This document appears to be a report card or progress report for a Grade 8 class in the subject of Informatics at an educational institution in Colombia. It lists 25 students and their grades in various categories like classwork, projects, exams, and commentaries on a network across four grading periods. It provides overall attendance and performance statistics for the class.

1. INSTITUCIÓN EDUCATIVA LEOCADIO SALAZAR
GRADO 8A ASIGNATURA INFORMÁTICA DOCENTE MIRELLA CUARTAS RINCON 2012
I PERIODO 16 ENE-30 MARZO II PERIODO 9 ABRIL-29 JUNIO III PERIODO. 30 JUL-5 OCTUB IV PERIODO. 15 OCTU-30 NOV AUSENTISMO IN
# ESTUDIANTES: APELLIDOS Y NOMBRES
ES CR P CL RE NPA NFR ES CR PI CL RE NPA NFR ES CR PI CL RE NPA NFR ES CR PI CL RE NPA NFR I II III IV
FINAL
1 ACEVEDO CANO ALEJANDRO 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.3 4.1 4.1 1.0 5.0 2.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 5.0 3.0 0.0 5.0 3.3 3.3 1
2 ARCE VEGA NATALIA ESTEFANY 2.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 1.0 4.0 3.5 3.5 5.0 4.0 5.0 3.5 3.5 2
3 BERMUDEZ CARDENAS JUAN DIEGO 5.0 4.0 5.0 3.7 4.4 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3 8 14
4 BLANCO ROJAS ANLLELA LORENA 2.0 4.0 4.0 2.7 3.2 3.2 2.5 5.0 2.0 3.0 3.1 3.1 5.0 1.0 1.0 5.0 3.0 3.0 4
5 BLANDON CARDENAS KELLY JOHANA 4.0 5.0 5.0 3.0 4.3 5.0 4.2 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.8 4.8 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 4.8 4.8 5
6 CARDONA MONSALVE FABIO ANDRÉS 3.0 4.0 4.0 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.0 5.0 3.0 1.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 6 2
7 CARDONA MONSALVE HÉCTOR FABIO 3.0 5.0 5.0 4.3 4.3 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.8 4.8 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 7
8 GARCIA LOPEZ DARWIN DAVID 5.0 4.0 4.0 2.7 3.9 3.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.0 1.3 1.3 8 10 14
9 GRANADA HERNÁNDEZ JHON ALEXANDER 4.0 4.0 4.0 2.3 3.6 3.6 2.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 1.3 1.3 5.0 1.0 1.0 4.0 2.8 2.8 9 2
10 GUILLEN GAONA JOSE DAVID 1.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.3 3.3 3.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.3 4.3 5.0 1.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.0 10
11 HERNANDEZ ALVAREZ LUISA FERNANDA 4.0 5.0 1.0 5.0 3.8 3.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 11
12 LONDOÑO GIRALDO JESSICA PAOLA 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.8 5.0 5.0 4.7 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.9 4.9 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 12
13 LONDOÑO PINEDA LAURA CAROLINA 3.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.5 5.0 4.7 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.9 4.9 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 13
14 MEJÍA TABORDA ANDRÉS MAURICIO 4.0 4.0 5.0 4.7 4.4 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 14
15 ORTEGA AGUIRRE SANTIAGO 4.0 4.0 5.0 4.3 4.3 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.8 4.8 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 15
16 PELAEZ RINCON DIEGO ANDRES 5.0 4.0 5.0 3.7 4.4 5.0 3.5 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.4 4.4 5.0 4.0 0.0 5.0 3.5 3.5 16
17 QUIROGA PAYAN JENNY JULIANA 1.0 5.0 5.0 4.3 3.8 5.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 3.3 3.3 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 4.8 4.8 17 4
18 RAIGOZA RODRÍGUEZ DAVIDSON ESTIVEN 1.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 3.5 5.0 1.5 5.0 5.0 3.0 3.6 3.6 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 4.8 4.8 18
19 RAMÍREZ LÓPEZ ANDRÉS SANTIAGO 4.0 4.0 5.0 4.7 4.4 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.8 4.8 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 19
20 RESTREPO CORTES ANDRES FELIPE 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 4.5 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.8 4.8 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 4.8 4.8 20
21 RESTREPO GONZALEZ LUISA FERNANDA 3.0 5.0 5.0 4.3 4.3 5.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 4.0 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 21 2
22 RIVERA LONDOÑO ANGI PAOLA 3.0 4.0 4.0 3.3 3.6 3.6 2.0 4.0 5.0 4.0 3.8 3.8 2.5 4.0 1.0 5.0 3.1 3.1 22
23 RODRIGUEZ RAMIREZ KENNY 5.0 4.0 5.0 4.7 4.7 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 23
24 ROJAS ORTIZ RICARDO ANDRES 3.0 5.0 5.0 4.7 4.4 5.0 3.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 4.6 4.6 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 24 8
25 TORRES BLANDÓN YEISON 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 25 6 10 14
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
CR= COMENTARIOS EN LA RED
PI= PROYECTO INTEGRADO PERDIERON 1 4 % PERDIERON 5 20 % PERDIERON 6 24 % PERDIERON PERDIERON 2012
ES= EVALUACIÓN METODOLOGÍA SABER GANARON 23 96 % GANARON 20 80 % GANARON 19 76 % GANARON
CL= COMPENDIO LECTURAS. RE: RECUPERA TOTAL 24 100 % TOTAL 25 100 % TOTAL 25 100 % TOTAL
NPA= NOTA DEL PERI CON ACTIVI DE APOYO
NFR= NOTA FINAL CON RECUPERACIÓN