This document discusses the 12 Angry Men film and analyzes the personalities and roles of the 12 jury members. It describes each jury member's traits and how they initially voted and changed their positions during deliberations. It focuses on Jury #8 who was logical, prepared, and able to use critical thinking and leadership to influence others and eventually convince the majority to vote not guilty. The document also addresses how stereotypes and personal prejudices of some jury members affected their initial perceptions and decisions.

1. 12 Angry Men
ORGANIZATION BEHAVIOR

2. Group Assignment
Rahul Parikh
Kashyap Pathak
Rajesh Pandey
Bharat Parulekar
Ashish nair
12 Angry Men by 5 intellectual People

3. Question 1
Various Personality traits of Jury members and
Accused. And the Role of Situation That effect the
Perceptual Process.

4. Jury 1
Personality Traits Role:
Organized  Initially he is influenced by
Disciplined others.
Methodical  When jury No9 highlights the
Composed doubts about the eyesight of the
Lady eye witness. Who is 45
years of age. And has viewed the
accused from a long distance. He
changes his opinion.

5. Jury 2
Personality Traits Role
Lack of Confidence Inexperienced in
Submissive evaluating a case.
Sharp minded Was a first time Jury
Influenced by
Rational Thinker
other but taken
decision when post
situation
demonstrated by
Jury no. 8

6. Jury 3
Personality Traits Role
Aggressive Preconceive on the
Temperamental basis of Personnel
Emotional difference with his son.
Defective decision
Rigid mind set
making without
Partial
analyzed the situation.
No good Team Player Want to mind guards
No soft skills everyone.
Biased Change his decision
Autocratic finally at last everyone
against him and don’t
have enough argue left.

7. Jury 4
Personality Traits Role
 He believed the
Stereotype
accused as guilty
Prejudice because he had pre
Driven by facts
conceived notions
about people from
Rigid mind set the slums
Egoistic  When he is able to
co-relate, the fact of
his own weak
eyesight & that of
the eyewitness, he
changes his opinion

8. Jury 5
Personality Traits Role
Earlier given vote due to
Good Decision maker
influence of others .
Sympathetic Feeling inferior status
Inferior while going though the
discussion
Introvert After having stereotype
comment by jury 5 and
influence by jury 8 logical
reasoning , he converted his
votes and soon after help jury
8 in the convincing all other
juries.

9. Jury 6
Personality Traits Role
Earlier given vote due to
• Good Decision maker influence of others .
• Sympathetic Main point raised while
discussion was what should
• Aggressive be the motive of the murder.
After convincing through
discussion with jury no 8
and jury 5 convinced for not
guilty.
Try to remove the mind
spreads generated by jury
3,4 ,10 with hot discussion.

10. Jury 7
Irresponsible  Person changes his
Insensitive votes according to
Not interested flow going on
majority side.
Unfocused
 Not a good thinker
Non reasoning as don’t have any
Undisciplined base for his
decisions.
 Not focused at all
through the decision
making.

11. Jury 8
 Logical Thinker  Based on his preparation,
 Critical Evaluator logical thinking ,great
 Good Temperament leader ship skill influence
 Visionary the rest of jury member
 Team player
convert the majority of
opinion in the favor of
 Practical accused.
 Disciplined  His ability through
 Convincing perceptual analyzing the
 Responsible facts of each situation in
 Leader details with logical
 Decision maker
answering to each
prosecution’s valid points
 Prepared converted votes of jury
 Task master members in his side.
 Socio Emotional

12. Jury 9
Good Follower  After Jury 8 has
Critical Thinker pointed on
Supportive Probabilities of not
Impartial guilty ,and given
the reasons for his
Responsible
judgment. He
Good Soft Skills
supported him to
have fair
discussion.

13. Jury 10
Not proper Thinker  For Earlier Discussion
his personality
Abusive reflects stereotype.
Prejudice  Changes his mind
when all the others
Arrogant juries are against him
 insensitive and specifically when
jury 4 tells him to
keep quite and not to
speak
 Which shows that his
arguments are
irrational and biased.

14. Jury 11
Personality Traits Role
 Earlier influenced by
Good decision maker others.
Rational thinker  Changes his decision
based on the
Supportive arguments put forth
Team player by Jury 8. He gets
convinced that there is
Open minded reasonable doubt in
the evidence. Which
Agreeable makes him change his
Good natured decision to not guilty.

15. Jury 12
Personality Traits Role
Indecisive
 He changed his mind
Not interested
based on the decision
Unfocused of others (Herd
Non reasoning Mentality)
In disciplined

16. Accused
Personality Traits Role
High temperamental Stressed with the
Uneducated situation
Immature Not in the age of
Stressed understanding
Legislations.
 Pressurized by
Prosecution arguments .
Confused behavior .

17. Question 2
Stereotype - # 4 has assumptions with respect to
kids from the slums.
Personal prejudice - # 3 & 10 had a personnel
prejudice to the accused due to their experience
with their own kids.

18. Question 3
 Boy had a fight
 He shouts in anger “ I will kill you”
 A knife was bought from the nearby stores.
 A woman has seen him “someone” committing the crime.
 Boy was found near fathers dead body
Yes, we can say that learning knowledge and
experience play a significant role in
developing our perceptual process.

19. Question 4
 Pre-prepared : Had already bought a replica knife to prove that murder may have been committed by a
person other than accused.
 Based on his professional qualification as an architect he is able to explain the jury about the approximate
time taken by the old man to open the door. “ Which was almost twice than as stated by the eye witness”.
 Prob’s jury no. 4 about how much he remembers his personal incidents from the past few days and tried to
prove that the accused may also have forgotten due to stressful conditions, like him and it was not
necessarily accused his lying.
Leadership style :
 Good communication
 Human value
 Convincing skills
 Reliable objector
 Aggressiveness (Situation based )
 Task oriented
 Socio – emotional

20. THANK YOU