4. Aims of Study
4
Highlight the different stages in the process life cycle of the
users’ activities where information is utilised with benefit to the
user.
Understand what makes volunteered information different from
professional information when used in a real world situation.
Determine how using volunteered or professional information
affects on the outcomes of activities it when it is used.
Explore under what conditions volunteered information may
provide unique opportunities to the user over and above that of
professional information.
5. Selecting Group
5
Hill Walkers Surfers Kayakers
Utilises geographic information as central to the activity Yes Yes Yes
Use of ‘dynamic information’ - Yes Yes
Requires information not covered by ‘traditional’ cartography - Yes Yes
Use a wide variety of information sources Yes Yes Yes
Cover a wide variety of experience levels and abilities Yes Yes Yes
Good inter-community links and shares information with
community (e.g. web forums)
Yes Yes Yes
Has the potential for VGI to enrich their activity above and
beyond professional information
Unknown Unknown Unknown
Consists of a number of different activities rather than one
phenomenon
- - Yes
Work in social groups rather than solo pursuit of activity Yes - Yes
Easy access to groups, active activities within 50 miles of
Loughborough
- - Yes
13. How To Not Get Distracted By ‘Interface’
13
Asked about what sources and how they are used
Mainly focused on how information makes a
difference
Delivery method of interest
How are Volunteered delivery methods different to
professional
Trust is a relationship between provider and consumer
Did not focus Axial coding on interface
16. Currency, Depth & Scope and Quality of the information are the three
most relevant factors when searching for information.
16
17. Data usability has a clear geographical element (i.e. both time and place
are important).
17
18. The data needs, and the usefulness of data to individuals is dependent on
the level of experience that the end users had with the kayaking
application domain.
18
20. Usable data often has a temporal aspect, such that the usefulness of data
often ‘decayed’ within a time window of opportunity. A good example of
this is water levels affecting the ‘paddleability’ of the river.
20
What maps and guidebooks don’t
give you is up to date information.
Just because it was a good guide to the
river five years ago doesn’t mean it’s
a good guide to the river now.
21. When questioned about professional and volunteered sources,
participants tended to refer to sources they perceive as reliable and
respectable as professional, despite their volunteer contribution base.
21
22. Future Research
22
Study 3
Ethnographic Research
Exploratory to support
discussion of Study 2
findings
Discussion & Theory
Generation
Study 4
Testing Theory
Disabled Travellers (?)
24. References
24
Barry, C.L. & Schamber, L. 1998, "Users' criteria for
relevance evaluation: a cross-situational comparison",
Information processing & management, vol. 34, no. 2-
3, pp. 219-236.
Goodchild, M. F. (2007). Citizens as sensors: The world
of volunteered geography. GeoJournal, 69(4), 211-221.
Preece, J., Rogers, Y., & Sharpe, H. (2002). Interaction
design: Beyond human-computer interaction. United
States of America: John Wiley & Sons.
Notes de l'éditeur
VGI - the creation of geographic information by largely untrained volunteers
Past Research into VGI Usability
Aims and objectives of studying VGI & PGI
Methodology
Results
“How volunteered geographic information may be combined with professional geographic information to make applications of higher consumer usability”
According to Wordle, these are the key words of my thesis so far
Previous work had looked into the relationship between the stakeholders in VGI
Wanted to move on from understanding stakeholders and start to understand information in use. Particularly what volunteered information users over and above professional information
Criteria created
Applications from OS’s GeoVation scanned for potential communities
Kayakers were selected as a group which embodied the best of these properties
RESEARCH APPROACH
Qualitative analysis– Focus Group
Efficient technique
Natural responses
Focused on important topics
Enjoyable
Cost effective
Wide range of views
32 participants Over 4 Clubs
9 Intermediate (1-4 years experience)
23 expert (5 years + experience)
So the study had two parts
degree of ethnographic research was undertaken,
kayaking with the groups at least once before the focus groups.
To fully understand and relate to the findings from the study
2) Ran focus groups in order to acquire a wide range of view points
Main body of research for this study
Open Coding – What is coming out of the data
Grouping into Concepts – Asking questions of data as previous slide
Applying sub-categorisation of Relevance (Barry & Schamber 1998), not shaping open codes, seeing how they relate to Relevance theory
Provides a ‘coding tree’ looking roughly like this
Now to run over some of the key findings from this study –
Focusing on Data Usability
Paper in progress for GISRUK 2011 which will include a broader overview
Outcomes
Information in Use
Information Sources
Relation to planning process
Relation to static and dynamic information
WHAT IS THIS GRAPH ABOUT!
Focusing today on the Results for Data Usability and touch on the Planning Process
the following slides show some basic outcomes from work
This graph shall be used to highlight phenomenon
You may notice TANGABILITY (definite, proven information is provided; hard data or actual numbers are provided) is missing from the responses of participants
Talking about information to participants, not exclusively geographic information
Yet information wasn’t about A weir, it was about THIS weir (VGLI – Volunteered Geo-Located Information)
Shown in the data
Experience is the filter for all information taken in by this study]
We see this in our data, how trust of personal experience, and the experience of other trusted kayakers is prevalent over authoritative information
This is mirrored by the Hierarchical Task Analysis (HTA) developed from the study to highlight the Planning Process
These are the processes requiring volunteered or professional information for decisions to be made
Leaving
As focusing on usability, only a snap shot of the overall picture
Considering highly negative ‘Out of Date’ with highly positive ‘Up to Date’
Easy to see how amateur volunteered and professional information compares
One participant commented.....
Chart shows the number of responses made by participants when asked to comment on professional and volunteered information
The major columns are as expected
The minor columns are ‘incorrect’ perceptions (thinking something professional is actually volunteered, e.g. Forums)
Where people say ‘volunteered’ when asked about ‘professional’ – sources are ‘unauthoritive’
E.g. – Online kayaking forums/ Internet
Where people say ‘professional’ when asked about volunteered – sources are ‘authoritative’
E.g. – BCU Local Access Officer (LAO)