SlideShare une entreprise Scribd logo
1  sur  2
Central Information Commission
                           2nd Floor, August Kranti Bhawan,
                        Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi – 110 066
                                Website: www.cic.gov.in

                                                        Decision No.5973/IC(A)/2010
                                                        F. No.CIC/MA/A/2010/900625
                                                     Dated, the, 24th September, 2010

Name of the Appellant:                Shri. Pushakar Raj Chandna

Name of the Public Authority:         MECON Limited


Facts: i

1.     Both the parties were heard on 24/9/2010.


2.     The appellant has asked for copies of ACRs for the period 2002 - 2006,
which have been refused to him u/s 8(1)(j) of the Act.


3.     During the hearing, the CPIO stated that the ACRs have traditionally been
considered as confidential document and therefore the information was refused
to the appellant.


Decision:


4.     Every government employee has the right to know his performance
evaluation and the grades obtained by him.             Such information are helpful in
improving work performance. Therefore, there is no justification for withholding
ACR grades of employees.
                    i “If you don’t ask, you don’t get.” - Mahatma Gandhi
                    i




              1
5.    The CPIO is therefore directed to furnish the information asked for within
15 working days from the date of receipt of this decision failing which penalty
proceedings u/s 20(1) of the Act would be initiated.


6.    The appeal is thus disposed of.

                                                                       Sd/-
                                                                 (Prof. M.M. Ansari)
                                                  Central Information Commissionerii


Authenticated true copy:


(M.C. Sharma)
Deputy Registrar

Name & address of Parties:

1.    Shri. Pushakar Raj Chandna, Flat No.710, MISAS Apartments, C-58/10,
      Sector-62, NOIDA – 201 301(U.P.)

2.    Shri. Ravi Bambha, Company Secretary & CPIO, MECON Ltd. Ranchi –
      834 002. (Jharkhand)

3.    Shri. R. Chand, Appellate Authority, MECON Ltd. Ranchi – 834 002.
      (Jharkhand)




                   ii “All men by nature desire to know.” - Aristotle
                   i




              2

Contenu connexe

Similaire à Performance Evaluation Govt. Employee RTI Judgement

Hc order on medical bills
Hc order on medical billsHc order on medical bills
Hc order on medical billscjarindia
 
High court order 07.01.2016
High court order 07.01.2016High court order 07.01.2016
High court order 07.01.2016cjarindia
 
Cic decision 2020 01-07-095152102730 ds
Cic decision 2020 01-07-095152102730 dsCic decision 2020 01-07-095152102730 ds
Cic decision 2020 01-07-095152102730 dssabrangsabrang
 
Cctv camera sc order sept 16
Cctv camera sc order sept 16Cctv camera sc order sept 16
Cctv camera sc order sept 16sabrangsabrang
 
Order dated 09.03.2018 against SC
Order dated 09.03.2018 against SCOrder dated 09.03.2018 against SC
Order dated 09.03.2018 against SCOm Prakash Poddar
 

Similaire à Performance Evaluation Govt. Employee RTI Judgement (8)

Hc order on medical bills
Hc order on medical billsHc order on medical bills
Hc order on medical bills
 
Madras hc order pio
Madras hc order pioMadras hc order pio
Madras hc order pio
 
High court order 07.01.2016
High court order 07.01.2016High court order 07.01.2016
High court order 07.01.2016
 
Cic decision 2020 01-07-095152102730 ds
Cic decision 2020 01-07-095152102730 dsCic decision 2020 01-07-095152102730 ds
Cic decision 2020 01-07-095152102730 ds
 
Cctv camera sc order sept 16
Cctv camera sc order sept 16Cctv camera sc order sept 16
Cctv camera sc order sept 16
 
RTI ACT 2005 PART V
RTI ACT 2005 PART VRTI ACT 2005 PART V
RTI ACT 2005 PART V
 
Hc order august 26
Hc order august 26Hc order august 26
Hc order august 26
 
Order dated 09.03.2018 against SC
Order dated 09.03.2018 against SCOrder dated 09.03.2018 against SC
Order dated 09.03.2018 against SC
 

Plus de Pushkar Raj Chandna

New Technology for Lead Production
New Technology for Lead ProductionNew Technology for Lead Production
New Technology for Lead ProductionPushkar Raj Chandna
 
Meteorite takes out roof and wall of russian zinc smelter plant
Meteorite takes out roof and wall of russian zinc smelter plantMeteorite takes out roof and wall of russian zinc smelter plant
Meteorite takes out roof and wall of russian zinc smelter plantPushkar Raj Chandna
 
Project Planning, Monitoring & Control
Project Planning, Monitoring & ControlProject Planning, Monitoring & Control
Project Planning, Monitoring & ControlPushkar Raj Chandna
 
RTI draft letter under Section 4
RTI draft letter under Section 4RTI draft letter under Section 4
RTI draft letter under Section 4Pushkar Raj Chandna
 
Satyam Lessons and Corporate Governance Reforms
Satyam Lessons and Corporate Governance ReformsSatyam Lessons and Corporate Governance Reforms
Satyam Lessons and Corporate Governance ReformsPushkar Raj Chandna
 
Zn India Metal Bulletin, London May06
Zn India Metal Bulletin, London May06Zn India Metal Bulletin, London May06
Zn India Metal Bulletin, London May06Pushkar Raj Chandna
 

Plus de Pushkar Raj Chandna (19)

Lead Poisoning
Lead PoisoningLead Poisoning
Lead Poisoning
 
New Technology for Lead Production
New Technology for Lead ProductionNew Technology for Lead Production
New Technology for Lead Production
 
Meteorite takes out roof and wall of russian zinc smelter plant
Meteorite takes out roof and wall of russian zinc smelter plantMeteorite takes out roof and wall of russian zinc smelter plant
Meteorite takes out roof and wall of russian zinc smelter plant
 
Indian Zinc Metallurgy
Indian Zinc Metallurgy Indian Zinc Metallurgy
Indian Zinc Metallurgy
 
Ancient Indian Zinc Metallurgy
Ancient Indian Zinc MetallurgyAncient Indian Zinc Metallurgy
Ancient Indian Zinc Metallurgy
 
Secondary lead recycling
Secondary lead recyclingSecondary lead recycling
Secondary lead recycling
 
Leadership Challenge
Leadership ChallengeLeadership Challenge
Leadership Challenge
 
Zinc Smelter Project Report
Zinc Smelter Project ReportZinc Smelter Project Report
Zinc Smelter Project Report
 
Non-ferrous Metal Recycling
Non-ferrous Metal RecyclingNon-ferrous Metal Recycling
Non-ferrous Metal Recycling
 
Project Planning, Monitoring & Control
Project Planning, Monitoring & ControlProject Planning, Monitoring & Control
Project Planning, Monitoring & Control
 
Design & Engineering Flow Chart
Design & Engineering Flow ChartDesign & Engineering Flow Chart
Design & Engineering Flow Chart
 
Project Management Essentials
Project Management EssentialsProject Management Essentials
Project Management Essentials
 
RTI draft letter under Section 4
RTI draft letter under Section 4RTI draft letter under Section 4
RTI draft letter under Section 4
 
Satyam Lessons and Corporate Governance Reforms
Satyam Lessons and Corporate Governance ReformsSatyam Lessons and Corporate Governance Reforms
Satyam Lessons and Corporate Governance Reforms
 
Zinc Metallurgy
Zinc MetallurgyZinc Metallurgy
Zinc Metallurgy
 
Execution of Copper Rod Plant
Execution of  Copper Rod PlantExecution of  Copper Rod Plant
Execution of Copper Rod Plant
 
Lead Smelting & Refining
Lead Smelting & RefiningLead Smelting & Refining
Lead Smelting & Refining
 
Chanderiya Lead Zinc Project
Chanderiya Lead Zinc ProjectChanderiya Lead Zinc Project
Chanderiya Lead Zinc Project
 
Zn India Metal Bulletin, London May06
Zn India Metal Bulletin, London May06Zn India Metal Bulletin, London May06
Zn India Metal Bulletin, London May06
 

Performance Evaluation Govt. Employee RTI Judgement

  • 1. Central Information Commission 2nd Floor, August Kranti Bhawan, Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi – 110 066 Website: www.cic.gov.in Decision No.5973/IC(A)/2010 F. No.CIC/MA/A/2010/900625 Dated, the, 24th September, 2010 Name of the Appellant: Shri. Pushakar Raj Chandna Name of the Public Authority: MECON Limited Facts: i 1. Both the parties were heard on 24/9/2010. 2. The appellant has asked for copies of ACRs for the period 2002 - 2006, which have been refused to him u/s 8(1)(j) of the Act. 3. During the hearing, the CPIO stated that the ACRs have traditionally been considered as confidential document and therefore the information was refused to the appellant. Decision: 4. Every government employee has the right to know his performance evaluation and the grades obtained by him. Such information are helpful in improving work performance. Therefore, there is no justification for withholding ACR grades of employees. i “If you don’t ask, you don’t get.” - Mahatma Gandhi i 1
  • 2. 5. The CPIO is therefore directed to furnish the information asked for within 15 working days from the date of receipt of this decision failing which penalty proceedings u/s 20(1) of the Act would be initiated. 6. The appeal is thus disposed of. Sd/- (Prof. M.M. Ansari) Central Information Commissionerii Authenticated true copy: (M.C. Sharma) Deputy Registrar Name & address of Parties: 1. Shri. Pushakar Raj Chandna, Flat No.710, MISAS Apartments, C-58/10, Sector-62, NOIDA – 201 301(U.P.) 2. Shri. Ravi Bambha, Company Secretary & CPIO, MECON Ltd. Ranchi – 834 002. (Jharkhand) 3. Shri. R. Chand, Appellate Authority, MECON Ltd. Ranchi – 834 002. (Jharkhand) ii “All men by nature desire to know.” - Aristotle i 2