Ce diaporama a bien été signalé.
Le téléchargement de votre SlideShare est en cours. ×

Rationalism

Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Publicité
Prochain SlideShare
Rationalism
Rationalism
Chargement dans…3
×

Consultez-les par la suite

1 sur 24 Publicité

Plus De Contenu Connexe

Diaporamas pour vous (20)

Similaire à Rationalism (20)

Publicité

Plus récents (20)

Publicité

Rationalism

  1. 1. RATIONALISM Muhammad Munsif Munsif123@slideshare
  2. 2. WHAT IS PHILOSOPHY OF RATIONALISM  Encompasses several strands of thought all of which usually share the conviction that REALITY is actually rationale in nature and that making the proper deductions is essential in achieving knowledge.  Latin word ratio, meaning reason-point of view that states that reason plays the main role in understanding the world and obtaining knowledge
  3. 3. CONT…  is “any view appealing to reason as a source of knowledge or justification.” in which the criterion of the truth is not sensory but intellectual and deductive.  The philosophical view that regards reason as the chief source and test of knowledge. Holding the reality itself has an inherent logical structure
  4. 4. EPISTEMOLOGY  How do we know what we know?  Types of knowledge  Acquaintance: I know Oxford well.  Know how: I know how to ride a bike.  Propositional: I know that elephants are grey.  Belief v. knowledge  Knowledge has a justification or evidence
  5. 5. REASON AND EXPERIENCE  The terms ‘rationalist’ and ‘empiricist’ can be applied to  theories of knowledge  theories of concept acquisition  theories of justification  historical schools of thought  Why choose reason or experience?  Most rationalists allow knowledge from experience.  All empiricists use reasoning to establish conclusions.
  6. 6. REASON AND EXPERIENCE  Experience: just sense experience? What about religious experience?  Reason: just reasoning? What about intuition?
  7. 7. A CLEAR DISTINCTION  Rationalism: we can have substantive a priori knowledge of how things stand outside the mind.  Empiricism: we cannot.
  8. 8. SUBSTANTIVE KNOWLEDGE  Substantive knowledge is knowledge of a synthetic proposition. Trivial knowledge is knowledge of an analytic proposition.  An analytic proposition is true or false in virtue of the meanings of the words.  Not all analytic propositions are obvious: ‘In five days time, it will have been a week since the day which was tomorrow three days ago’ - true or false?
  9. 9. A PRIORI KNOWLEDGE  A priori: knowledge that does not require (sense) experience to be known to be true (v. a posteriori)  It is not a claim that no experience was necessary to arrive at the claim, but that none is needed to prove it.
  10. 10. TWO QUICK POINTS  Empiricists do not claim there is no a priori knowledge; they deny there is substantive a priori knowledge.  Rationalists (except for Plato) do not claim sense experience can never provide knowledge.
  11. 11. INNATE IDEAS  Some ideas are present from birth. Ideas that do not provide the proof or suggestion of sense experience, are concepts which are present from birth.
  12. 12. CONT…  It could be theoretically be discovered or thought out from within the mind of each individual.  Example is Desartes arguments for the existence of God.
  13. 13. LOGICAL NECESSITY  Some things cannot be otherwise.  In order to pass your exam you have to study hard. (empirical necessity)  In order to have 3 things you have to have more than two things. (logical necessity)
  14. 14. CONT…  The question of whether God exists for example, depends on your concept of God or whether in fact you believe He exists. (empirical necessity)
  15. 15. METAPHYSICAL NECESSITY a) It is logically possible that God does not exist; b) However, the idea of God presupposes a perfect being; c) For a perfect being not to exist would be an imperfection; d) Therefore God must necessarily exist.
  16. 16. CONT….  This argument - called the Ontological Argument - assumes the existence of this third type of necessity (metaphysical) which sits midway between what can and cannot be otherwise.
  17. 17. KNOWLEDGE VIA REASON IS POWER  Knowledge via reason is superior.  Innate knowledge is superior because everything is in the state of flux.  Things are dying, things are born . Can we trust this changing world? If were to rely on reason were immune from change since the law for math and physics aren’t subject to change.
  18. 18. PROPONENTS AND HISTORY 1. Pythagoras – “All is Number” 2. Parmenides- “The world is a static whole and that the realm of change and motion is an illusion.” 4. Socrates – “Know thyself” 5. Plato- Reason is above Perception 6. Aristotle – Syllogistic logic is the best method to reach the ultimate truth.
  19. 19. CONT… 1. Rene Descartes “I think therefore I Am” 2. Benedict Spinoza – Man is not Free. All his actions are determined, by some forces greater than he is. 3. G.W. Leibnez – Cause and Effect
  20. 20. CRITIQUE 1. Objections to innate ideas. How is it possible to distinguish “remembering” from learning? If we cant, doesn’t that make the idea redundant? 2. Most idea seems to rely in some way on the real world to bring them out.
  21. 21. CONT… 3. If mathematical ideas are innate, wouldn’t we already know the answers to complicated sum? 4. If ideas such as “God exists” are innate, why doesn’t everyone believe that?
  22. 22. EDUCATIONAL IMPACTS  1. Family should be as the basic foundation of the state and should provide the first educational experience of the individual.  2. Education of the individual should attend to the development of the physical, moral, and intellectual aspects of his life.  3. The individuals from birth should be given basic education at home in preparation for formal schooling.
  23. 23. CONT… 4. Education to be efficacious should develop the total personality of the individual with special stress on his intellectual growth. 5. Education must enable man to know, to say and do all things. Because of this its ultimate goal is the development of its capacity to think rationally, reason out logically and act prudently.
  24. 24. THANKS FOR YOUR ATTENTION

×