1.
Why a Critical Look at AP Processes Makes
AP and Dynamics ERP Technology Work
Aligning Processes with Technology Enables Efficiency and
Empowers Decision Making
GPUG Premiere Sponsor
Booth #313
4. • Intelligent use of reliable data – Invoices and supporting documentation should be inputted, transmitted
and shared within the AP department and across the enterprise so that the intelligence, accuracy and
integrity of data is preserved and used to support decision making.
• Talent management – The accounting department’s best employees should be matched with the right
responsibilities.
Compounding these challenges is the paper problem. Quite simply, information stored on massive quantities of
paper can’t be shared, understood or acted upon efficiently, and it is this reality that stifles a would‐be efficient
P2P process. Not knowing where invoices and purchase orders are located, when they are due, and how much
they are worth perpetuates accounting as a “black hole” of inefficiency.
Getting back on track means understanding the role accounting best practices can play in ensuring core challenges
are addressed – even in advance of document management and workflow technology. It also means demanding
more from your data, promoting efficiency and accuracy with trusted data centers – made possible by ERP
solutions that are integrated with AP technology – that can be accessed used with confidence by the right people
at the right time to extract the right results.
Evaluating the Impact of Paper and Process on P2P
Determining if the accounting department is emphasizing efficiency, cost savings, and transparency, promoting
effective talent management and driving real business value requires a critical look at the organization’s
contributors to an efficient P2P process. They include:
• Invoice processing time – Take the accounting department’s processing pulse by tracking the progression
of a single invoice as it winds its way through the department. How are invoices received and processed –
in paper‐based or electronic format? How long does the process take? At what points does the process
encounter bottlenecks? How might the accuracy and integrity of data be impacted or otherwise affected
along the way?
• Invoice processing priority – Find out if the organization misses early‐payment incentives – or, worse,
gets saddled with late‐payment fees. Is there a discernible priority when it comes to processing invoices,
or is it simply the luck of the draw?
• Invoice processing costs – Beyond potential overtime for accounting staff, determine how much the
organization spends on postage, courier services and related elements to process an invoice.
• Vendor involvement – Compare the number of calls placed to and from suppliers and customers to the
number of transactions actually processed. Multiple calls per invoice mean barriers to efficiency.
• Vendor efficiency – How efficiently are vendors generating invoices, fulfilling orders and ensuring timely
shipments? Repeated breakdowns in the process present roadblocks to efficiency – especially when they
increase costs.
Enabling Intelligent Process Automation in Accounting
Migrating from a paper‐based process to a computerized one is only part of the accounting solution. True
automation results when accounting systems deliver built‐in intelligence across the customer and supplier
landscape so that, after the very first time information is entered at any point, the data will never have to be
rekeyed. Instead, it will appear automatically as work and data flow. When new information is needed, it will
simply be added to the process.
2 Metafile Information Systems, Inc.
5. CASE STUDY SIDEBAR: CENTRAL MAINTENANCE AND WELDING
About Central Maintenance and Welding
• Central Maintenance and Welding, Inc. (CMW) was founded in 1966 and is headquartered in Lithia,
Fla.
• CMW’s 375 employees provide customized welding, construction, fabrication and maintenance
services in the plants and facilities of chemical, mining, power generation and other companies in
Florida and internationally.
Situation
• CMW’s P2P process is largely rooted in materials used and time spent in conjunction with customers’
projects.
• Once materials are purchased, the resulting invoices and supporting documentation are provided to
the customer. A CMW invoice is also provided that includes billing for employees’ time on the
project.
• The CMW invoice is designed to bring together all vendor invoices – from time sheets, to equipment
logs, to stock transfers and more – to facilitate prompt payment.
• CMW’s AP and accounts receivable (AR) departments were entirely paper‐based, operating without
standardized procedures. Piles of paper‐based vendor and customer invoices, purchase orders, time
sheets, and supporting documentation prevented CMW from providing and receiving accurate
payments from suppliers and customers for services rendered.
Results
• Seamless integration with the Microsoft Dynamics GP solution. Metafile facilitated data sharing,
indexing and search between its MetaViewer AP and AR document management solution and CMW’s
Microsoft Dynamics system.
• Standardization of AP and AR processes. Metafile experts and the company’s MetaViewer solution
successfully transitioned CMW’s AP and AR functions from 100 percent paper‐based to 100 percent
paperless, laying the foundation for immediate and measurable return on investment.
• Empowering future decision making. As CMW continues to expand and grow, the MetaViewer
solution will offer the organization’s leaders a living, active repository of information they can use to
promote confidence in future financial decision making.
Invoice capture, document management and workflow automation technology is available to help organizations
introduce visibility into accounting processes and identify and resolve paper‐ and process‐based breakdowns. By
tracking the flow of an invoice within, outside and among P2P stakeholders, accounting leaders can identify and
correct process breakdowns. They can also take steps to ensure the right talent is positioned in the right
accounting roles to ensure efficiency. Technology also can help organizations easily identify the number and
prioritization of invoices awaiting action.
These and other elements create the level of process visibility that accounting department leaders and C‐level
executives need to empower their own decision‐making. Prioritizing integration with the organization’s ERP
Metafile Information Systems, Inc. 3
6. solution will enable the a
accounting fun nction to help u
upper managem ment extract mmaximum return from the
organizatioon’s ERP investtment.
For examp ple, technologyy can help organizations accoomplish data sh haring, indexing and searchinng between theeir
document management solutions and their respectiv ve ERP systems s. Indexed data
a and supporting documents can
then be shared, so that ssearches in thee ERP system wwill retrieve invoices stored in
n the documen nt management
That means use
solution. T ers key in information only onnce, whether u using the document managem ment solution or
ERP. Userss also can accomplish two‐ an nd three‐way innvoice matchin ng and retrieve
e supporting in
nformation acrross
disparate ssources with ju
ust a few mous se clicks.
Intelligent AP/ERP technology automat tion is happeni
ing now – and it is a distinct a
area of opport
tunity for accou
unting
leaders in numerous induustries nationw
wide.
The Cross‐Industry Oppo
ortunity for Int
telligent AP/ER
RP Technology
y Automation
How does your organizatio currently mana your AP proc
on age cess?
Resp
ponse Resp
ponse
Answer Op
ptions
Per
rcent Coount
Entirely pa
aper-based 14.6% 35
3
Blend of pa
aper-based activ and AP functi
vity ionality in Micros Dynamics
soft 59.2% 14
42
Entirely AP functionality in Microsoft Dynam
P mics 16.7% 40
4
Paperless solution offered by an AP docum
ment managemen technology pro
nt ovider 6.7% 16
1
We don't 2.9% 7
MSDynamicsWorld recen ntly conducted d a survey amoong 240 Micros soft Dynamics uusers to determ
mine the extennt to
which resppondents in a v
variety of indus
stries may or mmay not be leveeraging techno
ology – either A
AP, ERP or both – to
manage ac ccounting docuuments and wo orkflow. The suurvey found that close to 67 percent of resp
pondents take
between o one and five da
ays to process iinvoices using a blend of pap
per‐based activ
vity and AP doccument
manageme ent technology
y. Despite the p
presence and u use of technoloogy among theese respondent ts, processing
invoices in a timely mann
ner remains a c challenge facin
ng the AP profe
ession among more than 40 percent of
responden nts.
In additionn, while relative
ely few
responden nts are employing
AP/ERP tec chnology integ gration in
its entirety
y, integration is
s the
priority ide
entified as mos st likely to
improve th he Microsoft Dynamics
experience e. Integration is also
identified bby nearly half (
(43.3
percent) of the sample as a
priority over the next one to two
years.
4 Metafile Info
ormation System
ms, Inc.