8. S&OP Evolution
Greater Benefit
Business- • Growth
Sales Driven
planning Driven • Resilience
Match Demand
Maximize • Efficiency
with Supply
Profitability
Market Driven
Manufacturing- Demand Driven
Driven Maximize
Maximize
Opportunity and
Deliver a Feasible Opportunity
Mitigate Risk.
Plan for Operations Sense and
Orchestrate
Match Demand Shape
Demand
with Supply Demand
Market to Market
9. S&OP Process
Existence, Goals & Processes
Have a Sales & Operations Planning S&OP Process Goal
Process
Not sure Match demand with supply 43%
3%
No
10% Maximize opportunity and mitigate risk 32%
Develop a feasible plan 14%
Determine the most profitable plan 8%
Yes Other 3%
87%
# Distinct S&OP Processes
5 S&OP 27%
14% 20% 19%
processes 12% 9%
on average
1 2 3 4 5 More than 5
Base: Total Sample (117)
12. Supply Chain Organization
Functions Reporting Through Supply Chain Leader
Supply Chain
Supply Chain
Planning (Supply) 80% Chief Operating Officer 43% 69%
Supply Chain
Profit
Planning (Demand) 72% Center
Gen Mgr of Business Unit
(P&L Owner) 26% Managers
Inventory 63%
Deliver (Distribution) 56% Leader of Manufacturing 12%
Transportation 52% Chief Financial Officer 9%
Source
(Procurement) 51%
Head of Procurement 3%
Make
(Manufacturing) 38%
Customer Service 37% Chief Information Officer 2%
Base: Total Sample (117)
Q5. Please tell us how you define your company’s supply chain organization by selecting
14. Looking at Supply Chain as a Complex System
Growth
Corporate Revenue Cost of Goods
Trade-offs
Working Capital
Corporate Social Responsibility
Investment
Trade-offs
R&D Strategy and Investment Asset Strategy and Investment
Forecast Accuracy Customer Service Inventory
Supply
Chain Product and Service
Channel Strategy Supplier Strategy
Trade-offs Portfolio
Sales Distribution Manufacturing Logistics Procurement
Policies Policies Policies Policies Policies
Supply
Chain Backorders First Pass Material
Returns Empty Miles
Waste Obsolescence Yield Yield
15. What is Agility?
How Define Supply Chain “Agility”
Shorter supply
Flexibility to make cycles
and deliver
whatever is ordered 3%
10% Ability to recalibrate
plans in the face of
market, demand and
supply volatility and
49% deliver the same or
comparable cost, quality
and customer service
38%
Ability to
adapt to
variations in
demand and
supply
Base: Total Sample (117)
Q11. How would you define what it means for your company’s supply chain to be “agile”?
16. Agility Importance vs. Performance
Agility Importance vs. Performance
(7-Point Scale)
6%
5%
40% Low (1-3)
89% 32% Middle (4)
62 % Points
(Gap in Performance
vs. Importance)
27% High (5-7)
Importance Performance
Base: Total Sample (117)
Q12. How important is it for your company’s supply chain to be “agile” in 2012? Please
17. Agility Today vs. Past
Agility vs. 5 Years Ago, 1 Year Ago
9% LESS Agile
15%
17%
54%
Just as Agile
68% Ongoing
Increases
in Agility
38%
MORE Agile
Vs. 5 Years Ago Vs. 1 Year Ago
Base: Total Sample (117)
18. The Role of Demand Signals in Becoming Market Driven
Sell Deliver Make Source
Network Design: Channel Network Design Supplier Network.
Probability of Design. Cost- Supplier
Demand to-Serve Rationalization
Analysis
Supply Chain Category Sales and Operations Planning Category
Tactical Management New Product Launch Management
Planning:
Demand
Forecast
Supply Chain Contract Corporate Social Responsibility Contract
Policy: Demand Management Revenue Management Management
Shaping Working Capital Management
Market-driven Demand/ Demand Orchestration Supplier Sensing
Signal Channel Demand Translation
Management Sensing
Transactional Order Order-to-Cash Purchase Order
Processing: Management Procure-to-Pay Management
Order and
Shipment
Processing
19. Demand-side Views Supply-side Views
Hole in Enterprise
Architectures
Account-Level
VMI C
A Supplier Supplier Supplier Supplier
Downstream Data Distribution Distribution Distribution
Network Network Network
20. Demand-side Views Supply-side Views
Demand
Translation
Account-Level
VMI C
A Supplier Supplier Supplier Supplier
Downstream Data Distribution Distribution Distribution
Network Network Network
26. S&OP Process
Plan Execution
S&OP Plan Execution
Execution is not connected to S&OP plan 9%
We try to execute the S&OP plan, but hardly do
in practice 25%
We execute the S&OP plan most of the time 35%
We execute the S&OP plan nearly all of the
time 19%
We monitor market events and adjust to S&OP
plan within limits 13%
Base: Have a S&OP process (102)
28. Comparison of Revenue/Employee for
the Period of 2000-2011
P&G Colgate Unilever Kimberly-Clark Nestle Kraft
700
Revenue/Thousands of Employee
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
29. Comparison of EBIT/Employee for the
Period of 2000-2011
P&G Colgate Unilever Kimberly-Clark Nestle Kraft
140.0
120.0
100.0
EBIT/Employee
80.0
60.0
40.0
20.0
0.0
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
30. Consumer Products: Comparison of
Days of Inventory
P&G Colgate Unilever Nestle Kraft
80
75
70
65
60
55
50
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
31. Consumer Products: Cost of Sales as a
Percentage of Revenue
Unilever Kellogg Kraft General Mills
Campbell Hershey P&G
70%
Cost of Sales as a % of Revnue
65%
60%
55%
50%
45%
40%
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
32. Comparison of Days of Working Capital in High-tech and
Electronics for the Period of 2005-2011
Apple Motorola Solutions Samsung
Cisco Intel Dell
RIM Average
450.0
400.0
350.0
300.0
Axis Title
250.0
200.0
150.0
100.0
50.0
0.0
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
33. High-tech and Electronics
Revenue/Employee
Apple Motorola Solutions Samsung
Cisco Dell RIM
Average
1800.0
1600.0
1400.0
1200.0
1000.0
800.0
600.0
400.0
200.0
0.0
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
34. Cost of Sales as a Percentage of Revenue in High-tech
Apple Motorola Solutions Samsung Cisco
Intel Dell *cost of revenue* RIM Average
5.0
4.5
4.0
3.5
3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
35. Technology
Goal
A feasible plan • Model the network
• Recognize and respect
constraints
• Gain plan visibility
Match demand with supply • What-if analysis
• Multi-tier inventory analysis
• Network design
Deliver the most profitable • Demand translation
• Supply orchestration
Plan • Optimize financial drivers
Demand-driven • Sense channel demand
• Shape demand
• Drive the most profitable
response
Market-driven • Sense buy and sell-side market
conditions
• Bi-directionally orchestrate
demand
Key:
Demand Planning Supply Planning Inventory Planning Financial Planning Demand Translation Market Sensing
35
Platform