4. Introduction
Expanding criteria of CI
Why cant hearing aids be used ?
Problem of high freq HL
Concept of preservation (? residual
hearing) in CI
5. 1. residual hair cells
2. neural tissues
3. endocochlear potentials
4. the travelling wave
5. inner ear & middle ear transformer mech.
6. vestibular system
What is to be preserved?
6. Hearing preservation
- post op PTA (250,500,750,1000 Hz) within 10dB of pre op PTA
- post op PTA (250,500,1000,2000 Hz) within 10dB of pre op PTA
% of HP = [PTA post op – PTA pre op ] / [120 – PTA pre op] X 100
7. - Standard CI technique – residual hearing is lost in
50% of recipients
- Hearing conservation – increasingly realistic &
desired goal in CI surgery
- Lesser traumatic insertion achieved in several ways..
8. Hearing preservation - Devices
Manufacturer Electrode Electrode length HP principle Route &
Degree of
insertion
Cochlear Hybrid S 8
Hybrid S 12
6 mm (0.2-0.4 dia, 6 ch)
10 mm
10 mm (10 ch)
Short electrode Cochleostomy
(190200)
Cochleostomy
Cochlear Hybrid L 24 16 mm (22 ch) Short electrode Cochleostomy
RW (270)
Cochlear CI 422 Slim 25 mm (0.3-0.6 mm dia,
22 + 2 el)
Thin electrode
(straight, lateral wall
electrode)
Cochleostomy
RW(270450 )
Med El FLEX EAS 2124 mm (19 el = 7
pairs + 5)
Shorter, thin
electrode
Cochleostomy
RW (CCC)
Advanced
Bionics
Mid scala 18.5 mm Shorter, thin
( mid scala)
RW
Cochleostomy
9. Hearing preservation techniques
• Optimal electrode length
controversy
• Partially inserted standard
electrodes
• Softer & thinner electrodes
• Preservation with full insertion of
standard electrode
• Optimal insertion depth angle
• Minimized forces on outer
cochlear wall
• Minimized drilling
Methods
Alternate
methods
10. “Soft surgery” features
- identify RW membrane
- site, size & seal of cochleostomy
- elimination of bone dust & blood (? lubricant)
- low speed drilling while cochleostomy
- no suctioning of perilymph
- perioperative steroids
- careful insertion of electrode array
- ? cochleostomy / RW / Extended or peri RW technique
11. What is EAS ?
EAS – a combination of 2 technologies :
cochlear implant for high frequencies
acoustic amplification for low frequencies
Together, they cover full range of hearing for children & adults.
12. Electric + Acoustic stimulation
= CI (i) + HA (c)
= CI (i) + HA (i) + HA (c)
Effects :
1. Improved SDS
2. Improved SNR
3. Music appreciation
Bimodal hearing
Combined hearing
13. Restoring the hearing potential
EAS – can help to regain hearing in
both high and low frequencies
electric stimulation improve
hearing in high-frequency
acoustic amplification can
improve your residual hearing in the
low frequencies
14. HA Vs EAS
monosyllable speech score
test.
HA users score – 21%
EAS users score – 71%
an average of 50% points higher in speech
understanding & sound quality
15. EAS Vs Electric only stimulation
EAS benefits :
- in music with pitch discrimination
- interval perception
- song recognition
- in overall quality of life
16. Audio processor
3rd
generation AP
acoustic unit & customized ear mould
acoustic stimulation across low freq
electric stimulation in high freq
with 48dB acoustic amplification
across low freq
the ideal solution for candidates
with partial deafness
SONNET EAS
MED EL
17. Internal implant
is the ideal choice for EAS
soft, flexible (FLEX EAS)
electrodes to help preserve your
residual natural hearing
MRI Safe at 3.0 Tesla - Without Magnet
removalSYNCHRONY
MED EL
22. How to select EAS device?
Do off an ASSR ; Radio imaging
Anticipate the insertion depth
angle required
Select the most suitable electrode
23. Accessories
Wired accessories
• Audio cable
• TV / Hi-Fi cable
• Ear phones
• Lapel microphone
• FM cable
Wireless accessories
• Mic lock
Hybrid acoustic component
24. Activation
b/w 2-6 wk post implantation
both electric stimulation & acoustic
amplification are activated
initial period of adaptation to combined
stimulation is common as expected.
When ?
What ?
Why ?
25. How safe ?
- FDA approved the Cochlear Nucleus Hybrid L24
Cochlear Implant System for commercial release
- on 21 March, 2014
26. Pitfalls
o Patient related inability to take the advantage of
combined stimulus
o Lack of long term results
o Need for revision implants
27. In children (1-2 yr) – use of u/l short electrode in
situations tested
Unilateral deafness + intractable debilitating
tinnitus
SSD
Electrode Vs hearing threshold
28. • EAS – benefit of improved SD, hearing in noise, music
appreciation
• Residual hearing preservation – desirable & achievable
• Aspects of electrode design & surgical technique
• Ongoing investigations of strategies & programming post
implantation
29. References
- Cochlear implants 3rd
edition – Susan B. Waltzman
- Peter Luke Santa Maria, Michael Brian Gluth, Yongqing Yuan, et al. Hearing preservation
surgery for cochlear implantation: A Meta-analysis. Otology & Neurotology 2014; 35:e256-
e269.
- Nneka Eze, Dan Jiang, Alec Fitzgerald O’Connor. Inner ear energy exposure while drilling a
cochleostomy. Acta Oto-Laryngologica 2014; 134: 1109-1113.
- Ling Zhou, MD; David R. Friedmann, MD; Claudiu Treaba, Meng, MBA et al. Does
cochleostomy location influence electrode trajectory and intracochlear trauma? The
Laryngoscope 2014.
- www.medel.com
- www.cochlear.com
- Talks @ ISOCON 2014, Chennai
- Talks @ CIGICON 2014, AIIMS, New Delhi
MC form of adult HL is HF SNHL; Damage to hair cells in basal turn of cochlea – noise exposure, presbyacusis, ototoxicity
Apical hair cells may still function normally.
High freq HL – cause inability to distinguish high freq sounds of speech – (consonants) crucial for communication – reduction is speech scores
Low freq hearing – able to distinguish difference in loudness and speech pattern; provide significant cues & intelligibility
Traditional acoustic amplification of freq >2500 Hz – ineffective in improving SRS when thresholds exceed 65 dB
neural tissues – dendrites, spiral ganglion cells & axons
Complete – within 10dB; Partial - within 10-20dB; Unsuccessful - >20dB
Med El & Skarzynski classification of HP % : complete 0-25%; partial 25-60%; minimal >60%; complete loss – not measurable
HP better in pediatric population
Etiology plays a role rather than duration ?
Residual hearing (amplified or not) – cause increased speech perception in noise & music perception
Appears that hearing can be preserved in 80% in whom it is attempted
if low freq hearing is preserved @ time of Sx, progression of HL will be minimal
Full insertion by Med El combi 40+ is 31.5 mm; optimal insertion depth from cochleostomy for CI 422 (25 mm) is 450 degrees
Cochlear Contour by AOS tech & AB Helix slim electrodes – perimodiolar electrode
During cochleostomy acoustic trauma is upto 130 dB; Upto 1.5 mm size cochleostomy for stylet based models, SNR drop upto 25dB
Cochleostomy inferior to mid-portion of RWM;while drilling, endosteum should not be drilled or exposed for longer time; electrode insertion time >30sec and thin, short, flexible electrode
By Lehnhardt & Pau et al – described soft surgery ; also – WHITE DOT – submicroscopic cracks leading to air trapped in bone making the bone brighter just before endosteum entry while performing cochleostomy
When you cannot hear high-frequency sounds, you might have a type of hearing loss known as Partial Deafness.
Partial Deafness is common in both children and adults.
Improved SDS – Med El combi 40, 9 75% monosyllable words; combi 40+, 2471% @ 1 yr; Nucleus 24 contour advance, 15 55% @ 3m {short electrodes - Med El M, Hybrid S/L improved SRT or CNC word score in 75% pts}
SNR : normal have -30dB (hear 50% of words when background noise is @ 30 dB); for competing talkers, avg SNR in normals -15 dB
avg long electrode user require +3 dB for unmodulated background noise & +8 dB for multitalker babble
avg SNR for Med El combi 40+ is + 5dB; for Hybrid S -9dB
preservation of acoustic hearing below 500 Hz allow listener to separate talker from background noise based on fundamental freq
Pitch perception is one of the most basic funct of auditory system with respect to music appreciation
these technologies combine and can help you to hear all the sounds of speech.
5 independent studies demonstrate significant improvement in hearing of children & adults with Partial Deafness after switching from HA to EAS.
5 independent studies demonstrate significant improvement in hearing of children & adults with Partial Deafness after switching from HA to EAS.
With dual microphone technology, SONNET EAS features Automatic Sound Management 2.0 for hands-free control & effortless listening
water-resistant & lightweight SONNET EAS is designed for all-day comfort & security.
- implant magnet can freely rotate & self-align inside of its housing, so it's not affected by magnetic field of MRI scan
smallest & lightest cochlear implant available, an ideal choice—even for the youngest candidates
optional small (1.4 mm) titanium pins designed to secure the implant in place, provide excellent implant stability, long-term safety & reliability
softest & ? most flexible electrode arrays to preserve delicate cochlear structures & protect your residual hearing
Linear insertion depth & Insertion depth angle
HybridTM acoustic component is a detachable part of the Freedom Hybrid sound processor.
Long duration of deafness (>40yr) low preop CNC word scores
SSD – (other options – Bi CROS, BAHA)
For poor thresholds @ 1500 Hz – better candidates for 16 mm electrode length
For better thresholds (70-80dB) @ 1500 Hz – adapt to short electrode (6-10 mm)
Factors assoc with hearing preservation : Cochleostomy by posterior tympanotomy approach; slow insertion technique; soft tissue seal; postoperative steroids