2. Part 1: National Disaster Recovery Framework and
the Local Recovery Planning Manager Program
Part 2: Risk Assessments
■ Purpose
■ Methodology
Part 3: Risk Assessment Results
Part 4: Tackling Risk – Who’s Driving?
Topics
7. Initial Involvement
■ FEMA seeking a partner for local recovery effort
■ FEMA/Merck Foundation request to create LRPM position
■ New Jersey Recovery Fund transitioned from relief to recovery
8. FEMA’s National Disaster Recovery Framework
“ … strongly recommends that
State Governors as well as local
government ... prepare as part
of their disaster recovery plans
to appoint Local Disaster
Recovery Managers to lead
disaster recovery for the
jurisdiction.”
9. The Program
Screening Criteria
1. Considerable storm damage
2. Limited or no in-house planning capabilities
3. Primarily full-time residents
12. Why Do A Risk Assessment?
Purpose:
■ Evaluate vulnerability to likely hazards;
■ Prioritize those actions that most effectively
reduce or avoid future loss.
“If I had an hour to solve a problem
I’d spend 55 minutes thinking
about the problem and 5 minutes
thinking about solutions.”
-Albert Einstein
14. Sea Level Rise
2050 Sea Level Rise Projections
■ 1.48 FT (Miller, et. al.)
■ Coastal Plain
■ Central Scenario
Two Scenarios
■ Sunny Day - Mean Higher High Water
■ FEMA Special Flood Hazard Areas
15. Scenario 1
Sunny Day - Mean Higher High Water
■ The average of the higher high water height of each tidal
day observed over the National Tidal Datum Epoch
■ Used local NOAA Tide Stations or NOAA Vertical Datum
(Vdatum) Tool
17. ■ Land area covered by the floodwaters of the base flood
(1% Annual Chance Flood Hazard)
■ A* and V* Zones
■ NFIP regulations must be enforced
■ Mandatory purchase of flood insurance
FEMA Mapping
Special Flood Hazard Area
19. FEMA Special Flood Hazard Area
Focus of Analysis
■ AE and VE Zones (1% Annual Chance Flood Hazard)
■ Detailed Studies with Base Flood Elevations (BFE)
■ Predominate Flood Hazard Zones in Study Areas
Scenario 2
20. Two Routes of Increased Exposure
■ Inundation Extent
■ Water Depth
Evaluation
Note: Assumed a Linear Relationship
■ For Example, if MHHW = 1 FT in
current day conditions, then
projected MHHW = 2.48 FT in 2050
■ Creates Limitations for Scenario 2
25. ■ Percent of Land Inundated
■ Number of Parcels Impacted
■ Water Depth on each Property
■ Structure Damage
■ Depth Damage Curves
■ Residential vs. Commercial
■ One Story vs. Two Story
■ Basement vs. No Basement
For Each Scenario
27. At approximately 4 FT of
Water Depth, 50% of the
Structure is Damaged!
Depth Damage Curve
28. Refinements
■ First Floor Elevation at Grade
■ Exception – Parcels with Elevation Certificates since Sandy
■ Elevation > Base Condition + SLR
■ One-Story Residential and No Basement
■ Omitted Parcels
■ Less than 10% Inundation
■ Structure not Inundated
29. ■ Link Inundation Extents / Impacted Parcels with Parcel
Tax Assessors Data
■ Land Value
■ Improvement Value / Structure Value
■ Calculated Average Water Depth Across each Parcel
■ Derive Exposure Value for Each Scenario
Financial Exposure
30. Scenario 1
■ Percent of Land Inundated
■ Number of Parcels Impacted
■ Complete loss of the property, both structural and land value
■ “New Normal”
■ Elevated structures
Financial Exposure
31. Scenario 2: 1% Flood Event
■ Percent of Land Inundated
■ Number of Parcels Impacted
■ Water Depth
■ Temporary loss in structural assessment value
■ Elevated Structures
■ Loss of Land Value?
■ Frequency of this 1% flood event in 2050?
Financial Exposure
32. ■ Correlate loss of land and structural value to tax revenue
■ Correlate loss with land cover class
■ What implications does this have?
Financial Exposure
42. # of Exposed
Lots
Exposed
Acres
# of Exposed
Lots
Exposed
Acres
Vacant (1) 38 20 215 61
Residential (2) 176 25 885 86
Commercial (4A) 21 29 61 58
Apartment (4C) 1 1 4 2
Public Property (15C) 3 1 13 10
Church/Charitable (15D) 0 0 3 1
Other Exempt (15F) 1 0 2 1
Total 240 76 1,183 218
Property Class
(Class Code)
2050 SLR 2050 SLR/1% Flood
Sea Bright Borough - Parcels
The Bottom Line
■ 2050 SLR % of acres: 30%
■ 2050 /1% storm % of acres: 87%
43. Total Exposed
Value
% of Total
Value
Total Exposed
Value
% of Total
Value
Vacant (1) $4,873 7% $11,706,029 79%
Residential (2) $2,627,606 8% $224,602,347 61%
Commercial (4A) $1,077,896 36% $43,360,337 84%
Apartment (4C) $208,402 29% $2,269,751 70%
Public Property (15C) $11,225 3% $12,484,382 93%
Church/Charitable (15D) $0 0% $1,537,657 56%
Other Exempt (15F) $205,953 41% $1,026,553 70%
Total $4,135,955 11% $296,987,056 65%
Net Taxable Value $3,918,777 11% $281,938,464 65%
2050 SLR
Property Class
(Class Code)
2050/1% Flood
Sea Bright Borough - Value
The Bottom Line
■ 2050 % of total value: 11%
■ 2050/1% storm % of total value: 65%
56. Total Exposed Value: $115 million
% of Total Taxable Value: 39%
% of Total Area: 21%
The Bottom Line
Maurice River Township – 2050 SLR/1% Storm
60. Total Exposed Value: $45.5 million
% of Total Taxable Value: 15%
% of Total Area: 34%
The Bottom Line
Commercial Township – 2050 SLR/1% Storm
64. 1. Require state and municipal hmp coordination
2. Set mitigation project/planning priorities
3. Determine how/where CDBG-DR funds are spent
4. Promote regional planning context/set common
redevelopment standards (e.g. freeboard
requirements)
States: Much More Than Bit Players
65. Maryland
“As our climate continues to change and the
seas continue to rise, Maryland’s coastal areas
are highly susceptible to storms, flooding,
hurricanes and other hazards…By providing
funding and technical assistance we are helping
our most vulnerable communities combat the
threat, and build a stronger, resilient
Maryland”
Governor Martin O’Malley
66. Delaware
“The goal of the Sea Level Rise Advisory
committee is to assess Delaware’s vulnerability
to current and future inundation problems that
may be exacerbated by sea level rise and to
develop a set of recommendations for state
agencies, local governments, businesses and
citizens to enable them to adapt programs,
policies, business practices and make informed
decisions.”
Sea Level Rise Advisory Committee
67. New York
“New York is assisting communities to rebuild
better and safer based on community-driven
plans that consider current damage, future
threats to community assets, and the
community’s economic future.”
Guidance for New York Rising
71. 1. Can we continue to develop areas at risk?
2. Can we allow areas that suffer repetitive
loss to rebuild in place?
3. Will taxpayers throughout the country be
willing to subsidize risky behavior?
4. How long will the banking and insurance
industries continue to hedge their bets?
The Age of Innocence is So Over!
72. Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again
and expecting different results
Time for a new approach