2. This project has been funded with support from the
European Commission.
This communication reflects the views only of the
authors, and the Commission cannot be held
responsible for any use which may be made of the
information contained therein.
3. The Purpose of the
Presentation
Overview the KAREL project
Show some of the work done
Specifications
Karelino - first controller
prototype of Karel robot
Solving math problems
The second design of Karel
platform
4. KAREL PROJECT OVERVIEW
General Information
Karel Project in Numbers
Partners
Objectives
Results & Outcomes
Robot Requirements
Tasts Distribution
Work Breakdown Structure
5. General Information
Programme: LIFELONG LEARNING
PROGRAMME
Sub-programme: COMENIUS
Action type: PARTNERSHIPS
Action: COMENIUS Multilateral school
partnerships
LLP Link No: 2013-1-RO1-COM06-29664 1
Project title: Karel - Autonomous Robot for
Enhancing Learning
Project acronym: KAREL
Implementation: 01.08.2013 – 31.07.2015
6. Karel project in numbers
Countries: 4
Partners: 4
Teachers: 21
Students: 50
Mobilities: 96
Robots: 20
Lessons: 21
7. WHO?
Partners, pupils, teachers
1. Palatul Copiilor
(Drobeta Turnu Severin, România)
2. Platon Schools (Εκπαιδευτηρια Πλατων)
(Katerini, Grecia)
3. Beypazari Teknik Ve Endüstri Meslek Lisesi
(Beypazari, Turcia)
4. Technikum nr 1 im. Stanisława Staszica w
Zespole Szkoł Technicznych w Rybniku
(Rybnik, Polonia)
Pupils (aged from 14 to 19 years old) & Teachers
8. WHY?
Objectives
Improve teaching and learning of science and
technology using robotics as integrator
O1. Apply practical math and scientific
concepts while learning to design, build, test
and document KAREL.
O2. Create an interdisciplinary curriculum to
use with KAREL robotic platform.
O3. Improve confidence and fluency in English
and learn scientific and technical vocabulary in
partners’ languages.
9. WHAT?
Results & Outcomes
Robotics Dictionary in English and each
partner’s language.
Robotics Platforms designed and
manufactured (20).
Robotics Platform User Manual.
Curriculum with at least 21 lesson plans, in
English and each partner’s language . At
least 2 lesson plans for each of following
fields: physics, biology, programming,
mechanics, electronics, and robotics.
Website.
10. WHAT?
Robot Requirements
Climb a surface with a 30 % slope.
Maximum speed more than 0.5 m/s.
Battery autonomy at least 2 hours.
Open source programming software.
Cost of raw materials less than 99 EUR.
Performances better than of similar priced
robots.
11. HOW?
Tasks Distribution
Robotic platform design, manufacture, test
and document:
a) Mechanical system
Turkey
b) Electronic system
Poland (input / output devices)
Romania (controller, motor drivers, power supply,
communication)
d) Software
Greece (codes for lessons)
Romania (codes for input / output devices)
12. HOW?
Tasks Distribution
Curriculum for robotic platform design and
document:
a) Physics: Greece, Romania
b) Biology: Greece
c) Mechanics: Turkey, Poland
d) Electronics: Poland, Romania
e) Programming: Greece, Romania
e) Robotics: Poland, Romania
13. HOW?
Tasks Distribution
Pupils:
Create robotics dictionary
Research, design, build, test, and program
robotic platform
Test curriculum
Teachers:
Design curriculum
Guide pupils
14.
15. SOME OF THE WORK DONE
Specifications
Karelino - first controller prototype of Karel robot
Solving math problems
The second design of Karel platform
25. FIRST PROTOTYPE OF THE
ROBOTIC PLATFORM
Schematic
3D Views
PCB manufacturing
Board Testing
Mechanics, Electronics, and Software Integration (Rybnik meeting)
First Karel prototype
54. Proposed Improvements
(Rybnik meeting)
Integrate new blocks (e.g. Motor voltage
regulator, UART connector, Battery
management system)
Make changes to the initial design (e.g.
replace USB micro B connector with an USB
mini B connector)
Redesign the PCB (components places and
traces) according to the chassis shape
Add LEDs to show the state of Bluetooth
module
55. Useful Links
Drawings for manufacturing the Karelino
controller http://1drv.ms/1jet3ci
Bill of materials for all designs
http://1drv.ms/1oAF8hr
56. MATH PROBLEMS
Climbing an inclined plan
Karel Base Designs
Animation created in Geogebra
Problems Solved
57. Climbing a 30 % inclined plan
A requirement which seems to be related just
to the power of the motors.
61. Theoretical problems related to
geometrical constraints study
Ground clearance
Front overhang
Rear overhang
We will use the work for some Math lesson plan
83. Boards manufacturing
Older printer (Samsung) – 600 dpi resolution
New printer (HP) - 1200 dpi resolution
Very good results after some tests
Problems – printer driver for Windows 7
84. Printing problems
MS Word (doc)
Different results
Picture (png)
Scaling problems
Good results with
pdf files
97. Karel Second Prototype
Problems & Future Work
Some circuits (e.g. for battery
management) not tested yet
Some integrated circuits are not so easy
to procure (e.g. the ones made by Seiko)
Possible new changes in design using
new integrated circuits (e.g. boost
regulator supplied from 1 Li-Po battery
with high output current capabilities)
99. Bibliography
Agape, Mihai. Agape, Maria-Genoveva.
“KAREL Specifications”, agreed in Karel
Project Meeting, held at Beypazari on 10–
16.11.2013. http://sdrv.ms/170NTak
Agape, Mihai. “Karelino—One Step in Karel
Robotic Platform Developing”, presentation
given at National Symposium IPO-TECH,
Tirgu-Neamt, 29.03.2014
100. Bibliography
Agape, Mihai. “KAREL
Controller Design”, presentation delivered
at Karel project meeting, held at Rybnik, 06-
13.04.2014
Agape, Cristina-Maria. “KAREL Controller
Manufacturing”, presentation delivered at
Karel project meeting, held at Rybnik, 06-
13.04.2014
Who is working on this project, and who are they working with?
The obvious: identifying team members.
The ambigous: establishing clear connections among people who’ll be collaborating with each other, integrating their schedules and vacations, and noting how their role in the organization will affect their role on the project team. Outlining these kinds of details is worth the elbow grease, and can help you measure time frames in terms of actual labor hours rather than dubious calendar days.
The general objective of the project is to improve teaching and learning of science and technology using robotics as integrator
1. Apply practical math and scientific concepts while learning to design, build, test and document KAREL (a low cost, utonomous
robotic platform for enhancing learning of sciences and technology in secondary school).
2. Create an interdisciplinary curriculum to use with KAREL robotic platform.
3. Improve confidence and fluency in English and learn scientific and technical vocabulary in partners’ languages.
Principal results and outcomes of the project.
Robotics Platform Requirements
- Should be able to climb a surface with a 30 % slope.
- The maximum speed should be more than 0.5 m/s.
- The battery autonomy has to be at least 2 hours (for a movement time around 15 %).
- The software used for programming the robot has to be open source.
- The price of the raw materials used for robotic platform should be less than 99 EUR.
- The performances will be better than of the robots in the same price range.
Task Distribution
1. Robotic platform design, manufacture, test and document:
a) Mechanical system – Turkey
b) Electronic system – Poland (input / output devices), Romania (controller, motor drivers, power supply, communication)
d) Software – Greece (codes for lessons), Romania (codes for input / output devices)
The responsible partners will manufacture one final prototype for each partner. During the project all partners will learn to
manufacture their parts and will produce their own fleet of robots.
2. Curriculum for robotic platform design and document:
a) Physics – Greece, Romania
b) Biology – Greece
c) Mechanics – Turkey, Poland
d) Electronics - Poland, Romania
e) Programming – Greece, Romania
e) Robotics – Poland, Romania
Each lesson will be peer reviewed by other partners.
Each partner will translate the final curriculum in his language.
3. The robotic terms dictionary in English, Greek, Polish, Turkish and Romanian will be the result of our common effort.
1. Robotic platform design, manufacture, test and document:
a) Mechanical system – Turkey
b) Electronic system – Poland (input / output devices), Romania (controller, motor drivers, power supply, communication)
d) Software – Greece (codes for lessons), Romania (codes for input / output devices)
The responsible partners will manufacture one final prototype for each partner. During the project all partners will learn to
manufacture their parts and will produce their own fleet of robots.
2. Curriculum for robotic platform design and document:
a) Physics – Greece, Romania
b) Biology – Greece
c) Mechanics – Turkey, Poland
d) Electronics - Poland, Romania
e) Programming – Greece, Romania
e) Robotics – Poland, Romania
Each lesson will be peer reviewed by other partners.
Each partner will translate the final curriculum in his language.
3. The robotic terms dictionary in English, Greek, Polish, Turkish and Romanian will be the result of our common effort.
Strategy
This project involves both pupils and teachers. The pupils will participate in all stages of the project. They will research, design, build,
test, and program the robotic platform. Also they will contribute to test the curriculum. Teachers will guide pupils and will create the
curriculum. We will create a robotic terms dictionary in partners languages.
The Work Breakdown Structure presented here represents all the work required to complete KAREL project. You can see that it is a very complex project.
We use Transfer Toner System to manufacture the PCB.
We use the materials from the Pulsar kit “PCB Fab-In-A-Box”.
We use a laser printer.
We use a fine sandpaper to sand the copper. Clean the surface with a cloth. Do not touch the surface once the cleaning is done.
If you are you are using a double sided copper board, then be sure to scrub the other side as well. This will speed up the etching process of the other side.
We use a laminator to transfer the toner form paper to board.