This document is a thesis examining female archetypes in reality television. It begins with an abstract stating that the researcher studied how college students perceive female characters in reality TV. They conducted a survey of 120 students on shows like The Bad Girls Club and The Real Housewives, finding a statistical difference between those who know someone like a character versus those who don't. The introduction provides background on cultivation theory and social cognitive learning theory, which will guide the research. The literature review discusses how women are often portrayed as hyper-symbolized or flat characters, treated as objects, and reality TV reinforces societal attitudes about women and relationships. The purpose is to understand if college students are influenced by these portrayals of women.
1. Running head: EXAMINING FEMALE ARCHETYPES
Female Archetypes in Reality Television
Meg Harmon
Longwood University
2. EXAMINING FEMALE ARCHETYPES 2
Table of Contents
Abstract……………………………………………………………………………………3
Dedication & Acknowledgments………………………………………………………….4
Literature Review………………………………………………………………………….5
Method...…………………………………………………………………………………16
Results……………………………………………………………………………………19
Discussion………………………………………………………………………………..26
Suggestions & Future Research………………………………………………………….30
Work Cited……………………………………………………………………………….32
Appendix A………………………………………………………………………………34
3. EXAMINING FEMALE ARCHETYPES 3
Abstract
Researching reality television female characters, the researcher studies female character
archetypes and how the audience perceives these characters. A survey was taken by 120
college-age, male and female, students. The survey focused on three different reality
television programs: The Bad Girls Club, The Real World, and The Real Housewives of
Orange County. There was neither a difference in male and female participants nor light
viewer and moderate viewer participants. However, there was a statistical difference
between those who said they knew someone in their lives who resembles a character and
those who do not. This research was done to understand audience perception of female
archetypal characters in reality television.
Keywords: reality television, female, archetypes
4. EXAMINING FEMALE ARCHETYPES 4
Dedication
I would like to dedicate this research to my mom and dad, Maggie and Lew
Harmon, for the support throughout my college education. I would also like to dedicate
this to my family for all of their support throughout my life.
Acknowledgments
Of course, I have to recognize Kenzie Higgins for putting up with me, being my
roommate, cooking and feeding me, and being my nurse throughout my four years at
Longwood University. I would also like to thank Sara Stone for being my “comm.
buddy,” freaking out over assignments with me, and successfully fulfilling the buddy
system throughout college. Finally, I need to thank my colleagues for your proof reading
and all of my professors who have taught me life and academic skills to be able to put
this thesis together.
5. EXAMINING FEMALE ARCHETYPES 5
The Reality of Female Archetypes in Reality Television
Introduction
Technology has become a staple in American society and with technology comes
access to more information. Television alone is different from other media; Gerbner and
Gross (1976) explain, “Unlike newspaper and magazines, television does not require
literacy. Unlike movies, it runs continuously…Unlike radio, it can show as well as tell.
Unlike theater or movies, it does not require leaving your home” (2). Gerbner and Gross
explain the unlimited access that television provides. Reality television is a form of
programming which can have a great affect on the audience. Charles Slocum writes
about the history of reality television explaining Candid Camera in 1948 is credited with
being the first of reality television followed by many other shows. In 1992, The Real
World set up scenarios where “‘reality’” could happen (Slocum, 2010). Slocum suggests
the “staged reality shows increasingly borrowed from the concept of game shows”
(Slocum, 2010). Reality television may not be as real as many perceive it to be which
affects viewers if they believe characters are real. Murray (2004) explains reality
television as “encompass[ing] a wide range of non-fiction formats including gamedocs,
makeover programs, talent contests, docusoaps, dating shows, court programs, tabloid
newsmagazine shows, and reality-based sitcoms.” Women are showcased in reality
television in many different ways that can affect an audience in how they view women.
The purpose of this study will be to discover if college-aged students are influenced by
female characters in reality television. Research has found by what means women are
presented in reality television, but not if the portrayals influence audiences. Two theories
will guide this study: cultivation theory and social cognitive learning theory.
6. EXAMINING FEMALE ARCHETYPES 6
Theoretical Grounding
The Cultivation Theory by George Gerbner suggests that television has become a
main understanding of society (Griffin, 2008). Gerbner advises that heavy viewers of
television are affected by the violence and crime portrayed and begins to believe these
acts are a normal way of life. Gerbner and Gross (1976) suggest heavy viewers watch
four or more hours of television daily. Even though this theory focuses on violence and
crime in media, this theory can be extended and applied to the attitudes towards women
that the media provides. If people are constantly seeing women portrayed in a certain
way, then those affected by cultivation theory will believe all women are like this.
A second theory, social cognitive learning theory, proposes that people learn from
observing others in certain environments and social contexts (Gibson, 2004). This theory
supports my research because young adults and college-aged people may still be
impressionable and if certain messages are being communicated through reality
television, these people will believe this is how women are and should act. Therefore,
according to this theory, young adults and college-aged students may learn the role of a
woman, based on society’s standards, from watching reality television.
Research Problem
Understanding if college-aged students are influenced by the portrayals of women
in reality television is important to understand because women are being characterized by
how they are portrayed here, based on the research that follows. The communication
phenomenon which is the focus of this study is cultivation theory and the extent to which
reality television is influencing viewers of female roles. Specifically, women and men,
college-aged will be studied to determine if their attitudes and beliefs towards women is
7. EXAMINING FEMALE ARCHETYPES 7
influenced. The Bad Girls Club, Real Housewives of Orange County, and The Real
World are television programs that portray women in both stereotypical and non-
traditional ways. Most research on females in media has focused on stereotypes and
character portrayals; however, this research will focus on the audience and their
understanding of female characters and personal relationships.
The Reality of Characters in Media
Reality television has the ability to influence individuals in how they understand
the world to be. This being said, reality shows that focus on women such as The Bad
Girls Club and The Real Housewives of Orange County and shows that do not focus on
women but have strong female characters such as The Real World can keep men and
women thinking this is how real women act. Examples of how women are portrayed
include being hyper-symbolized, which are characters that are more intensely symbolized
by their characteristics (Brancato, 2007). In Wife Swap, mothers switch lives mothers of
conflicting characteristics. For example, a very organized, disciplined mom will switch
lives with a very disorganized, care-free mom. This show focuses on the mothers’
characteristics which makes their character hyper-symbolized. Flat characters are
showcased by having predictable personalities (Cato, 2008). Traditional fairy-tale, where
marriage is the greatest prize and a goal that life is spent trying to accomplish, is
consistently shown on television (Graham-Bertolini, 2004). Female characters are
portrayed as having an identity struggle since women do not have to fit the traditional
gender role anymore (Morgan, 2007). This is an issue because women are not expected
to be Mrs. Cleaver anymore, she can be whomever she chooses but television is
portraying women as struggling with this idea.
8. EXAMINING FEMALE ARCHETYPES 8
Studies have also concluded that women who watch more reality television will
express earlier expectations of peer sexual timing, or when one may feel ready to act out
sexually (Clark & Nabi, 2007). Ferris, Smith, Greenberg, and Smith (2007) concluded
that women are more looked upon as sex objects than not in reality television, based on
appearance, and that dating is considered as a game. Shanahan, Signorielli, and Morgan
(2008) found that heavy viewers of television were more likely to view gender roles
traditionally. Heavy viewers, according to Gerbner and Gross (1976), watch four or more
hours of television a day. This is important because it shows that television does have an
effect on this audience. Therefore, audience members who are heavy viewers may be
more likely to be influenced by portrayals of women including female archetypes and
stereotypes in reality television.
Women are Hyper-symbolized and Flat Characters in Reality Television
Women are characterized as being hyper-symbolized, characters whose
personalities are exaggerated and flat characters, characters who are predictable
(Brancato, 2007 & Cato, 2008). For example, some female characters may be
exaggerated with such characteristics as being beautiful, girly, butch, etc. Flat characters
may hold characteristics as perfectionists or being carefree where their actions can be
predicted easily. This is important to this study because audiences may look down upon
characters who are being exaggerated or predictable making the characters appear one
dimensional and conventional. Brancato (2007) explains that women are “hyper-
symbolized” throughout reality television (51). In shows such as Wife Swap and Nanny
911, the roles of women are presented dramatically to intensify their character. In Wife
Swap, certain characteristics are mocked and then the wives swap lives with someone
9. EXAMINING FEMALE ARCHETYPES 9
possessing completely opposite characteristics. For example, extremely feminine wives
who really care about their appearance may switch lives with a very uncomplicated wife
who never spends time or money on herself.
Cato (2008) focused on the television show Beauty and the Geeks, and suggested
the characters on the show are flat, or easily predictable. This presents women with one
main characteristic, which could be anything from flirtatious to confrontational, that will
drive their existence on the show similar to being hyper-symbolized. As women are
being characterized certain ways, their characteristics are shaping society’s beliefs.
Brancato (2007) and Cato (2008) introduced hyper-symbolized and flat
characters, respectively. Their research suggests that women are portrayed a certain ways
through reality television. Characters that are hyper-symbolized or flat may have
negative connotations attached which can have an impact on how women view other
women on reality television. Not only could women think of themselves as being hyper-
symbolized or flat, they may begin to pin other women in their lives as acting this way.
Women Treated as Objects in Reality Television
Women are treated as objects throughout reality television which is vital to
recognize because in terms of Cultivation Theory, heavy viewers are likely to believe this
is normal. Cato (2008) discussed the flat characters in the show Beauty and the Geeks.
This description of a character being flat make the show participant appear as an object
because the audience knows exactly how the character is going to act. The beginning of
the show presents the stereotypical geeks and beauties (sexual objects) and then they
morph into more sophisticated individuals by the final episode.
10. EXAMINING FEMALE ARCHETYPES 10
Brancato (2007) discusses the show Wife Swap explaining that the mothers swap
lives, homes, and families as opposed to the fathers swapping lives in these shows. This
shows women as objects because their domestic or non-domestic experience is what is
getting traded in order for the family to appreciate their habits. Aside from women being
treated as objects, love and sex are also treated as objects in media which can have the
audience believing reality television relationships are normal.
Reality television presents love and sex as a game that must be won. Graham-
Bertolini (2004) analyze episode one of Joe Millionaire, investigating the views of
women, “They flaunt their sexuality as a means of gaining advantage, but are ultimately
punished for this” (342). One contestant lay across the Bachelor’s lap and was later
released from the show because the Bachelor did not condone this behavior. The show
also shows the women fighting for their main prize: love and marriage, “Their degrees,
careers, and loved ones are marginalized for the change to accomplish what is being
touted as women’s primary objective, marriage” (342).
Cato (2008), Brancato (2007), and Graham-Bertolini (2004) conclude that women
are shown as sexual, domestic, and traditional objects through reality television shows.
Cultivation theory would suggest heavy viewing audiences watching women being
treated as sexual objects in reality television is normal.
Reality Television Reinforces Societal Attitudes
Reality television reinforces societal attitudes by presenting women as
stereotypical characters and not as real characters which audiences may be expecting.
Graham-Bertolini (2004) used Joe Millionaire as a study topic to focus on the traditional
perception of women and their fairy-tale life, where single women are on the search for
11. EXAMINING FEMALE ARCHETYPES 11
their soul-mate in order to feel successful in life. This reinforces societal attitudes on
women which can make them feel marriage is the ultimate goal in life and without true
love, life is not complete. This article discusses how the show plays off the fairy-tale
dream with such scenery as a castle, the bachelor (prince) riding up on a horse, and a
butler to serve the women as they so please.
Morgan (2007) contradicts Graham-Bertolini because this author suggests that
female roles are changing and, using Desperate Housewives as an example, suggests that
the show proposes that women can strive for whatever they want. Desperate Housewives
is similar to reality television because it draws on the everyday lives of, in this case,
women. Morgan says the women no longer have gender roles to fulfill and the show
frames identity struggles that women face. “...American society presents conflicting
expectations of what it means to be an ideal woman” (112).
Clark and Nabi (2007) studied how women’s sexual timing, or when she feels
ready to be sexually active, was affected by watching reality television. The study
concluded that women were more concerned with their sexual timing. People may be
worried about how others will perceive them and this study shows how sexual beliefs are
influencing societal attitudes through reality television. Adolescents who watch
television that incorporates sexual content, according to past research, has youth
overestimating their peers in being more sexually engaged, abortion rates, and
pregnancies.
Punyanunt-Carter (2010) studied how men and women view love and
relationships from television and the results conclude that men and women view televised
relationships, love, and sexual activities the same. Whereas men and women view the
12. EXAMINING FEMALE ARCHETYPES 12
realism of love, sex, and romance similarly, each party views the acts of love, sex, and
romance differently when on television. This reinforces societal beliefs because women
do find love, sex, and romance to mean different things than men. Punyanunt-Carter
explains men view sex on television as realistic while women believed representation of
love are more realistic. This study suggests that men and women may be influenced
differently through television.
Jennings-Walstedt, Geis, and Brown (1980) studied television commercials and
the self-esteem of women viewing the commercials. The authors claim, “Television
commercials telescope and exaggerate the same stereotypes that girls and women have
been exposed to throughout their lives, not only at home and at school but from all mass
media” (203). Commercials are seen hundreds of times a day but television shows are
also repeated over and over. Another study by Saito (2007) studied female gender roles
on television in Japan. Saito found female characters were illustrated as having
traditional female occupations such as working in “nightclubs” (515). Again, this
reinforces societal attitudes about gender roles because women are constantly being
shown in the same manner. If society is constantly seeing women in a certain manner,
eventually, society will come to believe this is how women are to act. Not to mention,
society may connect these characters to people in their personal lives which continues to
reinforce society’s beliefs of women.
Graham-Bertolini (2004), Morgan (2007), Clark and Nabi (2007), Punyanunt-
Carter, Jennings-Walstedt, Geis, and Brown (1980), and Saito (2007) show how societal
attitudes are reinforced through reality television. By reinforcing societal attitudes and
13. EXAMINING FEMALE ARCHETYPES 13
beliefs, stereotypical portrayals of women will continue to place negative attention on
women.
Stereotyped Character Representations in the Media
Repeating character stereotypes is a way media are able to set societal norms in
gender roles among other things. However, non-traditional characters that are not
necessarily stereotypes may still leave an audience reflecting upon certain characters.
Reep and Dambrot (1989) studied the impact of television on the viewer. The authors
state, “Greenberg has advanced the ‘Drench’ hypothesis.'* That is, viewers may not be
influenced by continual repetition of images, but rather some particular characters or
programs may have an intense and significant impact on viewers” (542). This is
important to note because viewers may become used to repeated images and ideas of
stereotyped characters; however, non-traditional characters presented in programs could
have a more lasting impression on the audience. If programs repeatedly have non-
traditional characters that provide lasting impressions the audience may become more
aware of female representations and believing this is true of all women.
Reality television has the opportunity to mold minds and create stereotypes for
many different groups of people. Much research focuses on minorities such as
homosexuals and people of color or different ethnicities in the media. Although men are
not the focus of this research, one study shows that men are being stereotyped in the
media. Joshua Gamson focuses on how homosexuals are stereotyped in talk shows and
how media portrays them. Gamson (1998) states, “Given the genre’s emphasis on
individual character, an unsympathetic homosexual can undermine a show’s sympathy
for homosexual’s in general” (565). He explains that one homosexual can determine
14. EXAMINING FEMALE ARCHETYPES 14
show viewers’ attitudes towards all gays. This is also known as essentializing or naming
an entire group of people. This can be detrimental to viewers watching this show because
their sole opinion of a group will be based off a single stereotype and this could easily
happen to women as they are shown in reality programs.
Reality television is supposed to show the reality of citizens under certain
circumstances. For example, The Bad Girls Club has women living in a mansion for
several weeks, given free alcohol, and taped in order to show what happens under these
conditions. Women are continuously put in conditions to show them as a stereotypical
bitch, superficial, or alcoholic person. West (1995) discusses the perceptions of black
women in the media including women that fill the three main perceptions of black
women: Mammy, Jezebel, and Sapphire. Mammy represents “subordinate, nurturing,
self-sacrificing,” black women in media which includes Aunt Jemima and the Pine-Sol
Lady (West, 289). “’Hoochies,’ ‘freaks,’ ‘hoodrats,’ and ‘chickenheads,’” are
characteristics represented by Jezebels which include dancers in hip-hop videos (West,
294). Finally, Sapphires have characteristics that include “hostile, nagging Black…
‘gangsta girl’ who is equally as violent as her male peers” and include characters such as
Omarosa from The Apprentice (West, 296). She explains that each character Mammy,
Jezebel, and Sapphire provide the most common African American stereotypes that
appear on television. If society constantly sees this archetype of black women in the
media, society is going to believe this is how black women act and may begin seeing
important women in their lives such as a mother or daughter that fit these stereotypes
shown on television.
15. EXAMINING FEMALE ARCHETYPES 15
Overall, the research reviewed here demonstrates that reality television research
has focused on how characters are portrayed through this channel of communication.
Women have been presented many different ways including: hyper-symbolized
(Brancato, 2007), flat characters (Cato, 2008), traditional fairy-tale where marriage is the
prize (Graham-Bertolini), and identity struggle since women do not have to fit the
traditional role (Morgan). However, research has not focused on how the audience is
affected by the portrayals of women in reality television. It is possible that students
create archetypes from reality television and may be greatly influenced by what this
source of media provides society as normal lives of women. Therefore, with this research
and the gap missing in this research, these research questions are presented:
RQ1: Do college-aged students who watch reality television shows interpret
acquaintances through characters or character archetypes from The Real Housewives of
Orange County, The Bad Girls Club Season 4, and The Real World Cancun?
RQ2: Do college-aged students who watch reality television shows interpret their family/
friends through The Real Housewives of Orange County, The Bad Girls Club Season 4,
and The Real World Cancun?
RQ3: Do college-aged students who watch reality television shows interpret their own
identities through The Real Housewives of Orange County, The Bad Girls Club Season 4,
and The Real World Cancun?
RQ4: How do college-age students define archetypal female characters in reality
television shows?
RQ5: Are persons who are heavy consumers of reality television programming more
likely to interpret others as character archetypes?
RQ6: Are persons who are heavy consumers of reality television programming more
likely to interpret themselves as character archetypes?
16. EXAMINING FEMALE ARCHETYPES 16
Method
Through my research I have examined the ways in which the audience perceives
female characters in reality television. Reality television presents female characters in
certain roles that are believed to represent women including the fairy-tale lifestyle,
editing women to appear as sexual objects, and reinforcing stereotypical representations.
Women shown in reality television may be archetypes to viewers because viewers may
understand these characters to be the epitome of all women. For this reason, I researched
college-aged students to understand their understandings of female characters in reality
television.
Participants
Participants included a total of 120 students participated including 4 males and
116 female college students who agreed voluntarily participate in this research survey.
The survey required students to have certain qualifiers before continuing one of which
being that students needed to be familiar with the reality television shows The Bad Girls
Club, The Real Housewives of Orange County, and The Real World. It is important to for
both sexes to be studied because men may view female characters the same way as
women. It is important to study those who are familiar with reality television because
this audience will be more in tune with the perceptions of certain characters, the format of
reality television, and what to expect from this channel of communication.
Participants for this survey were recruited through Longwood University’s
Communication 200 classes (Communication Theory). Professors from these classes
encouraged students to attend and also provided students with the information to take the
survey. Facebook and E-mails were also used to recruit students.
17. EXAMINING FEMALE ARCHETYPES 17
Survey
The survey was designed as post-test only; where the treatment is the participants’
previous viewing of reality television shows that are the focuses of the current study. The
survey was posted online through Survey Monkey for the convenience of participants. A
Facebook event was created with a URL directing students to the survey, as well as,
E-mails sent out with the URL asking students to participate. This study will work well
by using quantitative research in the form of surveys (see appendix A for survey).
The survey was developed on my own using such styles as the Likert Scale, yes
and no questions, and video clips followed by open ended questions which took students
ten to fifteen minutes to complete. The questions were based of the two research
questions presented. The survey consisted of six pages: one informed consent, one on
qualifications, one on demographics, and three pages focusing on the study. The three
pages on the study consisted of 19 questions not including four video clips participants
were asked to view before a few questions.
Survey Video Clips
The first clip is from the Bad Girls Club featuring Natalie with the length of the
clip being one minute, twenty-four seconds. Natalie makes fun of a housemate, Annie,
and claims to be picking on her to see if Annie really is a bad girl. Natalie constantly
provokes housemates trying to show her dominance and power within the house. Natalie
is a very outspoken and loud individual who declares to “Run L.A.” Natalie does curses
at the end of this clip. The purpose of this clip is to see if students believe they have a
“Natalie” in their life.
18. EXAMINING FEMALE ARCHETYPES 18
The second clip is from the Real Housewives of Orange County featuring
Gretchen and the length of the clip is two minutes, eleven seconds. Gretchen goes in for
a cellulite treatment to her thighs and constantly talks about her body appearance while
she is there. This video shows how Gretchen is concerned with her appearance and
encourages women to fix problems they have with their body that they are insecure
about. However, a glance at her thighs there is no cellulite to be seen. The purpose of
this clip is to see if students believe they have a “Gretchen” in their life.
The third clip features Jasmine from Real World Cancun and is two minutes,
thirty seconds in length. Jasmine is known to be a drinker and when she shows up drunk
one night her roommate, Emilee, decides to talk to her about it. Jasmine gets defensive
and the roommates begin arguing. Jasmine shows a stubborn and argumentative
personality in this clip while she is drunk. The purpose of this clip is to see if students
believe they have a “Jasmine” in their life.
The final clip features Alexis from the Real Housewives of Orange County and is
two minutes thirty seconds long. Alexis, similar to most women of this show, is very
fashion forward and a worried about their appearance. Alexis is shopping for a horse race
hat and her conversation with the store owner shows what is fashionably acceptable for
the race. The clip shows the importance of picking a hat first and then buy an outfit
around the hat. The purpose of this clip is to see if students believe they have an
“Alexis” in their life.
19. EXAMINING FEMALE ARCHETYPES 19
Operationalization of Variables
Variables in this study included the male versus female students and light versus
moderate viewers of reality television. T-tests were used to find the results of the survey
between the two groups of variables listed above.
Results
A survey was set up to understand viewer perceptions of reality television
archetypes. A total of 120 students participated in the survey, 4 being male and 116
being female. The survey was designed as post-test only; where the treatment is the
participants’ previous viewing of reality television shows that are the focuses of the
current study. The survey was developed on my own using such styles as the Likert
Scale, yes and no questions, and video clips followed by open ended questions which
took students ten to fifteen minutes to complete. Questions 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, and 15 show
results of a T-Test, questions 19, 22, 25, and 28 show results of a Chi Square Test, and
questions 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16-18, 20-21, 23-24, and 26-27 show the results of a content
analysis.
T-Test
Page three of survey: results.
For question three in the survey, “I find myself comparing myself with reality
television characters,” no statistically significant differences were found between men
(m= 4.25, sd= .957) and women (m= 3.66, sd= 1.119), t(46)= 1.020, (p= .313). No
statistically significant difference was found for this item between light viewers (m=
3.69, sd= 1.072) and moderate viewers (m= 3.74, sd= 1.195), t(46)= -.143, (p= .887).
This satisfies research question three.
20. EXAMINING FEMALE ARCHETYPES 20
Question five in the survey, “I find myself comparing family members with
reality television characters,” shows no statistically significant differences were found
between men (m= 3.75, sd= 1.500) and women (m= 4.24, sd= .957), t(47)= -.947, (p= .
348). No statistically significant difference was found for this item between light viewers
(m= 4.17, sd= 1.002) and moderate viewers (m= 4.25, sd= 1.020), t(47)= -.264, (p= .
793). This satisfies research question two.
Question seven in the survey, “I find myself comparing friends with reality
television characters,” shows no statistically significant differences were found between
men (m= 4.00, sd= 1.414) and women (m= 3.27, sd= 1.268), t(47)= 1.100, (p= .277). No
statistically significant difference was found for this item between light viewers (m=
3.45, sd= 1.298) and moderate viewers (m= 3.15, sd= 1.268), t(47)= .798, (p= .429).
This satisfies research question two.
For question nine in the survey, “I find myself comparing acquaintances with
reality television characters,” no statistically significant differences were found between
men (m= 4.00, sd= .816) and women (m= 3.89, sd= 1.153), t(47)= .188, (p= .852). No
statistically significant difference was found for this item between light viewers (m=
3.90, sd= 1.145) and moderate viewers (m= 3.90, sd= 1.119), t(47)= -.010, (p= .992).
This satisfies research question one.
Page four of survey: results.
Question eleven in the survey asks, “Have you ever been told by someone that
you resemble a reality television character?” shows no statistically significant differences
were found between men (m= 1.75, sd= .500) and women (m= 1.76, sd= .435), t(47)=
-.024, (p= .981). No statistically significant difference was found for this item between
21. EXAMINING FEMALE ARCHETYPES 21
light viewers (m= 1.76, sd= .435) and moderate viewers (m= 1.75, sd= .444), t(47)= .068,
(p= .946). This satisfies research question three.
Question thirteen in the survey asks, “Have you ever told someone that they
remind you of a certain character in reality television?” shows no statistically significant
differences were found between men (m= 1.75, sd= .500) and women (m= 1.64, sd= .
484), t(47)= .417, (p= .679). No statistically significant difference was found for this
item between light viewers (m= 1.69, sd= .471) and moderate viewers (m= 1.60, sd= .
503), t(47)= .637, (p= .527). This satisfies research question one and two.
Question fifteen in the survey asks, “Do you find yourself having similarities with
certain characters in reality television?” shows no statistically significant differences
were found between men (m= 1.25, sd= .500) and women (m= 1.58, sd= .499), t(47)=
-1.258, (p= .215). No statistically significant difference was found for this item between
light viewers (m= 1.52, sd= .509) and moderate viewers (m= 1.60, sd= .503), t(47)= .563,
(p= .576). This satisfies research question three and six.
Chi Square Test
Page five of survey: results.
Focusing on The Bad Girls Club, question nineteen inquired, “Do you know
someone in your life that resembles [Natalie’s] character?”, there was no statistically
significant difference between those who said they knew someone in their lives who
resembles the character and those who do not: x²(1, N=49) = 2.469, (p= .116). This
satisfies research question two and three.
Focusing on from The Real Housewives of Orange County, question twenty-two
asked, “Do you know someone in your life that resembles [Gretchen’s] character?”
22. EXAMINING FEMALE ARCHETYPES 22
shows a statistically significant difference between those who said they knew someone in
their lives who resembles the character and those who do not: x²(1, N=49) =5.898, (p= .
015). This satisfies research question two and three.
Focusing on The Real World, question twenty-five inquired, “Do you know
someone in your life that resembles [Jasmine’s] character?” shows a statistically
significant difference between those who said they knew someone in their lives who
resembles the character and those who do not: x²(1, N=49) =7.367, (p= .007). This
satisfies research question two and three.
Focusing on The Real Housewives of Orange County, question twenty-eight
asked, “Do you know someone in your life that resembles [Alexis’] character?” shows a
statistically significant difference between those who said they knew someone in their
lives who resembles the character and those who do not: x²(1, N=49) =7.367, (p= .007).
This satisfies research question two and three.
Content Analysis
Page three of survey: results.
For question four, participants were asked, “I find myself comparing myself with
reality television characters? If yes, which character(s) from what show(s)?” in an open-
ended question. While character responses were few and varied, 11 of 17 responses
suggested they find themselves comparing themselves to characters from The Real
World. This satisfies research question six.
Question six inquired, “I find myself comparing family members with reality
television characters? If yes, which character(s) from what show(s)?” Only 7 students
23. EXAMINING FEMALE ARCHETYPES 23
responded, 3 of which answered comparing family members to the show The Real
Housewives. This satisfies research question five.
Question eight refers to friends which asked, “I find myself comparing friends
with reality television characters? If yes, which character(s) from what show(s)?” Of the
14 participants that responded: 5 answered The Real World, 5 answered The Real
Housewives, and 7 answered The Bad Girls Club. Other answers included The Jersey
Shore and Family Guy. This satisfies research question five.
Asking about acquaintances, question ten inquired, “I find myself comparing
acquaintances with reality television characters? If yes, which character(s) from what
show(s)?” There were only two responses one being Jersey Shore, the other being Real
Housewives of Orange County. This satisfies research question five.
Page four of survey: results.
When question twelve asked, “Have you ever been told by someone that you
resemble a reality television character? If yes, which character(s) from what show(s)?”
seven participants responded: 2 stated The Real World, the rest answered: The Hills,
Laguna Beach, Jersey Shore, The Kardashians, The Bachelor, Rachel Ray, and Bad
Girls Club. This satisfies research question one, two, and six.
Question fourteen asked, “Have you ever told someone that they remind you of a
certain character in reality television? If yes, which character(s) from what show(s)?”
Twelve participants responded: 3 stated The Real World, 3 stated The Real Housewives
of Orange County, 3 responded Jersey Shore, and the rest answered The Hills, The Bad
Girls Club, The Bachelor, and The Kardashians. This satisfies research question five.
24. EXAMINING FEMALE ARCHETYPES 24
Question sixteen inquired, “Do you find yourself having similarities with certain
characters in reality television? If yes, which character(s) from what show(s)?” 7 of 11
respondents replied The Real World, 2 stated The Bad Girls Club, the rest answered The
Real Housewives of Orange County, and The Bachelor. This satisfies research question
six and three.
Page five of survey: results.
Questions seventeen and eighteen refer to Natalie’s character from The Bad Girls
Club. Respondents were asked to watch a one minute, twenty-four second clip from the
show in which Natalie makes fun of a housemate, Annie, and claims to be picking on her
to see if Annie really is a bad girl. Natalie constantly provokes other housemates
throughout the show; this clip just shows the bullying towards Annie.
Respondents in the sample used words such as bitch, obnoxious, and annoying.
When asked to describe Natalie in one word, question seventeen showed bitch to be the
most frequent response (n= 10). Question eighteen asked to provide additional
descriptions of Natalie, respondents used words such as rude (n= 18), annoying (n=16),
obnoxious (n=15), and bitch (n=15). Question seventeen and eighteen both satisfy
research question four.
Questions twenty and twenty-one refer to Gretchen’s character from The Real
Housewives of Orange County. Respondents were asked to watch a two minutes, eleven
second clip from the show in which Gretchen goes in for a cellulite treatment to her
thighs and constantly talks about her body appearance while she is there. This video
shows how Gretchen is concerned with her appearance and encourages women to fix
25. EXAMINING FEMALE ARCHETYPES 25
problems they have with their body that they are insecure about. However, a glance at
her thighs there is no cellulite to be seen.
Respondents in the sample used words such as obsessed, self-conscious, and
conceited. When asked to describe Natalie in one word, question twenty showed
obsessed to be the most frequent response (n= 6). Question twenty-one asked to provide
additional descriptions of Gretchen, respondents used words such as superficial/vein
(n=19), obsessed (n=14), and self-conscious (n=13). Questions twenty and twenty-one
both satisfy research question four.
Questions twenty-three and twenty-four refer to Jasmine’s character from The
Real World. Respondents were asked to watch a two minutes, thirty second clip from the
show in which Jasmine shows up drunk one night and her roommate, Emilee, decides to
talk to her about it. Jasmine gets defensive and the roommates begin arguing. Jasmine
shows a stubborn and argumentative personality in this clip while she is drunk.
Respondents in the sample used words such as drunk/alcoholic, loud, and crazy.
When asked to describe Jasmine in one word, question twenty-three showed
drunk/alcoholic to be the most frequent response (n= 8). Question twenty-four asked to
provide additional descriptions of Jasmine, respondents used words such as
drunk/alcoholic (n=24), loud (n=12), and obnoxious/annoying (n=11). Questions twenty-
three and twenty-four both satisfy research question four.
Questions twenty-six and twenty-seven refer to Alexis’ character from The Real
Housewives of Orange County. Respondents were asked to watch a two minutes thirty
second long clip from the show in which Alexis, similar to most women of this show, is
very fashion forward and a worried about their appearance. Alexis is shopping for a horse
26. EXAMINING FEMALE ARCHETYPES 26
race hat and her conversation with the store owner shows what is fashionably acceptable
for the race. The clip shows the importance of first picking a hat and then buying an
outfit around the hat.
Respondents in the sample used words such as rich, materialistic, spoiled. When
asked to describe Alexis in one word, question twenty-six showed rich to be the most
frequent response (n=6). Question twenty-seven asked to provide additional descriptions
of Alexis, respondents used words such as self-conscious (n=24), spoiled (n=11), and
materialistic (n=8). Questions twenty-six and twenty-seven each satisfy research
question four.
Other Results
Page three of the survey was not consistent with page five when participants were
asked to watch a clip and report if there was someone like that is their life. Although the
questions asked similar questions, participants claimed to not link characters to real life
people such as themselves, family members, friends, or acquaintances; however, after
watching the video clips, more respondents did claim to have someone similar to the
reality television characters in their life.
Discussion
The purpose of this research was to examine audience understanding of female
character archetypes in reality television. Through a survey of 120 college students, the
results showed that there is neither difference between men and women nor light and
moderate viewers. However, there was a statistical difference between those who said
they knew someone in their lives who resembles a character and those who do not.
27. EXAMINING FEMALE ARCHETYPES 27
Men and Women & Light and Moderate Viewers
There were neither differences between men and women nor light and moderate
viewers. Having no difference with light and moderate viewers supports Gerbner’s
Cultivation Theory which suggests that heavy viewers of television are affected by the
violence and crime portrayed and begins to believe these acts are a normal way of life
(Griffin 2008). While this theory is used in extension to reality television and character
archetypes, it still stands that light and moderate viewers showed no difference in how
they view characters in reality television. This suggests, college-age students who watch
reality television do not interpret themselves, family, friends, or acquaitances with reality
television characters from The Bad Girls Club, The Real World, or The Real Housewives
of Orange County (research questions one, two, and three). The results also propose that
persons who are heavy consumers of reality television programming may be more likely
to interpret themselves as character archetypes since there were no heavy viewers
participating in the survey (research question six). Finally, results continue to support
cultivation theory since there were no heavy viewers participating in the survey which
may suggest persons who are heavy consumers of reality television programming may be
more likely to interpret others as character archetypes (research question five).
Character Archetypes
The following discussion explains how college-age students define reality
television archetypes (research question four). The most frequent descriptions of Natalie
were bitch, obnoxious, and annoying. Overall, responses demonstrate a pattern of a bitch
and a mean girl. As a result of this pattern, the researcher describes this female character
archetype as The Bitch.
28. EXAMINING FEMALE ARCHETYPES 28
Frequent descriptions of Gretchen were obsessed, self-conscious, and conceited.
In general, responses demonstrate a pattern of being shallow and pretentious. As a result
of this pattern, the researcher describes this female character archetype as The Superficial
Snob.
Jasmine had the most frequent descriptions that included being a drunk/alcoholic,
loud, and crazy. Overall, responses demonstrate a pattern of a drunk, wild child. As a
result of this pattern, the researcher describes this female character archetype as The
Stubborn Drunk.
Finally, the most frequent descriptions of Alexis were rich, materialistic, spoiled.
Overall, responses demonstrate a pattern of being spoiled and a “fashionista”. As a result
of this pattern, the researcher describes this female character archetype as The Spoiled
Fashionista.
Each of the characters listed above have distinct characteristics which viewers
recognize. From the results, respondents generally gave the same or similar
characteristics for each separate character. This appears to support the understanding of
hyper-symbolized, characters whose personalities are exaggerated and flat characters,
characters who are predictable (Brancato, 2007 & Cato, 2008) because viewers were able
to provide similar responses about the characters. For example, Jasmine had recurrent
responses suggesting she is a drunk or an alcoholic. This suggests that her character is
exaggerated because viewers were able to label her and also that she is predictable
because viewers recognized this behavior.
Natalie, Gretchen, and Alexis support Morgan (2007) as the author suggests that
female roles are changing and, using Desperate Housewives as an example, suggests that
29. EXAMINING FEMALE ARCHETYPES 29
the show proposes that women can strive for whatever they want. Natalie is able to be
bold and bitch which used to not be an accepted trait in a female. Gretchen and Alexis
are able to flaunt their wealth and worry about their appearance which, again, used to not
be an acceptable female trait. Morgan (2007) says the women no longer have gender
roles to fulfill. “...American society presents conflicting expectations of what it means to
be an ideal woman” (112). While Natalie is being independent, audiences may frame her
as a bitch which shows a conflicting idea of a woman. However, Gretchen wants to make
her body appear flawless because she has the resources to do so, she is labeled as
conceited and superficial. Finally, Alexis has money to buy the nicest hat for the horse
race she is attending and she is labeled as spoiled and materialistic. These three women
are being branded for living independent lives of women.
Alexis supports Graham-Bertolini (2004) where this study focused Joe
Millionaire and the traditional perception of women trying to find their fairy-tale life and
single women on the search for their soul-mate in order to feel successful in life. Alexis
appears to lead a perfect life where she can spend her husband’s money on a fancy hat for
a horse race but instead of being marked as a princess she is labeled as spoiled and
materialistic.
Reep and Dambrot (1989) studied the impact of television on the viewer and
concluded “…that is, viewers may not be influenced by continual repetition of images,
but rather some particular characters or programs may have an intense and significant
impact on viewers” (542). This may suggest why Natalie had no statistical results while
Gretchen, Jasmine, and Alexis did. Natalie, labeled as the bitch, may be seen on
numerous shows more often. However, body image has changed over time and become
30. EXAMINING FEMALE ARCHETYPES 30
more drastic today which may explain Gretchen’s label as being superficial. Alexis is not
fitting a traditional gender role of taking care of her family, she is able to spend her
husband’s money all day.
Suggestions and Future Research
Suggestions
Suggestions for researching female character archetypes in reality television, I
would suggest using interviews or survey with video clips of characters and have
participants relate those characters back to the interviewee’s or survey participant’s life.
Result for the questions where participants were given a video clip and probed on the
characters seemed to provide more in-depth information regarding female archetypes in
reality television. Participants were able to describe the characters and think about if a
character was represented in their lives more thoroughly.
Future research
Focusing on the process of this research and results, I would suggest focusing on
white, female character archetypes because there is very little research and understanding
of those characters. Whiteness is far too often unrecognized as a race and while much
research stands of black female characters, little is understood for white female
characters. Another aspect of this research that would be interesting to focus on is class.
Alexis and Gretchen are obviously extremely wealthy but does the audience look up and
respect their lifestyle or is the audience jealous and offended by their status?
Limitations
Conducting this research presented a few limitations which need to be taken into
consideration for the purposes of understanding the results. One limitation that this
31. EXAMINING FEMALE ARCHETYPES 31
research faced is the lack of participation for the survey through Longwood’s community.
Out of over 5,000 students at this university, only 120 students participated in the survey.
There was also a limitation of having the survey sent out to other universities to get a
greater diversity from Longwood’s campus. Another limitation includes the lack of male
participation. Of the 120 student participants, 116 females and only 4 males took the
survey which may have produced different results.
Further limitations included participants skipping questions, particularly the
questions following the video clips and open ended questions. While most questions
were answered, participants answered yes and no questions and likert scale questions
more.
Conclusion
This research focuses on female character archetypes and how the audience
perceives these characters. A survey was taken by 120 college-age, male and female,
students. The survey focused on three different reality television programs: The Bad
Girls Club, The Real World, and The Real Housewives of Orange County. There was
neither a difference in male and female participants nor light viewer and moderate viewer
participants. However, there was a statistical difference between those who said they
knew someone in their lives who resembles a character and those who do not. This
research was done to understand audience perception of female archetypal characters in
reality television.
32. EXAMINING FEMALE ARCHETYPES 32
References
Brancato, J. (2007, September). Domesticating Politics: The Representation of Wives
and Mothers in American Reality Television. Film & History (03603695), 37(2),
49-56. Retrieved September 28, 2009, from Academic Search Complete database.
Cato, M. (2008). Stereotypes, Gender Roles, and Transformation on Reality TV: Is
Beauty and the Geek's Social Experiment a Success?. Conference Papers –
International Communication Association, 1-25.
http://search.ebscohost.com.proxy.longwood.edu
Clark, S., & Nabi, R. (2007). Television Consumption and Young Women's Expectations
of Sexual Timing. Conference Papers -- International Communication
Association, 1. http://search.ebscohost.com
Ferris, A., Smith, S., Greenberg, B., & Smith, S. (2007, September). The Content of
Reality Dating Shows and Viewer Perceptions of Dating. Journal of
Communication, 57(3), 490-510. Retrieved September 28, 2009,
doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2007.00354.x
Gamson, J. (2002). Sitting Ducks and Forbidden Fruits. Gender, Race, and Class in
Media: A Text-Reader (2nd ed., pp. 553-569). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications,
Inc.
Gerbner, G., & Gross, L. (1976). The Scary World of TV's Heavy Viewer. Psycology
Today Magazine. Retrieved April 12, 2010, from
ftp.beitberl.ac.il/~bbsite/misc/ezer_anglit/klali/05_86.pdf
Gibson, S. K. (2004). Social Learning (Cognitive) Theory and Implications for Human
Resource Development -- Gibson 6 (2): 193 -- Advances in Developing Human
Resources. Advances in Developing Human Resources. Retrieved December 2,
2009, from http://adh.sagepub.com/cgi/content/short/6/2/193
DOI: 10.1177/1523422304263429
Graham-Bertolini, A. (2004). Joe Millionaire as Fairy Tale: A feminist critique. Feminist
Media Studies, 4(3), 341-344. http://search.ebscohost.com.proxy.longwood.edu
Griffin, E. (2008). A First Look at Communication Theory. New York: McGraw
Hill Higher Education.
Jennings-Walstedt, J., Geis, F., & Brown, V. (1980). Influence of television commercials
on women's self-confidence and independent judgment. Journal of Personality
and Social Psychology, 38(2), 203-210. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.38.2.203.
Morgan, C. (2007). Gender Role Identity Crisis on Wisteria Lane: Desperate Housewives
33. EXAMINING FEMALE ARCHETYPES 33
as a Metaphor for the Modern Day Woman. Florida Communication Journal,
36(2), 112-118. http://search.ebscohost.com.proxy.longwood.edu
Murray, S. (n.d.). Encyclopedia of Television. Routledge - Publisher of Academic Books,
Journals and eBooks. Retrieved December 2, 2009, from <http://www.routledge-
ny.com/ref/television/realitytv.html>.
Reep, D., & Dambrot, F. (1989). Effects of Frequent Television Viewing on Stereotypes:
'Drip, Drip' or 'Drench'?. Journalism Quarterly, 66(3), 542-556. Retrieved from
Communication & Mass Media Complete database.
Saito, S. (2007). Television and the cultivation of gender-role attitudes in Japan: Does
television contribute to the maintenance of the status quo?. Journal of
Communication, 57(3), 511-531. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2007.00355.x.
Shanahan, J., Signorielli, N., & Morgan, M. (2008). Television and Sex Roles 30 Years
Hence: A Retrospective and Current Look From a Cultural Indicators Perspective.
Conference Papers -- International Communication Association, 1-26. Retrieved
from Communication & Mass Media Complete database.
Slocum, C. B. (2010). The Real History of Reality. Writers Guild of America, West.
Retrieved March 1, 2010, from http://www.wga.org/organizesub.aspx?id=1099
Punyanunt-Carter, N. M. (2010). Love on television: reality perception
differences between men and women | North American Journal of Psychology |
Find Articles at BNET. Retrieved October 19, 2009, from
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_6894/is_2_8/ai_n28410574/?
tag=content;col1
West, C. M. (1995). Mammy, Sapphire, and Jezebel: Historical images of Black Women
and Their Implications for Psychotherapy. Psychotherapy, 32, 458- 466.
34. EXAMINING FEMALE ARCHETYPES 34
Appendix A
Appendix includes IRB forms submitted for approval in order to distribute the survey to
students on campus. This section includes: description of research, video clip
description, action form, and consent form.