UGC NET Paper 1 Mathematical Reasoning & Aptitude.pdf
ACODE Learning Technologies Leadership Institute
1. Implications of Digital Futures,
Learning Spaces & Personal
Learning Environments for
Learning Technologies
Leadership
ACODE Learning Technologies Leadership Institute
20th August 2013
Professor Mike Keppell
Executive Director
Australian Digital Futures Institute
Director, Digital Futures - CRN
1Tuesday, 20 August 13
4. ADFI Major Projects
n Digital Futures - Collaborative Research Network
n Regional Universities Network (RUN) Maths and
Science Digital Classroom: A Connected Model for
all of Australia
n Aged Care Community, Education, Research &
training (ACCERT)
n Network of Australasian Tertiary Associations
(NATA)
n Making the Connection: Improving access to Higher
Education for Low SES Students with ICT
Limitations project
4
4Tuesday, 20 August 13
7. Beyond Current Horizons
n Networking and
connections - distributed
cognition
n Increasing
personalisation and
customisation of
experience
n New forms of literacy
n Openness of ownership of
knowledge (Jewitt, 2009).
7
7Tuesday, 20 August 13
9. Trends
‣ People expect to be able to work, learn, and
study whenever and wherever they want.
‣ The abundance of resources and
relationships will challenge our educational
identity.
‣ Students want to use their own technology
for learning.
‣ Personalisation - learning, teaching, place
of learning and technologies
9
9Tuesday, 20 August 13
12. Owning the Place of Learning
rapport
with
technology
mobile
generate
content
personalise
connected
adapt
space to
their needs
12Tuesday, 20 August 13
18. Forward-looking Feedback
nStudents need to receive appropriate feedback
which they can use to ‘feed forward’ into
future work.
nFeedback should be less final and judgemental
(Boud, 1995)
nFeedback should be more interactive and
forward-looking (Carless, 2002)
nFeedback should be timely and with a potential
to be acted upon (Gibbs & Simpson, 2004)
18
18Tuesday, 20 August 13
23. Spaces for Knowledge
Generation
n Physical, blended or virtual ‘areas’ that:
n enhance learning
nthat motivate learners
npromote authentic learning interactions
n Spaces where both teachers and students
optimize the perceived and actual
affordances of the space (Keppell &
Riddle, 2012).
23
23Tuesday, 20 August 13
24. Physical Virtual
Formal Informal InformalFormal
Blended
Mobile Personal
Outdoor
Professional
Practice
Distributed
Learning Spaces
Academic
24
24Tuesday, 20 August 13
26. Mobility
n Global mobility
n Mobility of people
n Technologies to support
mobility
n Adapting our teaching and
learning?
n Assessment?
26
26Tuesday, 20 August 13
27. Undergraduate Students
and IT
n Monitors students
relationship with digital
technologies
n Portable devices are the
‘academic champions’
n 3x as many students used
e-books or e-textbooks
than in 2010
n Survey of 100,000 students
across 195 institutions
27
27Tuesday, 20 August 13
28. Seamless Learning
Seamless learning
occurs when a
person experiences a
continuity of
learning across a
combination of
locations, times,
technologies or
social settings
(Sharples, et al,
2012).
28Tuesday, 20 August 13
30. Literacies
n Literacy is no longer “the ability
to read and write” but now “the
ability to understand
information however
presented.”
n Can't assume students have
skills to interact in a digital age
n Literacies will allow us to teach
more effectively in a digital
age (JISC, 2012)
30
30Tuesday, 20 August 13
31. Principles of Learning
Space Design
n Comfort: a space which creates a physical and
mental sense of ease and well-being
n Aesthetics: pleasure which includes the
recognition of symmetry, harmony, simplicity and
fitness for purpose
n Flow: the state of mind felt by the learner when
totally involved in the learning experience
31
31Tuesday, 20 August 13
32. Principles of Learning
Space Design
•Equity: consideration of the needs of cultural and
physical differences
•Blending: a mixture of technological and face-to-face
pedagogical resources
•Affordances: the “action possibilities” the learning
environment provides the users
•Repurposing: the potential for multiple usage of a
space (Souter, Riddle, Keppell, 2010) (http://
www.skgproject.com)
32
32Tuesday, 20 August 13
36. Personal Learning Spaces
‣ Integrate formal and informal learning
spaces
‣ Customised by the individual to suit their
needs
‣ Allow individuals to create their own
identities.
‣ Recognises ongoing learning and the need
for tools to support life-long and life-wide
learning.
36
36Tuesday, 20 August 13
37. Connectivism
‣ Knowledge has changed to networks and
ecologies (Siemens, 2006).
‣ Need improved lines of communication in
networks.
‣ “Connectivism is the assertion that learning is
primarily a network-forming process” (p.
15).
37
37Tuesday, 20 August 13
43. New Mindsets
n Privileging mobile learning and
teaching access
n Embedding digital literacies into
all aspects of learning, teaching
and curriculum
n Privileging diverse places of
learning as opposed to a
singular place of learning
43
43Tuesday, 20 August 13
44. New Mindsets
n Assisting teachers and students
to develop their own
personalised learning strategy
n Privileging user-generated
content
n Privileging learning-oriented
assessment
44
44Tuesday, 20 August 13