Java Abs Scalable Wireless Ad Hoc Network Simulation Using Xtc Domain Name System Security

SCALABLE WIRELESS AD-HOC NETWORK SIMULATION USING XTC
- DOMAIN NAME SYSTEM SECURITY
The Domain Name System (DNS) has become a critical operational part of the internet infrastructure,
yet it has no strong security mechanisms to assure data integrity or authentication. Extensions to the
DNS are described that provide these services to security aware resolves or applications through the
use of cryptographic digital signatures. These digital signatures are included zones as resource
records.
The extensions also provide for the storage of authenticated public keys in the DNS. This storage of
keys can support general public key distribution services as well as DNS security. These stored keys
enable security aware resolvers to learn the authenticating key of zones, in addition to those for which
they are initially configured. Keys associated with DNS names can be retrieved to support other
protocols. In addition, the security extensions provide for the authentication of DNS protocol
transactions.

SYNOPSIS
The Internet is a widespread conglomeration of hundreds of thousands of inter-connected
heterogeneous networks and hosts. Computers communicate with each other on the basis of different
types of addresses, on the physical layer using low level physical addresses like Ethernet- card
addresses, on the data link to presentation layer using host addresses such as IP addresses, and on
the application layer using host names.
The task of naming hosts and network domains is addressed by creating a hierarchical relation between
domains, with hosts as the furthest descendants from a root domain. By appending the domain labels
one after the other to the host labels on the path up to the root in the hierarchical tree, a unique,
memorizable, and usually pronounceable identifier is created: the host name.
One of the management tasks in the internet is the mapping of lower level addresses to host names. A
first naïve approach that was taken was to collect all names to address
mapping in a single file. The file “HOSTS.TXT” contained the name to address mapping for every host
connected to the ARPANET.
The mapping or binding of IP addresses to host names became a major problem in the rapidly growing
Internet and the higher level binding effort went through different stages of development up to the
currently used Domain Name System (DNS).

PROBLEM STATEMENT
Authenticity is based on the identity of some entity. This entity has to prove that it is genuine. In many
network applications the identity of participating entities is simply determined by their names or
addresses. High level applications use mainly names for authentication purposes, because address lists
are much harder to create, understand, and maintain than name lists.
Assuming an entity wants to spoof the identity of some other entity, it is enough to change the mapping
between its low level address and its high level name. It means that an attacker can fake the name of
someone by modifying the association of his address from his own name to the name he wants to
impersonate. Once an attacker has done that, an authenticator can no longer distinguish between the
true and the faked entity.

DESIGN OF SIG RR
The SIG or “signature” resource record (RR) is the fundamental way that data is authenticated in the
secure Domain Name System (DNS). As such it is the heart of the security provided.
The SIG RR unforgably authenticates other RR of a particular type, class, and name and binds them to
a time interval and the signer’s domain name. This is done using
Cryptographic techniques and the signer’s private key. The signer is frequently the owner of the zone
from which the RR originated.
The syntax of a SIG resources record (signature) is a shown below. It includes the type of the RR(s)
being signed, the name of the signer, the time at which the signature was created, the time in expires
(when it is no longer to be believed), its original time to Live (which may be longer than its current time
to live but cannot be shorter), the cryptographic algorithm in use, and the actual signature.

Every DNS entry in a secured zone will have associated with it at least one SIG
resource record for Flags
each resource type and a SIG record for the zone file. The SIG Record for the 16 bits
Whole Zone File can be used to verify whether all the information present is Protocol
correct or not, during zone transfers. A security aware server supporting the 8 bits
performance enhanced version of the DNS protocol security extensions will
attempt to return, with RR’s retrieved, the corresponding SIGs. If a server does not Algorithm
support the protocol, the resolver must retrieve all the SIG records for a name and 8 bits
select the one or ones that sign the resource record(s) that resolver is interested Public Key
in.

DESIGN OF KEY RR
Authentication is provided by associating with resource records in the DNS cryptographically
generated digital signatures. Commonly, there will be a single private key that signs for an entire
zone. If a security aware resolver reliably learns the public key of the zone, it can verify, for signed
data read from that zone, that it was properly authorized and is reasonably current. The zone’s
private key is to be kept off-line and can used to re-sign all of the records in the zone periodically.
The PUBLIC KEY of the zone is stored in KEY Resource Records.
This data origin authentication key belongs to the zone and not to the servers that store copies of the
data. It means that the compromise of a server or even all servers for a zone will not necessarily
affect the degree of assurance that a resolver has, that it can determine whether data is genuine.
A resolver can learn the public key of a zone either by reading it from DNS or by having it statically
configured. To reliably learn the public key by reading it from DNS, the key itself must be signed.
Thus, to provide a reasonable degree of security, the resolve must be configured with at least the
public key of one zone that it can use to authenticate signatures.

MODULES:
Authentication
Message Digest Algorithm
Cryptography PRNG
Generating Signature
Signature Verification
Data Integrity

Project Pre requisitions:-
The XTC ad-hoc network topology control algorithm shows three main advantages over previously
proposed algorithms. First, it is extremely simple. Second, it does not assume the network graph to
be a Unit Disk Graph; XTC proves correct also on general weighted network graphs. Third, the
algorithm does not require availability of node position information. Instead, XTC operates with a
general notion of order over the neighbors’ link qualities. In the special case of the network graph
being a Unit Disk Graph, the resulting topology proves to have bounded degree, to be a planar graph,
and—on average-case graphs—to be a good spanner. Employed on Euclidean and Unit Disk Graphs.

Topology Control:-
For two communicating ad-hoc nodes u and v, the energy consumption of their communication grows
at least quadratically with their distance. Having one or more relay nodes between u and v therefore
helps to save energy.
The primary target of a topology control algorithm is to abandon long-distance communication links
and instead route a message over several small (energy-efficient) hops .For this purpose each node
in the ad-hoc network chooses a ”handful” of ”close by” neighbors” in all points of the compass.
Clearly nodes cannot abandon links to ”too many” far-away neighbors in order to prevent the ad-hoc
network from being partitioned or the routing paths from becoming noncompetitively long. In general
there is a trade-off between networks connectivity and sparseness. Let the graph G = (V;E) denote

the ad-hoc network before running the topology control algorithm, with V being the set of ad-hoc
nodes, and E representing the set of communication links. There is a link (u; v) in E if and only if the
two nodes u and v can communicate directly. Running the topology control algorithm will yield a
sparse sub graph
Gtc= (V; Etc) of G, where Etc is the set of remaining links. The resulting topology Gtc should have the
following properties:

Property 1 (Symmetry):- The resulting topology Gtc should be symmetric, that is, node u is a neighbor of
node v if and only if node v is a neighbor of node u. Asymmetric communication graphs are unpractical,
because many communication primitives become unacceptably complicated. A simple ACK message
confirming the receipt of a Message, for example, is already a nightmare in an asymmetric graph.

Property 2 (Connectivity):- Two nodes u and v are connected if there is a path from u to v,
potentially through multiple hops. If two nodes are connected in G, then they should still be connected
in Gtc. Although a minimum spanning tree (MST) is a sparse connected subgraph, it is often not
considered a good topology, since close-by nodes in the original graph G might end up being far
away in Gtc (G being a ring, for instance). Therefore Property 2 is usually strengthened:

Property 2+ (Spanner):- For any two nodes u and v, if the optimal path between u and v in G has
cost c, then the optimal path between u and v in Gtc has cost f(c). If f(c) is bounded from above by a
linear function in c, the graph Gtc is called a spanner. Researchers have studied a selection of cost
metrics, the most popular being i) Euclidean distance and ii) various energy metrics. The cost of a
link in model i) is the Euclidean distance of the link, in model ii) the distance is raised to a predefined
power. In both models the cost of a path is commonly defined to be the sum of the costs of all links in
the path. As mentioned, the primary target of a topology control algorithm is to abandon long-distance
neighbors, or more formally.

Property 3 (Sparseness):- The remaining graph Gtc should be sparse, that is, the number of links
should be in the order of the number of nodes, i.e. jEtcj = O(jV j). This reflects that not too many close-
by nodes must be chosen, which reduces interference and thus saves energy. Since there still might be
some nodes with many neighbors (e.g. a star graph), also Property 3 features an improved version.

Property 3+ (Low Degree):- Each node in the remaining graph Gtc has a small number of neighbors.
In particular the maximum degree in the graph Gtc should be bounded from above by a constant.
Since connectivity and sparseness run against each other, topology control has been a thriving
research area. In addition to the properties 1, 2, and 3, one can often find secondary targets. For
instance, it is popular (and often for free) to ask the remaining graph to be planar in order to run a
geometric (a.k.a. geographic, location-based, position-based) routing algorithm, such as
GOAFR/GOAFR+ [11, 13], or GFG/GPSR [2, 9].

Preliminaries:- In a weighted graph G = (V; E) every edge (u; v) 2 E is attributed a weight! uv. When
referring to a weighted graph we assume that the weights are symmetric: !uv = !vu. The nodes of a
Euclidean graph are assumed to be located in a Euclidean plane. Furthermore the edge weight of an
edge (u; v) is defined to be !uv = juvj, where juvj is the Euclidean distance between the nodes u and
v. Note that the definition of Euclidean graphs does not contain a statement on the existence of
certain edges. A Unit Disk Graph is a Euclidean graph containing an edge (u; v) if and only if juvj _ 1.
Unit Disk Graphs are often employed to model an ad-hoc network where all network nodes are placed
in an unobstructed plane and have equal (normalized) transmission power and isotropic antennas
that is antennas sending with identical power in every direction of the plane. Strongly related to edge
weights is the cost of an edge. The cost of an edge c(u; v) can be considered to represent the effort
an algorithm is required to expend in order to send a message over (u; v). Common definitions of
edge cost metrics include the hop or link metric c(u; v) _ 1, the Euclidean metric c(u; v) = juvj, and the
energy metric c(u; v) = juvje for an attenuation exponent e _ 2. A path p(u; v) from a node u to a node
v being a sequence of consecutively contingent edges starting at u and ending at v, the cost of a path
jp(u; v)j is accordingly defined to be the sum of the costs of all edges contained in the path.

XTC Algorithm:-
The algorithm consists of three main steps:
I) Neighbor ordering,
II) Neighbor order exchange, and
III) Edge selection.

Detail Explanation:-
In the first step each network node u computes a total order over all its neighbors in the network
graph G. From an abstract point of view, this order is intended to reflect the quality of the links to the
neighbors. A node u will consider its neighbors in G (in the third step of the algorithm) according to _u
ordered with respect to decreasing link quality: The link to a neighbor appearing early in the order _u
is regarded as being of higher quality than the link to a neighbor placed later in _u. A neighbor w
appearing before v in order _u is denoted as w _u v. The neighbor order reflects a much more
general notion of link quality, such as signal attenuation or packet arrival rate. In the second step the
neighbor order information is exchanged among all neighbors.
Typically a node u broadcasts its own neighbor order while receiving the orders established by all of
its neighbors. During the third step, which does not require any further Communication, each node
locally selects those neighboring nodes which will form its neighborhood in the resulting topology
control graph, based on the previously exchanged neighbor order information. For this purpose a
node u traverses _u with decreasing link quality: “Good” neighbors are considered first, “worse” ones
later. Informally speaking, a node u only builds a direct communication link to a neighbor v if u has no
“better” neighbor w that can be reached more easily from v than u itself.
Although the XTC algorithm is executed at all nodes, the detailed description as shown in the above
box assumes the point of view of a node u. Lines 1 and 2 correspond to Steps I) and II). Lines 3-11
define Step III) in more detail: First the two sets Nu and _ Nu are initialized to be empty. Now the
neighbor ordering _u established in Line 1, is traversed in increasing order. In Line 7 the neighbor
order _u of the currently considered neighbor v is examined: If any of u’s neighbors w already
processed appears in v’s order before u (w _v u) node v is included in _ Nu (Line 8); otherwise v is
added to Nu (Line 10). After completion of the algorithm, the set Nu contains u’s neighbors in the
topology control graph GXTC. More formally, the edge set EXTC of the graph GXTC = (V;EXTC) is
EXTC = f(u; v)j 9u: v 2 Nug. In the algorithm as described above, each node constructs in Step I) a
total order over all its neighbors in G. In a variant of the algorithm a node u could apply a growing
radius technique— starting with the “best” neighbor— to decide on a neighbor v’s inclusion in Nu or _
Nu—based on _v—immediately when identifying v as the next “worse” neighbor found so far.
Applying such interleaving of steps I), II) and III), u could terminate earlier, that is, as soon as having
found “enough” neighbors. Property 1 is symmetry of the resulting graph, often has to be enforced by
topology control algorithms.

Project Modules:-
The various modules in the protocol are as follows
Module 1:- Sending the data in the form of packet

Module 2:-
Using the XTC algorithm the ranking for each node is calculated.
Distance
Energy
Link Quality

Module 3:- Nodes exchange rankings with neighbors.

Module 4:-
Each node locally goes through all neighbors in order of their ranking
If the candidate ranks any of your already processed neighbors higher than yourself, then
you do not need to connect to the candidate.

Data Flow Diagram:-

Send the distance, Energy,
Host
Link quality to all other nodes

Receive the distance, Energy,
Link quality from all other
nodes

Rank all the
nodes

Send and receive data Based on rank
through those connections. calculate onnections

Flow Chart Analysis :

Identify each node

Get Distance, Energy, and Link Quality for
current node.

Send Distance, Energy and Link Quality of current
node to all nodes.

Receive Distance, Energy and Link Quality of all
nodes.

Rank all the nodes

C
C
For every node

No Ranking is
greater than
current node

Establish connection Next Node
Remove
connection

Send data

Yes

Java Abs Scalable Wireless Ad Hoc Network Simulation Using Xtc Domain Name System Security

Java Abs Scalable Wireless Ad Hoc Network Simulation Using Xtc Domain Name System Security

Recommandé

Recommandé

Contenu connexe

Plus de ncct

Plus de ncct (20)

Dernier

Dernier (20)

Java Abs Scalable Wireless Ad Hoc Network Simulation Using Xtc Domain Name System Security