This document describes research on fabricating biological microspheres using inkjet printing and laser transfer methods. It finds that inkjet printing works well for low viscosity materials to form monodisperse, encapsulated microspheres, while laser transfer works for high viscosity materials. The size and distribution of the microspheres can be controlled by adjusting parameters like material concentration and laser fluence. Future work aims to better control microsphere size and uniformity for applications in drug delivery, tissue engineering, and stem cell studies.
Formation of Biological Microspheres Using Ink Jetting and Laser Transfer
1. Formation of Biological
Microspheres Using Ink
Jetting and Laser Transfer
Yong Huang
Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering
Adjunct Associate Professor of Bioengineering
Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634
http://www.ces.clemson.edu/camsil/
http://www.ces.clemson.edu/camsil/
Outline
Background
Fabrication Methods
Results and Conclusions
Summary and Future Collaborations
Acknowledgements
2
2. Introduction and Motivation
Encapsulated
materials (drug or cell)
Biomedical applications of microspheres:
Controlled drug/cell delivery
Cell encapsulation for transplantation
Matrix
Cellular spheroid-based tissue engineering material
(polymer)
Microsphere
Challenges in microsphere fabrication
Formability of size controllable microspheres using various low and high
viscosity biological materials
Monodisperse distribution of fabricated microspheres
3
Potential Fabrication Technologies
Size controllability
Good for low viscosity
materials
Ink jetting (thermal and
Nozzle jetting-based
piezoelectric)
Nozzleless Modified LIFT (Laser-Induced
jetting-based Forward Transfer)
Clog free
Good for viscous materials
4
3. Outline
Background
Fabrication Methods
Results and Conclusions
Summary and Future Collaborations
Acknowledgements
5
1. Vibration-Assisted Ink Jetting
Pressure pulse
For low viscosity materials Piezoelectric via piezoelectric
transducer device
Chamber
with liquid
solution
dN
Fluid reservoir
Orifice
dD
Microspheres Air gap
Nozzle Stir bar
Drop-on-demand
jetting schematic
6
5. Vibration-Assisted Inkjet-Based Method
Good
100 µm
Formability
100 µm
Bad
100 µm
Sodium alginate concentration (%)
Microsphere formability as a function of sodium
alginate concentration (and other operating conditions)
9
Vibration-Assisted Inkjet-Based Method
(cont’d)
Encapsulated
fluorescent beads
Microspheres
(alginate-based)
100 µm
Encapsulated monodisperse microsphere can be
formed as a function of sodium alginate concentration
and other operating conditions
10
6. Laser-Based Method
A B C
Sodium alginate (NaAlg) concentration: (A) 2 %; (B) 4 %; (C) 6 %(w/v)
under laser fluence: 3858±34 mJ/cm2
Microsphere size Slightly
NaAlg
concentration
Size uniformity
Effect of NaAlg concentration 11
Laser-Based Method (cont’d)
A B
Microsphere
size
Laser
fluence Number of
satellite
C D droplets
Effect of laser fluence
Laser fluence: (A) 2030±29; (B) 3858±34; (C) 5734±43;
(D) 7436±48 mJ/cm² uisng 6 % (w/v) NaAlg solution
12
7. Laser-Based Method (cont’d)
Using modified LIFT Using proposed metallic foil -
assisted LIFT
2 % (w/v) NaAlg solution with 1.8 ×106 beads/ml
Better encapsulation effect using proposed
metallic foil-assisted LIFT (laser-based)
13
Outline
Background
Fabrication Methods
Results and Conclusions
Summary and Future Collaborations
Acknowledgements
14
8. Summary
Encapsulated biological microspheres can be effectively fabricated
using proposed vibration-assisted ink jetting (for low viscosity
materials) and laser transfer (for high viscosity materials) based
approaches
Future work - size control and size distribution control (monodispersity)
Future collaborations envisioned
Encapsulated microspheres for controlled drug delivery
Tissue microspheroids for cell transplantation and organ printing
Encapsulated cellular microspheroids for controlled stem cell
differentiation study under matrix material-defined microenvironments
More …
15
Outline
Background
Fabrication Methods
Results and Conclusions
Summary and Future Collaborations
Acknowledgements
16
9. Acknowledgements
Financial support: the National Textile Center, the
National Science Foundation (CMMI-CAREER and EPS),
the National Institutes of Health (P20), and the South
Carolina EPSCoR/IDeA office (CCD grant).
Special thanks: Dr. Scott Little of the State EPSCoR
office, Dr. Douglas B. Chrisey of RPI, Drs. Roger
Markwald, Vladimir Mironov, and Joann Sullivan of MUSC,
and Dr. Jeremy Tzeng of Clemson
Students: Yafu Lin, Leigh Herran, Wei Wang, Nicole
Coutris, and Wenxuan Chai
17