At any given time, with all the knowledge we have, new knowledge can emerge. We call this the adjacent possible. It explains why new inventions are invented when they are, and why they are not possible before. Adjacent possible is a very useful term to understand the progress of technology. Technology evolves by using prevailing technologies to improve upon. Thus technology is combinatorial and built in layers. With each layer new ideas can be built upon the previous layers. Thus Gall's Law says that any complex system that works is built of simpler systems that work.
We will look at the adjacent possible and some ideas that came when all the enabling technologies are available. We also look at an idea that was not possible to build at the time, Charles Babbage engines.
2. The S-curve
Based on the notion of the Technical Life Cycle
Improvements in
performance varies
throughout the life
of the technology
3. Number of transistors on
an integrated circuit will double
in about 18-24 months
Moore’s Law
4. The Law of Accelerating Returns
Evolution applies positive feedback in that the more
capable methods resulting from one stage of
evolutionary progress are used to create the next
stage.
As a result, the rate of progress of an evolutionary
process increases exponentially over time.
11. When All the Enabling Technologies are Ready
Why was the telephone invented in 1876, but
not 1826 or 1926?
With electricity, wires, batteries and with the
workmanship and tools and with the knowledge of
these, at the time, it was possible in 1876 to create
a working telephone
13. Adjacent Possible
Inventions have their time in history
due to the possibilities of the
environment at any given time.
Inventions tend to happen within the
boundaries of the adjacent possible,
or the realm of possibilities available
at any given momentSteven Johnson
14. Adjacent Possible
Inventions tend to happen within the
boundaries of the adjacent possible,
or the realm of possibilities available
at any given moment
Steven Johnson
15. Adjacent Possible
...a kind of shadow future, hovering on
the edges of the present state of
things, a map of all the ways in which
the present can reinvent itself
Steven Johnson
16.
17. Ideas usually come at similar time
Electricity, wires, telegraph, batteries, …
21. Believed that machines
could replace laborious and
error-prone calculations -
“calculate by steam”
Charles Babbage
22.
23. Machine to compute polynomials
Got grants but efforts were slow
Lack of workmanship of the time
delayed the project
Worked stopped 1833
Difference Engine
24.
25. Analytical engine
Babbage started on a new machine in 1834
Programmable machine – with
primitive programming language
Input was in punched cards
Run by steam
26. Augusta Ada Byron
Countess of Lovelace
Mathematician and
scientist
Worked with Babbage on
his Analytical Engine
The first programmer
27.
28. Notes by the Translator
Ada worte notes on the Analytical machine
1. General purpose machine - mill to
calculate, store to keep data, and formulas
2. Machine was not limited to math - could
by any symbol - words, logic, music
3. Step by step instructions - programs,
subroutines
35. "Left to his own devices he couldn’t build a toaster.
He could just about make a sandwich
and that was it."
— Mostly Harmless, Douglas Adams, 1992
36.
37.
38. “And that was something that reoccurred
throughout the project, was, the smaller the scale
you want to work on, the further back in time you
have to go”
— Thomas Thwaites
47. The most important single central
fact about a free market is that no
exchange takes place unless both
parties benefit.
— Milton Friedman
48.
49. The Law of Disappearing Technology
When some technique is mastered,
it will “disappear” as something
obvious and trivial, and other more
useful things that are built on top of it
50. That means when technology
disappears
it becomes useful
The Law of Disappearing Technology
58. The Prevailing Technology Trap
Current and dominant technology
will highly influence and restrict
new innovations
59. Current and dominant technology will
highly influence new innovation, and can
even restrict them
Innovators are so influenced by the
current technologies that they will try to
work according to them, including their
limitations.
The Prevailing Technology Trap
63. Two Waves of Products Development
In the first wave the product is
restricted by the prevailing
technology, but in the second,
there is something new
64. Two Waves of Products Development
Web 1.0 Web 2.0
65. Two Waves of Products Development
One2Many Many2Many