This document analyzes social media use and online organizing efforts during the 2010 UK general election campaign. It finds that (1) candidates were deluged with emails triggered by single-issue campaigns, (2) these campaigns were successful in securing commitments from parties, and (3) the Liberal Democrats lacked infrastructure compared to others for turning online support into real-world action. Overall, social media had some influence but traditional large-scale media like TV and mailers remained most important. Effective online organizing required tools for emailing, surveying, and supporting issue-focused campaigns.
18. 24,709 26,646 44,485 52,315
1,122,838
-
200,000
400,000
600,000
800,000
1,000,000
1,200,000
Lib Dem party Labour party Conservative party Lib Dem leader Labour leader's wife
Twitter followers
28. Candidates deluged with emails from local
constituents – triggered by single issue campaigns
Genuine success in getting commitments from all
parties
Best example ‘Tuition Fees’ pledge from National
Union of Students
39. Social media not decisive
Apart from a few people who messed up
Some influence in shaping national media agenda
Some useful intelligence
Highest impact activity not under formal party control
But does help mobilise and organise supporters
Lib Dems had the weakest infrastructure to turn support
into action. Did this hurt their ability to react when the
polls surged?
Elections still being won and lost on messaging – via
the biggest and most intrusive media:
TV, press, direct mail and leaflets through the door
Notes de l'éditeur
Only Twitter stories were of relatively minor candidates having to resign for tweeting something idiotic.