When different modalities available, one with maximum chance of cure should be used. When different modalities have same results, one offering better quality of life, with organ, function preservation and good cosmetic results should be used
When different modalities available, one with maximum chance of cure should be used. When different modalities have same results, one offering better quality of life, with organ, function preservation and good cosmetic results should be used
1.
JC : Landmark studies in organ
preservation protocol
2.
Introduction -
Treatment considerations in H& N cancers –
• Highest loco- regional control
• Anatomical with functional preservation
• Stage I / II Single modality ( Surgery or RT )
• Stage III / IV Combined modality
Surgery + RT (in most patients)- used to be
the treatment modality
Chemotherapy + RT – organ preservation
protocol
3.
• When different modalities available, one with
maximum chance of cure should be used
• When different modalities have same results,
one offering better quality of life, with organ,
function preservation and good cosmetic
results should be used
4.
Functional larynx –
• Respiration
• Phonation
• Swallowing
• Protection of lower airway
• Patient is able to eat and speak without a
permanent tracheostomy at a point when no
recurrence is expected ( > 2yrs after treatment )
5.
Post laryngectomy –
• diminished sense of smell and therefore taste
• difficulty in swallowing, related to changes in
the pharyngeal anatomy
• emotional and cosmetic effects of both losing
an organ
• living with a permanent tracheostoma
• Voice Quality
6.
Prospective, randomized study
Previously untreated advanced (Stage III or IV)
laryngeal squamous carcinoma
Compare the results of induction chemotherapy
followed by definitive radiation therapy with
conventional laryngectomy and postoperative
radiation
8.
Treatment regimen –
Chemotherapy
• Induction chemotherapy
- Cisplatin 100mg/m2 rapid IV followed by 5FU
1000mg/m2/day for five days
- Chemo repeated on days 22 and 43
- Assessed 18 to 21 days after second cycle of
chemo – clinical and IDL
9.
• Complete response – complete disappearance of
clinically evident tumour
• Partial response – At least 50% reduction in sum
of product of longest dimension and its
perpendicular for each tumour
– Patients with atleast a partial response and no
progression of neck disease received 3rd cycle of
chemo, followed by RT
– Any lesser – surgery and post op RT
10.
Radiation –
Definitive radiation therapy - 66 to 76 Gy to the
primary tumor site.
11.
Surgery –
- Wide-field total laryngectomy
- Horizontal partial laryngectomy.
13.
• Reanalysed in 1998 – for voice and swallowing
outcomes
• Voice preservation better with chemoRT
• Swallowing problems similar even after 2
years
14.
EORTC
• Prospective, randomized
• European Organization for Research and
Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) in 1990
• Compare a larynx-preserving treatment
(induction chemotherapy + definitive RT with
conventional treatment in previously untreated
and operable patients with histologically proven
squamous cell carcinomas of the pyriform sinus
or aryepiglottic fold
15.
EORTC 24954
• Comparing 2 different CT regimens –
• Sequential arm – 2 cycles as in previous trial –
responders received two more cycles and RT
• Alternate arm – Cisplatin and 5fu CT on weeks 1,4,7,10;
RT in the other weeks
• Hence – lesser overall dose of chemo with lesser S/E
• Similar survival and laryngeal preservation in both
arms, lesser complications in alternate arm due to dose
difference
16.
GORTEC trial 2000-01
• Cisplatin, 5FU and Docetaxel
• 2 arms – TPF and PF
• End point – overall survival and disease free
survival
• No significant difference in 5 or 10 year survivals
• 3 yr larynygeal preservation was ~70% in TPF
17.
• Data on quality of life seem to favor
chemoradiation for organ preservation
• If rates of disease control are equal, more
weight should be given to individual patient
factors in determining treatment
Notes de l'éditeur
prospective, randomized study in patients with previously untreated advanced (Stage III or IV) laryngeal squamous carcinoma to compare the results of induction chemotherapy followed by definitive radiation therapy with those of conventional laryngectomy and postoperative radiation
All patients had biopsy-proved, previously untreated Stage III or IV squamous carcinoma of the larynx, according to the 1985 classification system of the American Joint Committee on Cancer. performance status above 50 points on the Karnofsky scale,32 a creatinine clearance ≥1 ml per second, a white-cell count ≥4000 per cubic millimeter, a platelet count ≥100,000 per cubic millimeter, and adequate auditory, nutritional, pulmonary, and cardiac status
3 cycles – Day 22 and 43. clinical tumor response was assessed by physical examination and indirect laryngoscopy 18 to 21 days after the start of the second cycle of chemotherapy. complete response was defined as the complete disappearance of all clinically evident tumor. A partial response was defined as a 50 percent reduction in the sum of the product of the longest dimension and its perpendicular for each tumor, as compared with the initial tumor dimensions. The responses of the primary tumor and any apparent neck nodes were graded separately.
All the patients received radiation therapy, either after chemotherapy or postoperatively. The dose to the spinal cord was kept below 4500 cGy. Five daily fractions of 180 to 200 cGy per field were used for all fields.
Classic wide-field total laryngectomy was performed for all primary tumors, except in rare instances in which a supraglottic primary tumor could be resected adequately with horizontal partial laryngectomy.
Local recurrences were significantly more common and distant metastases less frequent in the chemotherapy group.
(total laryngectomy with partial pharyngectomy, radical neck dissection, and postoperative irradiation)
Il semblerait que vous ayez déjà ajouté cette diapositive à .
Créer un clipboard
Vous avez clippé votre première diapositive !
En clippant ainsi les diapos qui vous intéressent, vous pourrez les revoir plus tard. Personnalisez le nom d’un clipboard pour mettre de côté vos diapositives.
Créer un clipboard
Partager ce SlideShare
Vous avez les pubs en horreur?
Obtenez SlideShare sans publicité
Bénéficiez d'un accès à des millions de présentations, documents, e-books, de livres audio, de magazines et bien plus encore, sans la moindre publicité.
Offre spéciale pour les lecteurs de SlideShare
Juste pour vous: Essai GRATUIT de 60 jours dans la plus grande bibliothèque numérique du monde.
La famille SlideShare vient de s'agrandir. Profitez de l'accès à des millions de livres numériques, livres audio, magazines et bien plus encore sur Scribd.
Apparemment, vous utilisez un bloqueur de publicités qui est en cours d'exécution. En ajoutant SlideShare à la liste blanche de votre bloqueur de publicités, vous soutenez notre communauté de créateurs de contenu.
Vous détestez les publicités?
Nous avons mis à jour notre politique de confidentialité.
Nous avons mis à jour notre politique de confidentialité pour nous conformer à l'évolution des réglementations mondiales en matière de confidentialité et pour vous informer de la manière dont nous utilisons vos données de façon limitée.
Vous pouvez consulter les détails ci-dessous. En cliquant sur Accepter, vous acceptez la politique de confidentialité mise à jour.