Parent data night
•Télécharger en tant que PPTX, PDF•
1 j'aime•1,211 vues
Parent Data Night Presentation at our school
Recommandé
Recommandé
Contenu connexe
Tendances
Tendances (20)
Dernier
Dernier (20)
Parent data night
- 1. Parent Data Night April 9th, 2012 Presented by: SPS District Data Team
- 2. District Data Team • Deana Dugi, Federal Prog./Data Coordinator • Evereta Thinn, PD/Assessment Coordinator • Lance Lane, MS/HS Reading Coach • Leandra Scott, Elementary Reading Coach
- 3. District Data Goals • To use data to drive curriculum and instruction • To improve student achievement using
- 4. K – 12 Assessments • Skills Based Assessments – Measures basic skills in subject areas to meet standards • DIBLES • AIMSWeb • Standards Based Assessments -Measures standards • NWEA • AIMS • Galileo • Norm-Reference Test – Access to true national comparisons, presented in National Percentile
- 5. Elementary/Middle School Data • NWEA – computerized adaptive formative assessments that allow teachers to see their students as individuals – each with their own base of knowledge. • DIBELS – measures the 5 Big Ideas in early literacy • Phonemic Awareness • Alphabetic Principle • Accuracy and Fluency • Vocabulary • Comprehension • AIMSWeb – AIMSWeb is a benchmark and progress Data allows teachers to find out where they need direct, frequent monitoring system based on to target their and continuous student assessment. instruction. – Lance Lane
- 7. Math AIMSweb Data 2011-2012 1st-8th Grades Fall Winter Intensive 13% Intensive 22% Stretegic Strategic 50% 26% 56% 28% Benchmark Benchmark
- 8. Math Findings • Fully implement Tier II and III • Add math intervention program • Focus on numbers and operations
- 9. DIBELS/AIMSWeb Data *Improvement of Basic Indicators of Percentage of Students: Grades Pre-K - 8 Literacy at Shonto Preparatory School Pre-K - Grade 8 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% 2006/2007 Present Intensive 40 16 Strategic 28 22 Benchmark 32 62
- 10. High School Data • Galileo Assessment – a fully integrated, standards-based instructional improvement system, providing comprehensive assessment and instructional tools. • Galileo Benchmark -Quarterly Assessment -Reading(9-12) 9-12 Grade Standards -Writing(9-10) 10 Grade Standards -Math(Algebra I, Algebra II, Geometry)
- 11. Reading Benchmarks Quarterly Galileo Reading 1800 1600 Benchmarks 1400 1200 Student Percentile 1000 800 600 400 200 0 Benchm Approac Benchm Approac Benchm Approac Meets Exceeds Meets Exceeds Meets Exceeds ark 1 hes ark 2 hes ark 3 hes Reading 9th 1386 1272 1412 1502 1300 1277 1417 1507 1280 1280 1420 1510 Reading 10th 1330 1259 1324 1485 1377 1268 1333 1494 1386 1274 1339 1500 Reading 11th 1497 1423 1506 1656 1504 1426 1509 1659 1526 1428 1511 1661 Reading 12th 1540 1448 1568 1682 1589 1451 1571 1685 1603 1453 1573 1687
- 12. Writing Benchmarks Quarterly Galileo Writing 1800 1600 Assessments 1400 Student Percentile 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 Benchma Approac Benchma Approac Benchma Approac Meets Exceeds Meets Exceeds Meets Exceeds rk 1 hes rk 2 hes rk 3 hes Writing 9th 1331 1272 1403 1525 1361 1329 1393 1528 1361 1303 1371 1495 Writing 10th 1385 1355 1398 1457 1493 1429 1513 1617 1444 1372 1458 1583
- 13. Math Benchmarks Quarterly Galileo Mathematics Assessments 1550 1500 1450 Student Percentile 1400 1350 1300 1250 1200 1150 Benchma Approach Benchma Approach Benchma Approach Meets Exceeds Meets Exceeds Meets Exceeds rk 1 es rk 2 es rk 3 es Algebra I 1421 1418 1447 1504 1390 1426 1455 1512 1384 1432 1461 1518 Algebra II 1295 1279 1353 1424 1360 1287 1361 1432 1362 1293 1367 1438 Geometry 1404 1394 1412 1489 1408 1414 1432 1509 1396 1427 1445 1522
- 14. Galileo Findings • Another Assessment (NWEA, AR, A+) • Quarterly Teacher Made Assessments • Data Driven Instruction • Consistent Monitoring • Implementation of
- 15. AIMSWeb - Defining Accuracy • Independent level (99%-100% accuracy) • Instructional level (90%-98% accuracy) • Frustration level (<90% accuracy)
- 16. 9th Grade Accuracy 9th Grade 0% 36% Independent Instructional Frustration 64%
- 17. 10th Grade Accuracy 10th Grade 8% 43% Independent Instructional Frustration 49%
- 18. 11th Grade Accuracy 11th Grade 17% 31% Independent Instructional Frustration 52%
- 19. 12th Grade Accuracy 12th Grade 6% 33% Independent Instructional Frustration 61%
- 20. AIMSWeb Findings • Very Low Fluency Rates for a majority of our students. • Lots of Opportunities!!! – Majority of our students are at Instructional level. – Focus on: • Direct Instruction of Content Area Vocabulary. • More opportunities for
- 21. State Assessments • AIMS – measures student proficiency of the Arizona Academic Content Standards in Writing, Reading, Mathematics, and Science • Stanford 10 – Used to make comparisons between individual student performance and the results of a reference group • AZELLA (Arizona English Language Learner Assessment)
- 22. Data Team Conclusions • Longitudinal data at K-8 is vital information • More data is needed at the High School • For data to be used effectively, all stakeholders need to
- 23. Ah4hee’
Notes de l'éditeur
- Skills Based – to meet basic needs of the students doesn’t mean they will meet the needs. Teachers still need to teach the students to get to meeting the basics.