Playful Pedagogy
•
2 j'aime•3,692 vues
Talk given at the University of Bergen on 12 April 2013.
Recommandé
Contenu connexe
Similaire à Playful Pedagogy
Similaire à Playful Pedagogy (20)
Plus de Elizabeth Lawley
Plus de Elizabeth Lawley (20)
Dernier
Dernier (20)
Playful Pedagogy
- 1. Playful Pedagogy Elizabeth Lane Lawley, Ph.D. Rochester Institute of Technology School of Interactive Games & Media • igm.rit.edu MAGIC Center • magic.rit.edu slides online by tomorrow! slideshare.net/mamamusings
- 14. JUST PRESS PLAY Outside the Classroom
- 15. play.rit.edu
- 20. ―We are beginning to see ourselves not just from the inside, as an actor doing something on a daily basis, but from the outside— understanding what we look like to the world around us and developing a kind of hybrid identity.‖ – Aram Simmreich
- 21. I apologize for this next slide…
- 22. Project Goals • Provide students with a clearer sense of their accomplishments in various areas (academic, social, and creative) of their college experience, and provide them with tools to reflect on their range and balance of activities. • Increase students‘ awareness of activities and opportunities outside of their academic coursework, from wellness to collaboration to knowledge of the campus and city, and inspire them to sample a range of experiences. • Enable students to maintain and share a record of their activities. • Provide students with a sense of fantasy, whimsy and playful abstraction in dealing with the stress and growth associated with the transformational nature of undergraduate education.
- 26. It‘s the autonomy, stupid.
- 27. ―My point is that the ‗fun‘, the pleasure of these elements does not come from some extrinsic reward value of those elements, but chiefly from the experience of competence they give rise to.‖ Sebastian Deterding
- 28. What behaviors did we want to reward and encourage? What feelings of competence could we engender? What did we want our students to remember and reflect on?
- 48. IMPLEMENTING THE “MULTIPLAYER CLASSROOM” Inside the Classroom
Notes de l'éditeur
- Need photos of a board game (based on a classroom?), a gamification image (from zichermann, or badgeville?), letter grade “A” (from
- http://www.flickr.com/photos/flem007_uk/3156285617/
- http://www.flickr.com/photos/amboo213/4020584983/
- An attempt to use what we know about games to make learning more engaging and playful (photo of students having fun)An ongoing and iterative experiment ((scientist with clipboard, maybe?)
- Inside the classroom
- The idea for this came from a conversation one of our professors was having with some students in the spring of 2010, in which the students said “we should get achievements for being awesome.” She took that idea to our chair, who took it to Microsoft Research, who said “here’s some seed money—think this through, then come back and tell us more.”
- We wanted to make the implicit map more explicit. What are the mileposts and markers along the way? How do they know they’re on the right track? How can we visualize their progress towards a goal?A personal narrative emerges…what does the narrative look like? How is lore disclosed?
- The intention was less about pushing them to do things that they wouldn’t otherwise do, and more about recognizing what successful students do, helping new students to discover those activities, and allowing all students to remember and reflect on their accomplishments.
- What we wanted to emulate from FourSquare was not just the points and the leaderboards, but the aggregation of information about enjoyable activities, both for sharing and for personal recall.
- When Andy first pitched this to MSR, he made a point of saying “GREAT DANGER HERE”…and he was right. The reason you don’t see this achievement approach everywhere in education is that it’s really hard to do well!
- By adding external tangible rewards, we can actually do damage to our students’ intrinsic motivations. The focus needs to be on “now…that” rewards, rather than “if…then” rewards.
- For this to be successful, it hadto be voluntary, fun, and engaging. Students had to vest in it as creators, not just consumers. This is the key takeaway from Deci & Ryan’s SDT work. We know this because we asked them
- http://gamification-research.org/2011/09/a-quick-buck-by-copy-and-paste/http://gamification-research.org/2011/09/gamification-by-design-response-to-oreilly/So….what feelings of competence did we want to focus on?
- Big questions that guided our content development.
- This was the model that emerged for us—the tension between the athenaeum and the mechanics institute, as well as the tension between individual and collaborative competencies. Bloom’s taxonomy informs the rings, but the important part is not just expansion but BALANCE.
- We got some things right…but we got a lot of things wrong, too.
- Four kinds of achievements:Collectible cardsUser-submitted content (photos, URLs)System-assigned based on external criteriaCheckins at locations or events (unable to implement properly)
- Images
- http://www.flickr.com/photos/skrewtape/1334368996/