Petra Hietanen-Kunwald: Lessons to be learnt from Austria, Germany and France
•
1 j'aime•682 vues
Petra Hietanen-Kunwald: Lessons to be learnt from Austria, Germany and France. Esitys Muutoksenhaku sosiaalivakuutuksessa -seminaarissa 19.3.2015. Kelan päätalo, Helsinki.
Recommandé
Contenu connexe
En vedette
En vedette (18)
Plus de Kelan tutkimus / Research at Kela
Plus de Kelan tutkimus / Research at Kela (20)
Dernier
Dernier (20)
Petra Hietanen-Kunwald: Lessons to be learnt from Austria, Germany and France
- 1. Lessons to be learnt from Austria, Germany and France Petra Hietanen-Kunwald, Researcher, HY
- 2. Purpose of the research Background Research problem Aim 19.3.2015Petra Hietanen-Kunwald
- 3. Basic Concepts Social security Social insurance Social assistance Judicial protection 19.3.2015Petra Hietanen-Kunwald
- 4. Structural choices Structure Centralized system Integrated system Fragmented system Administrative – ordinary (civil) court Involvement of lay judges Appeal system 19.3.2015Petra Hietanen-Kunwald
- 5. Centralized System Administrative Court Social Court Ordinary Court 19.3.2015Petra Hietanen-Kunwald In a centralized system judicial protection in social security matters is centralized within one specialized jurisdiction.
- 6. Integrated System Administrative Court Social Matters Ordinary Court 19.3.2015Petra Hietanen-Kunwald In an integrated sytem judicial protection in social security matters is integrated into the existing dual system.
- 7. Fragmented System Administrative Court Social Ordinary Court Social Social SocialSocial 19.3.2015Petra Hietanen-Kunwald A fragmented system is characterized by the existence of multiple specialized bodies that exercise jurisdiction in social security matters.
- 8. Organization of the social jurisdiction (Germany) Federal Social Court 3 professional judges and 2 lay judges Regional Social Court (Landessozialgericht) 3 professional judges and 2 lay judges Social Court (Sozialgericht) 1 professional judge and two lay judges 19.3.2015Petra Hietanen-Kunwald
- 9. Lay judges Involvement of lay judges Purpose Discussions Independence of lay judges Justification of lay judge system Tendencies Strengthening the role of the single judge 19.3.2015Petra Hietanen-Kunwald
- 10. Participation The right to be heard Oral proceedings Effective access to justice - instruction Dialogue with the parties Acceptance of the decision Alternatives to judgments 19.3.2015Petra Hietanen-Kunwald
- 11. Numbers (2012) Percentage (2012) Total number of cases 399.479 Adjudication Decision by judgment 42.216 10,6 Decision by court decision (without oral hearing) 24.293 6,1 Other termination Withdrawal 157.203 39,4 Court settlement 42.133 10,5 Accepted acknowledgment 60.379 15,1 Mutual declaration that there is no need to adjudicate 39.131 9,8 Germany Source: Statistisches Bundesamt, Fachserie 10, 2012 19.3.2015Petra Hietanen-Kunwald
- 12. Austria (invalidity pension) Figures (2011) Percentage (2011) Total number of cases 25.010 Adjudication Judgment 3943 15,8 Other termination Withdrawal 16.517 66 Court settlement 4.536 18,1 Source: Bundesarbeiterkammer, Wirtschafts- und Sozialstatistisches Taschenbuch 2013 19.3.2015Petra Hietanen-Kunwald
- 13. Pre-court procedures Nature Administrative Written procedure Panel Function Internal review system Filtering 19.3.2015Petra Hietanen-Kunwald
- 14. Issues Profile of the Appeal Board? Strengthening the role of the single judge? Involvement of the beneficiary? Expert evidence? Regulation of the procedure? 19.3.2015Petra Hietanen-Kunwald