SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  7
Télécharger pour lire hors ligne
1 Norms in educational linguistics: An introduction
Christiane Brand, Thorsten Brato, Stefanie Dose and Sandra Götz
Justus Liebig University Giessen
1.1 Educational linguistics: An emerging field of study
The articles in the present volume are all concerned with norms in educational lin-
guistics – but what exactly is educational linguistics (EL)? To explore the notion of
EL, we will first take a brief look at possible definitions, its relationship to applied
linguistics (AL) and its significance for research and teaching at the University of
Giessen. This leads us to the second point, i.e. the concept of ‘norms’ and its rele-
vance to EL; in other words, the reason why we have decided on dedicating a sym-
posium to the relationship between norms and this particular field. Finally, short
summaries of the contributions to this volume give an overview of the richness,
diversity and interdisciplinarity involved in this captivating topic.
As an articulated field of study, EL is relatively young, as its foundation only
dates back some 30-40 years. It was first named, defined and described by Bernard
Spolsky in the 1970s (e.g. Spolsky 1971, 1974, 1978) and continues to establish it-
self in the 21st century. What is probably obvious to someone who has never heard
of ‘educational linguistics’ as a discipline is that it can be situated somewhere at the
intersection of educational and linguistic concerns. A definition by Francis Hult
suggests that “[e]ducational linguistics is an area of study that integrates the re-
search tools of linguistics and other related disciplines of the social sciences in or-
der to investigate holistically the broad range of issues related to language and
education” (Hult 2008: 10). At first sight this also seems to hold true for applied
linguistics. However, researchers suggest that educational linguistics is to be sepa-
rated from AL (cf. Hornberger 2001; Hult 2008; Spolsky 2008).
The field of AL itself has been notoriously difficult to describe and we can now
distinguish various points on a continuum between a very narrow and a very wide
definition. In a nutshell, the former is exclusively concerned with the teaching of
foreign languages, while the latter covers “everything but language theory, history
and description” (Spolsky 1999: 1), i.e. fields such as lexicography, translation, lan-
guage planning, language teaching etc. Not all interests in AL are thus necessarily
tied to educational issues, which is why Bernard Spolsky defined a new field that
could be considered a subfield within the larger discipline of AL in its wider sense:
“It was the very lack of a core in applied linguistics that led me to propose educa-
tional linguistics. On the analogy of educational psychology, I hoped it would be
possible to define a field relevant to education but based on linguistics” (Spolsky
2008: 2). Education naturally interacts with language in numerous ways. As a con-
sequence, the scope of EL under this definition is fairly wide, ranging from issues
such as ‘vernacular dialect use at school’ to ‘second language phonological acquisi-
2 Christiane Brand, Thorsten Brato, Stefanie Dose and Sandra Götz
tion’ and ‘teacher training in linguistics’. Spolsky elaborated his previous conception
of EL over the years in so far as he now views EL’s core task as “providing the in-
struments for designing language policy and for implementing language education
management” (Spolsky 2008: 3).
EL is continually expanding as an independent area of study all over the globe,
which is also indicated by the growing number of publications and university pro-
grams in this field. Yet, EL is still in its infancy in Europe. At Justus Liebig Univer-
sity Giessen, the definition of EL is somewhat wider than that of Hornberger
(2001), Hult (2008) or Spolsky (2008). This is also reflected in the various interdis-
ciplinary EL-related research and teaching activities at this institution. At the Uni-
versity of Giessen, EL focuses on the conceptual and methodological combination
of linguistic and language-pedagogical research with regard to socially relevant is-
sues and questions related to education and teaching.
1.2 The concept of norms in educational linguistics
1. a. That which is a model or a pattern; a type, a standard. […] b. A standard or pattern
of social behaviour that is accepted in or expected of a group. Usu. in pl. […] c. A value
used as a reference standard for purposes of comparison (OED 2009: ‘norm’)
In the educational-linguistic context, norms appear to be a particularly interesting
object for study because norms and the related issue of standards play an important
role on a number of levels in the complex interplay of language, culture, society and
education. Education, or rather, educational institutions, shape a society and the
people that live in it, but society or culture can also influence education. Certain
norms, here understood in the classic sociological sense as ‘accepted and expected
patterns of social behaviour’ (cf. the OED 2009 definition 1. b.) are thus formed,
fostered, perpetuated and sometimes even deconstructed or newly created in social-
izing institutions such as schools and higher education. It is at schools, among
other places, that children acquire a sense of what is ‘normal’, what kind of behav-
iour is acceptable and expected of them – not only because that is where they see
many other people do the same things or behave in the same way, but also because
educational institutions function as an authority which explicitly teaches them cer-
tain norms. Of course, then, these dynamics also apply to language norms as a spe-
cial type of social norms. Language norms and standards represent everyday issues
in an educational context, even though we might not always be aware of the extent.
Language norms come into play e.g. when the selection of the language of instruc-
tion is concerned, when first, second or foreign languages are learned, when curri-
cula are designed (an example of an explicit set of norms formulated for the foreign
language classrooms in Europe is the Common European Framework of Reference for
Languages [Council of Europe 2001]) and when reference and teaching materials
such as dictionaries, grammars (as result of codification) and textbooks are de-
signed. These are but a few examples. Language policy and language management
Norms in educational linguistics 3
in general are further areas in which the discussion about norms can have an enor-
mous impact, both in monolingual countries like France and Poland, as well as in
many highly multilingual countries such as some of the former colonies in Africa.
Which language or variety is regarded valuable enough to be made the official lan-
guage and express the country’s identity – that of the majority of the population,
that of the former coloniser or a combination of local and coloniser languages? The
answers to these questions always influence education in a variety of ways, too, of
course.
The question of what exactly constitutes a norm is one that is extremely hard to
answer and always relies on a society’s cultural values. While some norms are gen-
erally accepted without much discussion or even consideration (e.g. that the typical
paper size in Germany is DIN A4), when it comes to language, the question of
norms and how to deal with them is discussed much more vigorously. Thus, it is
no surprise that also in EL there is no clear-cut definition of what constitutes a
norm. The matter is further complicated by the fact that most of the ‘factors’ and
disciplines involved in EL – such as those mentioned in Spolsky’s (1999: 2-6) tax-
onomy of EL1
and the “core themes”2
described in Spolsky and Hult (2008) – con-
tribute their own, sometimes even opposing, set of norms.
If we just focus on the linguistic side, there are those who argue that norms are
a set of grammatical rules that have to be followed, whereas sociolinguists have ar-
gued for a variety of other forms of linguistic norms such as that of “communica-
tive adequacy” (Gloy 1976: 335, 1980: 364, cited in Neuland 1996: 57). This
approach takes into account linguistic factors (grammatical and stylistic norms,
norms for oral, written and non-verbal communication), social factors (age, gender,
hierarchy) and legitimation criteria (cultural authorities, clerical elite, forms that de-
veloped historically, supraregional span, mutual understandability). They even argue
for the logic of the nonstandard (Labov 1969), which in educational contexts is of-
ten referred to as ‘wrong’ or as an ‘error’ (Hudson 2004: 109).
When talking about norms, then, it is essential to be aware of the double mean-
ing of the word ‘norm’ as describing both normal, as in ‘common, usual, used in
everyday settings’, but also normative, as in ‘what is valued most highly and thus is
considered most prestigious’ (Favreau this volume: 74): the standard (also see the
OED definition above). In other words, we can distinguish between a descriptive
and a prescriptive sense of a ‘norm’. For sociolinguists, nonstandard usage and
variation is the norm. In teaching, on the other hand, and especially in foreign lan-
guage teaching, a norm that is prescriptive and normative is common and to a large
extent necessitated by the practical needs of the language classroom. Nonstandard
1
Spolsky includes the following factors: social context, individual learner, school context, teach-
ing language, teaching additional languages and language testing.
2
These are linguistically and culturally responsive education, language education policy and man-
agement, literary development and language assessment.
4 Christiane Brand, Thorsten Brato, Stefanie Dose and Sandra Götz
and variant forms are often restricted to a minimum, such as the differences be-
tween British and American English.
Questions like those mentioned above warrant further discussion of the con-
cept of norms in the context of educational linguistics. For our symposium, we de-
cided to focus on three major areas which appeared to be particularly promising
research fields: first of all, Language policy as a reflection of cultural norms. Language
norms are an influential tool to codify, maintain or revive the own language or lan-
guage variety, sometimes also to consciously distance oneself from ‘the Other’, i.e.
other languages or language varieties. Secondly, Norm, standard, deviation. Language
norms in the sense of ‘standards’ tend to be developed slowly over time (influenced
by language-internal and -external factors) and are just as constructed as the devia-
tions from them; they are furthermore subject to change. Linguistic research into
language variation and change has long been a rewarding endeavour. The third
thematic area was titled Target norms in foreign language teaching. Pluricentric languages
are particularly challenging in the foreign language classroom, but different styles
and registers of languages are topics that have also received more attention in the
past years. Furthermore, there are interesting questions such as how to deal with
mistakes or errors and there is also the tension between a ‘focus on forms’ and a
‘focus on meaning’.
The multifaceted nature of EL, i.e. the multitude of philologies, theoretical
frameworks and applications involved is also reflected in the papers presented at
our conference in September 2008 and consequently in the contributions to the
present conference proceedings as well.
1.3 Overview of chapters
In accordance with the foci of our symposium, we have structured the present
book in four major parts, beginning with a thematic section on Language policy as a
reflection of cultural norms. The first contribution in this section is the paper by the
founding father of educational linguistics, Bernard Spolsky. He illustrates the Na-
vajo Reading Study, which he describes as the starting point for exploring the rich-
ness of educational linguistics. Spolsky gives an account of the beginning of the
process and shows how he and his team found that linguistic science proved to be
useful in dealing with the challenges posed by bilingual education. Almost 40 years
ago they put science into practice by setting up a Navajo/English education
scheme in the Southwestern US. The insights of this study are still valuable today.
The paper by Ruth Bartholomä focuses on textbooks as a means for language
planning in schools. She uses the Tatar language in Russia to illustrate issues of lan-
guage policy in Russia from a diachronic perspective. Tatar belongs to the Turkic
languages and is an everyday language that was subject to norm debates throughout
the last century. Bartholomä focuses on the development of a written norm repre-
sented in dictionaries, official wordlists and most importantly textbooks used in the
education of children in the 1920s, 1930s and 1990s.
Norms in educational linguistics 5
The second section of the book deals with the theme of Norm, standard, devia-
tion. Richard Hudson sets the scene by first discussing each of the three concepts
individually to subsequently bring them together, focusing on their importance to
the field of educational linguistics. In doing so, he questions the idea of norm and
deviation and makes a plea for a more flexible approach that shows greater toler-
ance for diversity. Hudson outlines in detail the relevance of tackling these issues as
he points out their practical implications for education and linguistics as well as for
cultural studies.
The second paper in this section by Chahrazed Messadh discusses foreign
language speaking anxiety among students. She reports on a research study con-
ducted in Algeria and introduces the idea of speaking anxiety as a factor relevant to
curriculum design and foreign language speaking instruction in an EFL university
context. Messadh illustrates different variables, ranging from personal to proce-
dural, that could have an influence on the level of anxiety in the beginners’ and ad-
vanced learners’ classroom. She uses a modified version of the FLCAS developed
by Horwitz et al. (1986) as a primary instrument to measure anxiety and imple-
ments focus groups to examine the participants’ beliefs, experiences, and feelings
related to anxiety in foreign language speaking.
Hélène Favreau’s contribution to the section tackles linguistic norms and
standards from a social perspective. She poses the question of the likelihood and
extent of social exclusion if norms and standards are not shared by both teacher
and learner. She discusses attitudes towards given norms in France and illustrates
the consequences for institutional education. Favreau’s particular interest is the
identity-constructing function of different sociolinguistic norms and the deviance
between standard and non-standard forms. She outlines how norms can act as a
tool of exclusion rather than communication and how this might result in a pro-
found social depreciation on the part of some speakers.
Mailin Antomo concludes the theme of norm, standard and deviation with a
discussion about major syntactic, semantic and pragmatic differences that arise
from different possible verb placements in German adverbial clauses of
cause/reason with weil (= ‘because’). She takes differences in spoken and written
German into consideration and examines verb placement in canonical vs. non-
canonical subordinate and coordinate clauses. Antomo emphasises the importance
of integrating her findings into German grammar teaching to increase the learners’
awareness of register differences and the adequacy of the variants in specific con-
texts.
The third section of this volume focuses on Target norms in foreign language teach-
ing. In the first paper Frank G. Königs presents a survey of how researchers in
foreign language teaching have gradually been including the – originally linguistic –
discussion about language norms in their research field. Based on this framework,
he critically discusses the learner-centred approach to foreign language teaching and
6 Christiane Brand, Thorsten Brato, Stefanie Dose and Sandra Götz
illustrates different scenarios of potential conflicts arising from the inclusion of dif-
ferent degrees of normativity in the foreign language classroom.
In his empirical study, Ralf Gießler investigates the written output of German
learners of English. He based his study on the (poor) performance of learners from
secondary schools in state-wide mandatory assessments and large-scale assess-
ments. Gießler’s qualitative analysis of learner texts from 2005 reveals that the
learners’ poor performance is to a large extent caused by their limited access to fre-
quently used prefabricated units, chunks and sentence patterns in English. As a
consequence, Gießler makes a plea for a greater focus on these particular areas in
foreign language teaching.
Gabriela Marques-Schäfer and Eva Platten continue this section by taking
the discussion of norms in foreign language teaching to the World Wide Web. They
investigate how learners of German as a foreign language deal with explicit and im-
plicit norms in a supervised and unsupervised didactic chat as well as in an unsu-
pervised Wiki Web. They reveal that learners follow the explicit linguistic and social
norms more often in the Wiki Web than in the chat (especially when the chat is
unsupervised), but they also show major parallels of how learners deal with the im-
plicit norms in both media, e.g. they strive for a high level of well-formedness of
their output.
Eirini Monsela focuses in her paper on the different realisations of speech
acts in German and Greek and puts special emphasis on the differences between
how two verbs are used in the two languages in the perfect and the preterite. Her
study reveals some areas that are especially error-prone for Greek learners of Ger-
man and offers concrete exercises that cover these difficult areas.
Martina Möllering completes the present volume in the final section with her
paper on language norms and integration. She addresses the different concepts of
norms discussed in the previous sections by describing the role of educational lin-
guistics in today’s multicultural and global society. She outlines the impact that lan-
guage norms and language standards have on specifying (minimum) language
requirements in the context of immigration and the conferral of citizenship in Aus-
tralia and Germany. In doing so, Möllering emphasises the importance of future
research in the field of EL as its practical implications are of major relevance in our
era of increasing globalisation.
References
Council of Europe. 2001. Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching,
assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hornberger, Nancy H. 2001. “Educational linguistics as a field: A view from Penn’s program on
the occasion of its 25th anniversary”. Working Papers in Educational Linguistics 17 (1-2), 1-26.
Horwitz, Elaine K., Michael B. Horwitz and Joann Cope. 1986. “Foreign language classroom
anxiety scale”. Modern Language Journal 70 (2), 125-132.

Contenu connexe

Tendances

General Linguistics By Rabia
General Linguistics By RabiaGeneral Linguistics By Rabia
General Linguistics By Rabia
Dr. Cupid Lucid
 
Linguistics vs applied linguistics
Linguistics vs applied linguisticsLinguistics vs applied linguistics
Linguistics vs applied linguistics
UTPL UTPL
 
English 344 session 1
English 344 session 1English 344 session 1
English 344 session 1
lisyaseloni
 
Integrating global issues in genre based approach
Integrating global issues in genre based approachIntegrating global issues in genre based approach
Integrating global issues in genre based approach
Titik Winarti
 
Investigating the Integration of Culture Teaching in Foreign Language Classro...
Investigating the Integration of Culture Teaching in Foreign Language Classro...Investigating the Integration of Culture Teaching in Foreign Language Classro...
Investigating the Integration of Culture Teaching in Foreign Language Classro...
The Annual International Conference on Languages, Linguistics, Translation and Literature
 

Tendances (20)

General Linguistics By Rabia
General Linguistics By RabiaGeneral Linguistics By Rabia
General Linguistics By Rabia
 
MAdissertation
MAdissertationMAdissertation
MAdissertation
 
Article: What is new in Autonomy
Article: What is new in AutonomyArticle: What is new in Autonomy
Article: What is new in Autonomy
 
Semiotics and TEFL
Semiotics and TEFLSemiotics and TEFL
Semiotics and TEFL
 
Linguistics vs applied linguistics
Linguistics vs applied linguisticsLinguistics vs applied linguistics
Linguistics vs applied linguistics
 
J0363057063
J0363057063J0363057063
J0363057063
 
540 week 2
540 week 2540 week 2
540 week 2
 
Identity, agency, and adult literacy in the digital era
Identity, agency, and adult literacy in the digital eraIdentity, agency, and adult literacy in the digital era
Identity, agency, and adult literacy in the digital era
 
Week 4 540
Week 4 540Week 4 540
Week 4 540
 
An exploration of the generic structures of problem statements in research ...
An exploration of the generic structures of problem   statements in research ...An exploration of the generic structures of problem   statements in research ...
An exploration of the generic structures of problem statements in research ...
 
English 344 session 1
English 344 session 1English 344 session 1
English 344 session 1
 
context and culture
 context and culture context and culture
context and culture
 
Integrating global issues in genre based approach
Integrating global issues in genre based approachIntegrating global issues in genre based approach
Integrating global issues in genre based approach
 
Sla stages
Sla stagesSla stages
Sla stages
 
Investigating the Integration of Culture Teaching in Foreign Language Classro...
Investigating the Integration of Culture Teaching in Foreign Language Classro...Investigating the Integration of Culture Teaching in Foreign Language Classro...
Investigating the Integration of Culture Teaching in Foreign Language Classro...
 
343 cr
343 cr343 cr
343 cr
 
D3123741.pdf
D3123741.pdfD3123741.pdf
D3123741.pdf
 
Sociocultural Factors in Language Teaching and Learning
Sociocultural Factors in Language Teaching and LearningSociocultural Factors in Language Teaching and Learning
Sociocultural Factors in Language Teaching and Learning
 
Project paper revision iv
Project paper revision  ivProject paper revision  iv
Project paper revision iv
 
Relationship between Creativity and Tolerance of Ambiguity to Understand Meta...
Relationship between Creativity and Tolerance of Ambiguity to Understand Meta...Relationship between Creativity and Tolerance of Ambiguity to Understand Meta...
Relationship between Creativity and Tolerance of Ambiguity to Understand Meta...
 

En vedette

engllish book
engllish bookengllish book
engllish book
erirosana
 
Research Article on Teaching English Globally_Shanawaz
Research Article on Teaching English Globally_ShanawazResearch Article on Teaching English Globally_Shanawaz
Research Article on Teaching English Globally_Shanawaz
Shanawaz Mohammed
 
Don't speak The Essential Skill of Listening Article 1
Don't speak The Essential Skill of Listening Article 1Don't speak The Essential Skill of Listening Article 1
Don't speak The Essential Skill of Listening Article 1
Andrina Morence, PhD
 
using subtitles for inference production while viewing a movie ECP 2013 Stock...
using subtitles for inference production while viewing a movie ECP 2013 Stock...using subtitles for inference production while viewing a movie ECP 2013 Stock...
using subtitles for inference production while viewing a movie ECP 2013 Stock...
Jean-Marc Lavaur
 
Final Research Proposal
Final Research ProposalFinal Research Proposal
Final Research Proposal
amirahjuned
 
Study skills for academic writing
Study skills for academic writingStudy skills for academic writing
Study skills for academic writing
Lê Ka Ka
 
Principles of teaching listening and speaking skills
Principles of teaching listening and speaking skillsPrinciples of teaching listening and speaking skills
Principles of teaching listening and speaking skills
Nasir Mohammad
 
MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIST
MEDICAL TECHNOLOGISTMEDICAL TECHNOLOGIST
MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIST
Ammar hussain
 
iamZoltanVaradi_iOSDevUK16
iamZoltanVaradi_iOSDevUK16iamZoltanVaradi_iOSDevUK16
iamZoltanVaradi_iOSDevUK16
Zoltán Váradi
 
Music video treatment
Music video treatmentMusic video treatment
Music video treatment
Danpalacefan
 
Global Warming for demonstrating Lesson in Moodle
Global Warming for demonstrating Lesson in MoodleGlobal Warming for demonstrating Lesson in Moodle
Global Warming for demonstrating Lesson in Moodle
colonna69
 

En vedette (20)

What Source to use ?
What Source to use ?What Source to use ?
What Source to use ?
 
engllish book
engllish bookengllish book
engllish book
 
Research Article on Teaching English Globally_Shanawaz
Research Article on Teaching English Globally_ShanawazResearch Article on Teaching English Globally_Shanawaz
Research Article on Teaching English Globally_Shanawaz
 
Don't speak The Essential Skill of Listening Article 1
Don't speak The Essential Skill of Listening Article 1Don't speak The Essential Skill of Listening Article 1
Don't speak The Essential Skill of Listening Article 1
 
using subtitles for inference production while viewing a movie ECP 2013 Stock...
using subtitles for inference production while viewing a movie ECP 2013 Stock...using subtitles for inference production while viewing a movie ECP 2013 Stock...
using subtitles for inference production while viewing a movie ECP 2013 Stock...
 
Movies effects on efl learners
Movies effects on efl learnersMovies effects on efl learners
Movies effects on efl learners
 
Final Research Proposal
Final Research ProposalFinal Research Proposal
Final Research Proposal
 
Study skills for academic writing
Study skills for academic writingStudy skills for academic writing
Study skills for academic writing
 
Cambridge academic english student's book intermediate
Cambridge academic english student's book intermediateCambridge academic english student's book intermediate
Cambridge academic english student's book intermediate
 
Principles of teaching listening and speaking skills
Principles of teaching listening and speaking skillsPrinciples of teaching listening and speaking skills
Principles of teaching listening and speaking skills
 
النورج
النورجالنورج
النورج
 
MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIST
MEDICAL TECHNOLOGISTMEDICAL TECHNOLOGIST
MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIST
 
Kisi kisi uh 3
Kisi  kisi uh 3Kisi  kisi uh 3
Kisi kisi uh 3
 
iamZoltanVaradi_iOSDevUK16
iamZoltanVaradi_iOSDevUK16iamZoltanVaradi_iOSDevUK16
iamZoltanVaradi_iOSDevUK16
 
2012 CNO Investor Day
2012 CNO Investor Day2012 CNO Investor Day
2012 CNO Investor Day
 
Cenário Botafogo, Lançamento Mozak, Apartamentos no Rio, 2 quartos em Botafog...
Cenário Botafogo, Lançamento Mozak, Apartamentos no Rio, 2 quartos em Botafog...Cenário Botafogo, Lançamento Mozak, Apartamentos no Rio, 2 quartos em Botafog...
Cenário Botafogo, Lançamento Mozak, Apartamentos no Rio, 2 quartos em Botafog...
 
Sean V. Bradley: The Four P's
Sean V. Bradley: The Four P'sSean V. Bradley: The Four P's
Sean V. Bradley: The Four P's
 
Music video treatment
Music video treatmentMusic video treatment
Music video treatment
 
Global Warming for demonstrating Lesson in Moodle
Global Warming for demonstrating Lesson in MoodleGlobal Warming for demonstrating Lesson in Moodle
Global Warming for demonstrating Lesson in Moodle
 
Coach Retreat Boston 2014
Coach Retreat Boston 2014Coach Retreat Boston 2014
Coach Retreat Boston 2014
 

Similaire à Foreign language speaking anxiety among Algerian students Germany 2008

Dr. Butler & Dr. W.A. Kritsonis
Dr. Butler & Dr. W.A. KritsonisDr. Butler & Dr. W.A. Kritsonis
Dr. Butler & Dr. W.A. Kritsonis
William Kritsonis
 
Second language acquisition and english language teaching
Second language acquisition and english language teachingSecond language acquisition and english language teaching
Second language acquisition and english language teaching
Osnovna šola Pivka
 
the-importance-of-including-culture-in-efl-teaching-pp-44-56
the-importance-of-including-culture-in-efl-teaching-pp-44-56the-importance-of-including-culture-in-efl-teaching-pp-44-56
the-importance-of-including-culture-in-efl-teaching-pp-44-56
Claudia Daza
 
How Culture And Perception Are Directly Influenced By...
How Culture And Perception Are Directly Influenced By...How Culture And Perception Are Directly Influenced By...
How Culture And Perception Are Directly Influenced By...
Tiffany Graham
 
The Input Learner Learners Forward Throughout...
The Input Learner Learners Forward Throughout...The Input Learner Learners Forward Throughout...
The Input Learner Learners Forward Throughout...
Tiffany Sandoval
 
hassans Contrastive Analysis
hassans Contrastive Analysishassans Contrastive Analysis
hassans Contrastive Analysis
Hassans09
 
Conrastive Analysis (Hassans Edu)
Conrastive Analysis (Hassans Edu)Conrastive Analysis (Hassans Edu)
Conrastive Analysis (Hassans Edu)
Hassans09
 
9300AWEEK 1 What is language Our relationship with language. T.docx
9300AWEEK 1 What is language Our relationship with language. T.docx9300AWEEK 1 What is language Our relationship with language. T.docx
9300AWEEK 1 What is language Our relationship with language. T.docx
blondellchancy
 
149Harvard Educational Review Vol. 85 No. 2 Summer 2015
149Harvard Educational Review  Vol. 85 No. 2 Summer 2015149Harvard Educational Review  Vol. 85 No. 2 Summer 2015
149Harvard Educational Review Vol. 85 No. 2 Summer 2015
AnastaciaShadelb
 

Similaire à Foreign language speaking anxiety among Algerian students Germany 2008 (20)

An analysis putri 6
An analysis putri 6An analysis putri 6
An analysis putri 6
 
Sociolinguistics
SociolinguisticsSociolinguistics
Sociolinguistics
 
Dr. Butler & Dr. W.A. Kritsonis
Dr. Butler & Dr. W.A. KritsonisDr. Butler & Dr. W.A. Kritsonis
Dr. Butler & Dr. W.A. Kritsonis
 
Culture in language learning and teaching
Culture in language learning and teachingCulture in language learning and teaching
Culture in language learning and teaching
 
sociolinguistics.pptx
sociolinguistics.pptxsociolinguistics.pptx
sociolinguistics.pptx
 
Second language acquisition and english language teaching
Second language acquisition and english language teachingSecond language acquisition and english language teaching
Second language acquisition and english language teaching
 
the-importance-of-including-culture-in-efl-teaching-pp-44-56
the-importance-of-including-culture-in-efl-teaching-pp-44-56the-importance-of-including-culture-in-efl-teaching-pp-44-56
the-importance-of-including-culture-in-efl-teaching-pp-44-56
 
An Introduction To Applied Linguistics Introduction
An Introduction To Applied Linguistics IntroductionAn Introduction To Applied Linguistics Introduction
An Introduction To Applied Linguistics Introduction
 
How Culture And Perception Are Directly Influenced By...
How Culture And Perception Are Directly Influenced By...How Culture And Perception Are Directly Influenced By...
How Culture And Perception Are Directly Influenced By...
 
Applied linguistics: overview
Applied linguistics: overviewApplied linguistics: overview
Applied linguistics: overview
 
linguistics_material.pdf
linguistics_material.pdflinguistics_material.pdf
linguistics_material.pdf
 
Applied Linguistics Challenge
Applied Linguistics ChallengeApplied Linguistics Challenge
Applied Linguistics Challenge
 
The Input Learner Learners Forward Throughout...
The Input Learner Learners Forward Throughout...The Input Learner Learners Forward Throughout...
The Input Learner Learners Forward Throughout...
 
What is Applied Linguistics-.pptx
What is Applied Linguistics-.pptxWhat is Applied Linguistics-.pptx
What is Applied Linguistics-.pptx
 
hassans Contrastive Analysis
hassans Contrastive Analysishassans Contrastive Analysis
hassans Contrastive Analysis
 
Conrastive Analysis (Hassans Edu)
Conrastive Analysis (Hassans Edu)Conrastive Analysis (Hassans Edu)
Conrastive Analysis (Hassans Edu)
 
9300AWEEK 1 What is language Our relationship with language. T.docx
9300AWEEK 1 What is language Our relationship with language. T.docx9300AWEEK 1 What is language Our relationship with language. T.docx
9300AWEEK 1 What is language Our relationship with language. T.docx
 
Methodology
MethodologyMethodology
Methodology
 
History of applied linguistic
History of applied linguisticHistory of applied linguistic
History of applied linguistic
 
149Harvard Educational Review Vol. 85 No. 2 Summer 2015
149Harvard Educational Review  Vol. 85 No. 2 Summer 2015149Harvard Educational Review  Vol. 85 No. 2 Summer 2015
149Harvard Educational Review Vol. 85 No. 2 Summer 2015
 

Foreign language speaking anxiety among Algerian students Germany 2008

  • 1.
  • 2. 1 Norms in educational linguistics: An introduction Christiane Brand, Thorsten Brato, Stefanie Dose and Sandra Götz Justus Liebig University Giessen 1.1 Educational linguistics: An emerging field of study The articles in the present volume are all concerned with norms in educational lin- guistics – but what exactly is educational linguistics (EL)? To explore the notion of EL, we will first take a brief look at possible definitions, its relationship to applied linguistics (AL) and its significance for research and teaching at the University of Giessen. This leads us to the second point, i.e. the concept of ‘norms’ and its rele- vance to EL; in other words, the reason why we have decided on dedicating a sym- posium to the relationship between norms and this particular field. Finally, short summaries of the contributions to this volume give an overview of the richness, diversity and interdisciplinarity involved in this captivating topic. As an articulated field of study, EL is relatively young, as its foundation only dates back some 30-40 years. It was first named, defined and described by Bernard Spolsky in the 1970s (e.g. Spolsky 1971, 1974, 1978) and continues to establish it- self in the 21st century. What is probably obvious to someone who has never heard of ‘educational linguistics’ as a discipline is that it can be situated somewhere at the intersection of educational and linguistic concerns. A definition by Francis Hult suggests that “[e]ducational linguistics is an area of study that integrates the re- search tools of linguistics and other related disciplines of the social sciences in or- der to investigate holistically the broad range of issues related to language and education” (Hult 2008: 10). At first sight this also seems to hold true for applied linguistics. However, researchers suggest that educational linguistics is to be sepa- rated from AL (cf. Hornberger 2001; Hult 2008; Spolsky 2008). The field of AL itself has been notoriously difficult to describe and we can now distinguish various points on a continuum between a very narrow and a very wide definition. In a nutshell, the former is exclusively concerned with the teaching of foreign languages, while the latter covers “everything but language theory, history and description” (Spolsky 1999: 1), i.e. fields such as lexicography, translation, lan- guage planning, language teaching etc. Not all interests in AL are thus necessarily tied to educational issues, which is why Bernard Spolsky defined a new field that could be considered a subfield within the larger discipline of AL in its wider sense: “It was the very lack of a core in applied linguistics that led me to propose educa- tional linguistics. On the analogy of educational psychology, I hoped it would be possible to define a field relevant to education but based on linguistics” (Spolsky 2008: 2). Education naturally interacts with language in numerous ways. As a con- sequence, the scope of EL under this definition is fairly wide, ranging from issues such as ‘vernacular dialect use at school’ to ‘second language phonological acquisi-
  • 3. 2 Christiane Brand, Thorsten Brato, Stefanie Dose and Sandra Götz tion’ and ‘teacher training in linguistics’. Spolsky elaborated his previous conception of EL over the years in so far as he now views EL’s core task as “providing the in- struments for designing language policy and for implementing language education management” (Spolsky 2008: 3). EL is continually expanding as an independent area of study all over the globe, which is also indicated by the growing number of publications and university pro- grams in this field. Yet, EL is still in its infancy in Europe. At Justus Liebig Univer- sity Giessen, the definition of EL is somewhat wider than that of Hornberger (2001), Hult (2008) or Spolsky (2008). This is also reflected in the various interdis- ciplinary EL-related research and teaching activities at this institution. At the Uni- versity of Giessen, EL focuses on the conceptual and methodological combination of linguistic and language-pedagogical research with regard to socially relevant is- sues and questions related to education and teaching. 1.2 The concept of norms in educational linguistics 1. a. That which is a model or a pattern; a type, a standard. […] b. A standard or pattern of social behaviour that is accepted in or expected of a group. Usu. in pl. […] c. A value used as a reference standard for purposes of comparison (OED 2009: ‘norm’) In the educational-linguistic context, norms appear to be a particularly interesting object for study because norms and the related issue of standards play an important role on a number of levels in the complex interplay of language, culture, society and education. Education, or rather, educational institutions, shape a society and the people that live in it, but society or culture can also influence education. Certain norms, here understood in the classic sociological sense as ‘accepted and expected patterns of social behaviour’ (cf. the OED 2009 definition 1. b.) are thus formed, fostered, perpetuated and sometimes even deconstructed or newly created in social- izing institutions such as schools and higher education. It is at schools, among other places, that children acquire a sense of what is ‘normal’, what kind of behav- iour is acceptable and expected of them – not only because that is where they see many other people do the same things or behave in the same way, but also because educational institutions function as an authority which explicitly teaches them cer- tain norms. Of course, then, these dynamics also apply to language norms as a spe- cial type of social norms. Language norms and standards represent everyday issues in an educational context, even though we might not always be aware of the extent. Language norms come into play e.g. when the selection of the language of instruc- tion is concerned, when first, second or foreign languages are learned, when curri- cula are designed (an example of an explicit set of norms formulated for the foreign language classrooms in Europe is the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages [Council of Europe 2001]) and when reference and teaching materials such as dictionaries, grammars (as result of codification) and textbooks are de- signed. These are but a few examples. Language policy and language management
  • 4. Norms in educational linguistics 3 in general are further areas in which the discussion about norms can have an enor- mous impact, both in monolingual countries like France and Poland, as well as in many highly multilingual countries such as some of the former colonies in Africa. Which language or variety is regarded valuable enough to be made the official lan- guage and express the country’s identity – that of the majority of the population, that of the former coloniser or a combination of local and coloniser languages? The answers to these questions always influence education in a variety of ways, too, of course. The question of what exactly constitutes a norm is one that is extremely hard to answer and always relies on a society’s cultural values. While some norms are gen- erally accepted without much discussion or even consideration (e.g. that the typical paper size in Germany is DIN A4), when it comes to language, the question of norms and how to deal with them is discussed much more vigorously. Thus, it is no surprise that also in EL there is no clear-cut definition of what constitutes a norm. The matter is further complicated by the fact that most of the ‘factors’ and disciplines involved in EL – such as those mentioned in Spolsky’s (1999: 2-6) tax- onomy of EL1 and the “core themes”2 described in Spolsky and Hult (2008) – con- tribute their own, sometimes even opposing, set of norms. If we just focus on the linguistic side, there are those who argue that norms are a set of grammatical rules that have to be followed, whereas sociolinguists have ar- gued for a variety of other forms of linguistic norms such as that of “communica- tive adequacy” (Gloy 1976: 335, 1980: 364, cited in Neuland 1996: 57). This approach takes into account linguistic factors (grammatical and stylistic norms, norms for oral, written and non-verbal communication), social factors (age, gender, hierarchy) and legitimation criteria (cultural authorities, clerical elite, forms that de- veloped historically, supraregional span, mutual understandability). They even argue for the logic of the nonstandard (Labov 1969), which in educational contexts is of- ten referred to as ‘wrong’ or as an ‘error’ (Hudson 2004: 109). When talking about norms, then, it is essential to be aware of the double mean- ing of the word ‘norm’ as describing both normal, as in ‘common, usual, used in everyday settings’, but also normative, as in ‘what is valued most highly and thus is considered most prestigious’ (Favreau this volume: 74): the standard (also see the OED definition above). In other words, we can distinguish between a descriptive and a prescriptive sense of a ‘norm’. For sociolinguists, nonstandard usage and variation is the norm. In teaching, on the other hand, and especially in foreign lan- guage teaching, a norm that is prescriptive and normative is common and to a large extent necessitated by the practical needs of the language classroom. Nonstandard 1 Spolsky includes the following factors: social context, individual learner, school context, teach- ing language, teaching additional languages and language testing. 2 These are linguistically and culturally responsive education, language education policy and man- agement, literary development and language assessment.
  • 5. 4 Christiane Brand, Thorsten Brato, Stefanie Dose and Sandra Götz and variant forms are often restricted to a minimum, such as the differences be- tween British and American English. Questions like those mentioned above warrant further discussion of the con- cept of norms in the context of educational linguistics. For our symposium, we de- cided to focus on three major areas which appeared to be particularly promising research fields: first of all, Language policy as a reflection of cultural norms. Language norms are an influential tool to codify, maintain or revive the own language or lan- guage variety, sometimes also to consciously distance oneself from ‘the Other’, i.e. other languages or language varieties. Secondly, Norm, standard, deviation. Language norms in the sense of ‘standards’ tend to be developed slowly over time (influenced by language-internal and -external factors) and are just as constructed as the devia- tions from them; they are furthermore subject to change. Linguistic research into language variation and change has long been a rewarding endeavour. The third thematic area was titled Target norms in foreign language teaching. Pluricentric languages are particularly challenging in the foreign language classroom, but different styles and registers of languages are topics that have also received more attention in the past years. Furthermore, there are interesting questions such as how to deal with mistakes or errors and there is also the tension between a ‘focus on forms’ and a ‘focus on meaning’. The multifaceted nature of EL, i.e. the multitude of philologies, theoretical frameworks and applications involved is also reflected in the papers presented at our conference in September 2008 and consequently in the contributions to the present conference proceedings as well. 1.3 Overview of chapters In accordance with the foci of our symposium, we have structured the present book in four major parts, beginning with a thematic section on Language policy as a reflection of cultural norms. The first contribution in this section is the paper by the founding father of educational linguistics, Bernard Spolsky. He illustrates the Na- vajo Reading Study, which he describes as the starting point for exploring the rich- ness of educational linguistics. Spolsky gives an account of the beginning of the process and shows how he and his team found that linguistic science proved to be useful in dealing with the challenges posed by bilingual education. Almost 40 years ago they put science into practice by setting up a Navajo/English education scheme in the Southwestern US. The insights of this study are still valuable today. The paper by Ruth Bartholomä focuses on textbooks as a means for language planning in schools. She uses the Tatar language in Russia to illustrate issues of lan- guage policy in Russia from a diachronic perspective. Tatar belongs to the Turkic languages and is an everyday language that was subject to norm debates throughout the last century. Bartholomä focuses on the development of a written norm repre- sented in dictionaries, official wordlists and most importantly textbooks used in the education of children in the 1920s, 1930s and 1990s.
  • 6. Norms in educational linguistics 5 The second section of the book deals with the theme of Norm, standard, devia- tion. Richard Hudson sets the scene by first discussing each of the three concepts individually to subsequently bring them together, focusing on their importance to the field of educational linguistics. In doing so, he questions the idea of norm and deviation and makes a plea for a more flexible approach that shows greater toler- ance for diversity. Hudson outlines in detail the relevance of tackling these issues as he points out their practical implications for education and linguistics as well as for cultural studies. The second paper in this section by Chahrazed Messadh discusses foreign language speaking anxiety among students. She reports on a research study con- ducted in Algeria and introduces the idea of speaking anxiety as a factor relevant to curriculum design and foreign language speaking instruction in an EFL university context. Messadh illustrates different variables, ranging from personal to proce- dural, that could have an influence on the level of anxiety in the beginners’ and ad- vanced learners’ classroom. She uses a modified version of the FLCAS developed by Horwitz et al. (1986) as a primary instrument to measure anxiety and imple- ments focus groups to examine the participants’ beliefs, experiences, and feelings related to anxiety in foreign language speaking. Hélène Favreau’s contribution to the section tackles linguistic norms and standards from a social perspective. She poses the question of the likelihood and extent of social exclusion if norms and standards are not shared by both teacher and learner. She discusses attitudes towards given norms in France and illustrates the consequences for institutional education. Favreau’s particular interest is the identity-constructing function of different sociolinguistic norms and the deviance between standard and non-standard forms. She outlines how norms can act as a tool of exclusion rather than communication and how this might result in a pro- found social depreciation on the part of some speakers. Mailin Antomo concludes the theme of norm, standard and deviation with a discussion about major syntactic, semantic and pragmatic differences that arise from different possible verb placements in German adverbial clauses of cause/reason with weil (= ‘because’). She takes differences in spoken and written German into consideration and examines verb placement in canonical vs. non- canonical subordinate and coordinate clauses. Antomo emphasises the importance of integrating her findings into German grammar teaching to increase the learners’ awareness of register differences and the adequacy of the variants in specific con- texts. The third section of this volume focuses on Target norms in foreign language teach- ing. In the first paper Frank G. Königs presents a survey of how researchers in foreign language teaching have gradually been including the – originally linguistic – discussion about language norms in their research field. Based on this framework, he critically discusses the learner-centred approach to foreign language teaching and
  • 7. 6 Christiane Brand, Thorsten Brato, Stefanie Dose and Sandra Götz illustrates different scenarios of potential conflicts arising from the inclusion of dif- ferent degrees of normativity in the foreign language classroom. In his empirical study, Ralf Gießler investigates the written output of German learners of English. He based his study on the (poor) performance of learners from secondary schools in state-wide mandatory assessments and large-scale assess- ments. Gießler’s qualitative analysis of learner texts from 2005 reveals that the learners’ poor performance is to a large extent caused by their limited access to fre- quently used prefabricated units, chunks and sentence patterns in English. As a consequence, Gießler makes a plea for a greater focus on these particular areas in foreign language teaching. Gabriela Marques-Schäfer and Eva Platten continue this section by taking the discussion of norms in foreign language teaching to the World Wide Web. They investigate how learners of German as a foreign language deal with explicit and im- plicit norms in a supervised and unsupervised didactic chat as well as in an unsu- pervised Wiki Web. They reveal that learners follow the explicit linguistic and social norms more often in the Wiki Web than in the chat (especially when the chat is unsupervised), but they also show major parallels of how learners deal with the im- plicit norms in both media, e.g. they strive for a high level of well-formedness of their output. Eirini Monsela focuses in her paper on the different realisations of speech acts in German and Greek and puts special emphasis on the differences between how two verbs are used in the two languages in the perfect and the preterite. Her study reveals some areas that are especially error-prone for Greek learners of Ger- man and offers concrete exercises that cover these difficult areas. Martina Möllering completes the present volume in the final section with her paper on language norms and integration. She addresses the different concepts of norms discussed in the previous sections by describing the role of educational lin- guistics in today’s multicultural and global society. She outlines the impact that lan- guage norms and language standards have on specifying (minimum) language requirements in the context of immigration and the conferral of citizenship in Aus- tralia and Germany. In doing so, Möllering emphasises the importance of future research in the field of EL as its practical implications are of major relevance in our era of increasing globalisation. References Council of Europe. 2001. Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Hornberger, Nancy H. 2001. “Educational linguistics as a field: A view from Penn’s program on the occasion of its 25th anniversary”. Working Papers in Educational Linguistics 17 (1-2), 1-26. Horwitz, Elaine K., Michael B. Horwitz and Joann Cope. 1986. “Foreign language classroom anxiety scale”. Modern Language Journal 70 (2), 125-132.