11. One month ago in Poland
A man without government for 291 days!
12. the Results
Agile made problems visible
Fight for resources / priority
Disruptions made planning hard >
expectations not met
Big variety of work
Specialists
Not giving good customer service
18. Improving
1st Retrospective
• WIP limits well respected –+ visualization of issues
• Missing visualization of detailed tasks
• Missing a planning meeting
19. Improving
1st Retrospective (cont’d)
• Needed different level of feature detail
Business request:
“Customers have to be able to fill in a reservation,
send it to the planning department and get a
confirmation email with pdf attachment”
20. Agile team would split this into:
1. As a user I want to fill in a new reservation...
2. As a user I want to send my reservation...
3. As a user I want to receive an e-mail
confirmation with my reservation in pdf
attachment so that I ...
21. Suppose we used user stories in the
flow:
As a user I As a user I As a user I want
want to fill want to send to receive an
in a new my e-mail
reservation reservation... confirmation ...
TOO Low TOO Low TOO
Not all
Level for Level too OK OK Low
applicable
Stakeholders early Level
READY Analysis DESIGN DEV TEST VALI PROD
2 2 1 2 2 1
22. Improving
1st Retrospective (cont’d)
• Walking the board took longer than daily
standup
• Big difference in size of work items
• Need for progress visualization
27. “A politician needs the ability
to foretell what is going to happen
tomorrow, next week, next month,
and next year.
And to have the ability afterwards
to explain why it didn't happen.”
W. Churchill
28. Discoveries
2nd Retrospective (cont’d)
• Limitations of the physical task
board
• Bigger teams ~ distributed
• More administration ~ measuring
• Progress visualization