Designing an experience that supports users’ motivations and goals is challenging enough, but it is far from all that is required in order to deliver a successful solution. The greater challenge for UX practitioners lies in positioning your work and your deliverables so that the organisation is able to implement the bulk of the recommendations and designs contained therein. Dumping a design and running, is not good enough. We must design solutions that will be implemented.
The key is designing with consideration of the business drivers and the motivations of technologists responsible for bringing your designs to fruition. Actively engaging technologists and business owners throughout the work turns your deliverables from “Recommendations” to “Specifications”.
In this talk, Matt Morphett of Amberdew presents a method for mapping out the specific motivations of three competing forces within your IT-based project and working with them as you undertake user experience design. Paper based tools are manipulated by representatives from each area in a group environment to negotiate the tradeoffs and compromises inherent in complex IT projects. The tools support structured decision making at all levels from the strategic intent of the project to “Can we update those drop-downs without a screen refresh?” The result is a usable and engaging design that meets business needs and will not be shouted down by cries of “Not technically possible”.
Electronic copies of the tools and templates are linked on the final slide.
Unlocking the Power of ChatGPT and AI in Testing - A Real-World Look, present...
Designs That Ship
1. Designs That Ship
New tools for ensuring your UX work
reaches its audience
UX Australia 2010
Melbourne, Australia
Matt Morphett
twitter: @mattmorphett
10. The 180 page
survival trophy
...I made it through this nightmare UX
gig and all I got was this lousy document
11. Designing is
the easy part...
...getting them to implement your
recommendations is the challenge
12. Why don’t they implement?
•Because they don’t understand you
•Because they don’t believe you
•Because it is hard
•Because you didn’t tell them to...
13. Why don’t they implement?
•Because they don’t understand you
•Because they don’t believe you
•Because it is hard
•Because you didn’t tell them to...
Because your method wasn’t as
usable as your designs
17. The Dynamic Motivations
Profitability
Service delivery quality
Reportability
Auditability
Process compliance
Business Practice standardisation
Regulatory compliance
Cleanliness of data
Users Architecture
18. The Dynamic Motivations
Profitability
Service delivery quality
Reportability
Auditability
Process compliance
Business Practice standardisation
Regulatory compliance
Cleanliness of data
Motivations
Implementability
Performance
Availability
Robustness
Scalability
Security
Maintainability
Extensibility
Accessibility
Users Architecture
19. The Dynamic Motivations
Profitability
Service delivery quality
Reportability
Auditability
Process compliance
Business Practice standardisation
Regulatory compliance
Cleanliness of data
Motivations Motivations
Specific User Goals Implementability
-------------------------- Performance
Intuitivity Availability
Learnability Robustness
Ease of use Scalability
Reduced typing / rekeying Security
Guidance not constraint Maintainability
Responsiveness Extensibility
Efficient operation Accessibility
Operational flexibility
Users Architecture
20. Example
Motivations
Profitability
Service delivery quality
Reportability
Auditability
Process compliance
Practice standardisation
Business Regulatory compliance
Cleanliness of data
Address
Street address 135 Bridge Rd
Suburb Bowen Hills
Postcode 4056
21. Example
Address
Unit number
Street number 135
Building name
Street name Bridge
Street type Road Motivations
Implementability
Suburb Bowen Hills Performance
Availability
Postcode 4056
Robustness
Scalability
State / Territory Queensland Security
Country Australia Maintainability
Extensibility
Unique postal identifier Q453687D Accessibility
Architecture
36. Detailed Design
Notifications Pending (4) Active Cases (12)
Vs Business
Notifications Pending Active Cases
See workload
without
navigating Less coding
Users Architecture