VIP Call Girl in Mira Road 💧 9920725232 ( Call Me ) Get A New Crush Everyday ...
An Asset Price Theory of Exchange Rates
1. Towards an asset price theory of
exchange rates
Jan Priewe, HTW Berlin – University of Applied Sciences
Kansas City, 26 September 2014
12th International Post Keynesian Conference
1
2. Agenda
1. Where does orthodox exchange rate theory stand?
2. Where does Keynesian exchange rate theory stand?
3. Some new ideas
4. The dollar-euro/DM-exchange rate since 1970
5. Where to go
2
3. 1. Where does orthodox exchange rate theory stand?
Traditional XR determinants:
st = α Et(yt+1 - yt+1*) + ß Et(PPP* - PPPt) + λ Et(πt+1* - πt+1) + γ Et(rt+1 - rt+1*) + εt
But:
„There is overwhelming empirical evidence that the exchange rates of the most
important currencies are unrelated to the fundamentals that economic theory has
identified.” (De Grauwe 2000, 353)
Most orthodox economists believe in the long-run validity of PPP, admit that in the
short-run (1-2 years) deviations from fundamentals occur. They cannot explain the
transition from the short-run to the long-run.
Exchange rate theory is one of the Achilles heels of mainstream international
macroeconomics.
3
4. 2. Where does Keynesian exchange rate theory stand?
• Keynes: PPP is „truism“ (1923); Keynes did not develop a coherent XR theory for flexible
XR; speculation not very important for him
• Davidson: uncertainty, unanchored expectations volatility, high XR elasticity of
expectations, visible hand necessary on forex markets
• Harvey: forex is financial asset; speculation of forex dealers, predominance of chartists
relative to fundamentalists; high volatility; in the long-run huge imbalances in BoP;
cyclicity not addressed
• Kindleberger/Minsky: model of boom-bust cycle of asset prices applicable to forex
markets
„One place where the model surely applies today is foreign exchange markets,
in which prices rise and fall in wide swings, despite sizable interventions in the
market by monetary authorities …. “ (Kindleberger, 2000, p. 21)
• Behavioral finance (De Grauwe et al.): microeconomic approach; under high uncertainty
search for simple heuristics; Chartists predominate against fundamentalists; rejection
of rational expectation theory and efficient market hypotheses; but: „bounded
rationality“; rejection of PPP
4
5. 3. Some new ideas
1.) Role of „fundamentals“ – key point of disagreement
• „Fundamentals“ is umbrella term for many diverse determinants – heterogeneity
of fundamentals
• Fundamentals do play a prime role when it comes to reversals from appreciation
to depreciation (change of sign)
• Fundamentals often without clear, unambiguous direction
• Indicators on fundamentals require interpretation and policy decision
• Trade-offs among different fundamentals
• „perverted PPP“ can happen: output/employment adjust to misaligned XR, in
case over-valued XR industries will shrink or go bust return to PPP impossible
• Natural „trustees“ of fundamentals are/should be central banks/governments
• In most modern analyses: PPP-deviation neglected, although very relevant in
exuberant episodes
5
6. 2. Predominance of destabilising speculation
• Most of the time: speculation of forex trading industry, algorithm trade
(high frequency trade), derivatives abet upward and downward speculation
• Short-termism underscores lack of fundamental ingrediences in traders‘
rules
• Predominance of destabilising speculation (microeconomically „rational“) ,
lack of stabilising speculation (see Kindleberger/Minsky)
• „rational bubbles“?
• Currencies are special asset class; traders deal mostly on their account,
detached from goods trade, portfolio or direct foreign investment
• Financialised forex markets
• Long waves of upward/downward speculation, as long as fundamentalists
are weak or inactive
6
7. 3. Boom-bust cycles of appreciation – depreciation
• Similar to other asset classes: value of currency does not grow infinitely
• Point and time of reversal unpredictable, no clearly defined floors/ceilings
• Reversal episodes in the past idiosynchrati
• Important fundamentals strongly „violated“
• PPP must play a role since trade with goods and services becomes
extremely distorted; heavy pain for strongly appreciating and depreciating
economies
• Capital flows also strongly distorted
• Risk of recession, balance of payments or financial crisis
• Central banks become concerned
• Vested interests of many interest groups are at risk
• In many reversal episodes of XR, central banks intervened on forex
markets
7
8. 4. The dollar-euro/DM-exchange rate since 1970
• Since 1970: strong volatility, trend towards nominal appreciation of
DM/euro
• Bilateral real exchange rate appreciated at times by > 100%, and
depreciated afterwards excessively
• Long-run trend: only little real appreciation of DM/Euro since 1973
• Among all fundamental factors, PPP most strongly violated in phases of
extreme misalignments
• Problems of measurement of PPP remain (tradables, nontradables; high
transaction costs (Rogoff)?)
• Varying deviation of PPP cannot be explained by transaction costs
• Europe can only „survive“ the roller-coaster XR by stable intra-European XR
• In several recessions, the dollar revalued against DM/euro
• Prime reserve currency is more resilient than others (not substitutable),
can live with XR volatility better than others
8
9. 400
350
300
250
200
150
100
50
index, 1973 = 100
Nominal exchange rates of leading currencies vis à vis US-$,
1950-2013
- Index 1973=100, annual averages -
DM
€
CHF
Yen
GBP
US-$/DM oder € US-$/Yen US-$/GBP US-$/CHF
9
11. 220
200
180
160
140
120
100
80
60
Nominal and real exchange rate DM/€ for US-dollar and real effective
exchange rate 1973-2013
index 1973 = 100 (annual averages, indirect quotation)
real effective XR
nominal XR
bilateral real XR
1973
1975
1977
1979
1981
1983
1985
1987
1989
1991
1993
1995
1997
1999
2001
2003
2005
2007
2009
2011
2013
11
12. 1.60
1.50
1.40
1.30
1.20
1.10
1.00
0.90
0.80
8.00
6.00
4.00
2.00
0.00
-2.00
-4.00
Exchange rate USD/DM-€, differential of short-term interest rates and
differential of current account balance D/EZ-USA) 1992-2013
(until 1998 Germany, then Eurozone)
differential short-term interest rates (D/EZ-US)
differential current account balance (% of GDP), D/EZ-US
USD per DM/€, rhs
12
13. 30
20
10
0
-10
-20
-30
-40
-50
8.00
6.00
4.00
2.00
0.00
-2.00
-4.00
-6.00
Four fundamentals and the DM/€/USD exchange rate 1992-2013
(until 1998 Germany, afterwards Eurozone)
diffential inflation (US-D/EZ) differential growth (D/EZ - US)
differential short-term interest rates (D/EZ-US) change of XR (USD per DM/€), rhs
deviation price level from PPP (US-D/EZ), rhs
13
14. 1.90
1.80
1.70
1.60
1.50
1.40
1.30
1.20
1.10
1.00
0.90
0.80
0.70
Deviation of PPP of select countries 1990-2013
vis à vis the US (= 1)*
Germany Japan Italy France US GB Switzerland
14
16. 5. Where to go
• Recommencment of XR theory necessary
• Reconsideration of Keynes‘s endorsement of PPP (for tradables, adjusted
for transaction costs) and on his analysis of uncertainty, expectations and
speculation
• Financialisation of XR in modern flexible rate regimes (unregulatted forex
markets, full international capital mobility) huge volume of transactions,
unrelated to fundamentals
• Destabilising speculation predominates, one-directional
• Reversals unavoidable!
• In reversal episodes, fundamentals under strong stress
• Crises or central bank interventions have plaid certain roles in the past
• Turning points still diffficult to explain; econometric methods fail
• Strong overlapping of behavioural finance XR theories and Keynesian ideas
16
17. collaboration of two leading CBs and reserve currencies
remember Keynes 1923: dollar and Sterling blocs should
cooperate, leading to more stable XR worldwide
monetary cooperation Fed/ECB is a cornerstone for global
monetary reform
Keynes 1923, p. 204:
„The best we can do, therefore, is to have two managed currencies,
sterling and dollars, with as close a collaboration as possible between
the aims and methods of the managements.“
17
