Center for Community Renewal project goals in Shreveport, Louisiana

Center for Community Renewal
Shreveport, Louisiana

Going Brown to Green
2009
2009

Center for Community Renewal – Site in Shreveport, Louisiana Historic District

Project Goals– Going Brown to Green

 Disseminate the CRI program model
• Training Center for replicating the CRI Model
• Institute for Community renewal for growing the knowledge base and technologies
• Think Tank Charrette for developing innovations through collaboration
• Communications and Media

 Catalyst for Renewal Through Sustainable Design
• Connecting the green building / sustainable design / energy conservation with CRI (fundamental to sustainability)
• Design Development & Construction Documents
• Funding – Grants, Tax Credits & Donations
• Project Delivery Method and Finalize Team

 Economic Development
• Deploying a new industry of social technology – reducing social overhead and creating prosperity

m h
s m

Project Phases – Going Brown to Green

Phase 1 Abatement & Demolition
• Partnerships and Funding
• Outcomes

Phase 2 Preliminary Design, Curriculum Development and Funding Strategies
• Facility program development with staff -
• LEED Goals
• CRI Green Web Site - Communications
• Building Design Progress – Concept to Computer Modeling
• Technology strategies – CCR building as a platform to demonstrate new technology & collaboration delivery system
• Higher Education Partners
• Government & Foundation Partners
• Relational process for growing industry partners – Open Network
• Tax Credits - $54 million in preliminary evaluation
• Grants

Phase 3 Complete Design & Funding
• Finalize Technologies and Testing / Verification Procedures
• Design Development & Construction Documents
• Funding – Grants, Tax Credits & Donations
• Project Delivery Method and Finalize Team

Phase 4 Construction & Operation
•
m h
s m


Phase 1 & Phase 2 funding to date:

CRI has secured $2.6 million since 2004 in federal funding for the
Center for Community Renewal.

The EPA holds CRI in high regard as a brown to green project and
as a significant environmental justice program due to our training and
hiring of hurricane evacuees and local poor to clean the asbestos from
our building.

In addition, the EPA provided a $450,000 revolving loan through
the City of Shreveport to complete the abatement process.

m h
s m


CRI utilized outside funding to support Phase I:

HUD/EDI
HUD/EDI
$447,345
$447,345
Johnson
Johnson HUD/EDI
HUD/EDI
Controls,
Controls, $247,500
$247,500
Inc.
Inc.

USUS EPA Cleanup
EPA Cleanup
Department
Department Grant
Grant
ofof Energy
Energy
$200,000
$200,000
$750,000
$750,000 Center for
Center for
Community
Community
Renewal
Renewal
Private
Private EPA Training
EPA Training
Donors
Donors Grant (City ofof
Grant (City
$350,000
$350,000 Shreveport/
Shreveport/
SUSLA/ALTEC
SUSLA/ALTEC
EPA Revolving
EPA Revolving
AmSouth
AmSouth Loan Program
Loan Program
Bank
Bank Shreveport
Shreveport City ofof
City
$750,000
$750,000 Downtown
Downtown Shreveport
Shreveport
Development
Development $500,000
$500,000
Authority
Authority
$30,000
$30,000
m h
s m


Goals for LEED Gold or Platinum
2006
Sustainable Sites (14 possible points – 11 to 14 points likely for NCCR)
•Erosion and Sedimentation Control
•Site Selection
•Development Density
•Brownfield Development
•Alternative Transportation: Public transportation access
•Alternative Transportation: bicycle storage and changing rooms
•Alternative Transportation: alternative fuel vehicles
•Alternative Transportation: Parking Capacity
•Development Footprint
•Restore Urban Fabric
•Stormwater Management
•Heat Island Effect
•Light Pollution Reduction
Water Efficiency (5 possible points – 3 to 5 points likely for NCCR)
•Water Efficient Landscaping
•Innovative Wastewater Technologies
•Water Use Reduction
Energy and Atmosphere (17 possible points – 8 to 14 points likely for NCCR)
•Energy Performance
•CFC Reduction in HVAC&R Equipment
•Renewable Energy
•Commissioning
•Ozone Protection
•Green Power
m h
s m


Goals for LEED Gold or Platinum
2006
Materials and Resources (13 possible points – 7 to 10 points likely for NCCR)
•Storage and Collection of Recyclables
•Building Reuse
•Construction Waste Management
•Resource Reuse
•Recycled Content
•Regional Materials
•Rapidly Renewable Materials
•Certified Wood
Indoor Environmental Quality (15 possible points – 13 to 15 points likely for NCCR)
•IAQ Performance
•Environmental Tobacco Smoke (ETS) Control
•Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Monitoring
•Ventilation Effectiveness
•Construction IAQ Management Plan
•Low-VOC-Emitting Materials
•Indoor Chemical and Pollutant Source Control
•Controllability of Systems
•Thermal Comfort
•Daylight and Views
Innovation & Design Process (5 possible points – 2 to 5 points likely for NCCR)
•Innovation in Design
•LEED Accredited Professional

m h
s m

By reducing lighting loads &
Energy Conservation other heat generators
the building energy load
can be reduced by
More than 60%
IES Lighting
 Average wattage / s.f. = 2 watts / s.f.
 Goal energy wattage ≤ 1.3 watts / s.f. 10%
15% 5%

Lighting load example:
Existing = 150,000 s.f.
New = 150,000 s.f.
300,000 s.f. 30% 40%
x 2 watts
600,000 watts
x 3.41 BTU/w
2,046,000 BTU
÷ 12,000 BTU/ton
Lighting = 170.5 tons AC

Goal for lighting load:
Reduce load to 1 watt / s.f. =
170.5÷2= 85.25 tons
Target Goal = .5 watts / s.f

CRI Think Tank Charrette #2
Designing the Center for Community Renewal  Energy, Green Systems & Learning Environs
October 17-18, 2008 10.29.08

Distributed Power Systems Options

Traditional Cogeneration

Trigeneration

CRI Think Tank Charrette #2
Designing the Center for Community Renewal  Energy, Green Systems & Learning Environs
October 17-18, 2008 10.29.08

LEED & Sustainable Systems

Center for Community Renewal - University of Texas Architecture - student project examples

The Solar Path: Direct and Blocked Sunlight per Season

Summer

Equinox

Winter


Consortium for
Education
Research &
Technology
22 Parish CERT Region
22 Parish CERT Region
 Link Region Higher Education
 Intermediary
 Convener / Facilitator
 Link to Business
 Workforce Development
 Technology Transfer
 Economic Development

HSC

Concept Study for
National Center for Community Renewal
Elevation, section and form studies

3.24.06

MHSM Architects

Concept Study for
Chapel at top of atrium structure

3.24.06

MHSM Architects

Concept Study
Shreveport Central Business District Context Study
3.24.06

MHSM Architects

Concept Study for
Atrium view from the Texas Street Entry

3.24.06

MHSM Architects

Concept Study
Atrium view to roof garden, downtown and Red River
from residence tower balcony

3.24.06

MHSM Architects

8.7.07
Concept Study
National Center for Community Renewal MHSM Architects
Atrium view at green roof level

Building Green
• Sustainable site in Shreveport CBD
• Recycle existing 16 story building
• Net Zero Green Energy –
Hybrid systems evaluation:
• Photovoltaic exterior glazing
• Wind wells under
new construction
• Solar Chimney
• Bio-Diesel
• Day lighting
• Green Roof - hanging garden
• Rain and gray water recycling
• Public Transportation access
• Shared parking
• Facilities for bikers
Str ards
eet
w
Ed

Texas Street

Largest “Net Zero Energy” Building in the South 8.18.08

Center for Community Renewal  Shreveport, Louisiana MHSM Architects

Building Green
• Renewing Main street
• Green Building & CRI information on
LCD screen on recycled high rise
• Day lighting

Texas Street
8.18.08


Building Green - Atrium
• Large screen video showing
renewal communities work &
National Center
Green Building information
• Day lighting
• Atrium as solar chimney
• Atrium connects recycled high rise
and new construction

8.18.08


Building Green - Atrium
• Day lighting
• Atrium connects
recycled high rise
and new construction
• Green Roof access at
upper level of atrium

8.18.08


Building Green – Roof Garden
• Green roof with hanging garden
• Outdoor chapel
• Rainwater collection

8.18.08


Building Green
• Recycling the historic Petroleum Tower as
a symbol of renewing communities
• LCD screen around building with information
on the National Center Green Building and on
renewal work of the CRI Network
• Renewing Downtown Shreveport with a
symbol of sustainable communities –
recycling & new construction

Edwards Street Texas Street
8.18.08


Going Brown to Green

m h
s m

Vertical Circulation Evaluation:
“Mansi” Healthy Stairs or Escalators

Healthy stairs selected over escalators for vertical
circulation based on following benefits:
• Increased health / reduced obesity
• Space efficiency – increased area for lobby
& balconies
• Reduced costs
• stairs as public art

Principles for Mansi Healthy Stairs:
• Stairs in high visibility preference location
• Amenities for encouraging stair use:
•Vertical garden
•Landings with views
•Daylight
•Water feature using gray water
•Elevators positioned with secondary
visual preference location

6.26.09

Morgan Hill Sutton & Mitchell Architects

Stairs at primary
Visual preference location Vertical Circulation Evaluation:
“Mansi” Healthy Stairs or Escalators

Healthy stairs selected over escalators for vertical
circulation based on following benefits:
• Increased health / reduced obesity
• Space efficiency – increased area for lobby
& balconies
• Reduced costs
• stairs as public art
Elevators at secondary Possible
visual preference location Principles for Mansi Healthy Stairs:
escalator
• Stairs in high visibility preference location
location
• Amenities for encouraging stair use:
•Vertical garden
•Landings with views
•Daylight
•Water feature using gray water
•Elevators positioned with secondary
visual preference location

6.26.09

Preference view Morgan Hill Sutton & Mitchell Architects
from entry into atrium

Growing CCR Relationships – Going Brown to Green

Academic Partners
• University of Texas
• Oklahoma University
• CERT- 12 North Louisiana Higher Education Institutions
• TCU
• Purdue
• Share the Vision
•
• Association
Industry Partners
• Hubbell
• Trane
• Mutual Selection
• General Electric
• Sysco
• Eliptipar
• Demonstration
• Sloan
• Delegation
Foundations
• Clinton Global Initiative • Replication
Government
• EPA, DOE, Justice, EDA, Labor…

m h
s m

As organizations have become more networked, older
strategic planning models do not work so well.

The reason: There is no top or bottom to a network.

Strategic Doing is a discipline to enable teams of people to
do complex projects in these open networks

Strategic Doing is simple, but not easy. It takes practice to
keep focused on four key questions...
What could
we do together?

How will we learn What should
together? we do together?

What will
we do together?

Growing Partners – An “Open Network” for building development
The CCR is a platform for new and emerging technologies of
sustainability and the goal for the CCR is a building that is ever renewing.

• Share the Vision
Emerging Process Method

• Association
• Mutual Selection
• Demonstration
• Delegation
• Replication

• Initial contacts - Local & Regional Sales Reps for National Companies
• Share CRI & CCR vision (MER) – Begin exploring relationship possibilities and
the process for more deeply exploring company involvement
• Invite to CRI Green
• Explore Company view of the future & how CRI / CCR can serve (MEH) –
•Conference Call
•Plant trip
•Are they a good fit for CRI? Do they believe?
• Begin the process of Strategic Doing to explore:
•What could we do together?
•What should we do together?
•What will we do together?
•What did we learn together?
• Follow up on specific initiatives and focus areas
m h
s m

Core Strategic
Team Expertise Networks Doing Opportunities Outcomes

2006

m h
s m


m h
s m

2009
Project Budget 12.18.09

Budget Item Units Unit Costs Budget Item Costs Sub Totals Totals

Existing 16 Story Renovated
Building
(basement, 14 floors & mechanical
penthouse at 9,000 s.f. per floor) 144,000 s.f. $140 $20,160,000
New Building
(5.5 floors at 15,800 s.f. per floor) 87,000 s.f. $150 $13,050,000
Atrium
(14 stories and includes 5 elevators, 2
stairs, upper floor lobbies and basement -
atrium volume = 720,000 cubic feet) 30,000 s.f. $250 $7,500,000
Building Construction Cost 261,000 s.f. $156 $40,710,000

Furniture, Fixtures & Equipment 261,000 s.f. $33 $8,613,000

A/E & other fees 10% construction $4,071,000

Land Acquisition Allowance $2,000,000

Cost Escalation (3 years) 3% per year increase $4,951,065

Contingency 10% const., FFE & fees $5,339,400

Total Project Costs $65,684,465

Optional Addition to Existing
Adjacent Parking Structure
(3 floors added at 38,400 s.f. per floor =
115,200 s.f.; includes A/E fees) 300 cars $19,000 $5,700,000

Total Cost with parking option 261,000 s.f. $274 $71,384,465

m h
s m

2009
Annual Operating Expenses 12.18.09

Budget Item Units or Assumptions Unit Costs Budget Item Costs Totals

Building Expenses
Utilities 261,000 s.f. ($2) ($522,000)
Maintenance & Cleaning 261,000 s.f. ($5) ($1,305,000)
Replacement Reserve 261,000 s.f. ($2) ($522,000)
Taxes & Insurance 261,000 s.f. ($1) ($261,000)
Annual Building Expenses 261,000 s.f. ($10) ($2,610,000)

Salaries (Direct Expenses)
Building Administration & Operations 16 staff ($35,000) ($560,000)
Training Center 14 staff ($24,000) ($336,000)
Resource Center 50 staff ($30,000) ($1,500,000)
Institute 6 staff ($40,000) ($240,000)

Annual Salaries (Direct Expenses) 86 staff ($30,651) ($2,636,000)

Overhead (Indirect Expenses) 80 % ($2,636,000) ($2,108,800)

Total Annual Operating Costs 261,000 s.f. ($28.18) ($7,354,800)

m h
s m

2008
Annual Income Projections 12.18.09

Assumed annual number of Community Renewers trained =
(273 rooms)(150 days occupancy per year) / (6 days average training stay per person) = 6,825
Assumed average cost per trainee for registration and housing = $500 registration + (6 days x $85 per day for housing) = $1015
Retail rental area of 7,200 s.f. will result in approximately 1 job for every 300 s.f. or 24 additional jobs
Parking revenues are based on 225 spaces (300 proposed) at $35 per month or $420 per year

Budget Item Units or Assumptions Unit Income Sub Totals Totals

Income Categories
Registrations 6,825 registrations $500 $3,412,500
Training Center Hotel Rooms 40,950 room days $85 $3,480,750
Retail Rental Income 7,200 s.f. $18 $129,600
Museum / Gift Shop Sales 3,500 s.f. $250 $875,000
Parking Revenues 225 parking $420 $94,500

Total Annual Income 261,000 s.f. $31 $7,992,350

Total Annual Expenses 261,000 s.f. ($28.18) ($7,354,800)

Total Annual Net Income 261,000 s.f. $2.44 $637,550

m h
s m

Center for Community Renewal project goals in Shreveport, Louisiana

Recommandé

Recommandé

Contenu connexe

Tendances

Tendances (17)

En vedette

En vedette (9)

Similaire à Center for Community Renewal project goals in Shreveport, Louisiana

Similaire à Center for Community Renewal project goals in Shreveport, Louisiana (20)

Plus de Kim Mitchell

Plus de Kim Mitchell (20)

Center for Community Renewal project goals in Shreveport, Louisiana