court.
Looking back I see my Mother's Lexus drive off. "First serve" I say...show more content...
I invision raising my hands in victory after beating my opponent. If Roger Federer can do it, why
can I not? For many, "practice makes perfect," but not for me. Practice makes my self esteem drop,
crumble, and burn to ashes.
For the next week I still practice despite of repercussions that come along with it. I do it in hope for
something life changing that will fill the hole in my heart.
The day has finally come. I feel exhausted by just thinking about it. "Get into the car. You do not
want to be late, do you?" I sit and look at the analogue clock on the dashboard. "Tick, tock." Mother
turns a little switch on the left door, and I feel the seats get warm. I need soothing before my
stressful tournament.
My mother and I walk slowly up the parking lot and to the main entrance. "Indoor Tennis Courts
and Pool" is engraved on the wall. I walk in and cock my head right to see what all the
ostentatious laughs were about. Two guys, both over six foot, standing with tennis rackets in their
hands. I sit down on the leather couch and start to perspire. I watch as a woman stands up in the
middle of the room and starts to speak. "Hello everyone. Thanks for coming today to our monthly
tournament. Today each opponent will play against seven others. If they win, they advance to the
next round. To win, you must be the first to win six games between you and your opponent. The
pairs for the first round are: John and Mason, Ryan and Nicholas, James and Jose,
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Court Proceedings Essay
Court Proceedings Court proceedings are the most public manifestation of the criminal justice
process, the arena in which justice is very literally "seen to be done". This is especially true of the
trial, generally assumed to be the stage in the process where the defendant has his or her day in
court and the opportunity to assert innocence. The trial is a vial part of the adversarial system, and
as we have seen the right to trial by one's peers, represented by the jury system, and as we have seen
the right to trial by one's peers, represented by the jury system, is seen as a fundamental protection
for the...show more content...
In the Crown court, the body charged with determining guilt or not is the jury. Defended by some
as the bastion of democracy, castigated by others as unwieldy anachronism that allows
miscarriages of justice to take place, the jury has been part of the criminal justice system in one
form or another since the twelfth century. Juries are currently composed of 12 men and women
drawn from the register of electors for the area in which the trial is to take place. The qualification
for jury service is now laid down in the Juries Act 1974. To be eligible for jury service a person must
be:
– between 18 and 70
– ordinarily resident in the UK for at least 5 years since the age of 13
– not ineligible
– not disqualified
Members of the judiciary and legal profession, the
clergy and the mentally disordered are ineligible. Disqualified categories of persons include
anyone who has received a custodial sentence of more than 5 years or a life sentence, those who
have been sentenced to probation within the last 5 years, or to community service or imprisonment
within the last 10 years. Added to this list of those debarred from jury service under the Criminal
Justice And Public Order Act 1994 (CJPOA 1994) are those on police or court bail. Other
categories have the right to be excused jury service if they so wish, including the medical profession,

Judicial Review : The Supreme Court Essay
The Supreme Court is the highest court in the United States. It has final appellate jurisdiction over
all cases in the United States of America. Although it was provided for only briefly in the
Constitution, it is an instrumental part of our democracy. The Supreme Court's largest responsibility
rests in its power of judicial review. The Supreme Court has the final say in all legal matters
concerning the Constitution. The Supreme Court has the authority "to invalidate legislation or
executive actions which, in the Court 's considered judgment, conflict with the Constitution" (The
Court and Constitutional Interpretation n.p.). This means that anything passed by Congress, or
mandated by the President can be struck down if the Court deems it unconstitutional. The Court can
also strike down laws made by local and state governments if they violate the Constitution ("The Role
of the Supreme Court" n.p.). Judicial review has been important in making sure that a citizen's
individual rights, stated in the Bill of Rights, are protected. There is no express consent written in the
Constitution to grant the Court the power of judicial review. The idea of it, however, was around
before the Constitution was written. Before the formal establishment of the Court in 1789, state
courts had exercised it by overturning several laws passed by their legislatures that conflicted with
their state constitutions (The Court and Constitutional Interpretation n.p.). It was not until the 1803
Supreme

Essay on International Criminal Court
The International Criminal Court (ICC) is a relatively new organization; only just a decade old
and it has seen a great deal of hardships and success. Since the creation of ICC it has seen a vast
deal of criticisms that "[range] from concerns about racism and neocolonialism" and so forth. Not
only has it encountered criticisms, but as well, people have questioned the usefulness of this
organization? In truth, is it necessary to question the value, based on what little it has accomplished
and in addition to, the amount of wealth it needs to stay buoyant? Concerning all of that, the ICC is
nothing humanity has seen before; it has been described as "the most ambitious initiative in the
history of modern international law." The ICC was...show more content...
This resulted in a forty–year war, also known to be called the Cold War.
With the conclusion of the conflict between United States and the Soviet Union, this brought a new
morality; it brought the philosophy of "a new era of international criminal justice." Thus,
discussions' regarding the idea of an international criminal court remerged, however, during this
time of ICC statue was in its youth. Additional problems arose, particularly with what had occurred
in Rwanda and as well the former state Yugoslavia; because of the rise in the growth of technology
during that era, mankind were able to witness through their television screens the atrocities
occurring in these parts of the world. Everyday people became aware of the "heinous crimes in the
territory of the former Yugoslavia and in Rwanda." TheUnited Nations response to said violence was
an establishment of an "ad hoc tribunal." The first officially conference regarding the International
Criminal Court formation, was headed in Rome in 1998. At some point in the convention assemblies
of states: Canada and Norway for example, were significant in call for the formation of an
international judicial system. However, the idea of an international judicial system was complex and
a very sensitive matter. Nevertheless, with conclusion of the conference, no verdict had been given
regarding the necessary requirements for international legal statue. Therefore, in the end "Bureau of

Descriptive Essay About Basketball Court
Most of us have a place where we can go and be free and be ourselves with no implications. It is a
place where we can just forget about the problems of life, the problems of the world, and just feel
true tranquility, pure freedom. I have a place like this, it is the basketball court. Just the sight of the
basketball court evokes countless emotions and feelings for me. There is not another place in the
world where I feel as free and excited as I do on the basketball court. When I step onto the court it is
impossible for me to conjure a negative feeling within myself, I enter an endless state of euphoria
and self–confidence.
I feel the second I step onto the hardwood I immediately am filled with a sense of never ending
joy, as if it was my first time setting foot in the gym and picking up a basketball, holding it in my
hands as if I had the world placed in my palms. I feel as if I am in complete control, like a maestro
conducting his symphony and everything I do is nothing but sweet music with the perfect melody
and flow. I have that thought I can do no wrong, because every move I make, every decision I
make, every shot I take is the right thing to do. When I lace up my shoes and step between the lines
something great, something astonishing is released within me. Nothing can stop me. Not the
referees, not the opposing fans and certainly not the opposing players. Why? Because I am in my
territory, my sanctuary. The game and the court, they are my canvas, and I am Picasso, the

The Power Of The Supreme Court
The supreme court plays a specific role in the United States government. Then Supreme Court has
the power to check the actions of the president and the congress. Overall, what the Supreme court
does is to make sure no laws violate the constitution and makes sure the president's actions are
allowed by the constitution. The power of that law which is to view the executive and legislative
actions is called judicial review. It is not all–power, just like the rest of the branches, it has limited
power and each branch checks up on each other to make sure one doesn't have too much power on
the others. One of the laws that the Supreme Court decided to change was the issue with abortion.
Roe v. Wadereached the Supreme Court on appeal in 1970 and remained the Supreme Court's most
recognized decision regarding the right of privacy through the Fourteenth Amendment, and mostly
argued whether it was human murder or simply protecting personal liberty and privacy.
In Roe v. Wade, the court looked at a Texas law that did not permit abortion
...show more content...
However, the majority refused to accept this theory and that the due process clause of the fourteenth
amendment was an 'appropriate source' of this case but the court determined it was also "broad
enough to encompass a woman's decision whether or not to terminate her pregnancy." (Blackmun)
They stated that, and with all respect to the law of Texas, that their belief of life is too general and
debatable and therefore not convincing enough to outweigh the woman's freedom. The court saw
that the states had interests in protecting a woman's health and potential for life so they decided to
even out these concerns by making abortion legal in the early months of pregnancy but not so legal
in the later months of

Essay On Traffic Court
It may be very upsetting to get a traffic solution, especially if it's never happened for you before.
Some people don't take getting the traffic citation or even ticket seriously when for his or her own
good they should. Getting a traffic ticket isn't always a easy or small issue. Going ahead as well
as paying the ticket doesn't bring an end into it. The Department of Cars (DMV) sees fit to put
points on your license for practically just about all traffic infractions, end up being they small,
moderate or large. This really is where a traffic attorney could be of help for you.
But it doesn't end there. If two or even three summons discover their way on your record then the
actual points can add until where you might lose your permit. There are...show more content...
Traffic court is just like any other kind of proceeding that happens in a courtroom. For many people
the idea of going to courtroom alone is scary and intimidating. When you attend court and are
represented with a traffic attorney you'll increase the chance that you'll walk out from the court
room successful. A lawyer who's familiar with all the rules of the actual court will keep your case is
presented in a manner that is intelligent, reasonable and persuasive.
It is strongly recommended that you don't go it on it's own in traffic court but that you simply hire
a attorney to represent your own interests. The attorney is actually skilled and experienced in this
region whereas the average person will probably know very little by what will take place within the
court room.
If the court feels you have broken the law then your traffic ticket you're issued will set you back a
great deal of money beyond simply paying the solution. There are court expenses to cover as well
as fines to consider. As previously pointed out, your auto insurance costs could go up as well as your
driving privileges might be suspended for a short period of time or for any lengthier span of your
time. While it is perfectly in your rights to represent yourself inside a court of regulation, you are
strongly advised to employ a traffic

Court Experience Essay
Activities since Last Report Since the last report I have continued to experience a lot more cases
and different types of courts. The different courts range from drug court, veterans court, mental
health court, recovery court, and so forth. Recently I experienced my first veteran's court, which I
saw two very familiar faces. I actually got to see Denise who works at the VA and Carl who is a
probation officer for the veterans. They came and gave a presentation when I had your
Interpersonal Relations class fall semester. They are very well respected and take their job very
seriously. One of the veterans were graduating from the program offered to veterans when they
commit a crime. The court was decorated with a lot of American flags to show support of the
veterans who have fought for our country. Drug court was the next court I got to experience, which
was very eye opening for me. The drug program which is a 12–24 month program that consist of 4
phases of supervision, which can be done sooner if it is taken seriously. The program is only
offered if the offender is charged with a non–mandatory drug offense or first offense DUI with no
prior record. I watched three people graduate and more than I could count...show more content...
The skills include listening skills, writing skills, comprehension skills, reading skills,
communication skills, organization skills, etc. These are the most important skills that are
constantly used on the daily basis. Listening skills are used to make sure you don't miss any
important details when conducting an interview and in court. I used this skill when I had to listen
to the phone messages from a prison inmate to people on the outside. The agency uses efforts to
make sure my listening skills are prepared by asking if I have any questions when we either finish
up for the day or after an interview or court

The Court Of A Bench Trial Essay
Our judicial system works hard every day to uphold the rule of law. Whether you are sitting in on a
case, watching Court TV, watching legal based movies, or whatever it may be, you notice that there
are different parties and people involved in the whole charade. There are different jobs within our
court system that coincide with each other to keep our courts strong and orderly. These jobs include:
judge, bailiff, stenographer, jury, clerk, and prosecuting attorney. These different jobs have specific
duties that help the court system thrive.Judges decide on the verdict if there is a bench trial. A bench
trial is a trial by a judge as opposed to a trial by jury (Reuter, 2016). In a bench trial, the judge is an
unbiased third–party advocate for justice. He or she determines the appropriate punishment and
sentence those convicted of crimes (Reuter, 2016). A judge takes on a couple of roles in a bench
trial such as, that of the referee who rules on the admissibility of evidence and decides questions
of law, and that of the finder of fact which ultimately determines how much weight to give the
testimony of different witnesses and the credibility of the evidence (American Bar Association,
n.d.). Some cases must be handled by a judge in a bench trial. A federal judge who presides may
be an Article III, Judge or a Magistrate Judge (Gray,Ritter, & Graham, P.C., 2015). An Article III,
Judge is a judge of the United States Supreme Court, the federal court of appeals and district

The Decision Of The Court Essay
Dear. Ms Stewart, it is in the best interest of the country, and the Constitution that I urge you to not
allow for a set of specific guidelines to be put in place to tell the Justices of the Court, how to
interpret the Constitution. With the decision of Marbury v. Madison in 1803 the Court established
its power of Judicial review(Judicial Learning Center, Web insert hyperlink), and it is up to the
Justices to decide when and how the Constitution will be interpreted. This memo will address the
following issues with creating guidelines for Justices in the Supreme Court The first problem with
the idea of the set of guidelines on how to interpret the constitution is the fact that it undermines the
relationship between the Constitution and the Court. Chief Justice Hughes once said the job of the
court is to maintain "a "living Constitution" whose broad provisions are continually applied to
complicated new situations"(U.S Supreme Court Hughes). This means that the Court uses the
Constitution as a way to interpret new laws, and cases that are appealed all the way up to the court.
Nevertheless, it must be noted that Chief Justice states that the Court must maintain a "living
Constitution". This word choice is intentional and deliberate. Unlike a typical Constitution that only
has the merit of what is explicitly stated on the document, a living constitution is a document
changes over time, and adapts to new circumstances, without being formally amended(Strauss, 2010,
Web).

The Court System Of England And Wales
The court system in England and Wales means a thousand years of history and development
throughout different political and social climates. This essay will provide a brief history of this
evolution and evaluation of some advantages and disadvantages of a modern jury system.
According to The Open University (2014, section 10.1), under Anglo–Saxon domination all disputes
were resolved in local courts called 'moots'. These courts later developed and became Magistrates'
Courts, still keeping their local function. Majority of all criminal cases are heard there, however the
courts can only decide on 'summary' or 'triable either way' offences, referring the most serious files
to the Crown Court.
Crown courts, which superseded the courts of assize and quarter sessions, were established under
the Courts Act 1971 to improve efficiency of the existing criminal justice system. The latter were
local courts of the Queen 's Bench Division, which served a number of circuits by assembling juries
and hearing cases not serious enough to go before a High Court judge.
The Norman Conquest made significant changes to the English law by establishing the 'Curia Regis',
the court which was ruled by the king and his appointed judges. Some key institutions of Parliament,
such as the common law courts including King's (Queen's) Bench, Common Pleas, Exchequer, and
the Court of Chancery evolved from the 'Curia Regis'. The law became to be more centralised
through a unified court system to a national

Child Testimony In Court
One of the most interesting parts of this chapter was the section regarding child testimony in court. It
mentioned a study by Myers et. al (1999) that
п»їп»їп»їп»їп»їп»їп»їп»їп»їп»їп»їп»їп»їп»їп»їп»їп»їп»їп»їп»їп»їп»їп»їп»їп»їп»їп»їп»їquestioned
п»ї248 jurors regarding child testimony and adult hearsay testimony. Jurors tend to find adult
hearsay witnesses more consistent and credible than the child witnesses, most likely because adults
can give more thorough, confident responses to questions asked of them by attorneys. This makes
sense to me because most people understand that a child does not always fully comprehend their
situation or understand what is being asked of them, especially in a legal setting. It can be hard to
have them relive these traumatic experiences and expect the children to provide

Mental Health Court Essay
A Mental Health Court represents a type of therapeutic court that sanctions the mental health
population a different level of treatment and opportunities from the "normal" population. The
difference between a mental health court and a regular court is that in a mental health court, they are
not as concerned with whether somebody is not guilty or guilty of the offense, rather, they are
focused on the individual. The Mental Health Court demonstrates compassion and empathy, while
still upholding the law. In fact, focus stands as therapeutic interventions as opposed to punishments.
The goal is to reconnect clients with a case manager, manage medication and treatment options, and
generate stability. Going through the court process, and possible...show more content...
Individuals with a mental illness enter a mental health court as it reduces the number of clients with
mental illnesses in the criminal justice system, reduces stigma and stereotypical judgement in court,
and reduces the number of clients with mental illnesses in prisons and jails. Although the judge does
sentence the client, the client does still retain rights: The right to refuse treatments, the right to
proper care and documentation, the right to be informed of all available medical treatments, and
most importantly, the right to be treated with dignity as a human being. The court demonstrated that
the client's rights were addressed by offering the client the opportunity to voice his concerns, and by
acknowledging his views on his condition. Even though the client did not think he needed help, the
nurse and case manager were concerned about his hallucination, eating patterns, and lack of
stability. They did not believe that an outpatient setting would work for this client as he was not
stable, did not have clear insight, and retained a lack of resources. Barrier to care, for the mental
health in general, include: lack of resource, knowledge deficits, stigma, financial barriers, and lack of
mental health care professionals. Overall, this experience offered me to opportunity to perceive how
a Mental Health Court functions and differs from the traditional court room, in relation to client
goals,

The Supreme Court Essay example
The Supreme Court At the apex of our federal court system stands the United States Supreme Court.
It stands as the ultimate authority in constitutional interpretation and its decision can be changed
only by a constitutional amendment. Two documents are responsible for its creation which is the
Constitution, which explicitly creates the Supreme Court, and the Judiciary Act of September 24,
1789. The Supreme Court is the only court named in the constitution laying out the Courts basic
jurisdiction, identifying the mode of selection and tenure for justices. Under Article III, Section 1 of
the Constitution provides that "[t]he judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one
Supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the...show more content...
13). The first Supreme Court in 1789 consisted of five justices. Congress added a sixth seat in
1790 and a seventh in 1807 to ease the strain on justices as the number of circuit courts increased.
Congress added the eighth and ninth seats in 1837. Membership stayed at nine until 1863, when
Congress added a tenth seat, only to abolish it when a justice died in 1865. In 1867, Congress
reduced the seats to seven to limit the opportunity of President Jackson to appoint new members.
Congress restored the number of seats to nine in 1869, and in 1891 abolished the Supreme Court
justices' circuit–riding burden. The number of justices has remained fixed at nine, for over 100
years, making tie votes unlikely unless circumstances prevent a justice from participating in
deliberations. There is currently one Chief Justice and eight associate justices in the Supreme Court
although Congress does have the authority to change the number of justices sitting on the Supreme
Court (Van Dervort, 2000, p. 69). Qualifications to become a justice although not spelled out
immediately became obvious. From the beginning, justices have all been lawyers and most have
pursued legal and political careers prior to serving the Court. The attainment of a high position in
government or the legal profession is also beneficial as they lend credibility for the consideration.
Some justices however chose a different path that began with private practice followed by at some
point by elevation to

District Court Essay
This week our class had the opportunity to visit the Warren County Justice Center. Through this
visit, I was able to learn about the varying jurisdiction, media access and technology, and security of
the courts in Bowling Green, specifically the Warren County Justice Center and the US District
Court in Bowling Green. Jurisdiction simply refers to the authority of a court to hear a case. The
two main jurisdictional barriers are the geographic location and the issue at hand. For instance, if a
misdemeanor such as petty theft occurred in a Tennessee county, it would likely not be heard by a
Kentucky district court because the geographical jurisdiction of Tennessee district courts does not
include Kentucky. On the other hand, if the same...show more content...
Thus, the media must be aware of these rules in order to remain in good standing with the courts
and enable themselves to continue covering the proceedings held there. Both facilities have been
influential in the technology of other courts across the country. For instance, the Warren County
Justice Center was one of the first courtrooms to get a media room. This room was specially
designed to assist the media in covering the legal process. The shape and colors of the walls was
specially designed for press conferences and interviews. There is a long wall for press
conferences and a concave wall for one on one interviews. Furthermore, both of these walls were
painted a deep blue because it is a very aesthetically pleasing color for video coverage. Moreover,
the other walls in the room are painted white to aid in balancing the light. Yet, the room was not
just designed for video interviews, it was also specially designed to assist in gathering audio clips.
The room is connected to the cameras and microphones of each courtroom to allow the media to see
and hear the proceedings. However, if the media wants to get a better quality quote, they can bring an
interviewee into the media room in order to get them away from the commotion unfolding in the
courtroom and to then get a clearer quote in the soundproofed room. Many other media rooms
throughout the country were then designed off the model set by the Warren County Justice Center.
The US

Law
Contempt is generally defined as an act of disobedience to an order of a court, or an act of
disrespect of a court. A client's failure to comply with a restraining order, a visitation order or an
injunction in any kind of action may result in a finding of contempt of court, no matter the intention.
The court has the power to punish neglection, violation of duty, or any other misconduct. Also a
non–payment of a sum of money, ordered by the court to be paid can lead to contempt of court.
Another type of contempt is whether the contempt charged is civil or criminal in nature. The
difference between civil and criminal contempt is the remedy sought. If the purpose of the contempt
order is remedial, such as to...show more content...
Assuming contempt of court is shown, it is punishable with many criminal penalties, such as
imprisonment or fines. A fine is readily imposed on either an individual person or a trade union .
Contempt of court concerning journalistic matters was dealt by the common law until 1981.
Newspapers were almost always held for contempt of court because of what they wrote. The
decisions were quite strict due to the fact that they were made by judges. After the Contempt of
Court Act of 1981, matters concerning contempt of court were dealt by acts of Parliament. With this
act a person can be found liable for contempt of court in two cases:
1) When a publication made by an individual had caused prejudice or impediment to particular
proceedings
2) Proceedings are active.
The court can punish journalists with contempt of court in many ways. One way is for him to show
a document, image, video or audio material to the public, which might interfere with the courts'
decision at a trial. Another way in which a journalist can be sentenced to contempt of court is when
he / she publicises material and information that only the court has the right to know like the
decision taken by the jury in the jury room. A journalist can be held in contempt of court in general
if he is interfering with justice.
In order to have a proper trial, judges will have to bear in mind that

Essay On The Federal Court System
The Federal Court System is one of the most essential and significant functions to help settle a
matter. Much work is involved in the application of a body of rules and principals of rulings. The
path the Federal Courts have to take in order to be heard by the Supreme Court is a lengthy process.
Given millions of disputes every year, it becomes impossible for the Federal Courts to be heard by
the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court has jurisdictions that limit the variety of cases that are
clearly defined in the Constitution. The Supreme Court has developed specific rules that within the
jurisdictions will and will not hear. The Federal Court must show they have extreme and substantial
evidence in the outcome of the case. In mootness, the Federal...show more content...
The writ of certiorari is an order to a lower court to deliver the records of a particular case to be
reviewed for legal errors. The support of four justices is needed for certiorari and few cases ever
satisfy this requirement. The Supreme Court's decision to accept a case is a very lengthy and
complex process. A brief is used to explain why the Courts should rule in favor of their client. This
brief contains facts about the case and presents evidence to the Supreme Court to affirm the lower
court's verdict. The next stage involved in a case is an oral argument, in which each attorney
presents their positions and answers the justice questions. It is very important to the outcome of a
case and allows the justices to better understand the heart of the case. Following the oral argument,
the courts discuss the case through conferences. In the book, it says "the Court discusses the cases
on Wednesday or Fridays" (263). After a decision has been reached, the majority is assigned to a
write opinion. The assignment of the opinion can really make a huge impact on the interpretation of a

Essay about Court Experience
Court Experience
I went to the court session on Wednesday afternoon at 2:00 and stayed until around 4:35. They did
not start court though until a little after 2.
Before court started everyone was talking to each other and having a good time.
There was only one other person in the courtroom besides myself watching the trial and that person
was also from this class.
When court resumed the lawyers were trying to agree to certain things concerning the trial before
the jury came back in. Since I had not seen the beginning of this trial, I had no idea who was suing
whom or what was going on.
Finally after they had got those things ironed out and a map set up, the jury was finally...show more
content...
He got his point across and actually kept members of the jury awake. While he was giving his
closing arguments, the two attorneys for Guge and Guge himself were whispering between one
another.
After McKinney finished his closing arguments, which was about 30 minutes or so,
Guge's attorney had his last say so. I believe that man talked to hear his ownself! After the closing
arguments, the judge asked the jury if they wanted a break. They indicted that they wanted one so
the judge called for a break.
During the break, one of the jurors asked to be removed from the jury. She said that she was sick.
The judge conferred with the attorneys and they let her go home. The first alternate took her place.
He also released the second alternate juror to go home since she was not needed. Then when they
came back in the judge gave them instructions concerning the deciding on the case. The judge
seemed bored during this process as well. Finally the judge sent the jury to the room to deliberate.
When I left the jury was still deliberating.
The judge's name was Johnston and the bailiff was Collins. Collins told us that Johnston was the
judge from Charlotte that was on that big murder case where a man had killed all those women.
As I was leaving the courtroom, the lawyers for Guge stopped me. Talked to me for a few minutes
and then asked me what I would do if I was on the jury. Just from the closing arguments, I

Texas Courts Essay
In 1822, Stephen F. Austin established one of the first courts in Texas and appointed a provisional
justice of peace. Since Texas was a part of Mexico at the time, the Mexican governor replaced the
justice of peace with three elected officials. (Utexas) Soon after Independence, the republic of Texas
under the 1836 Constitution, established a supreme court and allowed Congress to create inferior
courts. Judges in such courts were to be elected by Congress. Counties, at the time, had County and
Justice of Peace courts, whose judges were popularly elected. With the entrance of Texas into the
Union and the adoption of numerous constitutions during the period, Texas retained a similar
judicial structure. The current 1876 Constitution created a...show more content...
In addition, each precinct is required to have one to two Justice of Peace Courts, depending on the
precincts population. Such courts have very little original jurisdiction over criminal matters limited
to Class C misdemeanor and some jurisdiction over civil matters, including small claims. Other
functions for Justice of Peace Courts include issuing search and arrest warrants and serving as
coroner in counties that have no provision for medical examiners. Municipal Courts were created by
the State Legislature and incorporated in each of the states' cities. Larger cities have multiple
Municipal Courts, the number depending on the city's population and needs. Such courts have
original jurisdiction over the enforcement of city ordinances. Moreover, Municipal Courts have
concurrent jurisdiction, along with Justice of Peace Courts, in Class C misdemeanor cases
originating within city limits. Municipal Courts have no jurisdiction over most civil matters and
other functions include issuing search and arrest warrants. At the County level, three types of courts
exist, the first of them being Constitutional County Courts. The state constitution creates one
Constitutional County Court in each of the 254 Texas Counties. Constitutional County Courts have
concurrent jurisdiction with Justice of Peace Courts and State District Courts in small civil matters.
Constitutional County Courts

Essay On The Supreme Court
In the society of the United States, most of our rules, albeit laws or moral beliefs, come from
decisions made in the Supreme Court and what exactly they refer to. The direction of momentum
in the workforce, schooling, and even the white house have been vastly adjusted by the verdicts
that come out of the Court. These directional modifications have been ratified and lead the people
to challenge the current views of society and lead to more and more changes that are right and just
for the system in order to prevent further wrongdoing in the nation. Most verdicts that are reversed
and changed in many ways in the Supreme Court involve one's personal rights being taken away
from them or in some cases, how a person tries to abuse their rights...show more content...
The impact on society stands as being vastly influential, shifting the people to either side, and
bringing out the true colors of our 'strong belief system.' These many changes that have come
from the Supreme Court are what the people base their decisions on as well, for example, if
Nixon was allowed to exert his 'executive privilege' wrongfully, the world could be incredibly
different than it is today, with power being abused all around the world and limits on power would
have been terminated by any substantial means. The truth of the matter is that without challenging a
wrong decision, the world would not be making leaps and bounds in progression, as society would
only challenge the views of each other and believe that decisions are final, and that they should be
followed like laws themselves more than the actual law would have permitted otherwise. The
Supreme Court is what guides our people, and without it the nation would be a cluster of misguided
and convoluted views only leading each other in circles without any real interventions that have been
made to right wrongs in the Supreme

Court Essay

Recommandé

Recommandé

Contenu connexe

Plus de Paper Writing Service College

Plus de Paper Writing Service College (20)

Dernier

Dernier (20)

Court Essay