SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  30
United States Supreme Court Justices
John G. Roberts Jr.
John G. Roberts Jr, Chief Justice Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. was nominated as Chief Justice by President George W. Bush and has been actively serving since 2005 Chief Justice Roberts’ self proclaimed jurisprudence is one of “modesty and humility” but throughout his stint as Chief Justice it has been seen by the public as a jurisprudence that reflects “doctrinaire conservative” with values reflecting the “contemporary Republican Party” according to the New Yorker
John G. Roberts (Cont.) According to the New Yorker, from 2005 to 2009, in every major case he has heard he has sided with “the prosecution over the defendant, the state over the condemned, the executive branch over the legislative, and the corporate defendant over the individual plaintiff” This does a lot to the balance of Constitutionalism especially with the power balance between the Executive and Legislative Branches
John G. Roberts (Cont.) Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District No. 1 v. Holder (2009) This case was critical to the future of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 regarding a bill added to the Act  in 2006 requiring certain jurisdictions to obtain approval to change any electoral rules During the arguments Chief Justice Roberts aggressively questioned the Deputy Solicitor General, clearly showing bias and opinion on the case In the end the decision was that this new section was unconstitutional shifting power away from the legislative Branch influenced by Chief Justice Roberts
John G. Roberts (Cont.) Ricci v. DeStefano(2009) This case was important in the development of modern day race relations being that it was a reverse discrimination case In the argument phase Chief Justice Roberts again aggressively questioned the man defending the actions of the city showing bias and ultimately leading to a decision in favor of firefighter Frank Ricci
Antonin Scalia
Antonin Scalia, Associate Justice Justice Antonin Scalia was nominated as an Associate Judge by President Reagan and he took his seat in 1986 Justice Scalia has been called “the justice from the tea party” and often refers to and stays loyal to constitutional law
Antonin Scalia (Cont.) Morrison v. Olson (1988) The Ethics of Government Act of 1978 created a special court and gave the Attorney General the power to appoint an “independent counsel” with the responsibility of investigating and possibly prosecuting government officials in violation of federal criminal law Justice Scalia’s opinion that the power given to a branch of government in the Constitution should be honored helped to decide that this Act was Constitutional and his argument and dissent showed Justice Scalia as an advocate for Constitutionalism in the Supreme Court
Anthony M. Kennedy
Anthony M. Kennedy, Associate Justice Associate Justice Anthony Kennedy was nominated as an Associate Justice by President Reagan and he took his seat in 1988 Justice Kennedy is a conservative but has commonly played the role of the swing vote, siding sometimes with the more conservative Justices and sometimes with the more liberal Justices
Anthony M. Kennedy (Cont.) Boumediene v. Bush (2008) In this case the court questioned whether or not that Military Commission Act of 2006, eliminating federal courts’ jurisdiction over habeas corpus cases, was unconstitutional and if a 2002 Guantanamo Bay detainment was a violation of The Writ of Habeas Corpus In a 5 to 4 decision this law was considered unconstitutional and the detainment was determined a violation of The Writ of Habeas Corpus.  Justice Kennedy was again a swing vote and he also wrote the majority opinion proving again his major influence in the Supreme Court
Clarence Thomas
Clarence Thomas, Associate Justice Associate Justice Clarence Thomas was nominated by President George Bush and took his seat in the Supreme Court in 1991 Justice Clarence Thomas is often question in terms of his effectiveness and morals because of his 5 years of silence during oral arguments, an integral part of Supreme Court Hearings but Justice Thomas does also show strong conservative tendencies
Clarence Thomas (Cont.) NASA v. Nelson (2011) This is a Supreme Court Cases that is seemingly unrelated to Constitutionalism, but what happened during what happened during the decision and the public concern is what relates to Constitutionalism This is a case that did not require the court to settle a constitutional issue but Justice Thomas, along with Justice Scalia, insisted on resolving a constitutional issue.  This is an attempt by Justice Thomas to gain more power in the Judicial Branch which is what concerns the public
Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Associate Justice Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg was nominated as an Associate Justice in the Supreme Court by President Clinton and took her seat in 1993 Justice Ginsburg has for the most been a quiet member of the Supreme Court both in opinion and during arguments but in 2007 when Justice O’Connor left and shifted the court to the right when she became or more outspoken member of The Court
Ruth Bader Ginsburg (Cont.) A controversy within the court is whether or not foreign law can or should be cited in constitutional law cases but Justice Ginsburg approves of this tactic and often uses it oppose to her more conservative colleagues Justice Ginsburg has taken a strong stance on many “gender discrimination” cases as well as introducing the term “gender discrimination” as a synonym for “sex discrimination”
Stephen G. Breyer
Stephen G. Breyer, Associate Justice Justice Breyer was nominated as an Associate Justice by President Clinton and took his seat in the Supreme Court in 1994 Justice Breyer has been known to take a strong stance on right to bear arms
Stephen G. Breyer (Cont.) District of Columbia v. Heller (2008) This is a case that questioned whether a District of Columbia law banning the possession of handguns was a violation of the Second Amendment In this case and previous cases questioning the interpretation of the Second Amendment, Justice Breyer has stuck to James Madison’s thoughts and writings and sided with the majority in deciding that The Second Amendment did protect the individual right to possess a firearm and this law was a violation of the Second Amendment
Samuel Anthony Alito Jr.
Samuel Anthony Alito Jr, Associate Justice Justice Alito was nominated as an Associated Justice by President George W. Bush and took his seat in the Supreme Court in 2006 Justice Alito has tended to vote with his more conservative Colleagues in his 4 years of service
Samuel Anthony Alito (Cont.) Hamdan V. Rumsfeld (2006) This case questioned if the Geneva Convention could be enforced through a habeas corpus petition and if Congress or the President hat the power to try a criminal for war crimes Justice Alito voted with the conservatives in the majority deciding that neither Congress or the President had this authority in the Constitution, therefore, standard war procedures must be followed and that the Geneva Convention can be enforced in Supreme Court shifting the balance of power to the Supreme Court as a regulating force
Sonia Sotomayor
Sonia Sotomayor, Associate Justice Justice Sotomayor was nominated by President Obama and she took her seat on the Supreme Court in 2009 Justice Sotomayor is a liberal and has been called a “liberal activist” by her criticizers In her two years on the Supreme Court she has not made any major decisions reflecting her ideology but it is clear from her writings and opinions that she is a liberal with a passion for race and equality and rights, specifically with criminal defendants
Elena Kagan
Elena Kagan, Associate Justice Justice Kagan was nominated to the Supreme Court by President Obama and she assumed her position in 2010 Justice Kagan has commented on the “unitary executive” saying that she believes that the Executive Branch to control the Executive Branch giving the Executive Branch more power in her eyes.   Because of Justice Kagan’s short stint on the Supreme Court and the fact that she has excused herself from half of the heard cases in her time she has not made a big decision reflecting her jurisprudence
Works Cited “Anthony M. Kennedy.” The New York Times. The New York Times Company, 1 July 2009. Web. 20 May 2011. <http://topics.nytimes.com/‌top/‌reference/‌timestopics/‌people/‌k/‌anthony_m_kennedy/‌index.html>. Associate Justice Anthony Kennedy. N.d. Supreme Court of the United States. Supreme Court of the United States, n.d. Web. 20 May 2011. <http://www.supremecourt.gov/‌about/‌biographies.aspx>. Associate Justice Antonin Scalia. N.d. Supreme Court of the United States. Supreme Court of the United States, n.d. Web. 20 May 2011. <http://www.supremecourt.gov/‌about/‌biographies.aspx>. Associate Justice Clarence Thomas. N.d. Supreme Court of the United States. Supreme Court of the United States, n.d. Web. 20 May 2011. <http://www.supremecourt.gov/‌about/‌biographies.aspx>. Associate Justice Elena Kagan. N.d. Supreme Court of the United States. Supreme Court of the United States, n.d. Web. 20 May 2011. <http://www.supremecourt.gov/‌about/‌biographies.aspx>. Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. N.d. Supreme Court of the United States. Supreme Court of the United States, n.d. Web. 20 May 2011. <http://www.supremecourt.gov/‌about/‌biographies.aspx>. Associate Justice Samuel Alito. N.d. Supreme Court of the United States. Supreme Court of the United States, n.d. Web. 20 May 2011. <http://www.supremecourt.gov/‌about/‌biographies.aspx>. Associate Justice Sonia Sotomayor. N.d. Supreme Court of the United States. Supreme Court of the United States, n.d. Web. 20 May 2011. <http://www.supremecourt.gov/‌about/‌biographies.aspx>. Associate Justice Stephen G. Breyer. N.d. Supreme Court of the United States. Supreme Court of the United States, n.d. Web. 20 May 2011. <http://www.supremecourt.gov/‌about/‌biographies.aspx>. “Biographies of Current Supreme Court Justices.” Supreme Court of the United States. Supreme Court of the United States, 20 May 2011. Web. 20 May 2011. <http://www.supremecourt.gov/‌about/‌biographies.aspx>. Chief Justice John G. Roberts. N.d. Supreme Court of the United States. Supreme Court of the United States, n.d. Web. 20 May 2011. <http://www.supremecourt.gov/‌about/‌biographies.aspx>. “District of Columbia v. Heller.” Legal Information Institute: Cornell Law School. N.p., n.d. Web. 21 May 2011. <http://www.law.cornell.edu/‌supct/‌html/‌07-290.ZS.html>. Liptak, Adam. “Ginsburg Shares Views on Influence of Foreign Law on Her Court, and Vice Versa.” The New York Times. The New York Times Company, 11 Apr. 2009. Web. 21 May 2011. <http://www.nytimes.com/‌2009/‌04/‌12/‌us/‌12ginsburg.html?ref=ruthbaderginsburg>. - - -. “Sotomayor Guides Court’s Liberal Wing.” The New York Times. The New York Times Company, 27 Dec. 2010. Web. 21 May 2011. <http://www.nytimes.com/‌2010/‌12/‌28/‌us/‌politics/‌28bar.html?ref=soniasotomayor>.
Works Cited (Cont.) Maier, Pauline. “Justice Breyer’s Sharp Aim.” The New York Times. The New York Times Company, 21 Dec. 2010. Web. 21 May 2011. <http://www.nytimes.com/‌2010/‌12/‌22/‌opinion/‌22maier.html?ref=stephengbreyer>. The Oyez Project. “Hamdan v. Rumsfeld.” US Supreme Court Media: Oyez. N.p., n.d. Web. 21 May 2011. <http://www.oyez.org/‌cases/‌2000-2009/‌2005/‌2005_05_184?sort=ideology>. - - -. “Morrison v. Olson.” US Supreme Court Media: Oyez. Oyez Inc., 2011. Web. 20 May 2011. <http://www.oyez.org/‌cases/‌1980-1989/‌1987/‌1987_87_1279>. - - -. “NASA v. Nelson.” US Supreme Court Media: Oyez. N.p., n.d. Web. 21 May 2011. <http://www.oyez.org/‌cases/‌2010-2019/‌2010/‌2010_09_530>. “Politics and the Court.” Editorial. The New York Times. The New York Times Company, 4 Feb. 2011. Web. 20 May 2011. <http://www.nytimes.com/‌2011/‌02/‌05/‌opinion/‌05sat1.html?ref=clarencethomas>. “Ruth Bader Ginsburg.” The New York Times. The New York Times Company, 9 July 2009. Web. 21 May 2011. <http://topics.nytimes.com/‌top/‌reference/‌timestopics/‌people/‌g/‌ruth_bader_ginsburg/‌index.html?scp=1-spot&sq=ruth%20bader%20ginsburg&st=cse>. “Sonia Sotomayor.” The New York Times. The New York Times Company, 1 Feb. 2010. Web. 21 May 2011. <http://topics.nytimes.com/‌top/‌reference/‌timestopics/‌people/‌s/‌sonia_sotomayor/‌index.html?scp=1-spot&sq=sonia%20sotomayor&st=cse>. “Sonia Stotmayor.” The New York Times. The New York Times Company, 1 Feb. 2010. Web. 21 May 2011. <http://topics.nytimes.com/‌top/‌reference/‌timestopics/‌people/‌s/‌sonia_sotomayor/‌index.html?scp=1-spot&sq=sonia%20sotomayor&st=cse>. The Supreme Court of the United States. “Members of the Supreme Court of the United States.” Supreme Court of the United States. The Supreme Court of the United States, 16 May 2011. Web. 16 May 2011. <http://www.supremecourt.gov/‌about/‌members_text.aspx>. Toobin, Jeffery. “No More Mr. Nice Guy.” The New Yorker. Condé Nast Digital, 25 May 2009. Web. 20 May 2011. <http://www.newyorker.com/‌reporting/‌2009/‌05/‌25/‌090525fa_fact_toobin>. United States Supreme Court Justices. N.d. WhatIfPost.com. N.p., 5 May 2011. Web. 20 May 2011. <http://whatifpost.com/‌this-weeks-health-snapshots-may-5-2011.htm>.

Contenu connexe

Tendances

Section 1983 is born the supreme court stories of tenney v. brandhove and m...
Section 1983 is born   the supreme court stories of tenney v. brandhove and m...Section 1983 is born   the supreme court stories of tenney v. brandhove and m...
Section 1983 is born the supreme court stories of tenney v. brandhove and m...Umesh Heendeniya
 
Jury nullification cja 344
Jury nullification cja 344Jury nullification cja 344
Jury nullification cja 344Mimi Harvill
 
The canons of constitutional law
The canons of constitutional lawThe canons of constitutional law
The canons of constitutional lawkdouat
 
Christine Nemacheck - Choosing Justices The Sotomayor and Kagan Nominations a...
Christine Nemacheck - Choosing Justices The Sotomayor and Kagan Nominations a...Christine Nemacheck - Choosing Justices The Sotomayor and Kagan Nominations a...
Christine Nemacheck - Choosing Justices The Sotomayor and Kagan Nominations a...PearsonPoliticalScience
 
Inconsistency Robustness and the Law: A Random Walk
Inconsistency Robustness and the Law: A Random WalkInconsistency Robustness and the Law: A Random Walk
Inconsistency Robustness and the Law: A Random WalkRon Dolin
 
Jury Nullification
Jury NullificationJury Nullification
Jury NullificationTED
 
Rewrite final 2009
Rewrite final 2009Rewrite final 2009
Rewrite final 2009pryorpa
 
Granger lawsuits in federal court
Granger lawsuits in federal courtGranger lawsuits in federal court
Granger lawsuits in federal courtmrmagic666
 

Tendances (9)

Section 1983 is born the supreme court stories of tenney v. brandhove and m...
Section 1983 is born   the supreme court stories of tenney v. brandhove and m...Section 1983 is born   the supreme court stories of tenney v. brandhove and m...
Section 1983 is born the supreme court stories of tenney v. brandhove and m...
 
Jury nullification cja 344
Jury nullification cja 344Jury nullification cja 344
Jury nullification cja 344
 
Stevens And Souter
Stevens And SouterStevens And Souter
Stevens And Souter
 
The canons of constitutional law
The canons of constitutional lawThe canons of constitutional law
The canons of constitutional law
 
Christine Nemacheck - Choosing Justices The Sotomayor and Kagan Nominations a...
Christine Nemacheck - Choosing Justices The Sotomayor and Kagan Nominations a...Christine Nemacheck - Choosing Justices The Sotomayor and Kagan Nominations a...
Christine Nemacheck - Choosing Justices The Sotomayor and Kagan Nominations a...
 
Inconsistency Robustness and the Law: A Random Walk
Inconsistency Robustness and the Law: A Random WalkInconsistency Robustness and the Law: A Random Walk
Inconsistency Robustness and the Law: A Random Walk
 
Jury Nullification
Jury NullificationJury Nullification
Jury Nullification
 
Rewrite final 2009
Rewrite final 2009Rewrite final 2009
Rewrite final 2009
 
Granger lawsuits in federal court
Granger lawsuits in federal courtGranger lawsuits in federal court
Granger lawsuits in federal court
 

Similaire à United states supreme court justices

National Fed Of Business V Sebelius 2012 A Decision For The Ages (2)
National Fed Of Business V Sebelius 2012   A Decision For The Ages (2)National Fed Of Business V Sebelius 2012   A Decision For The Ages (2)
National Fed Of Business V Sebelius 2012 A Decision For The Ages (2)mluski
 
Unit 5 judicial branch academic
Unit 5   judicial branch academicUnit 5   judicial branch academic
Unit 5 judicial branch academicFredrick Smith
 
Unit 5 judicial branch academic
Unit 5   judicial branch academicUnit 5   judicial branch academic
Unit 5 judicial branch academicFredrick Smith
 
Respond to these four Kimberly HolcombThursdayMay 9 at 72.docx
Respond to these four Kimberly HolcombThursdayMay 9 at 72.docxRespond to these four Kimberly HolcombThursdayMay 9 at 72.docx
Respond to these four Kimberly HolcombThursdayMay 9 at 72.docxcwilliam4
 
Judge on the SpotNOV. 26, 2014 During the month that follo.docx
Judge on the SpotNOV. 26, 2014 During the month that follo.docxJudge on the SpotNOV. 26, 2014 During the month that follo.docx
Judge on the SpotNOV. 26, 2014 During the month that follo.docxpriestmanmable
 
Pol 140 04 american_legal_system_courts
Pol 140 04 american_legal_system_courtsPol 140 04 american_legal_system_courts
Pol 140 04 american_legal_system_courtsatrantham
 
Pi Sigma Alpha Paper
Pi Sigma Alpha PaperPi Sigma Alpha Paper
Pi Sigma Alpha PaperNicole Zeman
 
The Judicial Branch
The Judicial BranchThe Judicial Branch
The Judicial Branchdficker
 

Similaire à United states supreme court justices (9)

The Judicial Branch | The US Supreme Court
The Judicial Branch | The US Supreme CourtThe Judicial Branch | The US Supreme Court
The Judicial Branch | The US Supreme Court
 
National Fed Of Business V Sebelius 2012 A Decision For The Ages (2)
National Fed Of Business V Sebelius 2012   A Decision For The Ages (2)National Fed Of Business V Sebelius 2012   A Decision For The Ages (2)
National Fed Of Business V Sebelius 2012 A Decision For The Ages (2)
 
Unit 5 judicial branch academic
Unit 5   judicial branch academicUnit 5   judicial branch academic
Unit 5 judicial branch academic
 
Unit 5 judicial branch academic
Unit 5   judicial branch academicUnit 5   judicial branch academic
Unit 5 judicial branch academic
 
Respond to these four Kimberly HolcombThursdayMay 9 at 72.docx
Respond to these four Kimberly HolcombThursdayMay 9 at 72.docxRespond to these four Kimberly HolcombThursdayMay 9 at 72.docx
Respond to these four Kimberly HolcombThursdayMay 9 at 72.docx
 
Judge on the SpotNOV. 26, 2014 During the month that follo.docx
Judge on the SpotNOV. 26, 2014 During the month that follo.docxJudge on the SpotNOV. 26, 2014 During the month that follo.docx
Judge on the SpotNOV. 26, 2014 During the month that follo.docx
 
Pol 140 04 american_legal_system_courts
Pol 140 04 american_legal_system_courtsPol 140 04 american_legal_system_courts
Pol 140 04 american_legal_system_courts
 
Pi Sigma Alpha Paper
Pi Sigma Alpha PaperPi Sigma Alpha Paper
Pi Sigma Alpha Paper
 
The Judicial Branch
The Judicial BranchThe Judicial Branch
The Judicial Branch
 

United states supreme court justices

  • 1. United States Supreme Court Justices
  • 3. John G. Roberts Jr, Chief Justice Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. was nominated as Chief Justice by President George W. Bush and has been actively serving since 2005 Chief Justice Roberts’ self proclaimed jurisprudence is one of “modesty and humility” but throughout his stint as Chief Justice it has been seen by the public as a jurisprudence that reflects “doctrinaire conservative” with values reflecting the “contemporary Republican Party” according to the New Yorker
  • 4. John G. Roberts (Cont.) According to the New Yorker, from 2005 to 2009, in every major case he has heard he has sided with “the prosecution over the defendant, the state over the condemned, the executive branch over the legislative, and the corporate defendant over the individual plaintiff” This does a lot to the balance of Constitutionalism especially with the power balance between the Executive and Legislative Branches
  • 5. John G. Roberts (Cont.) Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District No. 1 v. Holder (2009) This case was critical to the future of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 regarding a bill added to the Act in 2006 requiring certain jurisdictions to obtain approval to change any electoral rules During the arguments Chief Justice Roberts aggressively questioned the Deputy Solicitor General, clearly showing bias and opinion on the case In the end the decision was that this new section was unconstitutional shifting power away from the legislative Branch influenced by Chief Justice Roberts
  • 6. John G. Roberts (Cont.) Ricci v. DeStefano(2009) This case was important in the development of modern day race relations being that it was a reverse discrimination case In the argument phase Chief Justice Roberts again aggressively questioned the man defending the actions of the city showing bias and ultimately leading to a decision in favor of firefighter Frank Ricci
  • 8. Antonin Scalia, Associate Justice Justice Antonin Scalia was nominated as an Associate Judge by President Reagan and he took his seat in 1986 Justice Scalia has been called “the justice from the tea party” and often refers to and stays loyal to constitutional law
  • 9. Antonin Scalia (Cont.) Morrison v. Olson (1988) The Ethics of Government Act of 1978 created a special court and gave the Attorney General the power to appoint an “independent counsel” with the responsibility of investigating and possibly prosecuting government officials in violation of federal criminal law Justice Scalia’s opinion that the power given to a branch of government in the Constitution should be honored helped to decide that this Act was Constitutional and his argument and dissent showed Justice Scalia as an advocate for Constitutionalism in the Supreme Court
  • 11. Anthony M. Kennedy, Associate Justice Associate Justice Anthony Kennedy was nominated as an Associate Justice by President Reagan and he took his seat in 1988 Justice Kennedy is a conservative but has commonly played the role of the swing vote, siding sometimes with the more conservative Justices and sometimes with the more liberal Justices
  • 12. Anthony M. Kennedy (Cont.) Boumediene v. Bush (2008) In this case the court questioned whether or not that Military Commission Act of 2006, eliminating federal courts’ jurisdiction over habeas corpus cases, was unconstitutional and if a 2002 Guantanamo Bay detainment was a violation of The Writ of Habeas Corpus In a 5 to 4 decision this law was considered unconstitutional and the detainment was determined a violation of The Writ of Habeas Corpus. Justice Kennedy was again a swing vote and he also wrote the majority opinion proving again his major influence in the Supreme Court
  • 14. Clarence Thomas, Associate Justice Associate Justice Clarence Thomas was nominated by President George Bush and took his seat in the Supreme Court in 1991 Justice Clarence Thomas is often question in terms of his effectiveness and morals because of his 5 years of silence during oral arguments, an integral part of Supreme Court Hearings but Justice Thomas does also show strong conservative tendencies
  • 15. Clarence Thomas (Cont.) NASA v. Nelson (2011) This is a Supreme Court Cases that is seemingly unrelated to Constitutionalism, but what happened during what happened during the decision and the public concern is what relates to Constitutionalism This is a case that did not require the court to settle a constitutional issue but Justice Thomas, along with Justice Scalia, insisted on resolving a constitutional issue. This is an attempt by Justice Thomas to gain more power in the Judicial Branch which is what concerns the public
  • 17. Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Associate Justice Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg was nominated as an Associate Justice in the Supreme Court by President Clinton and took her seat in 1993 Justice Ginsburg has for the most been a quiet member of the Supreme Court both in opinion and during arguments but in 2007 when Justice O’Connor left and shifted the court to the right when she became or more outspoken member of The Court
  • 18. Ruth Bader Ginsburg (Cont.) A controversy within the court is whether or not foreign law can or should be cited in constitutional law cases but Justice Ginsburg approves of this tactic and often uses it oppose to her more conservative colleagues Justice Ginsburg has taken a strong stance on many “gender discrimination” cases as well as introducing the term “gender discrimination” as a synonym for “sex discrimination”
  • 20. Stephen G. Breyer, Associate Justice Justice Breyer was nominated as an Associate Justice by President Clinton and took his seat in the Supreme Court in 1994 Justice Breyer has been known to take a strong stance on right to bear arms
  • 21. Stephen G. Breyer (Cont.) District of Columbia v. Heller (2008) This is a case that questioned whether a District of Columbia law banning the possession of handguns was a violation of the Second Amendment In this case and previous cases questioning the interpretation of the Second Amendment, Justice Breyer has stuck to James Madison’s thoughts and writings and sided with the majority in deciding that The Second Amendment did protect the individual right to possess a firearm and this law was a violation of the Second Amendment
  • 23. Samuel Anthony Alito Jr, Associate Justice Justice Alito was nominated as an Associated Justice by President George W. Bush and took his seat in the Supreme Court in 2006 Justice Alito has tended to vote with his more conservative Colleagues in his 4 years of service
  • 24. Samuel Anthony Alito (Cont.) Hamdan V. Rumsfeld (2006) This case questioned if the Geneva Convention could be enforced through a habeas corpus petition and if Congress or the President hat the power to try a criminal for war crimes Justice Alito voted with the conservatives in the majority deciding that neither Congress or the President had this authority in the Constitution, therefore, standard war procedures must be followed and that the Geneva Convention can be enforced in Supreme Court shifting the balance of power to the Supreme Court as a regulating force
  • 26. Sonia Sotomayor, Associate Justice Justice Sotomayor was nominated by President Obama and she took her seat on the Supreme Court in 2009 Justice Sotomayor is a liberal and has been called a “liberal activist” by her criticizers In her two years on the Supreme Court she has not made any major decisions reflecting her ideology but it is clear from her writings and opinions that she is a liberal with a passion for race and equality and rights, specifically with criminal defendants
  • 28. Elena Kagan, Associate Justice Justice Kagan was nominated to the Supreme Court by President Obama and she assumed her position in 2010 Justice Kagan has commented on the “unitary executive” saying that she believes that the Executive Branch to control the Executive Branch giving the Executive Branch more power in her eyes. Because of Justice Kagan’s short stint on the Supreme Court and the fact that she has excused herself from half of the heard cases in her time she has not made a big decision reflecting her jurisprudence
  • 29. Works Cited “Anthony M. Kennedy.” The New York Times. The New York Times Company, 1 July 2009. Web. 20 May 2011. <http://topics.nytimes.com/‌top/‌reference/‌timestopics/‌people/‌k/‌anthony_m_kennedy/‌index.html>. Associate Justice Anthony Kennedy. N.d. Supreme Court of the United States. Supreme Court of the United States, n.d. Web. 20 May 2011. <http://www.supremecourt.gov/‌about/‌biographies.aspx>. Associate Justice Antonin Scalia. N.d. Supreme Court of the United States. Supreme Court of the United States, n.d. Web. 20 May 2011. <http://www.supremecourt.gov/‌about/‌biographies.aspx>. Associate Justice Clarence Thomas. N.d. Supreme Court of the United States. Supreme Court of the United States, n.d. Web. 20 May 2011. <http://www.supremecourt.gov/‌about/‌biographies.aspx>. Associate Justice Elena Kagan. N.d. Supreme Court of the United States. Supreme Court of the United States, n.d. Web. 20 May 2011. <http://www.supremecourt.gov/‌about/‌biographies.aspx>. Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. N.d. Supreme Court of the United States. Supreme Court of the United States, n.d. Web. 20 May 2011. <http://www.supremecourt.gov/‌about/‌biographies.aspx>. Associate Justice Samuel Alito. N.d. Supreme Court of the United States. Supreme Court of the United States, n.d. Web. 20 May 2011. <http://www.supremecourt.gov/‌about/‌biographies.aspx>. Associate Justice Sonia Sotomayor. N.d. Supreme Court of the United States. Supreme Court of the United States, n.d. Web. 20 May 2011. <http://www.supremecourt.gov/‌about/‌biographies.aspx>. Associate Justice Stephen G. Breyer. N.d. Supreme Court of the United States. Supreme Court of the United States, n.d. Web. 20 May 2011. <http://www.supremecourt.gov/‌about/‌biographies.aspx>. “Biographies of Current Supreme Court Justices.” Supreme Court of the United States. Supreme Court of the United States, 20 May 2011. Web. 20 May 2011. <http://www.supremecourt.gov/‌about/‌biographies.aspx>. Chief Justice John G. Roberts. N.d. Supreme Court of the United States. Supreme Court of the United States, n.d. Web. 20 May 2011. <http://www.supremecourt.gov/‌about/‌biographies.aspx>. “District of Columbia v. Heller.” Legal Information Institute: Cornell Law School. N.p., n.d. Web. 21 May 2011. <http://www.law.cornell.edu/‌supct/‌html/‌07-290.ZS.html>. Liptak, Adam. “Ginsburg Shares Views on Influence of Foreign Law on Her Court, and Vice Versa.” The New York Times. The New York Times Company, 11 Apr. 2009. Web. 21 May 2011. <http://www.nytimes.com/‌2009/‌04/‌12/‌us/‌12ginsburg.html?ref=ruthbaderginsburg>. - - -. “Sotomayor Guides Court’s Liberal Wing.” The New York Times. The New York Times Company, 27 Dec. 2010. Web. 21 May 2011. <http://www.nytimes.com/‌2010/‌12/‌28/‌us/‌politics/‌28bar.html?ref=soniasotomayor>.
  • 30. Works Cited (Cont.) Maier, Pauline. “Justice Breyer’s Sharp Aim.” The New York Times. The New York Times Company, 21 Dec. 2010. Web. 21 May 2011. <http://www.nytimes.com/‌2010/‌12/‌22/‌opinion/‌22maier.html?ref=stephengbreyer>. The Oyez Project. “Hamdan v. Rumsfeld.” US Supreme Court Media: Oyez. N.p., n.d. Web. 21 May 2011. <http://www.oyez.org/‌cases/‌2000-2009/‌2005/‌2005_05_184?sort=ideology>. - - -. “Morrison v. Olson.” US Supreme Court Media: Oyez. Oyez Inc., 2011. Web. 20 May 2011. <http://www.oyez.org/‌cases/‌1980-1989/‌1987/‌1987_87_1279>. - - -. “NASA v. Nelson.” US Supreme Court Media: Oyez. N.p., n.d. Web. 21 May 2011. <http://www.oyez.org/‌cases/‌2010-2019/‌2010/‌2010_09_530>. “Politics and the Court.” Editorial. The New York Times. The New York Times Company, 4 Feb. 2011. Web. 20 May 2011. <http://www.nytimes.com/‌2011/‌02/‌05/‌opinion/‌05sat1.html?ref=clarencethomas>. “Ruth Bader Ginsburg.” The New York Times. The New York Times Company, 9 July 2009. Web. 21 May 2011. <http://topics.nytimes.com/‌top/‌reference/‌timestopics/‌people/‌g/‌ruth_bader_ginsburg/‌index.html?scp=1-spot&sq=ruth%20bader%20ginsburg&st=cse>. “Sonia Sotomayor.” The New York Times. The New York Times Company, 1 Feb. 2010. Web. 21 May 2011. <http://topics.nytimes.com/‌top/‌reference/‌timestopics/‌people/‌s/‌sonia_sotomayor/‌index.html?scp=1-spot&sq=sonia%20sotomayor&st=cse>. “Sonia Stotmayor.” The New York Times. The New York Times Company, 1 Feb. 2010. Web. 21 May 2011. <http://topics.nytimes.com/‌top/‌reference/‌timestopics/‌people/‌s/‌sonia_sotomayor/‌index.html?scp=1-spot&sq=sonia%20sotomayor&st=cse>. The Supreme Court of the United States. “Members of the Supreme Court of the United States.” Supreme Court of the United States. The Supreme Court of the United States, 16 May 2011. Web. 16 May 2011. <http://www.supremecourt.gov/‌about/‌members_text.aspx>. Toobin, Jeffery. “No More Mr. Nice Guy.” The New Yorker. Condé Nast Digital, 25 May 2009. Web. 20 May 2011. <http://www.newyorker.com/‌reporting/‌2009/‌05/‌25/‌090525fa_fact_toobin>. United States Supreme Court Justices. N.d. WhatIfPost.com. N.p., 5 May 2011. Web. 20 May 2011. <http://whatifpost.com/‌this-weeks-health-snapshots-may-5-2011.htm>.