1. PERSONAL BUT NOT PRIVATE
Mathias Klang @klang67

2. Privatus? Complex
term but
“separated from
the rest”

3. TECHNOLOGY AS
INTEGRITY THREAT

4. RIGHT TO PRIVACY

5. 1948: DECLARATION OF RIGHTS

6. 70S: LEGISLATING INTEGRITY

7. 90S HARMONIZATION BUT FLAWED
MODERNIZATION.

8. The threat up until this point was
orwell’s nightmare

9. Reality today is Huxley’s nightmare

10. The “problems”: or why Orwell lost.

11. SMALL BITS OF INFORMATION

12. PERMISSION BASED

13. INTERNATIONAL INFRASTRUCTURES

14. PARANOID? REGULATION BY PROXY

15. ONLY TECHNOLOGY
(SPOT THE ETHICAL DILEMMA?)

16. PRIVACY & TECHNOLOGY

17. WE LEAK INFORMATION

18. COMPARTMENTALIZATION STRATEGY

19. SURVEILLANCE: THE ORWELLIAN GAZE FROM ABOVE

21. A HUXLEYIAN SHIFT

22. ENDING THE COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLY

23. Blogger 1999
Google 1999
END OF COMMUNICATIONS MONOPOLY

24. NORMALIZING THE ABNORMAL

25. SOUSVEILLANCE:
A GAZE FROM BELOW

26. “friends” ensure: there is no opt-
out

27. AUTOVEILLANCE:
A GAZE FROM WITHIN

28. PERFORMANCE LIFESTYLE

29. MY AMAZING COFFEE

30. SILLY MAYBE, BUT HARMFUL?

31. VILLAGE VS
GLOBAL VILLAGE
Nothing new?

32. WHAT DO THE PEOPLE WHO CONTROL WHAT
WE CAN DO, THINK?

33. If you have
done nothing wrong,
you have nothing to fear

34. THE HIVE-MIND

35. THE EFFECT OF BANAL INFORMATION

36. Privacy will not be die suddenly of a massive leak.
It’s slowly fading by analysis of public data…

37. AUTONOMY: THE FREEDOM TO LOSE OUR PRIVACY

38. OUTING THE YOUNG

39. DO GOVERNMENT OFFICES HAVE A
PATERNALISTIC ROLE?

40. THANKS!

41. Mathias Klang
klang@ituniv.se or @klang67
www.digital-rights.net
Image & licensing info in the notes
section of slides.
Images at www.flickr.com (or
specifically stated).
This ppt licensed: Creative
Commons BY-NC-SA
Download presentation
www.slideshare.net/klang