This session explores how individuals can be professionally recognised for their work in higher education as teachers and supporters of learning, resulting in being rewarding the status as a Associate, Fellow, Senior and/or Principal Fellow of the Higher Education Academy.
2. 2
Session Outline
Explore your interests
and expectations of
the PSF
Provide opportunities
for you to interpret and
engage with the PSF
Raise your awareness
of Professional
Recognition of the
Higher Education
Academy (HEA)
Explore evidence
requirements and
expectations for being
recognised at different
categories
3. • RECOGNITION applies to an individual who
is seeking to become an Associate Fellow
(D1), Fellow (D2) , Senior Fellow (D3) or
Principal Fellow (D4) of the HEA.
Recognition
3
Recognition is attained either through direct
application via the Individual Recognition route or
by completing an accredited programme or route
through an accredited scheme. The term always
applies to an individual or group of individuals and
never to a programme or scheme.
4. The Academy recognises staff against the PSF in two
ways:
1. Applying on the basis of experience:
• HEA – offers recognition against each of the
Descriptors as AF, F, SF and PF. Application process
available –http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/professional-
recognition
• submission of an evidence based on account of
practice, supported by referees or
advocates, assessed by peer accreditors – more detail
on this later
2. Through successful completion of an accredited 4
Professional Recognition of the HEA
6. 6
Individuals recognised against PSF
at the end of December 2012
Total number
recognised – 39,264
Associate Fellows –
5,019
Fellows – 34,092
Senior Fellows - 134
Principal Fellows - 19
Approximately 20% of
UK Academics recognised
against PSF at the end of
December 2012
7. 7
Recognition – routes total (Dec 12)
Recognition route
(individual experience)
Accredited Provision
74%
51%
43%
Fellows
34,093
Associate Fellows
5,019
Senior Fellows
134
Principal Fellows
19
57%
43%
9%
91%
Approximately 20% of
UK Academics recognised
against PSF at the end of
December 2012
26%
8. Production of an Account of Professional Practice
8
Associate Fellow and
Fellow
Analytic approach
Structured round Areas of Activity
Core Knowledge and Professional Values -
explicit
1400 words for Associate Fellow (2 Areas of
Activity)
3000 words for Fellow (all dimensions)
Two referees + confirming institutional signatory
Assessed by two Accreditors
14. • Individually assess the application
• Compare judgements with another
colleague
• Reach agreement
• Record decision on flip chart
• Feedback in plenary
14
Activity: Assessing Fellowship
applications
15. • Identify and share your own engagements with
teaching and learning, both current and in the
past
• Generate a list of typical kinds of engagement
with teaching and learning in HE context
• Think about how these activities might map
onto the descriptors and how you might present
these via a reflective narrative for the
appropriate category of recognition
15
Activity: Engagement with own Recognition
16. To find out more
About the Framework
http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/ukpsf
About Professional Recognition
http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/professional-
recognition
About Accreditation
http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/accreditation
16
Account of professional practice (APP) = approx 6-7k in total though quality more important than quality and could be much shorterRecord of educational impact = list of examples of impactReflective account of practice = main part of APPThree advocate statements + confirming institutional signatoryAssessed by panel of three accreditors
Claim – application is a claim – not an assignment. + authenticity is crucial Engagement = all based on examples of practice – not just theoretical Reflection = using the Framework dimensions to explore the how and why of your practice Alignment = demonstrating that your practice is aligned with the principles of the FrameworkCommitment = continuing commitment to the value and quality of t & l – both your own and if appropriate others CPD – evidence based, and where appropriate scholarlyQuality = more important that quantity – word count is only a guidelineCurrency = need to demonstrate relevance – no absolute rule on this – the sooner the better
Divide into groups based on category you are interested inIdentify and share your own engagements with teaching and learning , both current and in the past–Generate a list of typical kinds of engagement with T & L What are the parameters of engagement? I.e. How can each engagement be described? E.g. who with, how many? What type? How long for? What proportion of work time? Which category of Fellowship? (see guidelines for each category)